Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T11:56:40.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2023

Lisa Dellmuth  and
Jonas Tallberg
Lisa Dellmuth
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Jonas Tallberg
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Legitimacy Politics
Elite Communication and Public Opinion in Global Governance
 , pp. 256 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Index

acceptance, 66–67
accountability, 5, 63–70, 94, 159, 187
activism. see civil society activism
actor, political, 11, 66, 76, see also citizen, international organization, non-governmental organization, political parties, member state, elites
African Union, 18, 24–36, 44–49, 58, 153, 165, 209, see also governance, regional
Afrobarometer, 20, 28
Alternative für Deutschland, 42, 123, 135
approach
approval, 65–67
sociological, 9–11, 60–64, 154
Argentina, 35–43, 54
ASEAN. see Association of Southeast Asian Nations
Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 18, 44, 153, 165, 209
association, word. see narrative
attachment, 66–67, 76, 81, 87–88, see also identification, partisan
AU. see African Union
awareness, political, 12, 22, 61, 71–75, 81, 85–87, 107, 143, 195, 208–220
blame, 5, 68
Brazil, 1, 6–7, 35–43, 117, 224
Brexit, 7, 9, 42, 54
Bundestag, the, 119, 126–135, 149
bureaucrat, 2, 38–43, see also elites
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands, 122–148, 200–205, 211–215
Christlich-Soziale Union, 122–148, 200, 211–215
citizen
attitude, 20–28, 96, 116
legitimacy beliefs, 2–4, 10, 15–16, 23–26, 28, 58, 80, 89–91, 175, 178, 203, 207
opinion, 12, 26–28, 39–44, 58, 172, 208
civil liberties. see human rights
civil society, 37–43, see also non-governmental organization
activism, 44
participation, 5, 155–159
representative, 2, 48, see also elites, societal
civil society organization. see non-governmental organization
climate change, 7, 13, 29, 66–71, 87, 117, 163–170, 178, 194–203, 213–215
cognitive psychology, 2, 11, 61, 71–81, 207–208
communication. see elite communication, international organization communication
comparative analysis, 100, 115, 175, 216
compliance, 2, 9, 66–67, see also obedience
confidence. 32, 36, 132, 146, 174, 189, 200–203, see also trust, institutional attachment in domestic government
in international organizations, 28, 39–43, 58, 67, 97–103, 126, 166–174, 188–203, 215
level of, 31, 164–165, 186
measure of, 60, 66–68, 97, 126
conflict, 87, 126, 135, 147, 165
constituency, 50, 159
content analysis, 44–45, 124–126, 138, 148
Coronavirus. see Covid-19
court
international, 8, 160, 176
COVID-19, 1, 40, 53, 54, 177, 206
crisis, 2, 6–9, 37, 47, 58, 90, 95, 123, 135, 163, 225
financial, 35, 47
cross-border problems, 5, 7, 69, 206
cueing, 11, 17–22, 62, 77–88, 95, 107–111, 147–150, 211, see also framing
delegitimation, 4, 18–21, 27, 51–64, 83, 90, 95–96, 105–106, 115–117, 208–219
deliberation, 65, 70
democracy, 5, 9, 10, 19, 24, 48, 62–67, 78, 145, 157–169, 183, 223
Democratic Party, The, 123–150, 189
Denmark, 34, 35
distributive justice, 70, 160
distrust, 81, 95, 114, see also trust
domestic institution, 73, 95
domestic politics, 12, 22, 73, 81–82, 87, 94, 118–120, 208, 220
economic utility, 20, 126, 142, 155
economics, 72, 79–83, 96, 212
effectiveness, 12–13, 24–29, 49, 63–67, 84–109, 145–148, 168, 212–216, 223
efficiency, 70, 94, 151–159, 168, 226
elites
credibility, 24, 81, 94, 115, 211
domestic, 10–12, 68, 89, 92, 115–118, 151, 177, 207–220
global, 4, 23–27, 38, 90–96, 109–118, 150, 208, 213
legitimacy beliefs, 23, 38–39, 58
opinion, 26–27, 38
political, 26–27, 37, 38, 75–80, 87, 115–117, 150, 221, 226, see also political representative, bureaucrat
societal, 5, 10, 18, 38, 51, 224, see also civil society, media
equality, 5, 72, 73, 87, 160, 222–225
EU. see European Union
Eurobarometer, 20, 28
European Union, 5–9, 17–28, 33–38, 49–58, 79, 91–96, 99–115, 153–155, 165–177, 181, 204–206, 208–213, 224–225
European Values Study, 26–29
experiment
conjoint, 4, 16–18, 178–180, 184–189, 205–210
vignette, 4, 15–17, 97–102, 123–127, 163–164, 178, 191, 208–209
expertise, 49, 65–70, 94, 151, 157–159, see also skill
fairness, 5, 24, 47–49, 62, 63, 94–95, 125, 157–160, 167, 187
far-right, 7, 135, see also right-wing
foreign policy, 38, 74–80, 103, 117–118
framing, 11, 21–22, 62, 77–86, 170, 219
France, 34, 35, 117
free trade, 117
functionalism, 48, 159
funding, 1, 90, 120, 124–125, 138
GAL-TAN, 87–88
governance
climate, 54, 153, 172, see also United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, climate change
economic, 5, 29, 36, 48, 120, 153, 170, see also International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization
regional, 153, 165, see also Mercosur, European Union, African Union
security, 29, 35–39, 153, see also United Nations Security Council, International Criminal Court
Group of Twenty, 38–44, 151
health, 2, 7, 35, 90, 194–203, 215, see also Covid-19, World Health Organization
heuristic, 3, 11–12, 23, 61–62, 68–89, 118, 146, 208, 213, 220
human rights, 5, 7, 70, 177, 183, 186, 202–203
ICC. see International Criminal Court
identification, partisan, 15, 22, 25, 81–83, 87–88, 107, 118–122, 128–150, 189–191, 195–200, 214–220
identity, 20, 46, 218, see also identification, partisan
ideology, 75–76, 88, 132, 178–191, 203, 215
IMF. see International Monatary Fund
impartiality, 70, 82, 93, 115, 151, 160, 210, 226
information
deficit, 10–11
institutional attachment, 67
international agreement, 41, 224
International Criminal Court, 8, 29, 36, 160, 224, see also security, court
International issues. see cross-border problems
International Monetary Fund, 5–9, 18–54, 90–124, 153–155, 163–175, 206–213, see also governance, economic
international organization
annual report, 44–48
authority, 181–205
communication, 8, 44–59, 115, 226, see also self-legitimation
legitimation of, 44–49
international relations, 2, 14, 60–70, 117, 187, 207, 219
internationalism, 25, 88, 112, 178–204
Italy, 35
Japan, 6, 29–32
justice, 62–64, 160, 171
Kenya, 32, 55
legality, 70, 151, 156
LegGov. see Legitimacy in Global Governance
legitimacy
beliefs. see elite legitimacy beliefs, citizen legitimacy beliefs
conceptualization, 43–50, 58–68
deficit, 50, 170, 181, 203
normative, 62
sociological, 62
legitimacy in global governance, 26, 38, 51, 58
legitimation, 4, 18–27, 43–64, 83, 90, 95–96, 105–107, 115–118, 208–219, see also legitimacy, delegitimation, self-legitimation
liberal order, 6, see also liberalism
liberalism, 6–8, 31, 48, 87, 138, 183–185, see also ideology, liberal order
loyalty, 88, 121
Mali, 33
media
consumption, 85, 189
landscape, 51
news, 14, 27, 38–59, 218
social, 14, 27, 50–51, 59, 217, 218, see also Twitter
member government. see member state
member state, 32–50, 70, 93–125, 153, 179–180, 188–206, 213
Mercosur, 28, 35–43, 58, 225, see also governance, regional
message. see also communication, narrative
content, 23, 120, 178, see also content analysis
negative, 43, 50, 83–84, 91, 96, 104–106, 212, see also delegitimation
object of, 12–13, 44, 61, 171, 210–213
positive, 83, 91–96, 106, 211–212, see also legitimation
tone of, 12–13, 27, 49–61, 80–98, 105, 210–220
messenger, 11, 60, 68, see also non-governmental organization, international organization, member state, elites
Mozambique, 33
multilateralism, 7–8, 31
NAFTA. see North American Free Trade Agreement
narrative, 19–27, 43–59, 68, 226, see also message
NATO. see North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NEPAD. see New partnership for Africa’s Development
New Partnership for Africa’s Development, 32
news. see media
newspaper, 27, 46, see also media
Nigeria, 33
non-governmental organization, 1–8, 12, 13, 19, 23, 24, 38–51, 63, 68–69, 82–120, 150, 208–211, 219–226, see also civil society
non-state actors. see civil society
non-state North American Free Trade Organization. see also United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement
normative political theory, 62, 65
North American Free Trade Agreement, 7, 18–24, 46, 91–115, 153, 165, 181, 208–213
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 18–24, 29, 36–49, 118–150, 209, 215
OAU. see Organization of African Unity
obedience, 66, see also compliance
observational data, 67, see also public opinion data
opinion. see elite opinion, citizen opinion
formation, 3, 23, 61–81, 89, 107, 120, 149, 208, 220
Organization of African Unity, 32
pandemic. see Covid-19, health, World Health Organization
Paraguay, 35
participation, 5, 14, 47–49, 63, 70–73, 151–159, 186–194, 226
party system, 122, 134, 146–150, 184, 211
peace, 70, 125–126, 138–143, 178–179, 191–206, 215, see also security
-keeping, 32, 95
Philippines, the, 7, 17, 24, 38–43, 117, 151–153, 162–175, 209, 224
Poland, 7, 29–35
polarization
elite, 12, 21–22, 61, 82–83, 124–127, 210–211, 216
opinion, 122, 123, 184
party, 122, 132, 144
political party, 81, 119–121, 132–139, 147, 189, 200
political representative, 1–7, 22, 49, 73, 117, 223, see also elite, political
politician. see political representative
politicization, 19, 45, 47–48, 108, 150, see also protest
population. see citizen
populism, 6, 7
poverty, 5, 70, 155, 160, 178, 183, 186, 196–205, 215
power, 2, 9, 34, 159, 172, 180, 186–206, 219, 222
distribution of, 6
press. see media, international organization communication
problem-solving, 70, 74, 94, 99, 154–194, 226
proportionality, 70, 160
protection. see security
protest, 5, 14, 29, 44–47, 160, see also politicization
public opinion. see citizen opinion
data, 15, 28
survey, 152–156
public statements. see international organization communication
public, the. see citizen
refugee, 53, 119, 124–126, 135–149, see also United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
representation, 5–6, 65, 69, 223
representative, political. see also elites
Republican Party, The, 87, 117–150, 189, 200, 205, 211–215
right-wing, 7, 42, see also far-right
Russia, 6, 29–43, 155
security, 28–39, 70, 135–153, 165, 179, 191–206, 215, see also United Nations security Council
self-legitimation, 19, 43–44, 50, 69, 91, 103, 109, 219, see also international organization communication
sentiment analysis, 51–52
skill, 65, 159
social movement, 19, see also civil society
South Africa, 6, 17, 24, 32–43, 153, 162–175, 209
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands, 123–148, 200–205, 211–215
Tanzania, 32
technocracy, 47–49, 152–175
transparency, 5, 49, 63–70, 151, 157–164, 186–194, 226
trust, 8, 20, 28–36, 65–67, 75–81, 114, 120, 132, 144, 149, 189, 225, see also confidence, distrust
Turkey, 29–31, 53
Twitter, 51–58, see also media
UK, the. see United Kingdom
UNFCCC. see United Nations Convention on Climate Change
UNHCR. see United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights
United Kingdom, 17, 24, 32–35, 45–54, 91–115, 177, 181, 206–212
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 7–8, 18, 24, 38–43, 52–54, 120–124, 153–155, 165–175, 206–213
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 44, 124
United Nations Security Council, 6, 8, 18, 24–29, 39–41, 50–58, 100, 153, 165–175, 209, 213
United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, 181, 213, see also North American Free Trade Agreement
UNSC. see United Nations Security Council
Uruguay, 35
values, 20, 62–64, 87, 114, 185–186, see also citizen opinion, World Values Survey
Venezuela, 35–43
WHO. see World Health Organization
World Bank, 5–6, 28–54, 155
World Health Organization, 1–2, 7, 29, 35–43, 71, 90, 155, 224
World Trade Organization, 5–7, 18, 24, 29, 35–46, 71, 91–93, 99–101, 108–115, 155, 206–213
World Values Survey, 20, 26–39, 173
WTO. see World Trade Organization
YouGov, 15, 97, 122, 132, 162, 185, 189

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Index
  • Lisa Dellmuth, Stockholms Universitet, Jonas Tallberg, Stockholms Universitet
  • Book: Legitimacy Politics
  • Online publication: 12 January 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222020.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Index
  • Lisa Dellmuth, Stockholms Universitet, Jonas Tallberg, Stockholms Universitet
  • Book: Legitimacy Politics
  • Online publication: 12 January 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222020.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Index
  • Lisa Dellmuth, Stockholms Universitet, Jonas Tallberg, Stockholms Universitet
  • Book: Legitimacy Politics
  • Online publication: 12 January 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222020.009
Available formats
×