Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T05:39:02.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Water Content Affects the Activity of Four Herbicides on Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rick A. Boydston
Rick A. Boydston*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Prosser, WA 99350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Low soil water content for 10 to 14 days before and 7 days after herbicide application reduced control of green foxtail with fenoxaprop, fluazifop-P, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim. Withholding irrigation for 10 to 14 days before herbicide application did not reduce control of green foxtail with normal use rates of herbicides if plots were irrigated at the time of application. Low soil water content reduced the activity of sethoxydim less than the other herbicides.

Keywords

Fenoxaprop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]-oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidhaloxyfop, 2-[4-[[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl) - 2 - pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onegreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVIDrought stressirrigationmoisture stresswater stressfenoxapropfluazifop-PhaloxyfopsethoxydimSETVI
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 1990 , pp. 578 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akey, W. C. and Morrison, I. N. 1983. Effect of moisture stress on wild oat (Avena fatua) response to diclofop. Weed Sci. 31:247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Coupland, D. 1989. Pre-treatment environmental effects on the uptake, translocation, metabolism and performance of fluazifop-butyl in Elymus repens . Weed Res. 29:289–297.Google Scholar
3. Dickson, R. L., Andrews, M., Field, R. J., and Dickson, E. L. 1990. Effect of water stress, nitrogen, and gibberellic acid on fluazifop and glyphosate activity on oats (Avena sativa). Weed Sci. 38:54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1980. The influence of soil moisture on the foliar activity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 534–539.Google Scholar
5. Grafstrom, L. D. Jr. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1988. Uptake and translocation of fluazifop in green foxtail. Weed Sci. 36:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143–149.Google Scholar
7. Kidder, D. W. and Behrens, R. 1988. Plant responses to haloxyfop as influenced by water stress. Weed Sci. 36:305–312.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J. D., Adamczewski, K. A., Garcia-Torres, L., Pacholak, E., and Miller, S. D. 1976. Factors affecting HOE-23408 phytotoxicity. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:132–134.Google Scholar
9. Peregoy, R. S. and Kitchen, L. M. 1988. Moisture stress effects on the efficacy of haloxyfop in grasses. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:278.Google Scholar
10. Reynolds, D. B., Wheless, T. G., Basler, E., and Murray, D. S. 1988. Moisture stress effects on absorption and translocation of four foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 2:437–441.Google Scholar
11. Richards, L. A. 1965. Physical condition of water in soil. Pages 128–152 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc., Madison.Google Scholar
12. West, L. D., Dawson, J. H., and Appleby, A. P. 1980. Factors influencing barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar