Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T18:13:41.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Forensic Patients in State Psychiatric Hospitals: 1999–2016

from Part I - Introduction/Description of the Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2021

Katherine Warburton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Stephen M. Stahl
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Recently, mental health officials have expressed concern regarding population shifts occurring in public psychiatric hospitals. Specifically, they have seen an increase in the number of “forensically involved” patients in these facilities. This trend is seen, in part, as an increase in the number of persons who have been brought to court on a criminal charge and subsequently court-ordered to receive inpatient services at state psychiatric hospitals. These “forensic patients’” are referred to the state psychiatric hospitals to be evaluated (e.g. to determine their mental status at the time of the crime and their ability to comprehend court proceedings and/or assist their attorney with their case because of an apparent mental illness) or to be restored (e.g. to receive treatment services and/or educational interventions aimed at helping defendants regain their ability to understand the court process) prior to adjudication.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colorado Department of Human Services. Needs analysis: current status, strategic positioning, and future planning. Office of Behavioral Health; 2015. www.nri-inc.org/media/1109/2015-colorado-department-of-human-service-behavioral-health-needs-analysis-nri.pdf (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar
Fitch, LW. Assessment #3: Forensic mental health services in the United States. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; 2014. www.nasmhpd.org/sites/default/files/Assessment%203%20-%20Updated%20Forensic%20Mental%20Health%20Services.pdf (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar
Nobles, J, Randall, J. Evaluation report: mental health services in county jails. Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA), State Of Minnesota; 2016. www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us/ped/pedrep/mhjails.pdf (accessed June 2020)Google Scholar
PCG. Initial findings report: Washington mental health system assessment. Public Consulting Group; 2016. www.ofm.wa.gov/reports/MentalHealthSystemAssessmentInitialFindings.pdf (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. Cassie Cordell Trueblood, et al., v. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, et al. Case No. C14-1178 MJP monthly report to the court appointed monitor - July 15, 2017. www.dshs.wa.gov/sites/default/files/BHSIA/FMHS/Trueblood/2017Trueblood/Trueblood-Report-2017-07.pdf (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar
Miller, RD. Hospitalization of criminal defendants for evaluation of competence to stand trial or for restoration of competence: clinical and legal issues. Behav Sci Law. 2003; 21: 369391.Google Scholar
Fisher, WH, Geller, JL, Pandiani, JA. The changing role of the state psychiatric hospital. Health Affairs. 2009; 28(3): 676684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parks, J, Radke, AQ. The vital role of state psychiatric hospitals. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; 2014. https://nasmhpd.org/content/vital-role-state-psychiatric-hospitals-july-2014-0 (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar
Lutterman, T, Shaw, R, Fisher, W, Manderscheid, R. Trend in psychiatric inpatient capacity, United States and each state, 1970 to 2014. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; August 2017.www.nri-inc.org/media/1319/tac-paper-10-psychiatric-inpatient-capacity-final-09-05-2017.pdf (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar
The State of Texas Legislative Budget Board. Texas state government effectiveness and efficiency report: selected issues and recommendations. January 2013. https://www.lbb.state.tx.us/Documents/Publications/GEER/Government%20Effectiveness%20and%20Efficiency%20Report%202012.pdf (accessed June 2020).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×