Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:25:28.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil type and tillage effects on sorption of cyanazine and degradation products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Krishna N. Reddy*
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS 38776
Martin A. Locke
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS 38776
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS 38776

Abstract

The hydrolytic and dealkylation products of cyanazine have been detected in soils, but the sorption of these products in soil has not been well studied. We examined sorption characteristics of five cyanazine degradation products in relation to cyanazine in Norfolk loamy sand, Tunica silty clay, and Dundee silt loam soils. Sorption was determined using a batch equilibrium method. Air-dried soil (3 g) was shaken in 6 ml of solution containing cyanazine or one of its degradation products for 48 h at 4 C. Five concentrations (2.04 to 54.67 μmol L−1) of each chemical were evaluated. The cyanazine Freundlich coefficient (Kf) ranged from 0.64 in Norfolk soil to 4.75 in Dundee no-tillage (NT) soil, and was higher in Dundee NT than in Dundee conventional-tillage (CT) soil. The Freundlich exponent (N) values for cyanazine were less than 0.85 in all soils, indicating nonlinearity of the sorption isotherm. In general, cyanazine sorption among the soils increased in the order of Norfolk << Dundee CT < Tunica < Dundee NT. Cyanazine sorption among the soils was correlated with fine texture and higher organic carbon content. Sorption of cyanazine degradation products was less than cyanazine sorption in all soils. Isotherms were nonlinear, with sorption decreasing in the order of cyanazine > desmethylpropanenitrile cyanazine > hydroxyacid cyanazine > desethyl cyanazine > cyanazine amide >> chloroacid cyanazine. The Kf for chloroacid cyanazine ranged from 0.21 in Norfolk soil to 0.42 in Dundee NT soil. Sorption patterns of five degradation products among the soils were generally similar to that of cyanazine. Our data indicate that under field conditions, cyanazine degradation products (especially cyanazine amide and chloroacid cyanazine) are more likely to remain in the aqueous phase and thus have a greater potential to move with water compared to cyanazine.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beynon, K. I., Bosio, P., and Elgar, K. E. 1972a. The analysis of crops and soils for the triazine herbicide cyanazine and some of its degradation products: II. Results. Pestic. Sci. 3: 401408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beynon, K. I., Stoydin, G., and Wright, A. N. 1972b. The breakdown of the triazine herbicide cyanazine in soils and maize. Pestic. Sci. 3: 293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, R. L. and Frye, W. W. 1993. Conservation tillage: an ecological approach to soil management. Adv. Agron. 51: 3378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumhorst, M. R. and Weber, J. B. 1992. Cyanazine dissipation as influenced by soil properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40: 894897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumhorst, M. R. and Weber, J. B. 1994. Chemical versus microbial degradation of cyanazine and atrazine in soils. Pestic. Sci. 42: 7984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodor, N., Gabanyi, Z., and Wong, C-K. 1989. A new method for the estimation of partition coefficient. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111: 37833786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, W.W.M., Boesten, J.J.T.I., and Siegers, W. G. 1990. Adsorption of transformation products of atrazine by soil. Weed Res. 30: 123128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B. A., Hayes, R. M., Tyler, D. D., and Mueller, T. C. 1994. Effect of tillage and cover crop on fluometuron adsorption and degradation under controlled condirions. Weed Sci. 42: 629634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancela, G. D., Taboada, E. R., and Sanchez-Rasero, F. 1990. Adsorption of cyanazine on peat and montmorillonite clay surfaces. Soil Sci. 150: 836843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, S. A., Allmaras, R. R., Koskinen, W. C., and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Desorption of atrazine and cyanazine from soil. J. Environ. Qual. 17: 719723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, H. O., Dupuis, G., Ebert, E., Marco, G., and Vogel, C. 1975. s-Triazines. in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 1. New York: Marcel-Dekker, pp. 129208.Google Scholar
Gaston, L. A. and Locke, M. A. 1994. Predicting alachlor mobility using batch sorption kinetic data. Soil Sci. 158: 345354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, L. A., Locke, M. A., Wagner, S. C., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Reddy, K. N. 1996a. Sorption of bentazon and degradation products in two Mississippi soils. Weed Sci. 44: 678682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, L. A., Locke, M. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1996b. Sorption and degradation of bentazon in conventional- and no-till dundee soil. J. Environ. Qual. 25: 120126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helling, C. S., Zhuang, W., Gish, T. J. Coffman, C. B., Isensee, A. R., Kearney, P. C., Hoagland, D. R., and Woodward, M. D. 1988. Persistence and leaching of atrazine, alachlor, and cyanazine under no-tillage practices. Chemosphere 17: 175187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, M. A. 1992. Sorption-desorption kinetics of alachlor in surface soil from two soybean tillage systems. J. Environ. Qual. 21: 558566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, M. A., Gaston, L. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1996. Alachlor biotransformation and sorption in soil from two soybean tillage systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44: 11281143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majka, J. T. and Lavy, T. L. 1977. Adsorption, mobility, and degradation of cyanazine and diuron in soils. Weed Sci. 25: 401406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D.C.G. and Baker, B. E. 1978. The disappearance and movement of three triazine herbicides and several of their degradation products in soil under field conditions. Weed Res. 18: 111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Gaston, L. A. 1997. Tillage and cover crop effects on cyanazine adsorption and desorption kinetics. Soil Sci. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., Wagner, S. C., Zablotowicz, R. M., Gaston, L. A., and Smeda, R. J. 1995a. Chlorimuron ethyl sorption and desorption kinetics in soils and herbicide-desiccated cover crop residues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43: 27522757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Locke, M. A. 1995b. Chlorimuron adsorption, desorption, and desorption in soils from conventional tillage and no-tillage systems. J. Environ. Qual. 24: 760767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirons, G. J., Frank, R., and Sawyer, T. 1973. Residues of atrazine, cyanazine, and their phytotoxic metabolites in a clay loam soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 21: 10161020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS System for Regression. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institue.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1970. Adsorption of s-triazines by montmorillonite as a function of pH and molecular structure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34: 401404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. B., Weed, S. B., and Ward, T. M. 1969. Adsorption of s-triazines by soil organic matter. Weed Sci. 17: 417421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weed Science Society of America. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America, 352p.Google Scholar