Barbour, J. and Pfister, H. (eds) (1995). Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Einstein Studies, vol. 6. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Belot, G. and Earman, J. (2001). Pre-Socratic quantum gravity. In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, eds Callander, C. and Huggett, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Menachem, Y. (2001). Convention: Poincaré and some of his critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 471–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R. and Goldberg, S. (1980). Tensor Analysis on Manifolds. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Bolzano, B. (1817). Rein analytische Beweis des Lehrsatz. In B. Bolzano, Early Mathematical Works, 1781–1848, ed. Novy, L.. Prague: Institute of Slovak and General History, 1981.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1956).Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. In Meaning and Necessity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Supplement A, pp. 205–21.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1995). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Dover Publications (reprint).Google Scholar

Carrier, M. (1994). Geometric facts and geometric theory: Helmholtz and 20th-century philosophy of physical geometry. In Universalgenie Helmholtz: Rückblick nach 100 Jahren, ed. Kruger, L.. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffa, J. A. (1983). From geometry to tolerance: sources of conventionalism in the 19th century. In From Quarks to Quasars, ed. Colodny., R. G.Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Coffa, J. A. (1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Demopoulos, W. (2000). On the origin and status of our conception of number. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 41, 210–26.Google Scholar

Demopoulos, W. (2003). On the rational reconstruction of our theoretical knowledge. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descartes, R. (1983). The Principles of Philosophy, transl. Miller, V. R. and Miller, R. P.. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Dingler, H. (1934). H. Helmholtz und die Grundlagen der Geometrie. Zeitschrift für Physik, 90, 348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiSalle, R. (1990). The “essential properties” of matter, space, and time. In Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

DiSalle, R. (1991). Conventionalism and the origins of the inertial frame concept. In PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association.

DiSalle, R. (2002a). Newton's philosophical analysis of space and time. In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DiSalle, R. (2002b). Conventionalism and modern physics: a re-assessment. NoÛs, 36, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiSalle, R. (2002c). Reconsidering Ernst Mach on space, time, and motion. In Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics to Honor Howard Stein on his 70th Birthday, ed. Malament, D.. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar

DiSalle, R. (2002d). Space and time: inertial frames. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/spacetime-iframes/>.

DiSalle, R. (2006). Kant, Helmholtz, and the meaning of empiricism. In Kant's Legacy, eds Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Earman, J. (1989). World Enough and Spacetime: Absolute and Relational Theories of Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1918). Report on the Relativity Theory of Gravitation. London: Fleetwood Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1920). Space, Time, and Gravitation. An Outline of General Relativity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1923). The Mathematical Theory of Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ehlers, J. (1973a). The nature and structure of space-time. In The Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Mehra, J.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlers, J. (1973b). A survey of general relativity theory. In Relativity, Astrophysics, and Cosmology, ed. Israel, W.. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. (1905). Zur elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. (1911). On the influence of gravitation on the propagation of light. In The Principle of Relativity, eds Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., transl. Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. B.. New York: Dover Books, 1952, pp. 97–108.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlage der allegemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth. (Reprint from Annalen der Physik, (4) 49, 769–822.)

Einstein, A. (1917). Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie (Gemeinverständlich), 2nd edn. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn.

Einstein, A. (1919). Was ist Relativitäts-Theorie? In The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, eds Jansen, M., Shulmann, R., Illy, J., Lehner, C. and Buchwald, D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 206–11.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1920). Grundgedanken und Methoden der Relativitätstheorie in ihrer Entwickelung dargestellt. In The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, eds Jansen, M., Shulmann, R., Illy, J., Lehner, C. and Buchwald, D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 212–49.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1922). The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Einstein, A. (1949). Autobiographical notes. In Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. Schilpp, P. A.. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 2–94.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, J. (1989). The low-water mark of general relativity, 1925–1950. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 277–92.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1748). Réflexions sur l'espace et le temps. Histoire de l'Academie Royale des sciences et belles lettres, 4, 324–33.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1765). Theoria motus corporum solidorum. Rostock and Greifswald, 1765.Google Scholar

Flores, F. (1999). Einstein's theory of theories and types of theoretical explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fock, V. (1959). The Theory of Space, Time, and Gravitation, transl. Kemmer, N.. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-time Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1990). Kant and Newton: why gravity is essential to matter. In Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999a). Geometry, convention, and the relativized a priori: Reichenbach, Schlick, and Carnap. In Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999b). Poincaré's conventionalism and the logical positivists. In Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999c). Geometry, construction, and intuition in Kant and his successors. In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, eds Scher, G. and Tieszen, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (2002a). Geometry as a branch of physics: background and context for Einstein's “Geometry and Experience”. In Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics to Honor Howard Stein on his 70th Birthday, ed. Malament, D.. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (2002b). The Dynamics of Reason: the 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Galileo, (1632 [1996]). Dialogo Sopra I Due Massimi Sistemi del Mondo – Ptolemaico e Copernicano. Florence, 1632. Reprint, Milan: Oscar Mondadori.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. (1978). General Relativity from A to B. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B. (eds) (1962). Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large-Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1868). Über die Thatsachen, die der Geometrie zum Grunde liegen. Nachrichten von der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 9, 193–221. Reprinted in Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 2, 618–39.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1870). Ueber den Ursprung und die Bedeutung der geometrischen Axiome. In Vorträge und Reden, 2 vols. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1878). Die Thatsachen in der Wahrnehmung. In Vorträge und Reden, 2 vols. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn, pp. 215–47.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1887). Zählen und Messen, erkenntnisstheoretische betrachtet. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. 3. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, pp. 356–91.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1921). Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie, eds Hertz, P. and Schlick, M.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hughes, R. I. G. (1987). The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1764 [1911]). Untersuchung ueber die Deutlichkeit der Grundsaetze der naturlichen Theologie und der Moral (the “Prize Essay”). In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 2, pp. 273–301.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1768 [1911]). Von dem ersten Grunde des Unterschiedes der Gegenden im Raume. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 2, pp. 375–83.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1770). De mundi sensibilis atque intelligibilis forma et principiis. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 2, pp. 385-419.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1783). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 4.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1786 [1911]). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reiner, vol. 4, pp. 465–565.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1787 [1956]). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Reprint, Berlin: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Klein, F. (1872). Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen. Erlangen: A. Duchert.Google Scholar

Kretschmann, E. (1917). Ueber die physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulaten. Annalen der Physik, (4) 53, 575-614.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1970a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1970b). Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1977). A function for thought-experiments. In The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lange, L. (1885). Ueber das Beharrungsgesetz. Berichte der Königlichen Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-physische Classe, 37, 333–51.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1694). Letter to C. Huygens. In Die mathematische Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Berlin, 1849–55. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, vol. II, pp. 179–85.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1695 [1960]). Systeme nouveau de la nature et de la communication des substances, aussi bien que l'union qu'il y a entre l'ame le corps. In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Berlin, 1875–90. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, vol. IV, pp. 477–87.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1699). Letter to B. de Volder. In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Berlin, 1875-90. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, pp. 168–70.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1716). Correspondence with S. Clarke. In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Berlin, 1875-90. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, vol. VII, pp. 345–440.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A. (1895). Michelson's interference experiment. In The Principle of Relativity, eds Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., transl. Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. B.. New York: Dover Books, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A. (1904). Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of light. In The Principle of Relativity, eds Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., transl. Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. B.. New York: Dover Books, pp. 11–34.Google Scholar

Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Mach, E. (1889). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Magnani, L. (2002). Philosophy and Geometry: Theoretical and Historical Issues. Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol. 66. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Malament, D. (1986). Newtonian gravity, limits, and the geometry of space. In From Quarks to Quasars: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, ed. Colodny, R.. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. (1877). Matter and Motion. New York: Dover Publications (reprint 1952).

Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. London: Parker and Son.Google Scholar

Minkowski, H. (1908). Die Grundgleichungen für die elektromagnetischen Vorgänge in bewegten Körper. Nachrichten der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, mathematisch-physische Klasse, pp. 53–111.Google Scholar

Minkowski, H. (1909). Raum und Zeit. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, 104–11.Google Scholar

Misner, C., Thorne, K. and Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Nagel, E. (1939). The formation of modern conceptions of formal logic in the development of geometry. Osiris, 7, 142–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, C. (1870). Ueber die Principien der Galilei-Newton'schen Theorie. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Newcombe, S. (1910). Light. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edn, vol. 16, sect. III, pp. 623–6.

Newton, I. (1704 [1952]). Opticks. London. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1726 [1999]). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, transl. Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1729 [1962]). The System of the World. In Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World, ed. Cajori, F., transl. Motte, A., 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Norton, J. (1989a). What was Einstein's principle of equivalence? In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 5–47.Google Scholar

Norton, J. (1989b). How Einstein found his field equations. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 101–59.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1899a). Des fondements de la géométrie; a propos d'un livre de M. Russell. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, VII, 251–79.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1899b). Des fondements de la géométrie; réponse à M. Russell. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, VIII, 73–86.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1902). La Science et L'Hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1905). Sur la dynamique de l'électron. Comptes rendues de l'Académie des Sciences, 140, 1504–8.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1913). Dernières Pensées. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1924). Die Bewegungslehre bei Newton, Leibniz, und Huyghens. Kantstudien, 29, 239–45.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1949). The philosophical significance of relativity. In Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. Schilpp, P. A.. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 289–311.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1957). The Philosophy of Space and Time, transl. Reichenbach, M.. New York: Dover Publications. (Originally published as Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin, 1927.)Google Scholar

Riemann, B. (1867). Ueber die Hypothesen, die der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen. In The Collected Works of Bernhard Riemann, ed. Weber, H.. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1902, pp. 272–87. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications, 1956.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1897). An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1899). Sur les axiomes de la géométrie. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, VII, 684–707.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1927). The Analysis of Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schlick, M. (1917). Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik. Zur Einführung in das Verständnis der Relativitäts- und Gravitationstheorie.Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sklar, L. (1977). Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Smith, G. E. (2003a). How Newton's Principia changed physics. Unpublished manuscript.

Smith, G. E. (2003b). Newton's Principia. Unpublished lecture notes, Tufts University.

Spivak, M. (1967). A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. Berkeley, CA: Publish or Perish Press.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1989a). The rigidly rotating disk as the “missing link” in the history of general relativity. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1989b). Einstein's search for general covariance. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 63–100.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (2002a). “What song the sirens sang”: How did Einstein discover special relativity? In Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 157–70.

Stachel, J. (2002b). The genesis of general relativity. In Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 233-4.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (2002c). Einstein and Newton. In Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 447-52.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (2002d). Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Stein, H. (1967). Newtonian space-time. Texas Quarterly, 10, 174–200.Google Scholar

Stein, H. (1977). Some philosophical prehistory of general relativity. In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, eds Earman, J., Glymour, C. and Stachel, J.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–49.Google Scholar

Stein, H. (2002). Newton's metaphysics. In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Synge, J. L. (1960). Relativity: The General Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Taylor, E. and Wheeler, J. A. (1978). Spacetime Physics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. (1884). On the law of inertia; the principle of chronometry; and the principle of absolute clinural rest, and of absolute rotation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 12, 568–78.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1977). Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré. Dordrecht: Riedel.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1983). Relativity and Geometry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1989). Creative Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Trautman, A. (1965). Foundations and current problems of general relativity. In Lectures on General Relativity. Brandeis 1964 Summer Institute on Theoretical Physics, vol. 1, eds Trautman, A., Pirani, F. A. E. and Bondi, H.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Trautman, A. (1966). The general theory of relativity. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 89, 319–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truesdell, C. (1967). Reactions of late Baroque mechanics to success, conjecture, error, and failure in Newton's Principia. Texas Quarterly, 10, 238–58.Google Scholar

Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyl, H. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie. Vorlesung über allgemeine Relativitätstheorie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Weyl, H. (1927). Philosophie der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften. In Oldenburg's Handbuch der Philosophie. Munich and Berlin: Verlag R. Oldenburg.Google Scholar

Will, C. (1993). Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, revised edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, C. (2002). Newton and celestial mechanics. In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barbour, J. and Pfister, H. (eds) (1995). Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Einstein Studies, vol. 6. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Belot, G. and Earman, J. (2001). Pre-Socratic quantum gravity. In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, eds Callander, C. and Huggett, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Menachem, Y. (2001). Convention: Poincaré and some of his critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 471–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R. and Goldberg, S. (1980). Tensor Analysis on Manifolds. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Bolzano, B. (1817). Rein analytische Beweis des Lehrsatz. In B. Bolzano, Early Mathematical Works, 1781–1848, ed. Novy, L.. Prague: Institute of Slovak and General History, 1981.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1956).Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. In Meaning and Necessity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Supplement A, pp. 205–21.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1995). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Dover Publications (reprint).Google Scholar

Carrier, M. (1994). Geometric facts and geometric theory: Helmholtz and 20th-century philosophy of physical geometry. In Universalgenie Helmholtz: Rückblick nach 100 Jahren, ed. Kruger, L.. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffa, J. A. (1983). From geometry to tolerance: sources of conventionalism in the 19th century. In From Quarks to Quasars, ed. Colodny., R. G.Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Coffa, J. A. (1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Demopoulos, W. (2000). On the origin and status of our conception of number. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 41, 210–26.Google Scholar

Demopoulos, W. (2003). On the rational reconstruction of our theoretical knowledge. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descartes, R. (1983). The Principles of Philosophy, transl. Miller, V. R. and Miller, R. P.. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Dingler, H. (1934). H. Helmholtz und die Grundlagen der Geometrie. Zeitschrift für Physik, 90, 348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiSalle, R. (1990). The “essential properties” of matter, space, and time. In Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

DiSalle, R. (1991). Conventionalism and the origins of the inertial frame concept. In PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association.

DiSalle, R. (2002a). Newton's philosophical analysis of space and time. In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DiSalle, R. (2002b). Conventionalism and modern physics: a re-assessment. NoÛs, 36, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiSalle, R. (2002c). Reconsidering Ernst Mach on space, time, and motion. In Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics to Honor Howard Stein on his 70th Birthday, ed. Malament, D.. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar

DiSalle, R. (2002d). Space and time: inertial frames. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/spacetime-iframes/>.

DiSalle, R. (2006). Kant, Helmholtz, and the meaning of empiricism. In Kant's Legacy, eds Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Earman, J. (1989). World Enough and Spacetime: Absolute and Relational Theories of Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1918). Report on the Relativity Theory of Gravitation. London: Fleetwood Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1920). Space, Time, and Gravitation. An Outline of General Relativity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1923). The Mathematical Theory of Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ehlers, J. (1973a). The nature and structure of space-time. In The Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Mehra, J.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlers, J. (1973b). A survey of general relativity theory. In Relativity, Astrophysics, and Cosmology, ed. Israel, W.. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. (1905). Zur elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. (1911). On the influence of gravitation on the propagation of light. In The Principle of Relativity, eds Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., transl. Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. B.. New York: Dover Books, 1952, pp. 97–108.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlage der allegemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth. (Reprint from Annalen der Physik, (4) 49, 769–822.)

Einstein, A. (1917). Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie (Gemeinverständlich), 2nd edn. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn.

Einstein, A. (1919). Was ist Relativitäts-Theorie? In The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, eds Jansen, M., Shulmann, R., Illy, J., Lehner, C. and Buchwald, D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 206–11.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1920). Grundgedanken und Methoden der Relativitätstheorie in ihrer Entwickelung dargestellt. In The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, eds Jansen, M., Shulmann, R., Illy, J., Lehner, C. and Buchwald, D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 212–49.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1922). The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Einstein, A. (1949). Autobiographical notes. In Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. Schilpp, P. A.. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 2–94.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, J. (1989). The low-water mark of general relativity, 1925–1950. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 277–92.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1748). Réflexions sur l'espace et le temps. Histoire de l'Academie Royale des sciences et belles lettres, 4, 324–33.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1765). Theoria motus corporum solidorum. Rostock and Greifswald, 1765.Google Scholar

Flores, F. (1999). Einstein's theory of theories and types of theoretical explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fock, V. (1959). The Theory of Space, Time, and Gravitation, transl. Kemmer, N.. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-time Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1990). Kant and Newton: why gravity is essential to matter. In Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, eds Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999a). Geometry, convention, and the relativized a priori: Reichenbach, Schlick, and Carnap. In Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999b). Poincaré's conventionalism and the logical positivists. In Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M. (1999c). Geometry, construction, and intuition in Kant and his successors. In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, eds Scher, G. and Tieszen, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (2002a). Geometry as a branch of physics: background and context for Einstein's “Geometry and Experience”. In Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics to Honor Howard Stein on his 70th Birthday, ed. Malament, D.. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (2002b). The Dynamics of Reason: the 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Galileo, (1632 [1996]). Dialogo Sopra I Due Massimi Sistemi del Mondo – Ptolemaico e Copernicano. Florence, 1632. Reprint, Milan: Oscar Mondadori.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. (1978). General Relativity from A to B. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B. (eds) (1962). Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large-Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1868). Über die Thatsachen, die der Geometrie zum Grunde liegen. Nachrichten von der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 9, 193–221. Reprinted in Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 2, 618–39.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1870). Ueber den Ursprung und die Bedeutung der geometrischen Axiome. In Vorträge und Reden, 2 vols. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1878). Die Thatsachen in der Wahrnehmung. In Vorträge und Reden, 2 vols. Braunschweig: Vieweg und Sohn, pp. 215–47.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1887). Zählen und Messen, erkenntnisstheoretische betrachtet. Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. 3. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, pp. 356–91.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. (1921). Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie, eds Hertz, P. and Schlick, M.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hughes, R. I. G. (1987). The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1764 [1911]). Untersuchung ueber die Deutlichkeit der Grundsaetze der naturlichen Theologie und der Moral (the “Prize Essay”). In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 2, pp. 273–301.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1768 [1911]). Von dem ersten Grunde des Unterschiedes der Gegenden im Raume. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 2, pp. 375–83.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1770). De mundi sensibilis atque intelligibilis forma et principiis. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 2, pp. 385-419.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1783). Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reimer, vol. 4.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1786 [1911]). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. In Gesammelte Schriften. Akademie Ausgabe, Berlin: Georg Reiner, vol. 4, pp. 465–565.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1787 [1956]). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Reprint, Berlin: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Klein, F. (1872). Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen. Erlangen: A. Duchert.Google Scholar

Kretschmann, E. (1917). Ueber die physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulaten. Annalen der Physik, (4) 53, 575-614.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1970a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1970b). Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1977). A function for thought-experiments. In The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lange, L. (1885). Ueber das Beharrungsgesetz. Berichte der Königlichen Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-physische Classe, 37, 333–51.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1694). Letter to C. Huygens. In Die mathematische Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Berlin, 1849–55. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, vol. II, pp. 179–85.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1695 [1960]). Systeme nouveau de la nature et de la communication des substances, aussi bien que l'union qu'il y a entre l'ame le corps. In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Berlin, 1875–90. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, vol. IV, pp. 477–87.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1699). Letter to B. de Volder. In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Berlin, 1875-90. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, pp. 168–70.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1716). Correspondence with S. Clarke. In Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Berlin, 1875-90. Reprint, Hildeshein: Georg Olms, vol. VII, pp. 345–440.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A. (1895). Michelson's interference experiment. In The Principle of Relativity, eds Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., transl. Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. B.. New York: Dover Books, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A. (1904). Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of light. In The Principle of Relativity, eds Einstein, A., Lorentz, H. A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H., transl. Perrett, W. and Jeffery, G. B.. New York: Dover Books, pp. 11–34.Google Scholar

Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Mach, E. (1889). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Magnani, L. (2002). Philosophy and Geometry: Theoretical and Historical Issues. Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol. 66. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Malament, D. (1986). Newtonian gravity, limits, and the geometry of space. In From Quarks to Quasars: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, ed. Colodny, R.. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. (1877). Matter and Motion. New York: Dover Publications (reprint 1952).

Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. London: Parker and Son.Google Scholar

Minkowski, H. (1908). Die Grundgleichungen für die elektromagnetischen Vorgänge in bewegten Körper. Nachrichten der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, mathematisch-physische Klasse, pp. 53–111.Google Scholar

Minkowski, H. (1909). Raum und Zeit. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, 104–11.Google Scholar

Misner, C., Thorne, K. and Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Nagel, E. (1939). The formation of modern conceptions of formal logic in the development of geometry. Osiris, 7, 142–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, C. (1870). Ueber die Principien der Galilei-Newton'schen Theorie. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Newcombe, S. (1910). Light. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edn, vol. 16, sect. III, pp. 623–6.

Newton, I. (1704 [1952]). Opticks. London. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1726 [1999]). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, transl. Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1729 [1962]). The System of the World. In Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World, ed. Cajori, F., transl. Motte, A., 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Norton, J. (1989a). What was Einstein's principle of equivalence? In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 5–47.Google Scholar

Norton, J. (1989b). How Einstein found his field equations. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 101–59.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1899a). Des fondements de la géométrie; a propos d'un livre de M. Russell. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, VII, 251–79.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1899b). Des fondements de la géométrie; réponse à M. Russell. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, VIII, 73–86.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1902). La Science et L'Hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1905). Sur la dynamique de l'électron. Comptes rendues de l'Académie des Sciences, 140, 1504–8.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1913). Dernières Pensées. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper, pp. 20–46.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1924). Die Bewegungslehre bei Newton, Leibniz, und Huyghens. Kantstudien, 29, 239–45.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1949). The philosophical significance of relativity. In Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. Schilpp, P. A.. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 289–311.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1957). The Philosophy of Space and Time, transl. Reichenbach, M.. New York: Dover Publications. (Originally published as Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin, 1927.)Google Scholar

Riemann, B. (1867). Ueber die Hypothesen, die der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen. In The Collected Works of Bernhard Riemann, ed. Weber, H.. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1902, pp. 272–87. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications, 1956.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1897). An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1899). Sur les axiomes de la géométrie. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, VII, 684–707.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1927). The Analysis of Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schlick, M. (1917). Raum und Zeit in der gegenwärtigen Physik. Zur Einführung in das Verständnis der Relativitäts- und Gravitationstheorie.Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sklar, L. (1977). Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Smith, G. E. (2003a). How Newton's Principia changed physics. Unpublished manuscript.

Smith, G. E. (2003b). Newton's Principia. Unpublished lecture notes, Tufts University.

Spivak, M. (1967). A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. Berkeley, CA: Publish or Perish Press.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1989a). The rigidly rotating disk as the “missing link” in the history of general relativity. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1989b). Einstein's search for general covariance. In Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, eds Howard, D. and Stachel, J.. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 63–100.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (2002a). “What song the sirens sang”: How did Einstein discover special relativity? In Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 157–70.

Stachel, J. (2002b). The genesis of general relativity. In Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 233-4.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (2002c). Einstein and Newton. In Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 447-52.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (2002d). Einstein from B to Z. Einstein Studies, vol. 9. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Stein, H. (1967). Newtonian space-time. Texas Quarterly, 10, 174–200.Google Scholar

Stein, H. (1977). Some philosophical prehistory of general relativity. In Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, eds Earman, J., Glymour, C. and Stachel, J.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–49.Google Scholar

Stein, H. (2002). Newton's metaphysics. In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Synge, J. L. (1960). Relativity: The General Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Taylor, E. and Wheeler, J. A. (1978). Spacetime Physics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. (1884). On the law of inertia; the principle of chronometry; and the principle of absolute clinural rest, and of absolute rotation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 12, 568–78.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1977). Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré. Dordrecht: Riedel.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1983). Relativity and Geometry. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1989). Creative Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Trautman, A. (1965). Foundations and current problems of general relativity. In Lectures on General Relativity. Brandeis 1964 Summer Institute on Theoretical Physics, vol. 1, eds Trautman, A., Pirani, F. A. E. and Bondi, H.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Trautman, A. (1966). The general theory of relativity. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 89, 319–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truesdell, C. (1967). Reactions of late Baroque mechanics to success, conjecture, error, and failure in Newton's Principia. Texas Quarterly, 10, 238–58.Google Scholar

Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyl, H. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie. Vorlesung über allgemeine Relativitätstheorie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Weyl, H. (1927). Philosophie der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften. In Oldenburg's Handbuch der Philosophie. Munich and Berlin: Verlag R. Oldenburg.Google Scholar

Will, C. (1993). Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, revised edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, C. (2002). Newton and celestial mechanics. In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, eds Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar