Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T06:04:50.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application Timing Affects Weed Control with Metolachlor Plus Atrazine in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65203
Michael S. Defelice
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65203
Cheryl S. Holman
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65203

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in no-till field corn in northern Missouri to compare weed control and crop response of metolachlor plus atrazine applied under five preplant herbicide management practices. The practices consisted of (1) applying the entire dose of metolachlor plus atrazine 15, 30, or 45 d early preplant (EPP), (2) applying a split application of an EPP (67%) followed by (fb) a PRE (33%), (3) applying the entire dose PRE, (4) applying metolachlor PRE fb dicamba early post (EPOST), or (5) applying atrazine alone EPOST. Weed control at 7 wk after planting was more variable with EPP treatments than with EPP fb PRE or PRE treatments. Giant foxtail and fall panicum control was greatest with treatments that included metolachlor PRE. Velvetleaf and common cocklebur control was greatest with atrazine or dicamba EPOST and was generally unacceptable (< 80%) with any soil-applied herbicide treatment. Common lambsquarters control was greater than 90% with all treatments that included metolachlor, atrazine, or dicamba, regardless of timing. Corn yields were slightly higher with EPP fb PRE and PRE fb EPOST dicamba than with EPP alone. The results suggest that herbicide applications made nearer to the date of planting provide less variable weed control and corn yield than treatments made more than 15 d EPP.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Buhler, D. D. 1988. Factors influencing fluorochloridone activity in no-till corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Sci. 36:207214.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1991. Early preplant atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 5:6671.Google Scholar
Defelice, M. and Sims, B. 1991. Weed Control Guide for Missouri Field Crops. Cooperative Extension Bulletin MP575, University of Missouri. 90 p.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. C. 1984. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley, pp. 386391.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. L. 1985. Control systems for triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci. 33:400404.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. L. and Kaufman, L. M. 1989. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.) control in full season no-till soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Technol. 3:151154.Google Scholar
Stougaard, B. and Kapusta, G. 1982. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till weed control in corn. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:195196.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybeans. Weed Sci. 32:293298.Google Scholar
Webb, F. and Johnston, G. 1985. Early preplant applications of cyanazine and oryzalin for full season no-tillage soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. Suppl. 39:35.Google Scholar
Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci. 36:629635.Google Scholar