Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T14:03:48.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Glyphosate-Resistant and Nontransgenic Soybean (Glycine max) Herbicide Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David R. Shaw ,
James C. Arnold ,
Charles E. Snipes ,
David H. Laughlin  and
J. Anthony Mills
David R. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant & Soil Sciences
James C. Arnold
Affiliation:
Department of Plant & Soil Sciences
Charles E. Snipes
Affiliation:
Delta Research & Extension Center, Stoneville, MS 38776
David H. Laughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
J. Anthony Mills
Affiliation:
Monsanto Agricultural Products Co., Collierville, TN 38017
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dshaw@pss.msstate.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted in 1997 and 1998 to evaluate the efficacy and economics of glyphosate-resistant and nontransgenic soybean systems. The three highest yielding glyphosate-resistant and nontransgenic soybean cultivars were chosen each year for three Mississippi locations based on Mississippi Soybean Variety Trials. Treatments within each cultivar/herbicide system included nontreated, low input (one-half of the labeled rate), medium input (labeled rate), and high input level (labeled rate plus an additional postemergence application). In 1997, all systems controlled hemp sesbania by more than 80% but nontransgenic systems controlled hemp sesbania more than the glyphosate-resistant systems in most instances in 1998. High input levels usually controlled pitted morningglory more than low or medium inputs in 1997. In 1998, both systems controlled pitted morningglory by 90% or more at Shelby; however, at other locations control was less than 85%. Soybean yield in 1997 at Shelby was more with the glyphosate-resistant system than with the nontransgenic systems at medium and high input levels, primarily because of early-season injury to a metribuzin-sensitive cultivar in the nontransgenic system. In 1998, soybean yield at Shelby was more with the nontransgenic system than the glyphosate-resistant system, regardless of input level, due to poor late-season hemp sesbania control with glyphosate. Net returns were often more with the glyphosate-resistant system at Shelby in 1997. Within the glyphosate-resistant system, there were no differences in net return between input levels. Within the nontransgenic system, low input level net returns were higher compared to medium and high input levels due to higher soybean yield and less herbicide cost. At Brooksville, using high input levels, the glyphosate-resistant systems net returns were $55.00/ha more than the nontransgenic system. Net returns were higher with the nontransgenic system compared to the glyphosate-resistant system at Shelby in 1998, regardless of input level.

Keywords

Glyphosatemetribuzinhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex. A. W. Hill # SEBEXpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrEconomicsreduced ratesglyphosate-resistant soybean systemsMSBG, Mississippi state budget generatorPOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 676 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askew, J. E., Blaine, A., Boykin, F., et al. 1996. Mississippi Soybean Variety Trials. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Info. Bull. 315. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.Google Scholar
Askew, J. E., Blaine, A., Ingram, D., et al. 1997. Mississippi Soybean Variety Trials. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Info. Bull. 328. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Shaw, D. R., and Street, J. E. 1998. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control and seedhead reduction with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 12: 504–506.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. 1985. Toxicological properties of glyphosate—a summary. In Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworth and Co., Toronto, Canada. pp. 210–216.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. 1995. Weed control in Roundup tolerant soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:46.Google Scholar
Bloodworth, K. M., Reynolds, D. B., Snipes, C. E., Shaw, D. R., Buehring, N. W., Serviss, B. E., and Elkins, W. C. 1997. Weed control programs in Roundup Ready cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:43.Google Scholar
Delanney, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35: 1,461–1,467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, D. G. and Coble, H. D. 1977. Differences in the control of five morningglory species by selected soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30: 39–45.Google Scholar
Goldmon, D. L. 1997. Performance of Roundup Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:33.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Prochaska, L. M., and Rogers, R. L. 1994. Evaluation of Roundup Ready transgenic soybean in Louisiana. Louisiana Agric. 37:23.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36: 345–353.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G. R., Krausz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean tolerance and summer annual weed control with glufosinate and glyphosate in resistant soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49:120.Google Scholar
Kendig, J. A., Barham, R. L., Ezell, P. M., and Swims, P. A. 1998. PRE-POST versus total POST weed competition issues. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 1–2.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F. and Kapusta, G. 1994. Annual weed control with glyphosate at several rates, weed sizes, and spray volumes. Proc. Northeast. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49: 120–121.Google Scholar
LaMastus, F. E., Shaw, D. R., and Smith, M. C. 1998. Influence of application timing and rate on weed control in Roundup-Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:8.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, J. M., Barry, G. F., and Kishore, G. M. 1989. The herbicide glyphosate. BioFactors 2: 17–25.Google Scholar
McKinley, T. L., Roberts, R. K., Hayes, R. M., and English, B. C. 1998. Economic comparison of herbicides for johnsongrass control herbicides in no-till Roundup Ready soybeans. Tenn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. 98-10, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., Jordan, T. N., and Wills, G. D. 1980. Translocation of 14C-glyphosate in soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 28: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. K. and Griffin, J. L. 1994. Comparison of herbicide programs and cultivation on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 8: 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. K., Milligan, J. L., and Wilson, C. F. 1998. Evaluation of reduced rate preemergence herbicides in Roundup Ready soybean weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 271–272.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7: 317–321.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C., Keeton, A., Smith, J. D., Fowler, J. T., and Toler, J. E. 1998. Sicklepod, pitted morningglory, and palmer amaranth control in soybean with cloransulam-methyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:64.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Taylor, S. E., and Gander, J. R. 1996. Influence of application timing and rate of glyphosate on weed control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:57.Google Scholar
Rankins, A. Jr., Shaw, D. R., and Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1998. HERB and MSU-HERB field validation for soybean (Glycine max) weed control in Mississippi. Weed Technol. 12: 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, G. N., Mueller, T. C., and Hayes, R. M. 1998. Performance of Roundup Ready corn weed control systems in Tennessee. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:20.Google Scholar
Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1988. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicide combinations with imazapyr for soybean weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:53.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. L. and Crawford, S. H. 1980. Weed control in soybeans with acifluorfen (Blazer). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:50.Google Scholar
Smith, M. C., Shaw, D. R., and Schraer, S. M. 1998. Soybean weed control with Strongarm, FirstRate, and Frontrow. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 62–63.Google Scholar
Spurlock, S. R. and Laughlin, D. H. 1992. Mississippi State Budget Generator User's Guide version 3.0. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Agric. Econ. Tech. Publ. No. 88, July, 1992.Google Scholar
Tingle, C. H., Chandler, J. M., and Protsko, E. P. 1998. Herbicide combinations for residual control in Roundup Ready corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 21–22.Google Scholar
Viator, B. J., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., and Ellis, J. M. 1998. Johnsongrass control using Roundup Ready technology in fallowed sugarcane fields. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 6–7.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Beaty, J. D., Earnest, L. D., and Bryant, K. J. 1997. Weed control programs for Roundup Ready versus non-tolerant Roundup Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 31–32.Google Scholar
Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6: 345–351.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Horton, D. N., and Fortner, L. D. 1990. Postemergence combinations with imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:40.Google Scholar
York, A. C. 1995. Weed management with Roundup-Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 34–35.Google Scholar