Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T01:57:55.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Is Pragmatist Truth Irrelevant to Inquiry?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2010

Erik J. Olsson
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden
André Fuhrmann
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of São Paulo
Get access

Summary

Such would be the scope of pragmatism – first, a method; and second, a genetic theory of what is meant be truth.

William James, Pragmatism (1907)

INTRODUCTION

In 1909 William James published a sequel, The Meaning of Truth, to his famous lectures on pragmatism of 1907. This new book opens with the sentence:

The pivotal part of my book named Pragmatism is its account of the relation called “truth” which may obtain between an idea (opinion, belief, statement, or what not) and its object.

(p. v)

Judging by the fact that he continued to focus on the concept of truth, James can have felt no remorse at having made the theory of truth the pivot of his presentation of pragmatism.

Apparently in strong disagreement with James, Isaac Levi writes that “pragmatism is seriously misrepresented as a philosophical outlook when attention is focused on the pragmatic theory of truth (whatever it may be)” (2002). Yet Levi agrees with the classical pragmatists, including James, that pragmatism is first a method and second, perhaps, a theory of truth. But Levi adds: If the second cannot be had without sacrificing the first, then we should let go of the idea of a distinctively pragmatist theory of truth. And he further adds: The second cannot be had without sacrificing the first. More specifically, Levi argues that the notion of truth that Peirce and James tried to describe as the ideal limit of converging inquiries does not square with the role that truth plays in pragmatically conceived inquiry.

Type
Chapter
Information
Knowledge and Inquiry
Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi
, pp. 32 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edgington, D. 1985. “The Paradox of Knowability.” Mind 94: 557–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, F. 1963. “A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 28: 135–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, A. 2004a. “Absolute pragmatische Wahrheit.” In Fuhrmann, A. and Olsson, E. (eds.), Pragmatismus heute. Frankfurt a.M.: OntosGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, A. Forthcoming. “James Unpeirced and Unfitched.” Cognitio 5Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. 1988. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford/MITGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1907. Pragmatism. New York: Longmans, GreenGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1909. The Meaning of Truth. New York: Longmans, GreenGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 1983. “Truth, Fallibility and the Growth of Knowledge.” In Cohen, R. S. and Wartovsky, M. W. (eds.), Language, Logic and Method, 153–74. Dordrecht: Reidel. Page references to the reprint in Levi 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 1984. Decisions and Revisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 1991. The Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 2002. “Seeking Truth.” In Hinzen, W. and Rott, H. (eds.), Belief and Meaning: Essays at the Interface, 119–138. Munich: Hänsel-HohenhausGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. 1995. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1997. “James's Theory of Truth.” In Putnam, R. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to William James, pp. 166–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rott, H. 2001. Change, Choice and Inference: A Study of Belief Revision and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 1998. “Truth: A Traditional Debate Revisited.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 24: 31–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 2001. “Minimalism, Deflationism, Pragmatism, Pluralism.” In Lynch, M. (ed.), The Nature of Truth, pp. 751–87. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×