Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T08:00:25.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Autonomy, Self-Determination, and the Development of Coping in Adolescence

from Part V - Social Contexts and the Development of Coping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2023

By
Stijn Van Petegem ,
Nele Flamant ,
Bart Soenens  and
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Edited by
Ellen A. Skinner  and
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Ellen A. Skinner
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we argue that autonomy-related developmental processes are key for a more complete and deep-level understanding of the development of coping. We first discuss the critical role of autonomy in psychosocial growth, not only during adolescence but also throughout the lifespan. Then, we consider how autonomy-relevant experiences, and autonomy frustration in particular, trigger specific coping responses, and we discuss the developmental patterns of these coping responses and their implications for individuals’ psychosocial development. We then review how situation-specific characteristics of individuals’ context (e.g., the social domain and the degree of autonomy support in the situation) have implications for the unfolding of a coping episode. The chapters ends by discussing how proximal figures in one’s social context (with a particular focus on parents) can foster more adaptive and flexible coping, and how self-determination and mindfulness also serve as critical coping resources.

Keywords

autonomyself-determinationadolescencecopingdevelopmentcontrol
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Development of Coping , pp. 510 - 537
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abela, J. R. Z., Brozina, K., & Haigh, E. P. (2002). An examination of the response styles theory of depression in third- and seventh-grade children: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(5), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019873015594Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodologies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952Google Scholar
Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Aldwin, C. M., Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Taylor, A. L. (2011). Coping and self-regulation across the life span. In Fingerman, K. L., Berg, C. A., Smith, J., & Antonucci, T. C. (Eds.), Handbook of life-span development (pp. 561–587). Springer.Google Scholar
Andreadakis, E., Joussemet, M., & Mageau, G. A. (2019). How to support toddlers’ autonomy: Socialization practices reported by parents. Early Education and Development, 30(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1548811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, K. A., Levine, L. J., & Arsenault, J. M. (2010). Shifting gears: Coping flexibility in children with and without ADHD. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409345070Google Scholar
Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg015Google Scholar
Bao, X. H., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79(2), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01125.xGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296–3319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131780CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.xGoogle Scholar
Baudat, S., Zimmermann, G., Antonietti, J. P., & Van Petegem, S. (2017). The role of maternal communication style in adolescents’ motivation to change alcohol use: A vignette-based study. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 24(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2016.1192584Google Scholar
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self‐regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development, 81(1), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01397.xGoogle Scholar
Brandtstädter, J., & Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.5.1.58Google Scholar
Brandtstädter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2002). The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: A two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22(1), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2001.0539Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brenning, K. M., Antrop, I., Van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., De Meulenaere, J., Rodríguez‐Meirinhos, A., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2019). I won’t obey! Psychologically controlling parenting and (non)‐clinical adolescents’ responses to rule‐setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(6), 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22750Google Scholar
Broderick, P. C. (2005). Mindfulness and coping with dysphoric mood: Contrasts with rumination and distraction. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(5), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-3888-0Google Scholar
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822Google Scholar
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Addressing fundamental questions about mindfulness. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701703344Google Scholar
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2013). Autonomy in family decision making for Chinese adolescents: Disentangling the dual meaning of autonomy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(7), 1184–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113480038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.814Google Scholar
Cheng, C., & Cheung, M. W. (2005). Cognitive processes underlying coping flexibility: Differentiation and integration. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00331.xGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C., Lau, H. P. B., & Chan, M. P. S. (2014). Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1582–1607. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037913Google Scholar
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87Google Scholar
Connor-Smith, J. K., Compas, B. E., Wadsworth, M. E., Thomsen, A. H., & Saltzman, H. (2000). Responses to stress in adolescence: Measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 976–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.976Google Scholar
Crockenberg, S., & Litman, C. (1990). Autonomy as competence in 2-years-olds: Maternal correlates of child defiance, compliance, and self-assertion. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.961Google Scholar
Daddis, C. (2011). Desire for increased autonomy and adolescents’ perceptions of peer autonomy: “Everyone else can; Why can’t I?” Child Development, 82(4), 1310–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01587.xGoogle Scholar
Davidov, M., & Grusec, J. E. (2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00855.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01Google Scholar
De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van Petegem, S., & Haerens, L. (2016). Do students with different motives for physical education respond differently to autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching?. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.001Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Andrews, D. W. (1995). Preventing escalation in problem behaviors with high-risk young adolescents: Immediate and 1-year outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(4), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.4.538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dix, T., Stewart, A. D., Gershoff, E. T., & Hay, W. H. (2007). Autonomy and children’s reactions to being controlled: Evidence that both compliance and defiance may be positive markers in early development. Child Development, 78(4), 1204–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01061.xGoogle Scholar
Dusek, J. B., & Danko, M. (1994). Adolescent coping styles and perceptions of parental child rearing. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9(4), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489494002Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.2.90Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Murphy, B. C., Guthrie, I. K., Jones, S., … & Maszk, P. (1997). Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children’s social functioning from regulation and emotionality. Child Development, 68(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04227.xGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0033Google Scholar
Flamant, N., Boncquet, M., Van Petegem, S., Haerens, L., Beyers, W., & Soenens, B. (2022). To endure and to resist? Adolescents’ coping with overprotective parenting. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 82, Article 101444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101444Google Scholar
Flamant, N., Haerens, L., Mabbe, E., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2020). How do adolescents deal with intrusive parenting? The role of coping with psychologically controlling parenting in internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.09.003Google Scholar
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150Google Scholar
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.642Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Rinehart & Co.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. Rinehart & Co.Google Scholar
Gescinska, A. (2011). De verovering van de vrijheid [The conquest of freedom]. Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., … & Lazar, S. W. (2016). Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617003Google Scholar
Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grolnick, W. S., Frodi, A., & Bridges, L. (1984). Maternal control style and the mastery motivation of one‐year‐olds. Infant Mental Health Journal, 5(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355(198422)5:2<72::AID-IMHJ2280050203>3.0.CO;2-OGoogle Scholar
Grolnick, W. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2009). Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00099.xGoogle Scholar
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890Google Scholar
Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015). How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006Google Scholar
Gutman, L. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Stage-environment fit during adolescence: Trajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, N. C., Chipperfield, J. G., Heckhausen, J., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Control striving in older adults with serious health problems: A 9-year longitudinal study of survival, health, and well-being. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019278Google Scholar
Hampel, P., & Petermann, F. (2005). Age and gender effects on coping in children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-3207-9Google Scholar
Heppner, W. L., Kernis, M. H., Lakey, C. E., Campbell, W. K., Goldman, B. M., Davis, P. J., & Cascio, E. V. (2008). Mindfulness as a means of reducing aggressive behavior: Dispositional and situational evidence. Aggressive Behavior, 34(5), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20258Google Scholar
Hodgins, H. S., & Knee, C. R. (2002). The integrating self and conscious experience. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 87–100). University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Hodgins, H. S., Yacko, H. A., & Gottlieb, E. (2006). Autonomy and nondefensiveness. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9036-7Google Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611419671Google Scholar
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028089Google Scholar
Kato, T. (2012). Development of the Coping Flexibility Scale: Evidence for the coping flexibility hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027770Google Scholar
Keng, S. L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006Google Scholar
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 283–357). Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Knee, C. R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A., & Patrick, H. (2005). Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.997Google Scholar
Knee, C. R., & Zuckerman, M. (1998). A nondefensive personality: Autonomy and control as moderators of defensive coping and self-handicapping. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2207Google Scholar
Koestner, R., & Losier, G. F. (1996). Distinguishing reactive versus reflective autonomy. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00518.xGoogle Scholar
Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.2.199Google Scholar
Koster, E. H., De Lissnyder, E., Derakshan, N., & De Raedt, R. (2011). Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective: The impaired disengagement hypothesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.005Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L. (2003). Beyond bidirectionality: Bilateral conceptual frameworks for understanding dynamics in parent-child relations. In Kuczynski, L. (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 1–24). Sage.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., & Hildebrandt, N. (1997). Models of conformity and resistance in socialization theory. In Grusec, J. E. & Kuczynski, L. (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 227–256). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., & Kochanska, G. (1990). Development of children’s noncompliance strategies from toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.398Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., Kochanska, G., Radke-Yarrow, M., & Girnius-Brown, O. (1987). A developmental interpretation of young children’s noncompliance. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.799Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., Parkin, C. M., & Pitman, R. (2014). Socialization as dynamic process. In Grusec, J. E. & Hastings, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 135–157). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, L., Pitman, R., & Twigger, K. (2018). Flirting with resistance: Children’s expressions of autonomy during middle childhood. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(Suppl. 1), Article 1564519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1564519Google Scholar
Laurin, J. C., & Joussemet, M. (2017). Parental autonomy-supportive practices and toddlers’ rule internalization: A prospective observational study. Motivation and Emotion, 41(5), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9627-5Google Scholar
Lerner, R. E., & Grolnick, W. S. (2020). Maternal involvement and children’s motivation and achievement: The roles of maternal autonomy support and children’s affect. Motivation and Emotion, 44(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09813-6Google Scholar
Mageau, G. A., Ranger, F., Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Moreau, E., & Forest, J. (2015). Validation of the perceived parental autonomy support scale (P-PASS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 47(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039325Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222Google Scholar
Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.xGoogle Scholar
Morling, B., & Evered, S. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.269Google Scholar
Morling, B., & Evered, S. (2007). The construct formerly known as secondary control: Reply to Skinner (2007). Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 917–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.917Google Scholar
Morling, B., Kitayama, S., & Miyamoto, Y. (2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286003Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Stice, E., Wade, E., & Bohon, C. (2007). Reciprocal relations between rumination and bulimic, substance abuse, and depressive symptoms in female adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.198Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.xGoogle Scholar
Ntoumanis, N., Edmunds, J., & Duda, J. L. (2009). Understanding the coping process from a self‐determination theory perspective. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X349352Google Scholar
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, C. M., & Kuczynski, L. (2012). Adolescent perspectives on rules and resistance within the parent-child relationship. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(5), 632–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411435852Google Scholar
Patall, E. A., & Hooper, S. Y. (2018). The role of choice in understanding adolescent autonomy and academic functioning. In Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (Eds.), Autonomy in adolescent development: Towards conceptual clarity (pp. 145–167). Routledge.Google Scholar
Paulmann, S., Furnes, D., Bøkenes, A. M., & Cozzolino, P. J. (2016). How psychological stress affects emotional prosody. PLoS ONE, 11(11), Article e0165022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165022Google Scholar
Pavey, L., & Sparks, P. (2009). Reactance, autonomy and paths to persuasion: Examining perceptions of threats to freedom and informational value. Motivation and Emotion, 33(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9137-1Google Scholar
Qin, L., Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). Are gains in decision‐making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and China. Child Development, 80(6), 1705–1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01363.xGoogle Scholar
Raftery-Helmer, J. N., & Grolnick, W. S. (2016). Children’s coping with academic failure: Relations with contextual and motivational resources supporting competence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(8), 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615594459Google Scholar
Robson, J., & Kuczynski, L. (2018). Deconstructing noncompliance: Parental experiences of children’s challenging behaviours in a clinical sample. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(Suppl. 1), Article 1563432. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1563432Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.xGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Autonomy and autonomy disturbances in self-development: Research on motivation, attachment, and clinical process. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and methods (3rd ed., pp. 385–438). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000162Google Scholar
Schultz, P. P., Ryan, R. M., Niemiec, C. P., Legate, N., & Williams, G. C. (2015). Mindfulness, work climate, and psychological need satisfaction in employee well-being. Mindfulness, 6(5), 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0338-7Google Scholar
Segrin, C., Givertz, M., Swaitkowski, P., & Montgomery, N. (2015). Overparenting is associated with child problems and a critical family environment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(2), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9858-3Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., Thoresen, C., & Plante, T. G. (2011). The moderation of mindfulness‐based stress reduction effects by trait mindfulness: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20761Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212007Google Scholar
Skhirtladze, N., Van Petegem, S., Javakhishvili, N., Schwrtz, S. J., & Luyckx, K. (2019). Motivation and psychological need fulfillment on the pathway to identity resolution. Motivation & Emotion, 43, 894–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09795-5Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.3.549Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A. (2007). Secondary control critiqued: Is it secondary? Is it control? Comment on Morling and Evered (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 911–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.911Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Edge, K. (2002). Self-determination, coping and development. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Self-determination theory: Extensions and applications (pp. 297–337). University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J. R., & Steele, J. (2013). Coping as part of motivational resilience in school: A multi-dimensional measure of families, allocations, and profiles of academic coping. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 803–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413485241Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Saxton, E. A. (2019). The development of academic coping in children and youth: A comprehensive review and critique. Developmental Review, 53, Article 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2019.100870Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Saxton, E. A. (2020). The development of academic coping across late elementary and early middle school: Do patterns differ for students with differing motivational resources? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419896423Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In Lerner, R., Featherman, D., & Perlmutter, M. (Eds.), Lifespan development and behavior (pp. 91–133). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). The development of coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085705Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2011). Perceived control and the development of coping. In Folkman, S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health and coping (pp. 35–59). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2016). The development of coping: Stress, neurophysiology, social relationships, and resilience during childhood and adolescence. Springer.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Development, 60(5), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb03536.xGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (2000). Middle class African American adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and parenting practices: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 71(6), 1672–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00257Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (2005). Adolescent-parent conflict: Resistance and subversion as developmental process. In Nucci, L. (Ed.), Conflict, contradiction and contrarian elements in moral development and education (pp. 69–91). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (2018). The development of autonomy during adolescence: The social-cognitive domain theory view. In Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (Eds.), Autonomy in adolescent development: Toward conceptual clarity (pp. 53–73). Routledge.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Ahmad, I., & Wray-Lake, L. (2015). Iraqi, Syrian, and Palestinian refugee adolescents’ beliefs about parental authority legitimacy and its correlates. Child Development, 86(6), 2017–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12457Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., & Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and adolescent autonomy. Child Development, 65(4), 1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00809.xGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75(5), 1418–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00749.xGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. G., & Daddis, C. (2002). Domain-specific antecedents of parental psychological control and monitoring: The role of parenting beliefs and practices. Child Development, 73(2), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00424Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (Vol. 2, pp. 23–45). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-yGoogle Scholar
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001Google Scholar
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (in press). A lifespan perspective on the importance of the basic psychological needs for psychosocial development. In Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2019). Parenting adolescents. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 1. Parenting across the lifespan (3rd ed., pp. 101–167). Routledge.Google Scholar
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.633Google Scholar
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., & Ryan, R. (2018). How to solve the conundrum of adolescent autonomy. In Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (Eds.), Autonomy in adolescent development: Towards conceptual clarity (pp. 1–32). Routledge.Google Scholar
Tisak, M. S., & Turiel, E. (1988). Variation in seriousness of transgressions and children’s moral and conventional concepts. Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.352Google Scholar
Titova, S., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Mendez, N., Zimmermann, G., & Van Petegem, S. (2021). Associations of adolescents’ coping with peer exclusion: A person-oriented approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02060-9Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (2007). The development of morality. In Lerner, R. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 473–514). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Mabbe, E. (2017). Children’s daily well-being: The role of mothers’, teachers’, and siblings’ autonomy support and psychological control. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000218Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Antonietti, J. P., Nunes, C. E., Kins, E., & Soenens, B. (2020). The relationship between maternal overprotection, adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems, and psychological need frustration: A multi-informant study using response surface analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(1), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01126-8Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2012). On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: Examining decisional independence from a self-determination theory perspective. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025307Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory. Child Development, 86(3), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12355Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2013). The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy: In search of an underlying structure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(2), 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9847-7Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Beyers, W., & Aelterman, N. (2015). Examining the longitudinal association between oppositional defiance and autonomy in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038374Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Zimmermann, G., Antonietti, J.-P., Baudat, S., & Audenaert, E. (2017). When do adolescents accept or defy to maternal prohibitions? The role of social domain and communication style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 1022–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0562-7Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Baudat, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Zimmermann, G. (2019). Adolescents’ responses to parental regulation: The role of communication style and self-determination. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 65, Article 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101073Google Scholar
Van Petegem, S., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Brenning, K., Mabbe, E., Vanhalst, J., & Zimmermann, G. (2017). Does general parenting context modify adolescents’ appraisals and coping with parental regulation? The case of autonomy-supportive parenting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 2623–2639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0758-9Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: A historical overview, emerging trends and future directions. In Urdan, T. & Karabenick, S. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 16. The decade ahead (pp. 105–166). Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Trends, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy‐supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.xGoogle Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Duriez, B. (2014). Longitudinal associations between adolescent perceived style of parental prohibition and oppositional defiance and internalization. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032972Google Scholar
Veronneau, M. H., Koestner, R., & Abela, J. R. Z. (2005). Intrinsic need satisfaction and well-being in children and adolescents: An application of self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.2.280.62277Google Scholar
Vinik, J., Almas, A., & Grusec, J. (2011). Mothers’ knowledge of what distresses and what comforts their children predicts children’s coping, empathy, and prosocial behavior. Parenting: Science and Practice, 11(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2011.539508Google Scholar
Wadsworth, M. E., & Compas, B. E. (2002). Coping with family conflict and economic strain: The adolescent perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(2), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.00033Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.008Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., & Hodgins, H. S. (2009). The moderating role of autonomy and control on the benefits of written emotion expression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208328165Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). A self‐determination theory approach to understanding stress incursion and responses. Stress and Health, 27(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1368Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., Vansteenkiste, M., & Paulmann, S. (2019). Listen to your mother: Motivating tones of voice predict adolescents’ reactions to mothers. Developmental Psychology, 55(12), 2534–2546. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000827Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., Vansteenkiste, M., & Paulmann, S. (2020). Don’t you say it that way! Experimental evidence that controlling voices elicit defiance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, Article 103949. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000827Google Scholar
Weinstein, N., Zougkou, K., & Paulmann, S. (2018). You “have” to hear this: Using tone of voice to motivate others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 898–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000502Google Scholar
Yu, S., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Maeda, Y. (2018). General need for autonomy and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis of studies in the US and East Asia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1863–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9898-2Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Locke, E. M. (2007). The socialization of adolescent coping behaviors: Relationships with families and teachers. Journal of Adolescence, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.001Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Skinner, E. A. (2011). The development of coping across childhood and adolescence: An integrative review and critique of research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410384923Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J, & Skinner, E. A. (2016). The development of coping and regulation: Implications for psychopathology and resilience. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.) Developmental psychopathology (3rd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 485–544). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Skinner, E. A., Modecki, K. L., Webb, H. J., Gardner, A. A., Hawes, T., & Rapee, R. M. (2018). The self-perception of flexible coping with stress: A new measure and relations with emotional adjustment. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), Article 1537908. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1537908Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Van Petegem, S., & Collins, W. A. (2018). Development of autonomy. In Stein, J. (Ed.), Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0–12-809324-5.21864-6Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Van Petegem, S., & Skinner, E. A. (2016). Emotion, controllability, and orientation towards stress as correlates of children’s coping with interpersonal stress. Motivation and Emotion, 40(1), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9520-zGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×