Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T13:41:06.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Propanil-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Rice (Oryza sativa) with Carbaryl/Propanil Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hassane Daou
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Ronald E. Talbert*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: rtalbert@comp.uark.edu.

Abstract

Propanil and carbaryl mixtures, propanil formulated with carbaryl, the package mixture of propanil plus molinate (alone and plus pendimethalin), propanil plus quinclorac, and propanil plus pendimethalin were evaluated in field experiments for control of propanil-resistant and -susceptible barnyardgrass in 1995 and 1996 in Arkansas. Propanil alone at 3.3 kg ai/ha did not control propanil-resistant barnyardgrass when applied to two-leaf and repeated at four-leaf barnyardgrass. Propanil at 3.3 kg/ha with carbaryl at 0.1 to 0.3 kg ai/ha controlled propanil-resistant barnyardgrass at least 90% when applied at the two-leaf stage with no rice yield reduction. Applications repeated at the four-leaf stage also controlled propanil-resistant barnyardgrass, but rice injury was 66% with 0.3 kg/ha carbaryl in 1 of 2 yr, and rice yield was reduced. Control of resistant barnyardgrass with the commercial formulation of propanil plus carbaryl and propanil plus molinate was lower with a single application than with repeat applications. Propanil plus quinclorac, propanil plus pendimethalin, and propanil plus molinate plus pendimethalin controlled resistant barnyardgrass with one application at the two-leaf stage.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published with permission of the Director of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701.

Current address of first author: IER BP258, Bamako, Mali

References

Literature Cited

Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass control in rice. Weed Technol. 8:576581.Google Scholar
Bowling, C. C. and Flinchum, W. T. 1968. Interaction of propanil with insecticides applied as seed treatments on rice. J. Econ. Entomol. 61:6769.Google Scholar
Bowling, C. C. and Hudgins, H. R. 1964. Compatibility of insecticides with the herbicide propanil as spray applications on rice. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. 2302.Google Scholar
Bowling, C. C. and Hudgins, H. R. 1966. The effect of insecticides on the selectivity of propanil on rice. Weeds 14:9495.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F. 1994. Verification of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass and its distribution in Arkansas. . University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 113 p.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F., Duke, S. O., Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995a. Resistance mechanism of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass: absorption, translocation, and site of action studies. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 52:182189.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F., Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995b. Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 9:366372.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F., Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1997. Resistance mechanism of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass: II In-vivo metabolism of the propanil molecule. Pestic. Sci. 49:333338.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, S. H. and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Comparison of single and multiple applications of propanil and residual herbicides in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 9:153157.Google Scholar
El-Refai, A. R. and Mowafy, M. 1973. Interaction of propanil with insecticides absorbed from the soil and translocated into rice plants. Weed Sci. 21:246248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frear, D. S. and Still, G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Photochemistry 7:913920.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Tugwell, N. P. 1986. Interaction of propanil and selected insecticides on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 34:800803.Google Scholar
Matsunaka, S. 1968. Propanil hydrolysis: inhibition in rice plants by insecticides. Science 160:13601361.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1965. Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in dry-seeded rice. Weed Sci. 33:686692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Tugwell, N. P. 1975. Propanil–carbofuran interactions in rice. Weed Sci. 23:176178.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Carey, V. F., Kitt, M. J., Helms, R. S., and Black, H. L. 1995. Control, biology, and ecology of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass. In Wells, B. R., ed. Arkansas Rice Research Studies, 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Ser. 446. pp. 2331.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. and Street, J. E. 1988. Propanil plus methyl-parathion on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 36:335339.Google Scholar