Book contents
- Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World
- Business and Public Policy
- Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on contributors
- Book part
- 1 The social regulation of the economy in the global context
- Part I Legitimation and contestation in global corporate responsibility
- Part II Social construction and field formation in global corporate social responsibility
- Part III Corporations’ reaction to global corporate social responsibility pressures
- Part IV The impact of global corporate social responsibility pressures on corporate social responsibility outcomes
- 11 Is greenness in the eye of the beholder? Corporate social responsibility frameworks and the environmental performance of US firms
- 12 The mobility of industries and the limits of corporate social responsibility: labor codes of conduct in Indonesian factories
- 13 Good firms, good targets: the relationship among corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting
- 14 Conclusion: corporate social responsibility as social regulation
- Index
- References
11 - Is greenness in the eye of the beholder? Corporate social responsibility frameworks and the environmental performance of US firms
from Part IV - The impact of global corporate social responsibility pressures on corporate social responsibility outcomes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World
- Business and Public Policy
- Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on contributors
- Book part
- 1 The social regulation of the economy in the global context
- Part I Legitimation and contestation in global corporate responsibility
- Part II Social construction and field formation in global corporate social responsibility
- Part III Corporations’ reaction to global corporate social responsibility pressures
- Part IV The impact of global corporate social responsibility pressures on corporate social responsibility outcomes
- 11 Is greenness in the eye of the beholder? Corporate social responsibility frameworks and the environmental performance of US firms
- 12 The mobility of industries and the limits of corporate social responsibility: labor codes of conduct in Indonesian factories
- 13 Good firms, good targets: the relationship among corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting
- 14 Conclusion: corporate social responsibility as social regulation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World , pp. 365 - 392Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Andersson, Lynne M., and Bateman, Thomas S.. 2000. “Individual Environmental Initiatives: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 43:548–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, Pratima. 2003. “From Issues to Actions: The Importance of Individual Concerns and Organizational Values in Responding to Natural Environment Issues.” Organization Science 14:510–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, Pratima. 2005. “Evolving Sustainably: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development.” Strategic Management Journal 26:197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, Pratima, and Roth, Kendall. 2000. “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” In Academy of Management Journal 43(4):717–736.Google Scholar
Berry, Michael, and Rondinelli, Dennis. 1998. “Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution.” Academy of Management Executive 12(2):1–13.Google Scholar
Bowen, Frances E. 2000. “Environmental Visibility: A Trigger of Green Organizational Response?” Business Strategy and the Environment 9:92–107.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, Rogene A. 1998. Principles of Environmental Management: The Greening of Business. New York: Prentice Hall College Div; 2 Subedition.Google Scholar
Bullis, Connie, and Fumiko, Ie. 2007. “Corporate Environmentalism.” Pp. 321–336 in The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by May, S., Cheney, G., and Roper, J.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroll, Archie B. 1999. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Evolution of a Definitional Construct.” Business and Society 38(3):268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetindamar, Dilek, and Husoy, Kristoffer. 2007. “Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact.” Journal of Business Ethics 76(2):163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Chien-Ming, and Delmas, Magali. 2011. “Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: An Efficiency Perspective.” Production and Operations Management 20(6):789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, Petra. 2000. “Effects of ‘Best Practices’ of Environmental Management on Cost Competitiveness: The Role of Complementary Assets.” Academy of Management Journal 43:663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, Magali, and Montiel, Ivan. 2008. “The Diffusion of Voluntary International Management Standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000 and ISO 14001 in the Chemical Industry.” Policy Studies Journal 36(1):65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, Magali, and Maria, Montes-Sancho. 2011. “An Institutional Perspective on the Diffusion of International Accountability Standards: The Case of the Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001.” Business Ethics Quarterly 21(1):1052–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doh, Jonathan, and Guay, Terrence R.. 2006. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective.” Journal of Management Studies 43:47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowell, Glen, Hart, Stuart, and Yeoung, Bernard. 1999. “Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?” Management Science 46(8):1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzion, Dror. 2007. “Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review.” Journal of Management 33:637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, Richard. 1996. “Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing.” California Management Review 39:80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, David J., Hironaka, Ann, and Schofer, Evan. 2000. ‘‘The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century.’’ American Sociological Review 65:96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Gompers, Paul, Ishii, Joy, and Metrick, Andrew. 2003. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:107–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Stuart, and Ahuja, Gautam. 1996. “Does It Pay to Be Green?” Business Strategy and the Environment 5(1):30–37.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Jamie R. 2006. “Taking Aim at Business. What Factors Lead Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations to Target Particular Firms?” Business and Society 45:47–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Andrew, and Ventresca, Marc., eds. 2002. Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment. Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Janney, Jay, Dess, Greg, and Forlani, Victor. 2009. “Glass Houses? Market Reactions to Firms Joining the UN Global Compact” Journal of Business Ethics 90(3):407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Ruihua, and Bansal, Pratima. 2003. “Seeing the Need for ISO 14001.” Journal of Management Studies 40:1047–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 2003. “From Spare Change to Real Change: The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation.” Pp. 189–214 in Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
Kassinis, George, and Vafeas, Nikos. 2002. “Corporate Boards and Outside Stakeholders as Determinants of Environmental Litigation.” Strategic Management Journal 23:399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, Madhu, and Damon, Lisa. 1999. “EPA’s Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Andrew, and Lenox, Michael. 2002. “Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction.” Management Science 48:289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLD Research and Analytics. 2007. “Getting Started with KLD Stats and KLD’s Ratings Definitions.” KLD Research and Analytics Inc. Document accessed through Wharton Research Data Services.Google Scholar
Konar, Shameek, and Cohen, Mark. 2001. “Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?” Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2):281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Anne, and Morell, David. 1995. “Leading-Edge Environmental Management: Motivation, Opportunity, Resources and Processes.” Pp. 99–127 in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, edited by Collins, D. and Starik, M.. Jai Press.Google Scholar
Lenox, Michael and Nash, Jennifer. 2003. “Industry Self-Regulation and Adverse Selection: A Comparison Across Four Trade Association Programs.” Business Strategy and Environment, 12(6): 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenox, Michael, and Eesley, Charles. 2009. “Private Environmental Activism and the Selection and Response of Firm Targets.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18:45–73.Google Scholar
Longhofer, Wesley, and Schofer, Evan. 2010. “National and Global Origins of Environmental Association.” American Sociological Review 75:505–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Joshua, and Walsh, James. 2003. “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48:268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongkrutraksa, Worawan Y. 2007. “Green Marketing and Advertising.” Pp. 365–378 in The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by May, S., Cheney, G., and Roper, J.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Michael, and Kramer, Mark. 2003. “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy.” Pp. 27–64 in Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Potoski, Matthew, and Prakash, Aseem. 2005. “Covenants with Weak Swords: ISO 14001 and Facilities’ Environmental Performance.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(4):745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runhaar, Hens, and Lafferty, Helene. 2009. “Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry.” Journal of Business Ethics 84(4):479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, Michael V., and Fouts, Paul A.. 1997. “A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 40(3):534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toffel, Michael W. 2005. “Resolving Information Asymmetries in Markets: The Role of Certified Management Programs.” Center for Responsible Business, Working Paper Series, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Turcotte, Marie-France. 1995. “Conflict and Collaboration: The Interfaces between Environmental Organizations and Business Firms.” Pp. 195–229 in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Sustaining the Natural Environment. Empirical Studies on the Interface between Nature and Organizations, edited by Collins, D. and Starik, M.. JAI Press.Google Scholar
van Marrewijk, Marcel. 2003. “Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion.” Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3):95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasi, Ion B. 2011. Winds of Change. The Environmental Movement and the Global Development of the Wind Energy Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasi, Ion B., and King, Brayden. 2012. “Social Movements, Risk Perceptions, and Economic Outcomes: The Effect of Primary and Secondary Stakeholder Activism on Firms’ Perceived Environmental Risk and Financial Performance.” American Sociological Review 77(4): 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 2006. The Market for Virtue. The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Donna. 1991. “Corporate Social Performance Revisited.” Academy of Management Review 16:691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by