Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-30T08:36:22.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Empirically derived dietary-lifestyle patterns and cardiometabolic health in young men: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2020

Marta Lonnie*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn 10-718, Poland
Lidia Wadolowska
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn 10-718, Poland
*
*Corresponding author: M. Lonnie, email marta.lonnie@uwm.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sex and gender are important factors that impact cardiometabolic traits. Men have lower life expectancy and higher prevalence of fatal chronic conditions at younger age. Lifestyle risk profiles in young men have been rarely studied in the context of cardiometabolic health. This review aimed to summarise the evidence regarding the patterns of dietary-lifestyle behaviours in a population of young men (age <40years) and their associations with cardiometabolic health. Overall, unfavourable clusters of health behaviours are more prominent in men, when compared to women and more prevalent in younger adults, when compared to older age groups. Early signs of cardiometabolic health abnormalities have been reported among men with higher adherence to patterns which consistently shared poor dietary habits as a common denominator, combined with stimulant use, inadequate sleep or insufficient physical activity. In the majority of studies, dietary assessment was limited to the investigation of one or two behaviours, most frequently fruit and vegetable intake. Since young men may engage in a mixture of explicit behaviours, the examination of a singular dietary habit may not represent the overall diet quality. To conclude, the data regarding the synergistic effects of a broad spectrum of dietary and lifestyle behaviours in the context of cardiometabolic health remain scarce in this population. The inclusion of a broader range of dietary and lifestyle variables into the multicomponent pattern analysis might have a greater potential in explaining the association with cardiometabolic health. Defining behavioural clusters can help to develop interventions, tailored to the specific needs of the targeted group.

Type
Conference on ‘Malnutrition in an obese world: European perspectives’
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2020

Sex and gender are important factors that have an impact on cardiometabolic traits(Reference Chella Krishnan, Mehrabian and Lusis1). Men have a lower life expectancy as well as a higher prevalence of fatal chronic conditions and heart disease at a younger age, with premature mortality due to non-communicable diseases in men being identified as one of the leading public health challenges(2Reference White, McKee and de Sousa4). Health inequalities between men and women can be explained by sex-related biological differences, genetic predisposition and lifestyle factors(Reference Chella Krishnan, Mehrabian and Lusis1). Lifestyle risk profiles in young men, as modifiable factors, have been rarely studied in the context of cardiometabolic health. This is of particular concern since behaviours acquired in young adulthood may trigger pathophysiological processes with immediate or delayed health consequences(Reference Mikkilä, Räsänen and Raitakari5,Reference Gooding, Shay and Ning6) .

A few particularly concerning health issues that affect more often young men than women include hypertension, heart and circulatory diseases, particularly acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death(Reference Zhang and Moran7Reference Eckart, Shry and Burke11). In the American cohort of young adults (age 18–39 years), men had a substantially higher prevalence of prehypertension compared to young adult women (34 v. 13 %), and at the same time significantly lower awareness, treatment and control (68 v. 86 %; 44 v. 61 % and 34 v. 52 %, men v. women, respectively)(Reference Zhang and Moran7). Although the authors speculated that this could be explained by less frequent medical check-ups among men, the sex-related inequalities in the incidence of CVD are not limited to behavioural factors. The intrinsic biological, hormonal and genetic factors are also studied. The vascular ageing (endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness) begins earlier in life in men than in women, which eventually evens out in the sixth decade of life(Reference Merz and Cheng12). This delay in the onset of CVD in women can be partially explained by the protective effect of higher oestrogen levels prior to the menopause(Reference Merz and Cheng12). Moreover, it has been suggested that higher predisposition to coronary artery disease in young men is associated with the paternal lineage of their Y chromosome, which increases the risk in this population segment(Reference Charchar, Bloomer and Barnes13). Interestingly, the research group found that men who inherited one of the most common Y chromosome types in Europe (haplogroup I) from their male ancestors had a 50 % higher risk of coronary artery disease than do men with other types of the Y chromosome(Reference Charchar, Bloomer and Barnes13). Further health disparities in this group are observed within Europe. The prevalence of premature mortality is higher in men from eastern European countries, than in the Western countries(Reference McKee and Shkolnikov14). In Poland, all-cause mortality is five times higher in men than women under 45 years old(15). Although a large proportion of these deaths is due to external causes (38 %), the deaths due to CVD in this age group are 3⋅5 times higher in Polish men than women of the same age(15).

According to the recent epidemiological data, a new epidemic of CVD is forecasted in the young adult population segment as they grow older(Reference Andersson and Vasan16). The authors analysed the trends in the incidence of CVD in developed countries and observed a decreasing trend in adults >50 years old. In contrast, within the same period of time, this trend in younger adults has either been steady or increasing, depending on the country(Reference Andersson and Vasan16). Due to the increasing prevalence of unhealthy risk behaviours among young individuals, it can be expected that the future generation of adults >50 years old will enter the sixth decade of life with a worse cardiovascular risk profile than the present population of mature adults.

It is unclear to what extent lifestyle factors can counterbalance the physiological and genetic predisposition to the diseases; however, it can be expected that morbidity and premature mortality could be reduced with appropriate lifestyle changes in this age group. In general, risky health behaviours are more prevalent in men, than women. Olson et al.(Reference Olson, Hummer and Harris17) investigated health behaviours in an American cohort aged 24–32 years and discovered that men exceeded women in all investigated outcomes, such as binge drinking, smoking, drug use, avoiding medical check-ups and fast-food consumption. The only exception was physical activity; the higher percentage of men was active in comparison to women(Reference Olson, Hummer and Harris17). Although it has been well established that men are more likely to engage in unhealthy behaviours than women(Reference Rabel, Laxy and Thorand18Reference Ha, Choi and Lee20), there is a gap in the understanding of which particular dietary behaviours tend to cluster with other lifestyle behaviours. Only a few studies reported clusters of dietary and lifestyle behaviours specific to the population of young men(Reference Noble, Paul and Turon21), despite strong recommendations to analyse behavioural patterns using age and gender stratification(Reference Northstone22). Defining behavioural clusters in this group could help to develop targeted interventions.

There are many approaches to defining early adulthood. For the purpose of the present paper, we will follow Levinson(Reference Levinson23) who suggested that early adulthood begins around age 22 years and ends at 40 years. The prelude to this stage of life is described as an early adult transition, which begins at age 17 years (Reference Levinson23). Both of these early periods of life encompass great levels of stress associated with the changing of societal roles of a young man, e.g. becoming a student, an employee, a husband, a parent(Reference Levinson23,Reference Mize24) . It is also time when the cardiovascular system is functioning at maximum capacity and when most of the biological peaks occur, such as muscle strength or bone mass(Reference Fleg and Strait25Reference Lu, Shin and Yen27). Hence, it is crucial to ensure that during this time, the body will benefit from optimal nutrition and health-promoting lifestyle behaviours, which would enable the build-up of the ‘health bank’ for the consequent decades of life, as well as support the mental health to alleviate the effects of stress.

This review aimed to summarise the evidence from cross-sectional studies regarding the patterns of dietary-lifestyle behaviours in the young male population and their potential associations with cardiometabolic health. The studies discussed in this review focused on empirically derived patterns, clustering a dietary component with at least one of the following health behaviours: smoking, alcohol use or physical activity.

Approaches to studying behavioural clusters

Health behaviours have been defined as overt behavioural patterns, actions and habits that relate to health maintenance, to health restoration and to health improvement(Reference Gochman28). In the literature, these are usually considered in a broad or narrow context. Behaviours sensu largo include a whole spectrum, including diet, physical activity, substance use, sexual activity, environmental hazard avoidance, preventive health and safety practices, e.g. seatbelt use(Reference Harris and Guten29). Health behaviours sensu stricto are usually limited to behaviours often abbreviated as SNAP: smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity(30) also known as the big four(3).

Two methodological approaches in studying the clustering of health behaviours can be considered: a priori and a posteriori. The first approach is hypothesis-driven. Based on the previous knowledge, the predefined dietary and lifestyle risk factors are selected and its cumulative effect on health is investigated. The results of studies which applied this approach were the keystone in public health research, documenting the detrimental effects of the main four modifiable lifestyle behaviours on health(31). As can be predicted, the cumulative effect of all four behaviours (SNAP) generates the highest health risk(Reference Khaw, Wareham and Bingham32). However, it has not been clearly specified which components of these behaviours in particular would create the clusters (patterns) of the highest or lowest risk to health.

To answer this research question, the a posterori approach needs to be applied. This means that the patterns of behaviours are derived with the use of multidimensional statistical techniques based on the available data, rather than the researcher's hypothesis(Reference Armitage, Berry and Matthews33,Reference Wirfält, Drake and Wallström34) . Most commonly applied techniques include factor analysis, latent class or principal component analysis. Next, the associations are being investigated between the derived clusters (commonly named patterns, e.g. dietary patterns or dietary-lifestyle patterns) and health outcomes using modelling, e.g. regression analysis or survival analysis(Reference Wadolowska, Hamulka and Kowalkowska35). The exploratory nature of this technique means that initially the components (sets of variables) are not known to the researcher and no assumptions can bias the results. This approach helps to obtain objective, often unexpected results which could not be predicted and investigated with the use of an a priori approach. This approach received a great deal of interest in the past decade, documenting the specific dietary patterns in various subpopulations(Reference Kant36,37) . However, the evidence regarding the clusters of combined dietary and lifestyle behaviours remains scarce, particularly in young men. In this study, we will focus on the published research, which applied the a posteriori approach, often referred to as the empirical method.

Clustering of dietary-lifestyle behaviours in young men

A recent review pooled data from fifty-six studies in adults (both men and women)(Reference Noble, Paul and Turon21). The authors found that being a male, with lower socioeconomic status and younger age is associated with adherence to riskier clusters. Often, those risky clusters had a common denominator: alcohol use and smoking. The authors also highlighted that diet was less often included in the reviewed studies in comparison to alcohol use and smoking. Moreover, the dietary component was often limited to one or two variables, e.g. the frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption or breakfast skipping. Interestingly, the associations with physical activity were unclear. In general, poor diet tends to cluster with substance use (alcohol, tobacco and/or drug use). Clusters differed depending on the sample (e.g. general population v. students), country and analytical methods used(Reference Noble, Paul and Turon21).

The reasons behind the clustering can be broken down into three segments: cognitive, social and biological(Reference Patterson, Haines and Popkin38). The cognitive reasons are linked to the theory of reasoned action and determinants such as intentions, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, perceived susceptibility and perceived severity(Reference Conner, Norman, Conner and Norman39). It has been previously documented that men display a lower level of nutritional knowledge than women(Reference Whitcombe, Nethery and Bergman40). Furthermore, in men, nutritional knowledge is not a direct predictor of healthy eating attitudes(Reference Brown, McIlveen and Strugnell41,Reference O'Brien and Davies42) . This would explain why some behaviours in men remain inconsistent, for example, as mentioned earlier, there is no clear association between physical activity and diet or substance use; men can have unhealthy dietary habits and at the same time be highly active(Reference Noble, Paul and Turon21). Gubbels et al.(Reference Gubbels, Kremers and Stafleu43) identified a cluster in boys labelled as Sports-Computer, which was characterised by health-promoting dietary behaviours, sedentary time and using a computer as well as being physically active. Although the authors studied behaviours in a sample of children, this example shows that some behaviours that may appear to be contradictory often coexist, and this phenomenon can be revealed using the data-driven approach.

Social reasons for the clustering of behaviours are related to age, sex, socioeconomic status, education, and these determinants appear to be the most frequently studied in lifestyle research(Reference Lv, Liu and Ren19,Reference Meader, King and Moe-Byrne44,Reference Murphy, MacDonncha and Murphy45) . These will be discussed in more detail further in the review. Lastly, biological explanations are associated with physical and mental health. It has been suggested that sex-related differences in lifestyle behaviours might be linked to hormonal differences(Reference Courtenay46). Higher levels of androgens and cortisol, and lower serotonin levels in men may increase the desire for intense sensations and experiences, which can be obtained with the use of stimulants(Reference Courtenay46). It has been shown that men have different responses to stress than women, with one of the avoidant coping strategies is alcohol or substance use(Reference Courtenay46). The psychological aspects of lifestyle behaviours have been previously described by Conry et al.(Reference Conry, Morgan and Curry47) Among six identified clusters, authors found that the multiple unhealthy behaviours reflected in ‘multiple risk factor’ and ‘physically inactive’ clusters, more prevalent in menaged 18–29 years, were associated with lower levels of energy and vitality and highest psychological distress(Reference Conry, Morgan and Curry47).

Due to the cross-sectional design of these studies, the results need to be cautiously interpreted. The potential reason can be either a cause or a result of certain behaviours, e.g. psychological distress can be a cause of unhealthy lifestyle choices but also a result of long-term poor lifestyle habits.

Clusters of dietary-lifestyle behaviours and cardiometabolic health

Although a number of studies have investigated the clusters of lifestyle behaviours in mixed-sex population, the number of studies in young men which used empirical methods and included a dietary component is very small. A study by Lawrence et al.(Reference Lawrence, Mollborn and Hummer48) investigated the associations between lifestyle clusters and cardiovascular health in a large American cohort. Eight indicators were used to create a cardiovascular risk scale (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, Hb A1c, TAG, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, BMI). The results revealed that two clusters named ‘inactive, poor diet, poor sleep’ and ‘consistently negative’ were the predictors of poorer cardiovascular health in young adults (aged 26–31) when compared to the ‘consistently positive’ cluster. However, these results were not sex-specific and only two dietary variables were used to assess the diet quality: frequency consumption of fast-foods and sugary beverages(Reference Lawrence, Mollborn and Hummer48).

Another interesting study, by Greene et al.(Reference Greene, Schembre and White49), investigated the clustering of diet, physical activity, psychosocial factors and elevated health risk associated with obesity. The authors found that male students (aged 18–24) from the cluster labelled as ‘psychosocially secure’ had better adiposity outcomes than men from other clusters, despite the lowest intake of fruit and vegetables and the lowest level of physical activity(Reference Greene, Schembre and White49). This paradox again shows that investigating only one aspect of a diet (here mean daily fruit and vegetable intake) may be insufficient to reflect overall diet quality.

In our recent study in young men (age <40 years), we proposed to include a broader spectrum of dietary variables along with lifestyle behaviours, such as physical activity at work and free time, current and past smoking, alcohol use and screen time(Reference Lonnie, Wadolowska and Kowalkowska50). Using a data-driven approach, we identified four dietary-lifestyle patterns. The early cardiometabolic risks associated with adiposity were observed in two dietary-lifestyle patterns labelled ‘sandwiches and convenient diet’ and ‘fast-foods and stimulants’, while two other dietary-lifestyle patterns appeared to be protective; due to its components, these were labelled ‘protein food, fried-food and recreational physical activity’ and ‘healthy diet, active, past smokers’. Both of these dietary-lifestyle patterns were associated with lower odds of obesity and lower risks of elevated total cholesterol (only ‘protein food, fried-food and recreational physical activity’) and fasting blood glucose (only ‘healthy diet, active, past smokers’), despite some unhealthy components such as frequent consumption of fried foods or smoking in the past. It could be that the physical activity component present in both patterns, alleviated the effect of the unhealthy behaviours(Reference Lonnie, Wadolowska and Kowalkowska50). This study, however, highlights that studying the dietary-lifestyle patterns using the empirical method mirrors the behaviours truly existing in populations (rather than compliance to guidelines recommendations). We believe that this approach more closely represents the real-life scenario, i.e. studies have shown that only a small percentage of the population entirely follow dietary recommendations, whereas a higher percentage display more relaxed, yet still pro-healthy dietary behaviours that can still be protective and used as an example for the rest of the population. There is an increasing recognition among academics and practitioners that health guidelines and interventions should be informed by the evidence obtained for the behaviour patterns research(51). Researching patterns, rather than individual health-related behaviours, recognise the fact that lifestyle behaviours are complex and may have synergistic or antagonistic effects on the human body.

Practical implications

Modifying lifestyle behaviours in this population pose a serious challenge. Men are described as a population not only hard-to-reach but also hard-to-engage(Reference Lefkowich, Richardson and Robertson52). It is also unclear whether single or multiple health behaviour change interventions are more effective(Reference Prochaska and Prochaska53). In the scoping review, Ashton et al.(Reference Ashton, Hutchesson and Rollo54) identified forty-six interventional studies which have targeted risk behaviours solely in young men (age 17–35 years) and fifty-four studies reporting outcomes with stratification for age and/or sex. Only a fraction of studies targeted poor diet (n 5), with the majority of the interventions being focused on increasing physical inactivity, lowering alcohol use and reducing risky sexual behaviours(Reference Ashton, Hutchesson and Rollo54). The important limitation in terms of applicability of the results was low diversity. Most often, the samples consisted of university students (being a population easily accessible to the researchers). Based on the studies included in the review, the authors concluded that the effectiveness of future interventions can be improved by: (i) being tailored to the specific subpopulations of men (e.g. unemployed, ethnic minorities, etc.); (ii) accounting for the different types of masculinity; (ii) incorporating theoretical frameworks; (iii) choosing the right delivery channel (face-to-face or online intervention), as well as intervention facilitator, similar to the targeted group(Reference Ashton, Hutchesson and Rollo54). Football Fans in Training (https://ffit.org.uk/) is a good example of a successful, age- and sex-sensitised, health-promoting initiative (Reference Hunt, Wyke and Gray55Reference Bunn, Wyke and Gray57). The 12-week intervention directed to overweight men aged 35–65 was delivered in Scottish football clubs by community coaches and involved dietary guidance and physical activity sessions(Reference Hunt, Wyke and Gray55). Participating men managed to implement lasting lifestyle changes, lose bodyweight, improve blood pressure and increase self-esteem(Reference Hunt, Wyke and Gray55Reference Bunn, Wyke and Gray57). The appeal and success of the intervention were attributed to feeling similar to other men in the group, sharing similar interests, filling sessions with effervescent experiences and receiving continuous peer-support(Reference Bunn, Wyke and Gray57).

Getting to know the target population is fundamental. The European Commission on Men's Health has stressed the fact that behavioural sex-related differences represent different needs and perceived barriers in terms of health promotion(Reference White, De Sousa and De Visser58). In further work, Ashton et al.(Reference Ashton, Hutchesson and Rollo59) suggested that focus groups might be helpful in identifying young men's motivators and perceived barriers towards eating healthily and being active. In this group of 18–25 years-old men, the main motivators for healthy eating were physical health, sport or performance, physical appearance and social influences, while key motivators for physical activity were physical appearance, social inclusion, physical and mental health and improvements for sport or performance(Reference Ashton, Hutchesson and Rollo59). Hence, it may be concluded that the ‘one size fits all’ approach is not feasible and a thorough analysis of the targeted population is recommended to design the intervention accordingly to the specific needs.

Recommendations for future studies

In the majority of studies, the dietary component was often limited to one or two variables, most commonly the frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption. It can be argued that the intake of fruit and vegetables is a reasonable indicator of diet quality. It is the food group included in all dietary indices designed to assess diet quality(Reference Burggraf, Teuber and Brosig60,Reference Waijers, Feskens and Ocké61) and its high intake is associated with the reduced risk of CVD, cancer and mortality(Reference Wang, Ouyang and Liu62). Hence, it might be presumed that high fruit and vegetable intake is a key marker of healthy dietary pattern. This has been previously confirmed by Ramsay et al. (Reference Ramsay, Shriver and Taylor63) in a study in children. Those who consumed whole fruit, fruit juice and non-starchy vegetables (apart from white potatoes) had higher diet quality measured with healthy eating index (HEI-2010)(Reference Ramsay, Shriver and Taylor63). However, the results from this sample cannot be generalised to other populations and older age groups. Moreover, studying only a singular dietary behaviour reflects the level of adherence to that particular dietary recommendation and does not expose the nuances in the complexity of human behaviour. As shown before, young men may engage in a mixture of explicit dietary behaviours(Reference Greene, Schembre and White49), and therefore in this case, the examination of a singular dietary habit does not represent the overall diet quality. Lastly, from the public health perspective, examining solely fruit and vegetable intake or breakfast skipping will not highlight other areas which require improvement and should be addressed in the target population.

Similarly, variables such as smoking, alcohol use or physical activity would benefit from a more in-depth assessment if used as variables in data-driven analyses. A detailed description of those behaviours could add to the existing knowledge, by revealing what specific types of lifestyle behaviours generate the highest risks and which ones might be protective, e.g. smoking (past, current, frequency, tobacco or electronic cigarettes), alcohol consumption (type, frequency, amount per drinking occasion), physical activity (recreational v. physical labour, moderate v. vigorous intensity, etc.).

Conclusions

Young men are a population at high risk of unfavourable health behaviours. Poor diet tends to cluster with stimulants use, but its correlation with physical activity is inconsistent in young men. The data regarding the synergistic effects of a broad spectrum of dietary behaviours combined with other lifestyle factors in the context of cardiometabolic health remain scarce in this population. The inclusion of a broader range of dietary and lifestyle variables into the multicomponent analysis of dietary and lifestyle patterns might have a greater potential in explaining the association with cardiometabolic health. Defining behavioural clusters in young men can help to develop lifestyle interventions, tailored to the specificity and needs of the targeted group.

Financial Support

This work was supported by the Minister of Science and Higher Education in the range of the programme entitled Regional Initiative of Excellence for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12 million PLN.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Author contributors

M. L. led the writing of the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. L. W. assisted in drafting the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content.

References

Chella Krishnan, K, Mehrabian, M & Lusis, AJ (2018) Sex differences in metabolism and cardiometabolic disorders. Curr Opin Lipidol 29, 404410.Google ScholarPubMed
European Commission (2011) The state of men's health in Europe: Extended Report, Luxembourg, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/health/population_groups/docs/men_health_extended_en.pdf (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2013) Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94384/1/9789241506236_eng.pdf (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
White, A, McKee, M, de Sousa, B et al. (2014) An examination of the association between premature mortality and life expectancy among men in Europe. Eur J Public Health 24, 673679.Google ScholarPubMed
Mikkilä, V, Räsänen, L, Raitakari, OT et al. (2005) Consistent dietary patterns identified from childhood to adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Br J Nutr 93, 923931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gooding, HC, Shay, CM, Ning, H et al. (2015) Optimal lifestyle components in young adulthood are associated with maintaining the ideal cardiovascular health profile into middle age. J Am Heart Assoc. 4, e002048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y & Moran, AE (2017) Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among young adults in the United States, 1999 to 2014. Hypertension 70, 736742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Heart Foundation (2019) Heart and Circulatory Disease Statistics 2019. https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/our-research/heart-statistics/heart-statistics-publications/cardiovascular-disease-statistics-2019 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Benjamin, EJ, Blaha, MJ, Chiuve, SE et al. (2017) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation 135, e146e603.Google ScholarPubMed
Office for National Statistics (2018) Deaths from diseases of the cardiovascular system and ischaemic heart disease, England and Wales: 2010 to 2017. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/adhocs/009367deathsfromdiseasesofthecardiovascularsystemandischaemicheartdisease2010to2017 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Eckart, RE, Shry, EA, Burke, AP et al. (2011) Sudden death in young adults: an autopsy-based series of a population undergoing active surveillance. J Am Coll Cardiol 58, 12541261.Google ScholarPubMed
Merz, AA & Cheng, S (2016) Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing. Heart 102, 825831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charchar, FJ, Bloomer, LD, Barnes, TA et al. (2012) Inheritance of coronary artery disease in men: an analysis of the role of the Y chromosome. Lancet 379(9819), 915922.Google ScholarPubMed
McKee, M & Shkolnikov, V (2001) Understanding the toll of premature death among men in Eastern Europe. Br Med J 323, 10511055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
General Statistical Office (2016) Health status of population in Poland in 2014. Ed. Piekarzewska M, Wieczorkowski R, Zajenkowska-Kozłowska A. Warsaw. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/stan-zdrowia-ludnosci-polski-w-2014-r-,6,6.html (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Andersson, C & Vasan, R (2018) Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in young individuals. Nat Rev Cardiol 15, 230240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, JS, Hummer, RA & Harris, KM (2017) Gender and health behavior clustering among U.S. young adults. Biodemogr Soc Biol 63, 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabel, M, Laxy, M, Thorand, B et al. (2019) Clustering of health-related behavior patterns and demographics. Results from the population-based KORA S4/F4 cohort study. Front Public Health 6, 387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lv, J, Liu, Q, Ren, Y et al. (2011) Socio-demographic association of multiple modifiable lifestyle risk factors and their clustering in a representative urban population of adults: a cross-sectional study in Hangzhou, China. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8 [Epublication 15 may 2011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, S, Choi, HR & Lee, YH (2017) Clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors among Korean adults with metabolic syndrome. PLoS ONE 12, e0174567.Google ScholarPubMed
Noble, N, Paul, C, Turon, H et al. (2015) Which modifiable health risk behaviours are related? A systematic review of the clustering of Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical activity (‘SNAP’™) health risk factors. Prev Med 81, 1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northstone, K (2012) Dietary patterns: the importance of sex differences. Br J Nutr 108, 393394.Google ScholarPubMed
Levinson, DJ (1986) A conception of adult development. Am Psychol 41, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mize, TD (2017) Profiles in health: multiple roles and health lifestyles in early adulthood. Soc Sci Med 178, 196205.Google ScholarPubMed
Fleg, JL & Strait, J (2012) Age-associated changes in cardiovascular structure and function: a fertile milieu for future disease. Heart Fail Rev 17, 545554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lexell, J, Taylor, CC & Sjöström, M (1988) What is the cause of the ageing atrophy? Total number, size and proportion of different fiber types studied in whole vastus lateralis muscle from 15- to 83-year-old men. J Neurol Sci 1988, 84, 275294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J, Shin, Y, Yen, MS et al. (2016) Peak bone mass and patterns of change in total bone mineral density and bone mineral contents from childhood into young adulthood. J Clin Densitom 19, 180191.Google ScholarPubMed
Gochman, DS (editor) (1997) Handbook of Health Behavior Research, vols 1–4. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Harris, DM & Guten, S (1979) Health-protective behavior: an exploratory study. J Health Soc Behav 20, 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (2004) Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical activity (SNAP). A population health guide to behavioural risk factors in gen-754eral practice. Melbourne: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Melbourne.Google Scholar
GBD (2016) Risk factors collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet 388, 16591724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaw, KT, Wareham, N, Bingham, S et al. (2008) Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med 5, e12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armitage, P, Berry, G, Matthews, JNS (editors) (2001) Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th ed., Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wirfält, E, Drake, I & Wallström, P (2013) What do review papers conclude about food and dietary patterns? Food Nutr Res 57 [Epublication 4 March 2013].Google ScholarPubMed
Wadolowska, L, Hamulka, J, Kowalkowska, J et al. (2018) Prudent-active and fast-food-sedentary dietary-lifestyle patterns: the association with adiposity, nutrition knowledge and sociodemographic factors in Polish teenagers – the ABC of healthy eating project. Nutrients 10 [Epublication 15 December 2018].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kant, AK (2010) Dietary patterns: biomarkers and chronic disease risk. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 35, 199206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Department of Agriculture (2014) Nutrition Evidence Library. A series of systematic reviews on the relationship between dietary patterns and health outcomes. US Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
Patterson, RE, Haines, PS & Popkin, BM (1994) Health lifestyle patterns of U.S. adults. Prev Med 23, 453460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conner, M & Norman, P (2015) Predicting and changing health behaviour: a social cognition approach. In Predicting and Changing Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models, 3rd ed., pp. 129 [Conner, M and Norman, P, editors]. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Whitcombe, D, Nethery, V & Bergman, E (1996) Relationship between nutrition knowledge and gender, ethnic background, and year in school in varsity athletes. J Am Dietetic Ass 96, A87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K, McIlveen, H & Strugnell, C (2000) Nutritional awareness and food preferences of young consumers. J Nutr Food Sci 30, 230235.Google Scholar
O'Brien, G & Davies, M (2007) Nutrition knowledge and body mass index. Health Educ Res 22, 571575.Google ScholarPubMed
Gubbels, JS, Kremers, SP, Stafleu, A et al. (2012) Clustering of energy balance-related behaviors in 5-year-old children: lifestyle patterns and their longitudinal association with weight status development in early childhood. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9, 7791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meader, N, King, K, Moe-Byrne, T et al. (2016) A systematic review on the clustering and co-occurrence of multiple risk behaviours. BMC Public Health 16, 657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, JJ, MacDonncha, C, Murphy, MH et al. (2019) Identification of health-related behavioural clusters and their association with demographic characteristics in Irish university students. BMC Public Health 19, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtenay, WH (2003) Key determinants of the health and well-being of men and boys. Int J Men's Health 2, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conry, MC, Morgan, K, Curry, P et al. (2011) The clustering of health behaviours in Ireland and their relationship with mental health, self-rated health and quality of life. BMC Public Health 11, 692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, EM, Mollborn, S & Hummer, RA (2017) Health lifestyles across the transition to adulthood: implications for health. Soc Sci Med 193, 2332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, GW, Schembre, SM, White, AA et al. (2011) Identifying clusters of college students at elevated health risk based on eating and exercise behaviors and psychosocial determinants of body weight. J Acad Nutr Diet 111, 394400.Google ScholarPubMed
Lonnie, M, Wadolowska, L & Kowalkowska, J (2019) Dietary-lifestyle patterns associated with adiposity and metabolic abnormalities in young men: a cross-sectional study (MeDiSH Project). Nutrients [Epublication 12 march 2020].Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2009) Interventions on Diet and Physical Activity: What Works. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Lefkowich, M, Richardson, N & Robertson, S (2017) ‘If we want to get men in, then we need to ask men what they want’: pathways to effective health programing for men. Am J Men's Health 11, 15121524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prochaska, JJ & Prochaska, JO (2011) A review of multiple health behavior change interventions for primary prevention. Am J Lifestyle Med 5 [Epublication May 2011].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, LM, Hutchesson, MJ, Rollo, ME et al. (2014) A scoping review of risk behaviour interventions in young men. BMC Public Health 14, 957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, K, Wyke, S, Gray, CM et al. (2014) A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet 383, 12111221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, C, Hunt, K, Mutrie, N et al. (2011) Can the draw of professional football clubs help promote weight loss in overweight and obese men? A feasibility study of the football fans in training programme delivered through the Scottish Premier League. J Epidemiol Community Health 65, A37A38.Google Scholar
Bunn, C, Wyke, S, Gray, CM et al. (2016) ‘Coz football is what we all have’: masculinities, practice, performance and effervescence in a gender-sensitised weight-loss and healthy living programme for men. Sociol Health Illn 38, 812828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A, De Sousa, B, De Visser, R et al. (2011) The state of men's health in Europe: European Commission: The state of men's health in Europe: Extended report, pp. 1407. http://ec.europa.eu/health/population_groups/docs/men_health_extended_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Ashton, LM, Hutchesson, MJ, Rollo, ME et al. (2015) Young adult males’ motivators and perceived barriers towards eating healthily and being active: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12, 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burggraf, C, Teuber, R, Brosig, S et al. (2018) Review of a priori dietary quality indices in relation to their construction criteria. Nutr Rev 76, 747764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waijers, P, Feskens, E & Ocké, M (2007) A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr 97, 219231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X, Ouyang, Y, Liu, J et al. (2014) Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br Med J 349, 4490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsay, SA, Shriver, LH, Taylor, CA (2016) Variety of fruit and vegetables is related to preschoolers' overall diet quality. Prev Med Rep 5, 112117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed