Aristoxenus of Tarentum: The Pythagorean Precepts (How to Live a Pythagorean Life) An Edition of and Commentary on the Fragments with an Introduction
Book contents
- Aristoxenus of Tarentum: the Pythagorean Precepts (How to Live a Pythagorean Life)
- Aristoxenus of Tarentum: the Pythagorean Precepts (How to Live a Pythagorean Life)
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Fragments with Translation and Commentary
- Appendices
- Concordance with the Fragment Numbers in Wehrli’s Edition
- Bibliography
- Select Index of Greek Words and Phrases Discussed
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2019
Edited and translated by
Book contents
- Aristoxenus of Tarentum: the Pythagorean Precepts (How to Live a Pythagorean Life)
- Aristoxenus of Tarentum: the Pythagorean Precepts (How to Live a Pythagorean Life)
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Fragments with Translation and Commentary
- Appendices
- Concordance with the Fragment Numbers in Wehrli’s Edition
- Bibliography
- Select Index of Greek Words and Phrases Discussed
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aristoxenus of Tarentum: The Pythagorean Precepts (How to Live a Pythagorean Life)An Edition of and Commentary on the Fragments with an Introduction, pp. 606 - 615Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adcock, F. E. 1927. “Literary Tradition and Early Greek Code-Makers,” Cambridge Historical Journal 2.2: 95–109.Google Scholar
Allen, D. 2003. “Angry Bees, Wasps and Jurors: The Symbolic Politics of Orgê in Athens,” in Braund, S. and Most, G. (eds.), Ancient Anger. Yale Classical Studies xxxii. Cambridge University Press, 76–98.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2002. “Democritus and Eudaimonism,” in Caston, V. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. Aldershot: Ashgate, 169–81.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 1989. Greek Musical Writings ii: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2007. The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2010. “Mathematical Beauty Made Audible: Musical Aesthetics in Ptolemy’s Harmonics,” Classical Philology 105: 403–20.Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2012. “Aristoxenus and the Early Academy,” in Huffman, (ed.), 2012c: 297–324.Google Scholar
Bellemare, P. M. 1999. “The Pythagorean Oath: Edelstein Revisited,” in Coyle, J. K. and Muir, S. C. (eds.), Healing in Religion and Society, from Hippocrates to the Puritans. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1–64.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. and Segonds, A. P. 1996. Jamblique: Vie de Pythagore. Paris: Les Belles Lettres (2nd edn. 2011).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1962. Weisheit und Wissenschaft: Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon. Nuremberg: Hans Carl.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1965. Review of M. von Albrecht. Jamblich. Pythagoras: Legende – Lehre – Lebensgestaltung. Gnomon 37: 24–6.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. tr. of Burkert, W., 1962 by Minar, E., with revisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1982. “Craft Versus Sect: The Problem of Orphics and Pythagoreans,” in Meyer, B. F. and Sanders, E. P. (eds.), Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, vol. 3: Self Definition in the Graeco-Roman World. London: SCM Press, 1–22 and 183–9 (reprint in Burkert, 2006, 191–216).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1998. “Pythagoreische Retraktationen: Von den Grenzen einer möglichen Edition,” in Burkert, W., Gemelli Marciano, L., Matelli, E. and Orelli, L. (eds.), Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 303–19 (reprint in Burkert, 2006, 299–316).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 2006. Kleine Schriften, iii: Mystica, Orphica, Pythagorica, ed. Graf, F., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Camassa, G. 1976–7. “Il mutamento delle leggi nella prospettiva pitagorica (a proposito di Giamblico, Vita Pitagorica 176),” Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia di Perugia 14: 457–71.Google Scholar
Cataudella, Q. 1960. “Note critiche al testo della Vita Pythagorae di Giamblico,” Revue des études grecques 73: 448–50.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 1990. Pseudopythagorica ethica. I trattati morali di Archita, Metopo, Teage, Eurifamo. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Cobet, C. G. 1847. Oratio de arte interpretandi grammatices et critices fundamentis innixa primario philologi officio. Lugduni-Batavorum: Hazenberg.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 1991. Law, Sexuality and Society: The Enforcement of Morals in Classical Athens. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Skalli, A. 2012. Diodore de Sicile. Bibliothèque historique. Fragments. Tome i. Livres vi–x. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Collard, C. and Cropp, M. 2008. Euripides: Fragments, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Deubner, L. 1935. “Bemerkungen zum Text der Vita Pythagorae des Iamblichos,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 612–90, 824–7.Google Scholar
Deubner, L. 1975. Iamblichi de vita Pythagorica liber. Stuttgart: Teubner (Revised by Klein, U.).Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1890. “Ein gefälschtes Pythagorasbuch,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 3: 451–72.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1973. Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis Dialogos Commentariorum Fragmenta. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2014. “Pythagoreanism in the Academic Tradition: the Early Academy to Numenius,” in Huffman, 2014a, 250–73.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Hershbell, J. (eds.) 1991. Iamblichus: On the Pythagorean Way of Life (Text, Translation and Notes). Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Polleichtner, W. 2010. Iamblichus of Chalcis: The Letters. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dooley, W. E. 1989. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle’s Metaphysics 1. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dudley, J. 2012. Aristotle’s Concept of Chance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. 1943. The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins (reprinted in Edelstein, 1967).Google Scholar
Fisher, N. R. E. 1995. “Hybris, Status and Slavery,” in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World. London: Routledge, 44–84.Google Scholar
Flinterman, J.-J. 2014. “Pythagoreans in Rome and Asia Minor Around the Turn of the Common Era,” in Huffman, 2014a, 341–59.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. and Matthews, E. 1987–2005. A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von 1940. Pythagorean Politics in Southern Italy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Garland, R. 1990. The Greek Way of Life: From Conception to Old Age. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2014. “The Pythagorean Way of Life and Pythagorean Ethics,” in Huffman, 2014a, 131–48.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. 1990. Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae, 4 vols. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1956. A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Graham, A. J. 1982. “The Western Greeks,” in The Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press, 3.3: 163–95.Google Scholar
Greenwood, L. H. G. 1909. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Book Six. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1965. A History of Greek Philosophy: vol. 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy: vol. 3, The Fifth-Century Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1978. A History of Greek Philosophy: vol. 5, The Later Plato and the Academy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1981. A History of Greek Philosophy: vol. 6, Aristotle: an Encounter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 1993. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2001. “The Philolaic Method: The Pythagoreanism Behind the Philebus,” in Preus, A. (ed.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy vi: Before Plato. Albany: State University of New York Press, 67–85.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2005. Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2006. “Aristoxenus’ Pythagorean Precepts. A Rational Pythagorean Ethics,” in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici/The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 103–21.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2008a. “The Pythagorean Precepts of Aristoxenus: Crucial Evidence for Pythagorean Moral Philosophy,” Classical Quarterly 58.1: 104–19.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2008b.“Two Problems in Pythagoreanism,” in Curd, P., and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 284–304.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2009. “The Pythagorean Conception of the Soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus,” in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 21–44.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2012a. “Aristoxenus’ Account of Pythagoras,” in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A. (eds.), Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in Honor of Charles Kahn. Las Vegas: Parmenides, 125–43.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2012c. (ed.) Aristoxenus of Tarentum: Discussion. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 2014b. “The Peripatetics on the Pythagoreans,” in Huffman, (2014a), 274–95.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. 1988. “Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate Concerning Skills in Fourth-Century Medicine, Rhetoric and Ethics,” Apeiron 21: 17–52.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 2007. The Development of Ethics, A Historical and Critical Study, vol. 1: From Socrates to the Reformation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W 1957. “Aristotle’s Use of Medicine as a Model of Method in his Ethics,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77.1: 54–61.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 1997. “Luck and Good Fortune in the Eudemian Ethics,” Ancient Philosophy 17: 85–102.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1960. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press (2nd edn. 1985. Philadelphia: Centrum Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1997. “Greek Religion and Philosophy in the Sisyphus Fragment,” Phronesis 42.3: 247–62.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1998. “Pre-Platonic Ethics,” in Everson, S. (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 4: Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 27–48.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2001. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, K. 1895. “Die neuplatonische, fälschlich dem Galen zugeschriebene Schrift Πρὸς Γαῦρον περὶ τοῦ πῶς ἐμψυχοῦται τὰ ἔμβρυα,” Abhandlungen der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Philol.-hist. Kl.: 33–62.Google Scholar
Kühn, K. G. 1821–33. Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, 20 vols. Leipzig: Cnobloch [re-issued 1965. Hildesheim: Olms].Google Scholar
Lamb, W. R. M. 1924. Plato: Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Lévy, I. 1926. Recherches sur les sources de la légende de Pythagore. Paris: Leroux (reprint New York: Garland Publishing 1987).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2013. “The Eclectic Pythagoreanism of Alexander Polyhistor,” in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc. Cambridge University Press, 139–59.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. 1997. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McCredie, J. R. 1971. “Hippodamos of Miletus,” in Mitten, D. G., Pedley, J. G. and Scott, J. A. (eds.), Studies Presented to George M. A. Hanfmann. Cambridge, MA: Fogg Art Museum, 95–100.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. 1959. Die Fragmente der Tragödien des Aischylos. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Mewaldt, J. 1904. De Aristoxeni Pythagoricis Sententiis et Vita Pythagorica. Diss. Berlin.Google Scholar
Mills, M. J. 1982. “ΤΥΧΗ in Aristoxenus, Fr. 41, and Eudemian Ethics Θ. 2,” American Journal of Philology 103.2: 204–8.Google Scholar
Minar, E. L. 1942. Early Pythagorean Politics in Practice and Theory. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Minar, E. L. 1944. “Pythagorean Communism,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Society 75: 34–46.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D. C. 2001. “Dicaearchus of Messana: The Sources, Text and Translation,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick and London: Transaction, 1–142.Google Scholar
Mondolfo, R. (tr.) 1938. La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, vol. 1.2. Florence: La Nuova Italia (translation of Zeller, 1919).Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 2008. The Route of Parmenides. Revised and Expanded Edition. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Nauck, A. 1884. Iamblichi de vita pythagorica liber. St. Petersburg: Eggers [repr. 1965. Amsterdam: Hakkert].Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2002. “Controlling Women’s Dress: gynaikonomoi,” in Llewellyn-Jones, L. (ed.), Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World. London: Duckworth, 203–26.Google Scholar
Oldfather, C. H. 1946. Diodorus of Sicily, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 1989. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. 1933. “To Prepon: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des griechischen Geistes,” Nachrichten der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, Heft 1, 53–92 (Reprint in Dorrie, H. (ed.), Kleine Schriften, vol. 2. Hildesheim: Olms, 100–39).Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, W. G. 1957. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Sources of its Reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. 1926. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Renehan, R. 1980. “On the Greek Origins of the Concepts of Incorporeality and Immateriality,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 21: 105–38.Google Scholar
Riddle, J. M. 1992. Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 2002. Pythagoras: Leben, Lehre, Nachwirkung. Eine Einführung. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. 2005. Pythagoras: His Life, Teaching and Influence, tr. of Riedweg, 2002 by Rendall, S.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rivaud, A. 1932. “Platon et la ‘politique pythagoricienne’,” in Mélanges Gustave Glotz, vol. 2. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 779–92.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 1871–2. “Die Quellen des Iamblichus in seiner Biographie des Pythagoras,” Rheinisches Museum 26: 554–76 and 27: 23–61[= 1901. Kleine Schriften ii Tübingen: Mohr, 102–72].Google Scholar
Rostagni, A. 1922. “Un nuovo capitolo nella storia della retorica e della Sofistica,” Studi italiani di filologia classica n.s. 2: 148–201.Google Scholar
Sallares, R. 1991. The Ecology of the Ancient Greek World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sandridge, N. B. 2012. Loving Humanity, Learning, and Being Honored: The Foundations of Leadership in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus. Washington, D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Schorn, S. 2013. “Die Pythagoreer im zehnten Buch der Bibliothek Diodors. Zitate, Traditionen-und Manipulationen,” in Berti, M. and Costa, V. (eds.), Ritorno ad Alessandria. Storiographia greca e cultura bibliotecaria. Tracce di una relazione perduta. Tivoli: Tored.Google Scholar
Schorn, S. 2014. “Pythagoras in the Historical Tradition,” in Huffman, 2014a, 296–314.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E., Stork, P., van Ophuijsen, J. and Prince, S. (eds.) 2008. Heraclides of Pontus: Texts and Translation. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Shipley, G. 2005. “Little Boxes on the Hillside: Greek Town Planning, Hippodamos and Polis Ideology,” in Hansen, M. H. (ed.), The Imaginary Polis. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Arts and Letters, 335–403.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1909. “Φύσις, Μελέτη, Ἐπιστήμη,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 40: 185–201.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. 1930–35. Plato: The Republic. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Staab, G. 2002. Pythagoras in der Spätantike: Studien zu die Vita Pythagorica des Iamblichos von Chalkis. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1996. “‘In a Pure and Holy Way’: Personal and Professional Conduct in the Hippocratic Oath?,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 51: 404–37.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1999. “Hōs epi to polu, ‘Hippocrates’ Between Generalization and Individualization,” in Thivel, A. and Zucker, A. (eds.), Le normal et le pathologique dans la Collection hippocratique. Nice: Faculté des lettres, arts et sciences humaines de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 23–44.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1987. “Greek Ethics and Moral Theory,” Tanner Lectures on Human Values 9: 182–202.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1999. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Thom, Johan C. 2013. “The Pythagorean Akousmata and Early Pythagoreanism,” in Cornelli, G., McKirahan, R. and Macris, C. (eds.), On Pythagoreanism. Berlin: De Gruyter, 77–102.Google Scholar
Timpanaro Cardini, Maria (1958–64). Pitagorici: Testimonianze e Frammenti. 3 vols. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Tracy, T. 1969. Physiological Theory and the Doctrine of the Mean in Plato and Aristotle. Chicago: Loyola Press.Google Scholar
Trédé, M. 1992. Kairos: L’ à-propos et l’occasion (le mot et la notion, d’Homère à la fin du ive siècle avant J.-C.). Paris: Editions Klincksieck (2nd edn. 2015. Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. 1994. “Zeno’s Republic and the Origins of Natural Law,” in Vander Waerdt, P. (ed.), The Socratic Movement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 272–308.Google Scholar
Vince, C. A. and Vince, J. H. 1926. Demosthenes: Orations, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (eds.) 1884–1912. Stobaeus: Anthologium. 5 vols. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1951. “Ethik und Medizin: zur Vorgeschichte der aristotelischen Mesonlehre,” Museum Helveticum 8: 36–62.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1967. Die Schule des Aristoteles, vol. 2: Aristoxenus. Second edn. Basel: Benno Schwabe (first edn. 1945).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1969. Die Schule des Aristoteles, vol. 7: Herakleides Pontikos. Second edn. Basel: Benno Schwabe (first edition 1953).Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. 1919. “Eine pythagoreische Urkunde des iv. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.,” Hermes 54: 225–48.Google Scholar
White, S. A. 1992. “Natural Virtue and Perfect Virtue in Aristotle,” in Cleary, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8: 135–68.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2011. Porphyry: To Gaurus On How Embryos are Ensouled and On What is in Our Power. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. 2009. “Empedocles and his Ancient Readers on Desire and Pleasure,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 36: 1–71.Google Scholar
Wyttenbach, D. (ed.) 1795–1830. Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1919. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. 6th edn. Nestle, W.. Leipzig: Reisland (repr. 1963 Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. First edn. 1844–52).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. 1966. Tyche bei Platon. Diss. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn.Google Scholar
Zucconi, M. 1970. “La tradizione dei discorsi di Pitagora in Giamblico: Vita Pythagorica 37–57,” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 98: 491–501.Google Scholar