Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T13:06:12.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Effect on Corn (Zea mays) Growth and Yield in South Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chad Scholes ,
Sharon A. Clay  and
Kalyn Brix-Davis
Chad Scholes
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
Sharon A. Clay
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
Kalyn Brix-Davis
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted at two sites in South Dakota in 1992 and at one site in 1993 to measure the effect of velvetleaf on corn growth and yield. Velvetleaf was overseeded in corn rows and thinned to densities of 0, 1.3, 4, 12, and 24 plants/m2. Velvetleaf leaf area index and total biomass were positively correlated with velvetleaf density. Biomass per velvetleaf plant and corn biomass were correlated negatively with velvetleaf density. The percent corn yield reduction was similar for locations and years in spite of large yield differences. Maximum yield loss estimated by a hyperbolic yield reduction model was 37.2% with a loss of 4.4% per unit velvetleaf density.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti L. # ABUTHcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3615,’ ‘Agripro 193,’ ‘Agripro 270.’Weed interferenceweed competitionyield lossABUTH
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 665 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Sparrow, D. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional- and no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 43:81–87.Google Scholar
2. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.Google Scholar
3. Dekker, J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). I. Growth. Weed Res. 23:91–101.Google Scholar
4. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Early root and shoot development of nine plant species. Weed Sci. 21:289–291.Google Scholar
5. Hall, R. G. 1993. 1993 South Dakota corn performance trials. Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. C253.Google Scholar
6. Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.Google Scholar
7. Hashemi-Dezfouli, A. and Herbert, S. J. 1992. Intensifying plant density response of corn with artificial shade. Agron. J. 84:547–551.Google Scholar
8. Marwat, K. B. and Nafziger, E. D. 1990. Cocklebur and velvetleaf interference with soybean grown at different densities and planting patterns. Agron. J. 82:531–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mitich, L. W. 1991. Intriguing world of weeds: Velvetleaf. Weed Technol. 5:253–255.Google Scholar
10. Sattin, M., Zanin, G., and Berti, A. 1992. Case history for weed competition/population ecology: Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155–181.Google Scholar
12. Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. D. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 90. Abutilon theophrasti . Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Zanin, G. and Sattin, M. 1988. Threshold level and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) in maize. Weed Res. 28:347–352.Google Scholar