Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T01:07:15.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thru but not wisht: Language, writing, and universal reading theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Charles Perfetti
Charles Perfetti*
Affiliation:
Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Perfetti@pitt.eduhttp://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/people/person-detail.asp?Dir_ID=308
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Languages may get the writing system they deserve or merely a writing system they can live with – adaption without optimization. A universal theory of reading reflects the general dependence of writing on language and the adaptations required by the demands of specific languages and their written forms. The theory also can be informed by research that addresses a specific language and orthography, gaining universality through demonstrating adaptations to language and writing input.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 299 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolger, D. J., Perfetti, C. A. & Schneider, W. (2005) A cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structures plus writing system variation. Journal of Human Brain Mapping 25(1):92–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977) Ideas about language. In: Aims and perspectives in linguistics. Occasional Papers, No. I, pp. 32–55. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003) Ideas about language. In: On language and linguistics: Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, vol. 3, ed. Webster, Jonathan, pp. 92–115. Continuum.Google Scholar
Mattingly, I. G. (1972) Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In: Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading, ed. Kavanaugh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G., pp. 133–47. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., Cotelli, M., Cossu, G., Corte, F., Lorusso, M., Pesenti, S., Gallagher, A., Perani, D., Price, C., Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. (2000) A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience 3(1):91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C. A. (2003) The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 7(1):3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. & Harris, L. N. (under review). Reading universals are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Fiez, J., Nelson, J., Bolger, D. J. & Tan, L-H. (2007) Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation in the brain's reading network. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(2):131–46. [Special issue on “Neurocognitive approaches to bilingualism: Asian languages,” ed. P. Li.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (2011) Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In: Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link, ed. McCardle, P., Miller, B., Lee, J. R. & Tzeng, O. J. L., pp. 146–68. Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (2005) Learning to read with a language impairment. In: The science of reading: A handbook, ed. Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C., pp. 397–412. Blackwell.Google Scholar