Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T05:31:12.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed and giant ragweed in soybean with halauxifen-methyl applied preplant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

Jessica Quinn
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Jamshid Ashigh
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Corteva Agriscience Inc., London, ON, Canada
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Adjunct Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
David C. Hooker
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Nader Soltani, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ONN0P 2C0 Email: soltanin@uoguelph.ca

Abstract

Horseweed and giant ragweed are competitive, annual weeds that can negatively impact crop yield. Biotypes of glyphosate-resistant (GR) giant ragweed and horseweed were first reported in 2008 and 2010 in Ontario, respectively. GR horseweed has spread throughout the southern portion of the province. The presence of GR biotypes poses new challenges for soybean producers in Canada and the United States. Halauxifen-methyl is a recently registered selective herbicide against broadleaf weeds for preplant use in corn and soybean. There is limited literature on the efficacy of halauxifen-methyl on GR horseweed and giant ragweed when combined with currently registered products in Canada. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of halauxifen-methyl applied alone and tank-mixed to control GR giant ragweed and GR horseweed in glyphosate and dicamba-resistant (GDR) soybean in southwestern Ontario. Six field experiments were conducted separately for each weed species over 2018 and 2019. Halauxifen-methyl applied alone offered 72% control of GR horseweed at 8 wk after application (WAA). Control was improved to >91% when halauxifen-methyl applied in combination with metribuzin, saflufenacil, chlorimuron-ethyl + metribuzin, and saflufenacil + metribuzin. At 8 WAA, halauxifen-methyl provided 11% control of GR giant ragweed, and 76% to 88% control when glyphosate/2,4-D choline, glyphosate/dicamba, glyphosate/2,4-D choline + halauxifen-methyl, and glyphosate/dicamba + halauxifen-methyl were used. We conclude that halauxifen-methyl applied preplant in a tank-mixture can provide effective control of GR giant ragweed and horseweed in GDR soybean.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Vipan Kumar, Kansas State University

References

Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazzaz, FA (1979) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. I. Influence of species removal on the organization of the plant community. New Phytol 83:813816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1982) The Biology of Canadian Weeds 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can J Plant Sci 62:10031010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baysinger, JA., Sims, BD (1991) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 39:358362 Google Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, D, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2018) Distribution of glyphosate and cloransulan-methyl resistant Canada fleabane [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 98:492497 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Owen, MD (1997) Emergence and survival of horseweed. Weed Sci 45:98101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013a) Occurrence of glyphosate and cloransulam resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis L. Cronq.) in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 93:851855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013b) Glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane [Conyza canadensis (L). Cronq]: Dose reponse to glyphosate and control with postemergence herbicides in soybean in Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 93:11871193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow AgroSciences (2017) ElevoreTM Herbicide. Indianapolis, IN: Dow AgroSciencesGoogle Scholar
Follings, J (2013) Control and Distribution of Glyphosate Resistant Giant Ragweed in Ontario, Guelph, ON: University of Guelph Google Scholar
Hartman, GL, West, ED, Herman, TK (2011) Soybean - worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests. Food Security 3:517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2020) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. weedscience.org. Accessed: August 25, 2020Google Scholar
[HRAC] Herbicide Resistance Action Committee (2020) Guideline to the Management of Herbicide Resistance. https://hracglobal.com/prevention-management/best-management-practices. Accessed: August 25, 2020Google Scholar
McCauley, CL, Johnsome, WG, Young, BG (2018) Efficacy of halauxifen-methyl on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis). Weed Sci 66:758763 Google Scholar
Royer, F, Dickson, R (1999) Pages 3637 in Weeds of Canada and the Northern United States. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta Press Google Scholar
Shields, EJ, Dauer, JT, VanGessel, MJ, Neumann, G (2006) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci 54:10631067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smisek, A (1995) Resistance to paraquat in Erigeron canadensis L. M.Sc. Thesis. London, ON: University of Western OntarioGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Burke, I, Everman, W, VanGessel, M, Vince, D, Sikkema, PH (2017) Perspectives on potential soybean yield losses from weeds in North America. Weed Technol 21:148154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, EW, Harrison, SK, Wax, LM, Regnier, EE, Nafziger, ED (1987) Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev Weed Sci 3:155181 Google Scholar
Van Acker, RC, Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1993) The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci 41:194200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012a) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) control with preplant herbicides in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Can J Plant Sci 92:913922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012b) Occurrence and distribution of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in southwestern Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 92:533539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE (2001) The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Can J Plant Sci 81:867875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S (2018) Personal Communication: Yield loss in soybean by weed species.Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Loux, MM, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (1994) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) canopy architecture and interference studies in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 8:559564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, M, Young, BG, Johnson, WG (2018a) Weed control with halauxifen-methyl applied alone and in mixtures with 2,4-D, dicamba and glyphosate. Weed Technol 32:597602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, M, Young, BG, Johnson, WG (2018b) Herbicide programs utilizing halauxifen-methyl for glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in soybean. Weed Technol 32:659664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar