Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T16:47:47.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-reports and peer ratings

from Part II - Methods in child development research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Brian Hopkins
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Elena Geangu
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Sally Linkenauger
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further reading

Bukowski, W.M., Newcomb, A.F., & Hartup, W.W. (1998). The company they keep: Friendships in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, , Bukowski, K.H, , W., & Parker, J.G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Damon, W. & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 619700). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

References

Bukowski, W.M., & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In Berndt, T.J. & Ladd, G.W. (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 1545). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Los Reyes, A., & Prinstein, M.J. (2004). Applying depression-distortion hypotheses to the assessment of peer victimization in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 325335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 8797.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, E.V.E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W.M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymel, S. (1986). Interpretations of peer behavior: Affective bias in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 57, 431445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymel, S., & Rubin, K.H. (1985). Children with peer relationship and social skills problems: Conceptual, methodological, and developmental issues. In Whitehurst, G.J. (Ed.), Annals of Child Development (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hymel, S., Wagner, E., & Butler, L. (1990). Reputational bias: View from the peer group. In Asher, S.R. & Coie, J. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 156186). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masten, A.S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D.S. (1985). A Revised Class Play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 3, 523533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J.L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinstein, M.J., Boergers, J., & Vernberg, E.M. (2001). Overt and relational aggression in adolescents: Social-psychological adjustment of aggressors and victims. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 479491.Google Scholar
Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In Cillessen, A.H.N. & Bukowski, W.M. (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 88, pp. 311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Velasquez, A.M., Santo, J.B., Saldarriaga, L.M., Lopez, L.S., & Bukowski, W.M. (2010). Context-dependent victimization and aggression differences between all-girl and mixed-sex schools. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 283302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×