Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T04:25:50.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of planting time and row spacing on growth and seed production of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) and feather fingergrass (Chloris virgata) in sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2021

Caleb Squires
Affiliation:
Post Doctoral Fellow, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, CamdenNSW, Australia
Gulshan Mahajan*
Affiliation:
Current: Research Fellow, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia; former: Principal Agronomist, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Michael Walsh
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, CamdenNSW, Australia
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
Current: Professor, The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) and School of Agriculture and Food Sciences (SAFS), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia; former: Adjunct Professor, Department of Agronomy, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India.
*
Author for correspondence: Gulshan Mahajan, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland4343, Australia Email: g.mahajan@uq.edu.au

Abstract

Junglerice and feather fingergrass are major problematic weeds in the summer sorghum cropping areas of Australia. This study aimed to investigate the growth and seed production of junglerice and feather fingergrass in crop-free (fallow) conditions and under competition with sorghum planted in 50-cm and 100-cm row spacings at three sorghum planting and weed emergence timings. Results revealed that junglerice and feather fingergrass had greater biomass in early planting (November 11) compared to late planting times (January 11). Under fallow conditions, seed production of junglerice ranged from 12,380 to 20,280 seeds plant–1, with the highest seed production for the December 11 and lowest for the January 11 planting. Seed production of feather fingergrass under fallow conditions ranged from 90,030 to 143,180 seeds plant–1. Seed production of feather fingergrass under crop-free (fallow) conditions was similar for November 11 and December 11 planting times, but higher for the January 11 planting. Sorghum crop competition at both row spacings reduced the seed production of junglerice and feather fingergrass >75% compared to non-crop fallow. Narrow row spacing (50 cm) in early and mid-planted sorghum (November 11 and December 11) reduced the biomass of junglerice to a greater extent (88% to 92% over fallow-grown plants) compared to wider row spacing (100 cm). Narrow row spacing was found superior in reducing biomass of feather fingergrass compared to wider row spacing. Our results demonstrate that sorghum crops can substantially reduce biomass and seed production of junglerice and feather fingergrass through crop competition compared with growth in fallow conditions. Narrow row spacing (50 cm) was found superior to wider row spacing (100 cm) in terms of weed suppression. These results suggest that narrow row spacing and late planting time of sorghum crops can strengthen an integrated weed management program against these weeds by reducing weed growth and seed production.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References

Beard, BH, Geng, S (1982) Interrelationships of morphological and economic characters of sunflower 1. Crop Sci 22:817822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, OC, Colville, WL (1964) Soybean and weed yields as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12:109112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2010) Implications of narrow crop row spacing and delayed Echinochloa colona and Echinochloa crus-galli emergence for weed growth and crop yield loss in aerobic rice. Field Crops Res 117:177182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Mahajan, G (2012) Role of integrated weed management strategies in sustaining conservation agriculture systems. Curr Sci 103:135136 Google Scholar
Clay, SA, Kleinjan, J, Clay, DE, Forcella, F, Batchelor, W (2005) Growth and fecundity of several weed species in corn and soybean. Agron J 97:294302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRDC (2017) GRDC GrowNotes. What’s new sorghum. https://grdc.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0035/238886/GRDCGrowNotesSorghumNorthern.pdf. Accessed: March 25, 2021Google Scholar
GRDC (2020) Integrated weed management of feathertop Rhodes grass. GRDC updates 2020. https://s3.apsoutheast2.amazonaws.com/cdn.weedsmart.org.au/app/uploads/2021/01/FeathertopRhodesGrass2006WEB.pdf. Accessed: March 25, 2021Google Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Besler, BA, Brewer, KD (2004) Effect of row spacing and herbicide dose on weed control and grain sorghum yield. Crop Prot 23:263267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2021) International Herbicide Resistant Weed Database. http://www.weedscience.org/Home.aspx. Accessed: June 27, 2021Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Horak, MJ, Vanderlip, RL (1999) Estimates of physiological determinants for Amaranthus retroflexus . Weed Sci 47:291296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ (2014) Integrated weed management in soybean, Pages 223–227 in Chauhan B, Mahajan G, eds, Recent Advances in Weed Management. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1019-9_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, RS, Ronning, D, Ouzman, J, Walker, S, Mayfield, A, Clarke, M (2016) Impact of weeds on Australian grain production: the cost of weeds to Australian grain growers and the adoption of weed management and tillage practices. Report for GRDC. CSIRO, Australia, 112 pGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, G, Brar, LS, Walia, US (2002) Phalaris minor response in wheat in relation to planting dates, tillage and herbicides. Indian J Weed Sci 34:114115 Google Scholar
Mahajan, G, Chauhan, BS (2021) Biological traits of six sterile oat biotypes in response to planting time. Agron J 113:4251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, G, Kaur, V, Thompson, M, Chauhan, BS (2020) Growth behavior and glyphosate resistance level in 10 populations of Echinochloa colona in Australia. PloS One 15:p.e0221382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221382 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahajan, G, Mutti, NK, Walsh, M, Chauhan, BS (2019a) Effect of varied soil moisture regimes on the growth and reproduction of two Australian biotypes of junglerice (Echinochloa colona). Weed Sci 67:552559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, G, Sharma, N, Kaur, R, Chauhan, BS (2015) Comparison of photoperiod sensitive and photoperiod insensitive basmati cultivars for grain yield, water productivity, and quality traits under varied transplanting dates in Northwest India. Crop Pasture Sci 66: 793801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, G, Walsh, M, Chauhan, BS (2019b) Junglerice (Echinochloa colona) and feather fingergrass (Chloris virgata) seed production and retention at sorghum maturity. Weed Technol 34:272276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matloob, A, Khaliq, A, Tanveer, A, Hussain, S, Aslam, F, Chauhan, BS, (2015) Weed dynamics as influenced by tillage system, sowing time and weed competition duration in dry seeded rice. Crop Prot 71:2538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D, Boerboom, CM (2000) Critical time of weed removal in glyphosate resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci 48:3542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliveira, MJ, Jha, P, Malik, M, Buckelew, JK, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2008) Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass growth with plasticulture grown bell pepper. Weed Technol 22:296302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, T (2018) Impact of narrow row spacing on grain yield, seed quality and weed competitiveness in sorghum. GRDC Update paper. https://grdc.com.au/resources-and-publications/grdc-update-papers/tab-content/grdc-update-papers/2018/07/impact-of-narrow-row-spacing-in-sorghum. Accessed: March 25, 2021Google Scholar
Rasmussen, IA (2004) The effect of sowing date, stale seedbed, row width and mechanical weed control on weeds and yields of organic winter wheat. Weed Res 44:1220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, BJ, Martin, P, Riethmuller, G (2013) Row spacing of winter crops in broad scale agriculture in southern Australia. Pages 1–94 in Nugent T, Nicholls C, eds, Graham Centre Monograph No. 3. Orange, NSW: NSW Department of Primary Industries. https://www.csu.edu.au/research/grahamcentre/publications/monograph/row-spacing-monograph Google Scholar
Sharma, MP, McBeath, DK, Vanden Born, WH (1977) Studies on the biology of wild oats. II. Growth. Can J Plant Sci 57:811817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, BS, Murray, DS, Green, JD, Wanyahaya, WM, Weeks, DL (1990) Interference of three annual grasses with grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Technol 4:245249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sur, HS, Sharma, AR (1999) Response to sowing dates and performance of different sunflower hybrids during rainy season in high intensity cropping systems. Indian J Agric Sci 69:683689 Google Scholar
Traoré, S, Mason, SC, Martin, AR, Mortensen, DA, Spotanski, JJ (2003) Velvetleaf interference effects on yield and growth of grain sorghum. Agron J 95:16021607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H, Walker, SR, Osten, VA, Robinson, G (2010) Competition of sorghum cultivars and densities with Japanese millet (Echinochloa esculenta). Weed Biol Manage 10:185193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar