Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T05:46:04.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia): Effects of Carrier Volume on Toxicity and Distribution of Triclopyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas J. Tworkoski ,
Roger S. Young  and
John P. Sterrett
Thomas J. Tworkoski
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Foreign-Dis.–Weed Sci. Res., Ft. Detrick, Bldg. 1301, Frederick, MD 21701
Roger S. Young
Affiliation:
W. V. Univ. Exp. Farm, Route 9, Kearneysville, WV 25430
John P. Sterrett
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Foreign-Dis.–Weed Sci. Res., Ft. Detrick, Bldg. 1301, Frederick, MD 21701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The butoxyethyl ester of triclopyr {[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acid} was more effective than either the triethylamine salt formulation or an equivalent combined rate of the butoxyethyl esters of triclopyr plus 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] (1:2, w/w) for the control of Virginia creeper [Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. # PRTQU]. Carrier volume did not affect 14C-triclopyr absorption and distribution, but control generally was greater after high carrier-volume application (281 L/ha) because the dense Virginia creeper canopy was thoroughly penetrated. In orchards, Virginia creeper was controlled by triclopyr ester at 0.6 kg ae/ha through the second season after treatment if foliage was covered thoroughly.

Keywords

2,4-Dlow volumetranslocationformulationsPRTQU
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 31 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., and Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1980. Effectiveness and distribution of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in honey mesquite (Pro sopis juliflora var. glanulo sa). Weed Sci. 28:666–670.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1983. Absorption and translocations of triclopyr in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glanulo sa). Weed Sci. 31:807–812.Google Scholar
3. Gleason, H. A., and Cronquist, A. 1963. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. D. Van Nostrand Co., New York.Google Scholar
4. Hardman, D., and Moore, J. 1985. Band applications with turbo rotary atomizers. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:507–509.Google Scholar
5. McCormack, M. L. Jr., Sprague, E. B., Saviello, T. B., and Hendler, R. J. 1982. Timing triclopyr and glyphosate treatments on forest brush. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:209–213.Google Scholar
6. McEachern, G. R., and Storey, J. B. 1984. Low volume, high concentrate Roundup herbicide control of pecan weeds. The Pecan Q. 18:29–30.Google Scholar
7. Ostle, B., and Mensing, R. W. 1975. Statistics in Research. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
8. O'Sullivan, P. A., and O'Donovan, J. T. 1980. Interaction between glyphosate and various herbicides for broadleaved weed control. Weed Res. 20:255–260.Google Scholar
9. Peterson, J. I. 1969. A carbon dioxide collection accessory for the rapid combustion apparatus for preparation of biological samples for liquid scintillation analysis. Anal. Biochem. 31:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Reynolds, P. E., Hendler, R. J., Betsch, W. D. and Ollice, W. 1983. Preliminary evaluation of triclopyr ester efficacy on a West Virginia pipeline row. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:286–290.Google Scholar
11. Sin, L., and Mohd Alif, A. F. 1981. Herbicide application by ultra-low-volume sprayer for controlling common weeds in rubber. Proc. Rubber Res. Inst. Malays. Plant. Conf., p. 337–351.Google Scholar
12. Tworkoski, T. J., Young, R. S., and Sterrett, J. P. 1984. Control of Virginia creeper with combinations of triclopyr and plant growth regulators or glyphosate. Proc. 60th Annu. Meet. Cumberland–Shenandoah Fruit Work. Conf., Harpers Ferry, WV. Paper 20.Google Scholar
13. Young, R. S. 1984. Response of glyphosate on Virginia creeper. Proc. 60th Annu. Meet. Cumberland–Shenandoah Fruit Work. Conf., Harpers Ferry, WV. Paper 23.Google Scholar