Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T13:03:40.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biology and morphometric relationship of gall inducers Contarinia sp. and corresponding parasitoids for swollen galls of Nitraria sibirica pall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2023

Qian Zhao
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, People's Republic of China
Hong-Ying Hu*
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, People's Republic of China
Ning Kang
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, People's Republic of China
Cai-Hong Gao
Affiliation:
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, People's Republic of China
*
Corresponding author: Hong-Ying Hu; Email: huhongying@xju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Galls function as provide shelter for gall inducers, guarding them against their natural enemies. Previous research has illuminated the interactions between galls, gall inducers, and their corresponding parasitoids within various caltrop plants. However, less is known about these relationships within Nitraria sibirica, particularly regarding the efficacy of parasitism. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the morphometric relationships among the swollen galls, gall inducers, and their parasitoids. Two species of gall inducers and three species of parasitoids were obtained from the swollen galls of N. sibirica. The correlations of the parasitization indexes, the lifespan of gall inhabitants, and temperature and the morphometric relationships between the galls and their inhabitants were analyzed. The dominant gall inducer identified was Contarinia sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Furthermore, it was observed that three solitary parasitoids attacked Contarinia sp. in the swollen galls, with only Eupelmus gelechiphagus acting as an idiobiont ectoparasitoid. The dominant parasitoids were Platygaster sp. and Cheiloneurus elegans at sites 1 and 2, respectively, with Platygaster sp. displaying greater abundance than C. elegans in the swollen galls. The lifespan of the gall inhabitants shortened gradually as the temperature increased. Moreover, the optimal number of gall chambers ranged from two to four per swollen gall with maximized fitness, which can be considered the optimal population density for the gall inducer Contarinia sp. Morphometric analysis exhibited a strong linear correlation between gall size and chamber number or the number of gall inhabitants, as well as a weak correlation between gall size and body size of the primary inhabitants of swollen galls. Our results highlight the importance of the biological investigation of parasitoids and gall inducers living in closed galls with multiple chambers and may pave the way for potential application in biological control.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Galls, formed in response to irritation from inducing organisms, occur in most plants, with insects being the major producers of galls. Insects can cause abnormal growth of tissues and change the external morphology into diverse and complex structures (Stone and Schonrogge, Reference Stone and Schonrogge2003; Miller and Raman, Reference Miller and Raman2019; Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Singh and Chauhan2020). Approximately 21,100 species of galling insects have been recorded in numerous types of galls, which have unique shapes and a wide range of variation (Price et al., Reference Price, Fernandes and Waring1987; Espirito-Santo and Fernandes, Reference Espirito-Santo and Fernandes2007). Different gall inducers can yield variant galls on related plant species, and the same gall inducers may produce different galls across various plants. Despite this variability, many gall inducers show high specialization toward their host plants, often belong to the same species or genus (Stone and Schonrogge, Reference Stone and Schonrogge2003; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wang and Wu2010; Sevarika et al., Reference Sevarika, Rossi Stacconi and Romani2021).

Owing to the rich nutrients that are stored in most Zygophyllaceae plants (caltrops) as an adaptation to xeric environments, many insects prefer to produce galls in these plants to provide themselves with shelter and protection (Fernandes et al., Reference Fernandes, Price, Santos and Negreiros2022). Nitraria sibirica Pall. (Zygophyllaceae) is a typical woody halophyte that is known as ‘the king of desert vegetation’ because of its cold and salt tolerance and strong adaptability to drought (Li et al., Reference Li, Tang, Yang and Zhang2017, Reference Li, Yang, Tang and Zhang2020; Gu et al., Reference Gu, Yang, Bakri, Chen and Aisa2018). These characteristics make it a useful plant for wind prevention and sand fixation in deserts. Moreover, the ecological functions of N. sibirica plants, such as adjusting the local climate and increasing biodiversity, are irreplaceable (Ren and Lv, Reference Ren and Lv2020). The leaves and fruits of N. sibirica have long been used as natural remedies for indigestion, irregular menses, and hypertension in the Middle East and Central Asia, indicating their ethnopharmacological relevance. In particular, in the northwest region of China, these plants are recommended for treating hypertension (Turghun et al., Reference Turghun, Bakri, Abdulla, Ma and Aisa2020; Voronkova et al., Reference Voronkova, Banaev, Tomoshevich and Lama2020). Therefore, conserving N. sibirica in natural ecosystems is imperative, not only for desertification control but also to ensure its medicinal availability.

There is broad consensus in the literature stating that gall midges are the most widespread gall-forming insects in caltrop plants. More than 20 species of gall midges belonging to six genera have been recorded in Zygophyllaceae. Contarinia Rondania is a large, cosmopolitan genus in the supertribe Cecidomyiidi, and many female midges of this genus oviposit in the shoots, buds, or leaves of host plants, where the larvae feed and develop (Uechi et al., Reference Uechi, Tokuda, Yukawa, Kawamura, Teramoto and Harris2003; Kolesik and Gagné, Reference Kolesik and Gagné2020). Contarinia nitrariae Fedotova, Contarinia nitrariagemmae Fedotova (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), and Trilobophora nitrariae Marikovskij (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) have been collected on Nitraria spp. in Kazakhstan (Gagné and Jaschhof, 2021). Although more than 30 species of pests can damage Nitraria spp. in desert forests worldwide, only a few pests are associated with the galls on Nitraria (Li and Liu, Reference Li and Liu1993; Morse, Reference Morse2003; Kravchenko et al., Reference Kravchenko, Hausmann and Miller2006). Diaspidiotus roseni Danzig. (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) is considered to be a gall inducer of Nitraria in Israel (Danzig, Reference Danzig1999). In addition, five species (Eremocampe nitrariae Sugonjaev, Mongolocampe bouceki Sugonjaev, M. kozlovi Sugonjaev, M. trjapitzini Sugonjaev, and M. zhaoningi Yang) belonging to the subfamily Mongolocampinae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) have been reported to damage the leaves of Nitraria spp. (Sugonjaev, Reference Sugonjaev1971; Yang, Reference Yang1990; Sugonjaev and Voinovich, Reference Sugonjaev and Voinovich2003). The parasite Aphaniosoma sp. (Chyromyidae) has been reported in gall-like swellings on the leaves of Nitraria spp. (Sugonjaev, Reference Sugonjaev1971, Reference Sugonjaev1974; Abrahamson et al., Reference Abrahamson, Armbruster and Maddox1983). However, previous studies have not provided convincing evidence to support that these insects were the induces of the swollen galls, and little information is available about the dominant species of gall inducers, especially gall midges.

Currently, efforts to control sheltered gall inducers have had limited success through the extensive application of insecticides (Stone and Schonrogge, Reference Stone and Schonrogge2003; Singh and Yadav, Reference Singh and Yadav2007; Bhandari and Cheng, Reference Bhandari and Cheng2016). Furthermore, insecticide use is not a sustainable control measure as it causes adverse effects on beneficial non-target organisms (Passos et al., Reference Passos, Soares, Collares, Malagoli, Desneux and Carvalho2018; Soares et al., Reference Soares, Campos, Passos, Carvalho, Haro, Lavoir, Biondi, Zappala and Desneux2019). Thus, a more effective and eco-friendly pest management method that uses fewer chemical insecticides is needed. Biological control is a vital component of integrated pest management, and utilizing parasitic natural enemies is a promising way to control pests in agricultural and forest ecosystems (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Liu, Shi, Huang and Chen2019; Masry and El-Wakeil, Reference Masry, El-Wakeil, El-Wakeil, Saleh and Abu-Hashim2020; Harush et al., Reference Harush, Quinn, Trostanetsky, Rapaport, Kostyukovsky and Gottlieb2021). Several studies have reported biological control using chalcidoid parasitoids, which were thought to be effective agents for the biological control of important forest pests worldwide (Tunca et al., Reference Tunca, Venard, Colombel, Capelli and Tabone2019; Haeussling et al., Reference Haeussling, Lienenlueke and Stoekl2021; Riaz et al., Reference Riaz, Johnson, Ahmad, Fitt and Naiker2021). Studies clarifying the host–parasite relationship between the Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) and its natural enemy Torymus sinensis Kamijo (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) have provided convincing evidence to support biological control methods (Yara et al., Reference Yara, Sasawaki and Kunimi2010; Quacchia et al., Reference Quacchia, Ferracini, Nicholls, Piazza, Saladini, Tota, Melika and Alma2013; Avtzis et al., Reference Avtzis, Melika, Matošević and Coyle2018; Ferracini et al., Reference Ferracini, Ferrari, Pontini, Saladini and Alma2019; Gil-Tapetado et al., Reference Gil-Tapetado, Cabrero-Sanudo, Gomez, Askew and Nieves-Aldrey2021). Increasing evidence has also indicated that the major factors affecting integrated pest management strategies include the entomic species composition, abundance of natural enemies, and host size (Dhawan et al., Reference Dhawan, Singh and Kumar2009; Daniel and Grunder, Reference Daniel and Grunder2012; Bhede et al., Reference Bhede, Bhosle, Shinde and Sharma2014). Nevertheless, studies on the parasitoids of galls on N. sibirica have not been conducted.

The gall–inducer–natural enemy system is an excellent model to study the nutritional relationships among plants, insects, and their natural enemies. Such study may provide a strong theoretical basis for the biological control of gall inducers and help to unravel the complex web of their interactions (Price et al., Reference Price, Fernandes and Waring1987; Stone and Schonrogge, Reference Stone and Schonrogge2003; Compton et al., Reference Compton, Chen, Chen, Hatcher, Peng, Quinnell, Rodriguez, Yu, Ouyang, Wei, Cai and Wang2018; Martini et al., Reference Martini, Raymundo, Prado-Junior and Oliveira2021; Michell and Nyman, Reference Michell and Nyman2021). To date, no agreement has been reached about gall formation and its relation to gall inducers (Diamond et al., Reference Diamond, Blair and Abrahamson2008; Bannerman et al., Reference Bannerman, Shorthouse, Pither and Lalonde2012; Laszlo and Tothmeresz, Reference Laszlo and Tothmeresz2013; Miller and Raman, Reference Miller and Raman2019; Ramos et al., Reference Ramos, Solar, Santos and Fagundes2019). Generally, the gall inducers seem to control gall development by affecting the articulated metabolic pathway of the plants, creating a protective and beneficial structure to serve as shelter and food, in which they are defended against natural enemies and spend most of their preimaginal instars (Price et al., Reference Price, Fernandes and Waring1987; Cooper and Rieske, Reference Cooper and Rieske2010; Tooker and Giron, Reference Tooker and Giron2020). As a result, the gall inducers may evolve highly specialized nutritional dependencies on their host plants. The relationships between the gall characteristics (gall volume, chamber number, and chamber density) and gall inhabitants (emerged gall inducers, parasitoids, and body length) were found to have a canonical correlation (Weis, Reference Weis1993; Ozaki, Reference Ozaki2000; Laszlo et al., Reference Laszlo, Solyom, Prazsmari, Barta and Tothmeresz2014; Aguirrebengoa et al., Reference Aguirrebengoa, Wong, Boyero and Quinto2022). In addition, the interactions between galling insects and their parasitoids are complex, and the principal factor influencing gall inducer mortality is parasitoid attacks. Successful attacks from parasitoids on gall inducers depend on the gall size, chamber number, and chamber density (Laszlo et al., Reference Laszlo, Solyom, Prazsmari, Barta and Tothmeresz2014; Hernandez-Lopez et al., Reference Hernandez-Lopez, Hernandez-Ortiz, Castillo-Campos and Fernandes2021). Despite the potential of insect galls as model systems, gall induction and the species richness of galls on N. sibirica are still poorly understood.

A preliminary survey was performed in north Xinjiang in 2016, and the galls on N. sibirica induced by the gall midge Contarinia sp. were investigated. However, limited information was obtained about the relationships among the galls, gall inducers, and corresponding parasitoids. In the present study, we hypothesized that closed galls with limited space limit the quantity and size of inhabitants of N. sibirica galls. We aimed to evaluate the occurrence and degree of damage by swollen galls on N. sibirica and determine the potential resources of gall inducers and their parasitoids. This allowed us to identify the morphometric relationships among the swollen galls, gall inducers, and their parasitoids and to clarify the biological characteristics of the parasitoids. We anticipate that our findings could contribute to the development of a novel strategy for safeguarding the desert ecosystem in which N. sibirica predominates.

Materials and methods

Study sites and sampling collections

Two collecting sites (table 1) with different habitat types where N. sibirica are naturally found with galls were selected to study the biological properties of the gall inducers and their parasitoids in Wujiaqu city (S1) and Jinghe county (S2) in Xinjiang during 2018–2021. The five-point sampling method was used by randomly selecting 3–5 trees from five sub-samples of the trees (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021; Kang et al., Reference Kang, Guo, Jiang, Zhang, Zhao and Hu2022). For each sampling date from March to October, five shrubs from five subsamples of 70–90 galls each were randomly selected and taken to the laboratory for rearing and dissection.

Table 1. Survey sites of Nitraria sibirica in Xinjiang in 2018–2021

Laboratory rearing of the galls

The field-collected galls were placed individually in glass vials (diameter 1.5 cm and length 10.0 cm) to monitor their development in the insect laboratory of the College of Life Sciences and Technology, Xinjiang University (ICXU). The galls were divided into three groups containing 20 galls each and were reared in 2018–2021 in climate-controlled chambers at 26°C and 65 ± 5% relative humidity, with a fluorescent lighting regime of 14:10 h (L:D). Furthermore, additional swollen galls were dissected to identify the morphological characteristics and life history of the dominant gall inducers and parasitoids.

The galls were checked every day for the emergence of gall inducers and the corresponding parasitoid adults. The insects were then separated according to their taxonomy and sex. The sex ratio was calculated as the mean percentage of female offspring for each type of parasitoid from the pest species that emerged in the laboratory. The emerged gall inducers and the corresponding parasitoids were reared individually in glass vials with gauze under four different temperatures (20, 26, 32, and 38°C). The gall inducers and parasitoids were fed with absorbent cotton soaked with water and 15% honey water. Next, the lifespan of the gall inducers and parasitoids was recorded every day until they all died, and the number of adults that emerged from the galls which were collected on each sampling date was counted. The dead gall inducers and parasitoids were stored in 100% ethanol for further morphological identification and molecular analyses. Then, the genomic DNA was extracted, and sequence amplification (COⅠ and the D2 domain of 28S) was conducted following the method of Zhao et al. (Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021). All the specimens were deposited at ICXU.

Emergence periods and parasitization indexes of the insects in the swollen galls of N. sibirica

After emergence, all the collected swollen galls were inspected and dissected under a Nikon stereo microscope with a magnification of up to 100× to count the total number of gall inducers and parasitoids including the un-emerged insects. The percentage of emerged insects was used to calculate the different emergence periods among the gall inducers and parasitoids. The emergence periods of the gall inducers and corresponding parasitoids were determined, and the four parasitization indexes for each parasitoid species were calculated using the following formulae (Costi et al., Reference Costi, Haye and Maistrello2019; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021).

The index discovery efficiency (DE) was used to describe the ability of the parasitoids to find galls in the field and was calculated as:

(1)$${\rm DE}\,{\rm} = \displaystyle{{{\rm Number}\;{\rm of}\;{\rm swollen}\;{\rm galls}\;{\rm with}\;{\rm parasitoids}} \over {{\rm Number}\;{\rm of}\;{\rm collected}\;{\rm swollen}\;{\rm galls}}}\,\times 100.$$

The index exploitation efficiency (EE) was used to evaluate the ability of the parasitoids to exploit their hosts and was calculated as:

(2)$$\eqalign{{\rm EE} = \displaystyle{{\eqalign{\rm Number\;of\;parasitized\;gall\;inducers \cr & \hskip-11pc{\rm\ in\;the\;swollen\;galls}}} \over {\eqalign{\rm Total\;number\;of\;the\;gall\;inducers\;and\cr & \hskip-13pc{\rm \;parasitoid\;in\;the\;parasitized\;swollen\;galls}}}} \times 100.} $$

The parasitism rate (PR) was used to describe the efficacy of a parasitoid in reducing gall inducers and was calculated as:

(3)$$\eqalign{{\rm PR} = \displaystyle{{\eqalign{\rm Number\;of\;parasitoids\;in\;swollen {\;galls}} \over {\eqalign{\rm Total\;number\;of\;the\;gall\;inducers\;and\;\cr & \hskip-13pc parasitoid {\rm \;in\;the\; swollen\;galls}}}} \times 100.}} $$

The index relative importance (RI) was calculated as DE × PR × 100 (Virla et al., Reference Virla, Van Nieuwenhove, Palottini, Triapitsyn and Logarzo2019), which was used to describe the integrated capability of a parasitoid to reduce the gall inducers, and RI > 10, 9.99 ≥ RI > 1.0, 1 ≥ RI ≥ 0.09, and RI < 0.09 were considered ‘very frequent’, ‘frequent’, ‘scarce or occasional species’, and ‘rare’, respectively.

Morphometric relationship between the galls and insects in the swollen galls of N. sibirica

The swollen galls that were collected in 2019–2021 and dissected were used to explore the morphometric relationship between the galls and the inhabitants of the swollen galls of N. sibirica. Based on the different species of inhabitants in the swollen galls, we calculated the frequency of insect types in the different chambers at S1 and S2. For each gall on these survey dates, we measured the frequency of the number of chambers, the parasitism rate corresponding to the different number of gall chambers, and the gall size and body length of the major insects after all the gall inhabitants had emerged. In addition, the gall volume and chamber density were calculated using the following formulae:

(4)$$\eqalign{{\rm Gall\;}\;{\rm volume}\;\,( {{\rm GV}} ) = &{\rm \pi }\;\times \;\left({\displaystyle{1 \over 2} \times {\rm gall}\;{\rm length}} \right)\; \cr & \times \;\left({\displaystyle{1 \over 2} \times {\rm gall}\;{\rm width}} \right)^2 \times \displaystyle{3 \over 4}, \;}$$
(5)$${\rm Chamber}\;{\rm density}\,\;( {{\rm CD}} ) = \displaystyle{{{\rm \;Gall}\;{\rm volume}\;{\rm of}\;{\rm each}\;{\rm gall}} \over \eqalign{& {\rm Total}\;{\rm number}\;{\rm of}\;{\rm chambers}\cr & \hskip 30pt {\rm in}\;{\rm each}\;{\rm gall}}}\,\times \,100.$$

Statistical analysis

All the analyses were performed using Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and Origin 2021 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA), and data were assessed for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and variance (F-test), when appropriate. The sample sizes were selected according to standard practice in the field (Sopow and Quiring, Reference Sopow and Quiring2001; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021; Kang et al., Reference Kang, Guo, Jiang, Zhang, Zhao and Hu2022). Additionally, a two-tailed Student's t-test was used to determine the significance between the two groups. For multiple comparisons, a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used. The significance level was set at P < 0.05, and the data are presented as the mean ± standard error of at least three independent experiments. In addition, the relationships between the gall morphological characteristics (chamber number, gall volume, and chamber density) and the body size of the dominant insects were analyzed through logistic regression (binomial generalized linear model) which was performed using R version 3.4.1.

Results

Occurrence of swollen galls on N. sibirica

We collected a total of 215 and 565 swollen galls from the branches of N. sibirica at S1 and S2, respectively, during the period from 2018 to 2021 in northern Xinjiang. However, no galls were collected at S1 in 2018. The galls were conical and swollen when compared to the normal branches, and they were characterized by the lignification and thickening of the epidermis.

The development of the swollen galls on N. sibirica occurred once a year and consisted of four stages (fig. 1). The early period was from late May to early August, and the growth period was from mid-June to late October. The mature period was from early September to mid-May of the next year. The emergence period was from late April to early July. Additionally, the emergence of the gall inducers was followed by the drying up of the swollen galls. The galls that occurred had overlapping generations.

Figure 1. Phenological fitting based on the dynamic changes in the growth period of the swollen galls, Contarinia sp., and Platygaster sp. on Nitraria sibirica. The early period is labelled with light green, and the growth period is labelled with light white. The mature period is labelled with white lignification, and the emergence period is labelled with off-white.

Species of gall inducers and parasitoids in swollen galls on N. sibirica

Two species of gall inducers, Contarinia sp. and Platyneurus gobiensis Sugonjaev (Hymenoptera: Tetracampidae), were recorded from the swollen galls that were collected at both sites. All the gall inducers were mostly univoltine, and they overwintered at the mature larval stage in the galls. After dissecting the swollen galls collected from 2018 to 2021, 89.83% unisexual galls (53.39% female and 36.44% male) and 10.17% mixed galls were identified (fig. S1). The proportion of unisexual galls (90.48% at S1 and 89.47% at S2) and mixed galls (9.52% at S1 and 10.53% at S2) was similar at S1 and S2 and among the 3 years, except for in 2019. Furthermore, in the unisexual galls, the number of gall midges in each ‘female’ gall was averaged at 2.69 ± 2.14, whereas that in each ‘male’ gall was averaged at 2.31 ± 1.90. Furthermore, the sex ratio (female:male) was approximately 15:7 in the mixed galls.

The dominant gall inducer Contarinia sp. mainly lived in the galls from the larval to pupal stages. After mating, the female adult laid eggs on the leaf buds, new shoots, or young leaves of N. sibirica. Then, the hatched larvae bored into the twigs. Later, the larvae developed inside the galls to form gradually enlarged galls. With the development of the pupae, the gall inducers broke the epidermis of the swollen gall using the spines on their head and then emerged successfully (fig. 1).

In this survey, three solitary parasitoid species belonging to the genera Platygaster (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae), Cheiloneurus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and Eupelmus (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) were recorded from the swollen galls (fig. 2). Among them, Platygaster sp. and Cheiloneurus elegans are solitary primary koinobiont endoparasitoids, whereas Eupelmus gelechiphagus is an idiobiont ectoparasitoid of Contarinia sp. Only Platygaster sp. was an egg parasitoid, and the others were larval parasitoids (fig. S2). Moreover, the molecular analyses confirmed the identity of the gall inducers and corresponding parasitoids that emerged from the swollen galls. All obtained sequences of the 28S and COⅠ genes were deposited in the GenBank database (fig. 2).

Figure 2. Number of specimens of the gall inducers and their parasitoids in the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica in 2018–2021, with the GenBank accession numbers for the deposited sequences that were generated from this study. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

Emergence of gall inducers and their parasitoids from swollen galls on N. sibirica

The highest number of emerged gall inducers (♀107, ♂70) and parasitoids (♀312, ♂118) from the swollen galls of N. sibirica was observed in 2019 at S2 (figs 2 and 3). For the gall inducers, the number of Contarinia sp. recorded at S1 was significantly higher than that at S2 (F = 6.348, df = 30, P < 0.0001). In addition, there were slightly more female adults than male adults for each species of gall inducers and corresponding parasitoids that emerged from the swollen galls (fig. 2).

Figure 3. Emergence periods of the gall inducers and their parasitoids from the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica in 2018–2021. The emergence of the individuals from the swollen galls was investigated daily under laboratory conditions at sites 1 and 2. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

The emergence of both the gall inducers and parasitoids obtained from the swollen galls showed an initial increasing tendency before decreasing from April to June. Contarinia sp. emerged earlier than P. gobiensis, which rarely emerged in the 4 years (fig. 3). Moreover, the parasitoid Platygaster sp. emerged earlier than the other parasitoids, and C. elegans emerged earlier than E. gelechiphagus (fig. 3).

Parasitization indexes of parasitoids recorded from swollen galls on N. sibirica

The parameters of the parasitization indexes for the different parasitoid species showed significant differences (fig. 4). All the parasitization indexes of Platygaster sp. were significantly higher than those of C. elegans (F = 2.097, df = 31, P = 0.0431) and E. gelechiphagus (F = 10.28, df = 31, P < 0.0001). The parasitoid impact and relative importance of Platygaster sp. were 17.70% and 6.73 at S1 and 57.46% and 28.88 at S2, respectively. The relative importance of Platygaster sp. peaked at 41.68 at S2 in 2018, whereas the maximum was 15.40 and 0.87 for C. elegans at S1 in 2019 and E. gelechiphagus at S2 in 2020, respectively. The results indicated that Platygaster sp. and C. elegans were the dominant parasitoids of the swollen galls at S1 and S2, respectively.

Figure 4. Parasitization indexes and relative importance of the parasitoid species that were recorded from the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica. RI > 10, very frequent; 9.99 ≥ RI ≥ 1.0, frequent; 1.0 ≥ RI ≥ 0.09, scarce or occasional species; RI < 0.09, rare.

Among the indexes, the EE was higher than the DE in most cases, with the exception of Platygaster sp. and C. elegans in 2019 at S1 and Platygaster sp. in 2020 at S2. In general, the EE did not reach 100% since few parasitized gall midges were reared from one gall with more than one gall inducer. The swollen galls of N. sibirica collected in 2019 at S1 and in 2020 at S2 had lower EE.

Effect of temperature on the lifespan of adult parasitoids recovered from swollen galls on N. sibirica

There were differences in lifespan between the gall inducers and parasitoids, and they were affected by temperature and sites (fig. 5). The lifespans of the adult gall inducers and parasitoids that emerged from the swollen galls showed a shortened trend with an increasing temperature. The minimum number and shortest lifespan of gall inducers and parasitoids were recorded at 38°C. The average expected lifespan of the gall inducers Contarinia sp. and P. gobiensis was 3.08 and 14.63 days at 20°C and 0.83 and 2.29 days at 38°C, respectively.

Figure 5. Survival curves of the gall inducers and their parasitoids from the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica at four different temperatures, 20, 26, 32, and 38°C. The 95% confidence intervals are represented by shades of different colors. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

The average expected lifespan of Platygaster sp., C. elegans, and E. gelechiphagus was 9.96, 21.48, and 20.00 days at 20°C and 2.03, 4.94, and 5.25 days at 38°C, respectively. However, there was a small difference in the average lifespans of the gall inducers between the two sites. The average lifespan of E. gelechiphagus was 13.54 days at S2, whereas no living E. gelechiphagus were observed at S1. Moreover, the adults of C. elegans recorded from the swollen galls had longer lifespans than those of Platygaster sp. at the given temperatures (20℃: χ2 = 47.06, P < 0.0001; 26℃: χ2 = 75.45, P < 0.0001; 32℃: χ2 = 75.72, P < 0.0001; 38℃: χ2 = 24.93, P < 0.0001). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the lifespans of the parasitoids recorded from the swollen galls between S1 and S2 and between the females and males of each parasitoid species at all the given temperatures (fig. 5).

Number, parasitism rate, and insect composition types of swollen gall chambers on N. sibirica

The frequency of gall chamber numbers in the swollen galls on N. sibirica is illustrated in fig. 6a. The chamber numbers of the swollen galls ranged from 1 to 34. The maximum number of gall chambers was 22 at S2 (N = 200) and 35 at S1 (N = 500). The distribution of the number of gall chambers was approximately bell-shaped with extended tails (fig. 6a), and it was similar among the given years with a few subtle differences. In 2018 and 2019, the percentages of gall chambers with fewer than five chambers were 82.80 and 79.27%, whereas those in 2020 and 2021 were 72.03 and 62.85%, respectively. In addition, the percentage of gall chambers with fewer than 5 and 10 chambers were 65.05 and 89.56% at S1, whereas those at S2 were 78.98 and 97.87%, respectively. In general, the highest frequency of gall chamber number ranged from two to four.

Figure 6. Frequency of the number of gall chambers (a), the parasitism rate corresponding to the different numbers of gall chambers (b) in the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica, and the frequency of the insect composition types in the different chambers (c) at S1 and S2 in 2019–2021. The color of the year corresponds to the color of the curve in (a). A–C indicate 16 insect composition types recorded in swollen galls on N. sibirica. A: only parasitoids in the galls, A1: Platygaster sp., A2: Cheiloneurus elegans, A3: Eupelmus gelechiphagus, A4: Platygaster sp. and C. elegans; B: only gall inducers in the galls, B1: Contarinia sp., B2: P. gobiensis, B3: Contarinia sp. and Platyneurus gobiensis; C: both parasitoids and gall inducers in the galls, C1: Platygaster sp. and Contarinia sp., C2: C. elegans and Contarinia sp., C3: E. gelechiphagus and Contarinia sp., C4: Platygaster sp. and C. elegans and Contarinia sp., C5: E. gelechiphagus and C. elegans and Contarinia sp., C6: Platygaster sp. and P. gobiensis, C7: Platygaster sp. and C. elegans and P. gobiensis, C8: Platygaster sp. and Contarinia sp. and P. gobiensis, C9: C. elegans and Contarinia sp. and P. gobiensis.

The average probability of parasitoid attack for all parasitoids was 0.41 (SE = 0.40, N = 111) at S1 and 0.58 (SE = 0.52, N = 187) at S2. The probability of a parasitoid attack was similar for the swollen galls at S1 and S2. The parasitoid attack rates showed a bimodal distribution, with peaks at both low and high values. In most cases, the parasitoids were either absent or attacked almost all inhabitants (fig. 6b). When the gall chamber numbers ranged from one to eight, the probability of a parasitoid attack fell in the interval of 0.8–1.0, whereas an extremely low attack probability or even no attacks were found when the gall chamber number was greater than eight.

The insect composition of the swollen gall chambers was simpler at S1 than at S2; Contarinia sp. and C. elegans did not simultaneously emerge from the same galls at S1. Additionally, 28.13 and 17.11% of the galls produced only the dominant gall inducer Contarinia sp. at S1 and S2, respectively, whereas 28.13 and 44.74% of the galls produced only the dominant parasitoid Platygaster sp. (fig. 6c). Moreover, 48.96 and 28.95% of the galls produced both gall inducers and parasitoids at S1 and S2, respectively. It was shown that the insect composition of the swollen galls was similar over the 3 years with a slightly different percentage of gall inhabitants.

Morphometric relationship between galls and insects on swollen galls of N. sibirica

The gall size was positively correlated to the number of gall chambers and emerged insects (fig. 7a, c, d, f), and negatively correlated to the chamber density, except in 2021 (R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.14; fig. 7b, e). Among all parasitoids, for Platygaster sp. (R 2 = 0.04, P = 0.079), the relationship between the number of gall chambers and body length was stronger than that for C. elegans and Contarinia sp. (R 2 = 0.01, P = 0.26; R 2 < 0.01, P = 0.43) without evident linear correlation. However, the relationship between the chamber density and body length was stronger for both C. elegans and Contarinia sp. than that for Platygaster sp. The regression analysis showed a significant negative relationship between the chamber volume and body length for both C. elegans and Contarinia sp. (R 2 = 0.19, P = 0.0043; R 2 = 0.13, P = 0.0013), but not for Platygaster sp. (R 2 < 0.01, P = 0.52).

Figure 7. Morphometric relationship between the galls and the major insects in the swollen galls of Nitraria sibirica at S1 and S2 in 2019–2021. (a) Relationships between chamber (CH) and gall volume (GV) at S1 and S2. (b) Relationships between GV and chamber density (CD) at S1 and S2. (c) Relationships between emerged insects (EN) and GV at S1 and S2. (d) Relationships between CH and GV in 2019–2021. (e) Relationships between GV and CD in 2019–2021. (f) Relationships between EN and GV in 2019–2021. (g) Relationships between CH and body length (BL) of major insects. (h) Relationships between CD and BL of major insects. (i) Relationships between chamber volume (CV) and BL of major insects. Note differences in scales of axes. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

Discussion

Various gall inducers engender a myriad of gall types across different caltrop plants, yet only a single type of leaf gall has been reported on Nitraria (Sugonjaev, Reference Sugonjaev1971; Yang, Reference Yang1990; Sugonjaev and Voinovich, Reference Sugonjaev and Voinovich2003). In the present study, we delineated the occurrence period of the swollen galls on N. sibirica for the first time. Some of the collected galls from previous years might have been in diapause, resulting in non-eclosion, which complicates the determination of the current generation of galls solely based on their appearance. It is noteworthy that the inhabitants in overwintering galls could emerge in the current year, indicating that overwintering diapause was broken and that the insects can resume normal development under favorable environmental conditions (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Chen, He, Xia and Xue2013, Reference Chen, Feng, Li, Niu, Qiu and Qiang2015). In addition, anthropogenic interference and overgrazing at S1 have significantly diminished the populations of swollen galls and gall inhabitants compared to S2, a nature reserve with limited logging.

Although Contarinia nitensis and C. nitrariae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) have been documented on N. sibirica in Kazakhstan, and T. nitrariae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on Nitraria schoberi, none were considered as gall inducers (Gagné and Jaschhof, Reference Gagné and Jaschhof2021). In China, this study represents the first documentation of gall midge Contarinia sp. as a major gall inducer for swollen galls, specifically attacking the indigenous species N. sibirica. Only three species of this genus have been collected on caltrop plants (Gagné and Jaschhof, Reference Gagné and Jaschhof2021). Another gall inducer, P. gobiensis, from the subfamily Mongolocampinae, was previously reported as a parasitoid of N. sibirica (Sugonjaev, Reference Sugonjaev1971), but our findings suggest it to be an inquiline species, not a parasitoid. Furthermore, this study is also the first to report the male specimen of P. gobiensis, which will be described in detail in a subsequent paper.

This study indicated that the gall inducers Contarinia sp. exhibit monogeny – an unusual reproductive characteristic prevalent among gall midges, whereby female Contarinia sp. principally generated unisex galls on N. sibirica. Similar observations have been reported in several species of gall midges within the genera Dasineura (Murchie and Hume, Reference Murchie and Hume2003), Asphondylia (Park and Thompson, Reference Park and Thompson2018), Izeniola (Dorchin and Freidberg, Reference Dorchin and Freidberg2004), and Aphidoletes (Tabadkani et al., Reference Tabadkani, Khansefid and Ashouri2011), which produce predominantly male or female offspring, with only a sporadic mixed brood. We discovered a few mixed galls, significantly outnumbered by unisexual ones, among the swollen galls, potentially resulting from multiple female gall midges ovipositing on a single shoot to share the same gall due to nutritional limitations in arid areas. However, the sex-determination mechanism in gall midges remains unclear, and the monogenous Contarinia sp. pedigrees need to be further studied.

Interestingly, we observed two species of gall inducers, Contarinia sp. and P. gobiensis, coexisting sympatrically with the same gall on N. sibirica. This finding is unusual as gall inducers inhabiting the same host plant typically exploit different ecological niches or make different types of galls (Sardon-Gutierrez et al., Reference Sardon-Gutierrez, Gil-Tapetado, Gomez and Nieves-Aldrey2021). Considering the numerical superiority and the extent of damage inflicted by these species, Contarinia sp. was the dominant gall inducer of the swollen galls, while P. gobiensis was likely an inquiline species.

Cheiloneurus elegans has been recorded in association with several species of scale insects in Europe and was perceived as a hyperparasitoid of Mayetiola destructor Say, which is parasitized by Platygaster zosinae Walker in the USA (Gahan, Reference Gahan1933). However, our study demonstrated that C. elegans, similar to Platygaster sp., was the primary parasitoid of Contarinia sp. It was also observed that the emergence time of an unreported parasitoid, Eurytomidae sp., coincided with that of P. gobiensis, although we detected no evidence of parasitism. Consequently, investigations are warranted to elucidate these observations.

Parasitization indexes have been extensively utilized to evaluate the parasitic efficacy of egg parasitoids (Virla et al., Reference Virla, Van Nieuwenhove, Palottini, Triapitsyn and Logarzo2019; Moraglio et al., Reference Moraglio, Tortorici, Pansa, Castelli, Pontini, Scovero, Visentin and Tavella2020; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021). In the present study, we adapted these indexes to evaluate the overall efficiency of parasitoids from swollen galls – a methodology yet to be reported in the literature. In most cases, the exploitation efficiency (EE) exceeded the discovery efficiency (DE). In general, the EE rarely achieved 100% due to the scarcity of parasitized gall midges reared from galls with multiple gall inducers. Moreover, the swollen galls collected in 2019 at S1 and in 2020 at S2 exhibited a lower EE, likely due to the abundant occurrence of both the gall inducers and galls during these periods. Some galls contained only non-parasitized gall midges, whereas others harbored both parasitoid(s) and gall midges.

The RI, which measures the frequency of parasitoids recorded from galls (Virla et al., Reference Virla, Van Nieuwenhove, Palottini, Triapitsyn and Logarzo2019; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021), was used to determine the dominant parasitoid species in the different galls. Platygaster sp. and C. elegans were the dominant parasitoids of the swollen galls at S1 and S2, respectively. However, dissecting the swollen galls showed that it was difficult for the gall midges to develop from young larvae into adults under laboratory conditions. Furthermore, determining whether young larvae have been parasitized based only on their external appearance is difficult, potentially leading to an underestimation of the actual parasitic rate in the wild. The parasitization indexes of the three species of parasitoids remained consistent in both 2019 and 2020. In addition, for S1, the indexes of Platygaster sp. were significantly lower than those of C. elegans in both 2019 and 2020, whereas in 2021, they demonstrated an opposite trend. This could be attributed to a shorter survey period and fewer swollen galls in 2021 compared to 2019 and 2020. An increased parasitism rate of Platygaster sp. may also account for these results.

Temperature stands as a significant environmental factor influencing the life activities of insects (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Lao, Li, Yang, Mo and Dan2018; Gopko et al., Reference Gopko, Mironova, Pasternak, Mikheev and Taskinen2020). The present study demonstrated that the lifespan of gall inducers and parasitoids fluctuate in response to escalating temperature. Specifically, when temperatures ranged from 20 to 38°C, the lifespan of these insects showed a steady decline. This was consistent with the composition of the Psyllaephagus parasitoid complex that was reported in the flower-like galls of Haloxylon spp. and other similar wasps that parasitize gall inducers (Picciau et al., Reference Picciau, Ferracini and Alma2017; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Jiang, Guo, Zhang and Hu2021). However, it is important to conduct further evaluations to understand the impact of multiple factors on the biological characteristics (life cycle, sex ratio, and longevity) of the gall midges and dominant wasps documented in this study (Quacchia et al., Reference Quacchia, Moriya, Bosio, Scapin and Alma2008; Dang Hoa et al., Reference Dang Hoa, Khac, Ueno and Takagi2012; Bari et al., Reference Bari, Jahan and Islam2015).

The galls provide shelter for the gall inducers and make it more difficult for parasitic natural enemies to parasitize the hosts (Stone and Schonrogge, Reference Stone and Schonrogge2003). The galls represent a changing resource for the natural enemies. As the gall develops, the community of parasitoids that can exploit the gall also changes. Generally, small species with short ovipositors attack their host at an early stage of development, whereas larger species with long ovipositors attack at a later stage (Craig et al., Reference Craig, Itami and Price1990; Stone et al., Reference Stone, Schonrogge, Atkinson, Bellido and Pujade-Villar2002; Laszlo and Tothmeresz, Reference Laszlo and Tothmeresz2013). In the present study, the gall midges laid eggs on the surface rather than in the young branches of N. sibirica. Thus, the egg parasitoid Platygaster sp., which has a shorter ovipositor, could successfully parasitize the gall midges. In contrast, when the larvae of the gall midges induced the swollen galls of N. sibirica, they developed inside the galls. Then, only the larval parasitoids with longer ovipositors, i.e. C. elegans and E. gelechiphagus, could successfully lay eggs on or inside the larvae of the hosts. Moreover, considering the location of the gall inducers in the swollen galls and the ovipositor length of the parasitoids, we noted that larvae of the gall midges parasitized by Platygaster sp. were primarily found in the inner center of the galls. Conversely, those parasitized by C. elegans and E. gelechiphagus were predominantly located near the epidermis, facilitated by their ability to pierce through the bracts of the galls more readily. Nonetheless, the relationship between successful parasitism, the parasitoid's ovipositor length, and the size of swollen galls on N. sibirica remains unclear, warranting further investigation in future studies.

Ecological studies about the relationships between plant traits and the fitness of galling insects have assumed that the fitness of the gall inhabitants was directly related to gall size; however, fitness did not necessarily increase as the gall size increased (Honěk, Reference Honěk1993; McKinnon et al., Reference McKinnon, Quiring and Bauce1999; Freeman and Geoghgen, Reference Freeman and Geoghgen2010). The number of chambers in the swollen galls on N. sibirica showed an asymmetric distribution that was bell-shaped with extended tails with predominantly smaller galls (the number of gall chambers ranged from two to four), and the gall size increased as the number of gall chambers increased. Previous studies have focused on other species, such as Thecodiplosis japonensis, Dryocosmus kuriphilus, and Diplolepis rosae, which showed similar gall size and gall chamber distributions (Bailey and Whitham, Reference Bailey and Whitham2003; Laszlo and Tothmeresz, Reference Laszlo and Tothmeresz2008; Mao et al., Reference Mao, Wu, Ren, Chen and Luo2017). Thus, there is an optimal gall chamber number that corresponds to the maximum fitness for some insects.

For many insect species, empirical evidence has suggested that the gall size is positively related to the number of gall inhabitants within the galls but negatively related to the chamber density (Honěk, Reference Honěk1993; Freeman and Geoghgen, Reference Freeman and Geoghgen2010). Consistently, our results showed that the size of the swollen gall on N. sibirica was positively associated with the number of gall chambers or emerging insects, and inversely related to the chamber density of the swollen galls. Comparable findings have been reported for different types of galls (Ozaki, Reference Ozaki1993; McKinnon et al., Reference McKinnon, Quiring and Bauce1999; Sopow and Quiring, Reference Sopow and Quiring2001). For a solitary gall, the body size of the gall inhabitants escalates with increasing gall size and decreases with increasing chamber density (Sopow and Quiring, Reference Sopow and Quiring2001). Nevertheless, no evident linear correlation was observed between the gall chamber number and body length for all species. However, a weak linear correlation was observed between chamber density and body length for Contarinia sp. Contrary to previous reports, our results showed a negative correlation between the chamber volume and body length for both C. elegans and Contarinia sp. The unidentified thickness of both the inner and outer walls and the irregular distribution of the swollen gall chambers may explain this phenomenon. Thus, more morphometric parameters (thickness of both the inner walls and out walls of the galls, ovipositor length of the parasitoids, and chamber volume) and their relationships need to be evaluated.

Conclusions

Our results provide important insights into the ecological interactions and complex nutritional relationships among swollen galls, gall inducer groups, and their parasitoids. Additionally, the importance of exploring the gall formation, species composition of gall inhabitants, abundance of natural enemies, and morphometric relationships for N. sibirica is highlighted. However, the process of gall formation is complicated and remains to be fully understood, especially for the swollen galls on N. sibirica with multiple chambers. Future studies should demonstrate which hypothesis was directly supported by the formation of the swollen galls. Nevertheless, this study improves our understanding of the biology and ecology of Contarinia sp. on N. sibirica and its parasitoids and may pave the way for the future development of management strategies for gall inducers.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000342

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to S. V. Triapitsyn, who is an expert taxonomist on several families of Chalcidoidea and works in the Entomology Research Museum, University of California, Riverside, California, USA (UCRC) for the identification of the Encyrtidae species.

Financial support

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31672338, Tianshan Talent Project of the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, grant number 10020000220, and the Doctoral Innovation Project of Xinjiang University, grant number XJUBSCX-2017018.

References

Abrahamson, WG, Armbruster, PO and Maddox, GD (1983) Numerical relationships of the Solidago altissima stem gall insect-parasitoid guild food chain. Oecologia 58, 351357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguirrebengoa, M, Wong, ME, Boyero, JR and Quinto, J (2022) Host gall size and temperature influence voltinism in an exotic parasitoid. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avtzis, DN, Melika, G, Matošević, D and Coyle, DR (2018) The Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus: a global invader and a successful case of classical biological control. Journal of Pest Science 92, 107115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, JK and Whitham, TG (2003) Interactions among elk, aspen, galling sawflies and insectivorous birds. Oikos 101, 127134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannerman, JA, Shorthouse, JD, Pither, J and Lalonde, RG (2012) Variability in the parasitoid community associated with galls of Diplolepis variabilis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae): a test of the distance decay hypothesis. Canadian Entomologist 144, 635644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bari, MN, Jahan, M and Islam, KS (2015) Effects of temperature on the life table parameters of Trichogramma zahiri (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid of Dicladispa armigera (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Environmental Entomology 44, 368378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhandari, BP and Cheng, ZQ (2016) Trunk injection of systemic insecticides to control stem and leaf gall wasps, Josephiella species (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae), on Chinese banyan (Rosales: Moraceae) in Hawaii. Florida Entomologist 99, 172177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhede, BV, Bhosle, BB, Shinde, ST and Sharma, OP (2014) Ecofriendly integrated pest management in pigeonpea. Journal of Entomological Research 38, 259263.Google Scholar
Chauhan, S, Singh, N and Chauhan, SVS (2020) Morphological studies of insect-induced galls in flower and fruit of Alstonia scholaris (L.) R. Br. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy Part B Biological Sciences 90, 705712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, YS, Chen, C, He, HM, Xia, Q-W and Xue, FS (2013) Geographic variation in diapause induction and termination of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 59, 855862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, P, Feng, H, Li, G, Niu, Y, Qiu, F and Qiang, X (2015) Impacts of temperature and photophase on diapause termination of Adelphocoris suturalis. Plant Protection 41, 143145.Google Scholar
Compton, SG, Chen, XY, Chen, Y, Hatcher, MJ, Peng, YQ, Quinnell, RJ, Rodriguez, LJ, Yu, H, Ouyang, A, Wei, FL, Cai, ZT and Wang, R (2018) Host-parasitoid relationships within figs of an invasive fig tree: a fig wasp community structured by gall size. Insect Conservation and Diversity 11, 341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, WR and Rieske, LK (2010) Gall structure affects ecological associations of Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Environmental Entomology 39, 787797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costi, E, Haye, T and Maistrello, L (2019) Surveying native egg parasitoids and predators of the invasive Halyomorpha halys in Northern Italy. Journal of Applied Entomology 143, 299307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, TP, Itami, JK and Price, PW (1990) The window of vulnerability of a shoot-galling sawfly to attack by a parasitoid. Ecology 71, 14711482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang Hoa, T, Khac, P, Ueno, T and Takagi, M (2012) Effects of temperature and host on the immature development of the parasitoid Neochrysocharis okazakii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University 57, 133137.Google Scholar
Daniel, C and Grunder, J (2012) Integrated management of European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi (L.): situation in Switzerland and Europe. Insects 3, 956988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danzig, EM (1999) A new species of gall-forming armored scale insect from Israel (Homoptera, Coccinea: Diaspididae). Zoosystematica Rossica 1999, 287289.Google Scholar
Dhawan, AK, Singh, S and Kumar, S (2009) Integrated pest management (IPM) helps reduce pesticide load in cotton. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 11, 599611.Google Scholar
Diamond, SE, Blair, CP and Abrahamson, WG (2008) Testing the nutrition hypothesis for the adaptive nature of insect galls: does a non-adapted herbivore perform better in galls? Ecological Entomology 33, 385393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorchin, N and Freidberg, A (2004) Sex ratio in relation to season and host plant quality in a monogenous stem-galling midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Ecological Entomology 29, 677684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espirito-Santo, MM and Fernandes, GW (2007) How many species of gall-inducing insects are there on earth, and where are they? Annals of the Entomological Society of America 100, 9599.Google Scholar
Fernandes, GW, Price, PW, Santos, DDV and Negreiros, D (2022) I Irrigation and fertilization of Chrysothamnus nauseosus (Asteraceae) affect the attack and gall growth of Rhopalomyia chrysothamni (Cecidomyiidae). European Journal of Ecology 8, 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferracini, C, Ferrari, E, Pontini, M, Saladini, MA and Alma, A (2019) Effectiveness of Torymus sinensis: a successful long-term control of the Asian chestnut gall wasp in Italy. Journal of Pest Science 92, 353359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, BE and Geoghgen, A (2010) Size and fecundity in the Jamaican gall-midge Asphondylia boerhaaviae. Ecological Entomology 12, 239249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, RJ and Jaschhof, M (2021) A catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the world. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Washington 25, 1408.Google Scholar
Gahan, AB (1933) The serphoid and chalcidoid parasites of the hessian fly. United States Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publications 174, 125.Google Scholar
Gil-Tapetado, D, Cabrero-Sanudo, FJ, Gomez, JF, Askew, RR and Nieves-Aldrey, JL (2021) Differences in native and introduced chalcid parasitoid communities recruited by the invasive chestnut pest Dryocosmus kuriphilus in two Iberian territories. Bulletin of Entomological Research 111, 307322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopko, M, Mironova, E, Pasternak, A, Mikheev, V and Taskinen, J (2020) Parasite transmission in aquatic ecosystems under temperature change: effects of host activity and elimination of parasite larvae by filter-feeders. Oikos 129, 15311540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, D, Yang, Y, Bakri, M, Chen, Q and Aisa, HA (2018) Biological activity and LC-MS profiling of ethyl acetate extracts from Nitraria sibirica (Pall.) fruits. Natural Product Research 32, 20542057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haeussling, BJM, Lienenlueke, J and Stoekl, J (2021) The preference of Trichopria drosophilae for pupae of Drosophila suzukii is independent of host size. Scientific Reports 11, 110.Google Scholar
Harush, A, Quinn, E, Trostanetsky, A, Rapaport, A, Kostyukovsky, M and Gottlieb, D (2021) Integrated pest management for stored grain: potential natural biological control by a parasitoid wasp community. Insects 12, 1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez-Lopez, M, Hernandez-Ortiz, V, Castillo-Campos, G and Fernandes, GW (2021) Size matters: larger galls produced by Eutreta xanthochaeta (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Lippia myriocephala (Verbenaceae) predict lower rates of parasitic wasps. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 15, 615625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honěk, A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66, 483492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, N, Guo, J, Jiang, LL, Zhang, DK, Zhao, Q and Hu, HY (2022) Biology, parasitoid complex and potential distribution of saxaul's dominant defoliators, Teia dubia (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 112, 162170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolesik, P and Gagné, RJ (2020) A review of the gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) ofIndonesia: taxonomy, biology and adult key to genera. Zootaxa 4847, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravchenko, VD, Hausmann, A and Miller, GC (2006) Deserticolous Noctuidae from Israel: new host-plant records and description of larval habitats (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 96, 2740.Google Scholar
Laszlo, Z and Tothmeresz, B (2008) Optimal clutch size of the gall wasp Diplolepis rosae (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Entomologica Fennica 19, 168175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laszlo, Z and Tothmeresz, B (2013) The enemy hypothesis: correlates of gall morphology with parasitoid attack rates in two closely related rose cynipid galls. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103, 326335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laszlo, Z, Solyom, K, Prazsmari, H, Barta, Z and Tothmeresz, B (2014) Predation on rose galls: parasitoids and predators determine gall size through directional selection. PLoS ONE 9, e99806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, F and Liu, Y (1993) The psyllid (homoptera: psylloidea) of the Ningxia China: an annotated checklist. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica 2, 612.Google Scholar
Li, H, Tang, X, Yang, X and Zhang, H (2017) De novo transcriptome characterization, gene expression profiling and ionic responses of Nitraria sibirica Pall. under salt stress. Forests 8, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H, Yang, X, Tang, X and Zhang, H (2020) Metabolomics analysis of Nitraria sibirica roots under salt stress. Plant Physiology Journal 56, 16171626.Google Scholar
Mao, JP, Wu, HW, Ren, LL, Chen, RM and Luo, YQ (2017) Reports on the discovery and preliminary studies of the invasive species Thecodiplosis japonensis (Uchida & Inouye) in Huangdao area of Shandong province. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology 54, 915923.Google Scholar
Martini, VC, Raymundo, D, Prado-Junior, J and Oliveira, DC (2021) Bottom-up and top-down forces in plant-gall relationships: testing the hypotheses of resource concentration, associational resistance, and host fitness reduction. Ecological Entomology 46, 10721081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masry, SHD and El-Wakeil, N (2020) Egg parasitoid production and their role in controlling insect pests. In El-Wakeil, N, Saleh, M and Abu-Hashim, M (eds), Cottage Industry of Biocontrol Agents and Their Applications. Cham: Springer, pp. 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, ML, Quiring, DT and Bauce, E (1999) Influence of tree growth rate, shoot size and foliar chemistry on the abundance and performance of a galling adelgid. Functional Ecology 13, 859867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michell, CT and Nyman, T (2021) Microbiomes of willow-galling sawflies: effects of host plant, gall type, and phylogeny on community structure and function. Genome 64, 615626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, DG III and Raman, A (2019) Host-plant relations of gall-inducing insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraglio, ST, Tortorici, F, Pansa, MG, Castelli, G, Pontini, M, Scovero, S, Visentin, S and Tavella, L (2020) A 3-year survey on parasitism of Halyomorpha halys by egg parasitoids in northern Italy. Journal of Pest Science 93, 183194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, JG (2003) Ecological and evolutionary diversification of the seed beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) (Ph.D. diss). Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Murchie, AK and Hume, KD (2003) Evidence for monogeny in the brassica pod midge Dasineura brassicae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107, 237241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozaki, K (1993) Effects of gall volume on survival and fecundity of gall-making aphids Adelges japonicus (Homoptera: Adelgidae). Researches on Population Ecology 35, 273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozaki, K (2000) Insect-plant interactions among gall size determinants of adelgids. Ecological Entomology 25, 452459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, I and Thompson, DC (2018) Unisexual broods of Asphondylia species in new floral bud galls on mesquite in New Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist 43, 585589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passos, LC, Soares, MA, Collares, LJ, Malagoli, I, Desneux, N and Carvalho, GA (2018) Lethal, sublethal and transgenerational effects of insecticides on Macrolophus basicornis, predator of Tuta absoluta. Entomologia Generalis 38, 127143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciau, L, Ferracini, C and Alma, A (2017) Reproductive traits in Torymus sinensis, biocontrol agent of the Asian chestnut gall wasp: implications for biological control success. Bulletin of Insectology 70, 4955.Google Scholar
Price, PW, Fernandes, GW and Waring, GL (1987) Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environmental Entomology 16, 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quacchia, A, Moriya, S, Bosio, G, Scapin, I and Alma, A (2008) Rearing, release and settlement prospect in Italy of Torymus sinensis, the biological control agent of the chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus. BioControl 53, 829839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quacchia, A, Ferracini, C, Nicholls, JA, Piazza, E, Saladini, MA, Tota, F, Melika, G and Alma, A (2013) Chalcid parasitoid community associated with the invading pest Dryocosmus kuriphilus in north-western Italy. Insect Conservation and Diversity 6, 114123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, LF, Solar, RRC, Santos, HT and Fagundes, M (2019) Variation in community structure of gall-inducing insects associated with a tropical plant supports the hypothesis of competition in stressful habitats. Ecology and Evolution 9, 1391913930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ren, S and Lv, G (2020) Comparative study on anatomical structure of different Nitraria sibirica Pall. leaves in different habitats. Chinese Wild Plant Resources 39, 15.Google Scholar
Riaz, S, Johnson, JB, Ahmad, M, Fitt, GP and Naiker, M (2021) A review on biological interactions and management of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 145, 467498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardon-Gutierrez, S, Gil-Tapetado, D, Gomez, JF and Nieves-Aldrey, JL (2021) Ecological niche modelling of species of the rose gall wasp Diplolepis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) on the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Entomology 118, 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevarika, M, Rossi Stacconi, MV and Romani, R (2021) Fine morphology of antennal and ovipositor sensory structures of the gall chestnut wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphilus. Insects 12, 231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, SS and Yadav, SK (2007) Efficacy of some new insecticides against mango shoot gall psylla. Indian Journal of Horticulture 64, 359361.Google Scholar
Soares, MA, Campos, MR, Passos, LC, Carvalho, GA, Haro, MM, Lavoir, AV, Biondi, A, Zappala, L and Desneux, N (2019) Botanical insecticide and natural enemies: a potential combination for pest management against Tuta absoluta. Journal of Pest Science 92, 14331443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sopow, SL and Quiring, DT (2001) Is gall size a good indicator of adelgid fitness? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99, 267271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, GN and Schonrogge, K (2003) The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 512522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, GN, Schonrogge, K, Atkinson, RJ, Bellido, D and Pujade-Villar, J (2002) The population biology of oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Annual Review of Entomology 47, 633668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugonjaev, ES (1971) A new subfamily of chalcids, Mongolocampinae Sugonyayev, subfam. n. (Chalcidoidea, Tetracampidae) from Mongolia and Kazakhstan. Entomological Review 50, 377383.Google Scholar
Sugonjaev, ES (1974) Description of a new species in subfam. Mongolocampinae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Tetracampidae) from Mongolia with a key to genera and species. Nasekomye Mongol 4, 297303.Google Scholar
Sugonjaev, ES and Voinovich, ND (2003) On the geographic distribution and host linkages of phytophagous chalcids of the subfamily Mongolocampinae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Tetracampidae) living on Nitraria spp. (Nitrariaceae), with descriptions of their immature stages. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 82, 310320.Google Scholar
Tabadkani, SM, Khansefid, M and Ashouri, A (2011) Monogeny, a neglected mechanism of inbreeding avoidance in small populations of gall midges. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 140, 7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooker, JF and Giron, D (2020) The evolution of endophagy in herbivorous insects. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 581816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunca, H, Venard, M, Colombel, E-A, Capelli, M and Tabone, E (2019) Life history traits of Ooencyrtus pityocampae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) reared on Halyomorpha halys eggs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Entomologia Generalis 39, 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turghun, C, Bakri, M, Abdulla, R, Ma, Q and Aisa, HA (2020) Comprehensive characterisation of phenolics from Nitraria sibirica leaf extracts by UHPLC-quadrupole-orbitrap-MS and evaluation of their anti-hypertensive activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 261, 113019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uechi, N, Tokuda, M, Yukawa, J, Kawamura, F, Teramoto, KK and Harris, KM (2003) Confirmation by DNA analysis that Contarinia maculipennis (Diptera : Cecidomyiidae) is a polyphagous pest of orchids and other unrelated cultivated plants. Bulletin of Entomological Research 93, 545551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virla, EG, Van Nieuwenhove, GA, Palottini, F, Triapitsyn, SV and Logarzo, GA (2019) Spatial and seasonal distribution of egg parasitoids of the sharpshooter Tapajosa rubromarginata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Proconiini) on feral Johnson grass and commercial citrus host in Argentina. Biological Control 132, 8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voronkova, M, Banaev, E, Tomoshevich, M and Lama, TAK (2020) Possibilities of using the HPLC method in the taxonomy of the genus Nitraria (Nitrariaceae). In E. V. Banaev, M. A. Tomoshevich, & Y. G. Zaytseva (Eds.), International Conferences Plant Diversity: Status, Trends, Conservation Concept 2020. Vol. 24.Google Scholar
Wang, GY, Wang, YP and Wu, H (2010) Gall and gall-former insects. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology 47, 419424.Google Scholar
Wang, JL, Lao, GF, Li, YW, Yang, M, Mo, ZQ and Dan, XM (2018) Effects of temperature and host species on the life cycle of Cryptocaryon irritans. Aquaculture 485, 4952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, ZZ, Liu, YQ, Shi, M, Huang, JH and Chen, XX (2019) Parasitoid wasps as effective biological control agents. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18, 705715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, AE (1993) Host gall size predicts host quality for the parasitoid Eurytoma gigantea (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), but can the parasitoid tell? Journal of Insect Behavior 6, 591602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, ZQ (1990) The discovery of Tetracampidae (Hymenoptera) from China with description of a new species. Entomotaxonomia 2, 145150.Google Scholar
Yara, K, Sasawaki, T and Kunimi, Y (2010) Hybridization between introduced Torymus sinensis (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) and indigenous T-beneficus (late-spring strain), parasitoids of the Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Biological Control 54, 1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Q, Jiang, LL, Guo, J, Zhang, DK and Hu, HY (2021) Differences in gall induction of flower-like galls on Haloxylon by psyllids (Hemiptera: Aphalaridae), and the emergence of corresponding parasitoids. Insects 12, 861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Survey sites of Nitraria sibirica in Xinjiang in 2018–2021

Figure 1

Figure 1. Phenological fitting based on the dynamic changes in the growth period of the swollen galls, Contarinia sp., and Platygaster sp. on Nitraria sibirica. The early period is labelled with light green, and the growth period is labelled with light white. The mature period is labelled with white lignification, and the emergence period is labelled with off-white.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Number of specimens of the gall inducers and their parasitoids in the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica in 2018–2021, with the GenBank accession numbers for the deposited sequences that were generated from this study. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Emergence periods of the gall inducers and their parasitoids from the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica in 2018–2021. The emergence of the individuals from the swollen galls was investigated daily under laboratory conditions at sites 1 and 2. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Parasitization indexes and relative importance of the parasitoid species that were recorded from the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica. RI > 10, very frequent; 9.99 ≥ RI ≥ 1.0, frequent; 1.0 ≥ RI ≥ 0.09, scarce or occasional species; RI < 0.09, rare.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Survival curves of the gall inducers and their parasitoids from the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica at four different temperatures, 20, 26, 32, and 38°C. The 95% confidence intervals are represented by shades of different colors. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Frequency of the number of gall chambers (a), the parasitism rate corresponding to the different numbers of gall chambers (b) in the swollen galls on Nitraria sibirica, and the frequency of the insect composition types in the different chambers (c) at S1 and S2 in 2019–2021. The color of the year corresponds to the color of the curve in (a). A–C indicate 16 insect composition types recorded in swollen galls on N. sibirica. A: only parasitoids in the galls, A1: Platygaster sp., A2: Cheiloneurus elegans, A3: Eupelmus gelechiphagus, A4: Platygaster sp. and C. elegans; B: only gall inducers in the galls, B1: Contarinia sp., B2: P. gobiensis, B3: Contarinia sp. and Platyneurus gobiensis; C: both parasitoids and gall inducers in the galls, C1: Platygaster sp. and Contarinia sp., C2: C. elegans and Contarinia sp., C3: E. gelechiphagus and Contarinia sp., C4: Platygaster sp. and C. elegans and Contarinia sp., C5: E. gelechiphagus and C. elegans and Contarinia sp., C6: Platygaster sp. and P. gobiensis, C7: Platygaster sp. and C. elegans and P. gobiensis, C8: Platygaster sp. and Contarinia sp. and P. gobiensis, C9: C. elegans and Contarinia sp. and P. gobiensis.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Morphometric relationship between the galls and the major insects in the swollen galls of Nitraria sibirica at S1 and S2 in 2019–2021. (a) Relationships between chamber (CH) and gall volume (GV) at S1 and S2. (b) Relationships between GV and chamber density (CD) at S1 and S2. (c) Relationships between emerged insects (EN) and GV at S1 and S2. (d) Relationships between CH and GV in 2019–2021. (e) Relationships between GV and CD in 2019–2021. (f) Relationships between EN and GV in 2019–2021. (g) Relationships between CH and body length (BL) of major insects. (h) Relationships between CD and BL of major insects. (i) Relationships between chamber volume (CV) and BL of major insects. Note differences in scales of axes. Cs, Contarinia sp.; Pg, Platyneurus gobiensis; Ps, Platygaster sp.; Ce, Cheiloneurus elegans; Es, Eupelmus gelechiphagus.

Supplementary material: File

Zhao et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 398.4 KB