Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T11:33:33.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - What is written into creation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

David B. Burrell
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Carlo Cogliati
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Janet M. Soskice
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
William R. Stoeger
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

It is difficult to see what science can usefully say about creatio ex nihilo. Even to describe it as an ‘event’ begs the question of prior nothing as against historical something. The latter is patently open to scientific investigation, but the former and any conceivable connecting factor are matters (so to speak) for metaphysical discussion. Even the fashionable suppositions of a universe emerging via the agency (again so to speak) of a quantum perturbation would seem to fall into the category of metaphysics, given that any proposed ‘mechanism’ apparently possesses no prior explanation, and would not be open to any sort of experimental verification. Those subscribing to naturalistic, if not materialist, world-pictures seem seldom to perceive a problem; broadly they regard the material universe as a brute fact. Creatio ex nihilo might be an embarrassment, but it is only a potential stumbling-block; as already noted, given it is beyond scientific discourse, the scientists have nothing to contribute.

Even so, no scientist can avoid being embedded in a metaphysical framework (even if it is ostensibly nihilistic or solipsistic), and it is not surprising that the apparent peculiarities of our universe (famously in terms of the apparent ‘fine-tuning’ of the physical constants) sharpen the desire to find an ‘escape clause’ from the ominous sense of a world designed for our habitation and understanding.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reppert, V., C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: A Philosophical Defense of Lewis's Argument from Reason (Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Switzer, C. Y., Moroney, S. E. and Benner, S. A., ‘Enzymatic Recognition of the Base Pair between Isocytidine and Isoguanosine’, Biochemistry 32 (1993), pp. 10,489–10,496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, S. Conway, Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, N., ‘There Is No Adequate Definition of “Fine-tuned” for Life’, Inquiry 43 (2000), pp. 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westheimer, F. H., ‘Why Nature Chose Phosphates’, Science 235 (1987), pp. 1,173–1,178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryan, G. W. and Gibbs, P. E., ‘Zinc – a Major Inorganic Component of Nereid Polychaete Jaws’, Journal of the Marine Biological Association, UK 59 (1979), pp. 969–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljas, A. and Laurberg, M., ‘A Wheel Invented Three Times: The Molecular Structure of Three Carbonic Anhydrases’, EMBO Report 1 (2000), pp. 16–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tripp, B. C., Smith, K. and Ferry, J. C., ‘Carbonic Anhydrase: New Insights for an Ancient Enzyme’, Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 (2001), pp. 48,615–48,618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
So, A. K.-C. and Espie, G. S., ‘Cyanobacterial Carbonic Anhydrase’, Canadian Journal of Botany 83 (2005), pp. 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, K. J., Qin, X.-X. and Waite, J. K., ‘Extensible Collagen in Mussel Byssus: A Natural Block Copolymer’, Science 277 (1997), pp. 1,830–1,832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piatigorsky, J., ‘Gene Sharing, Lens Crystallins and Speculations on an Eye/Ear Evolutionary Relationship’, Integrative and Comparative Biology 43 (2004), pp. 492–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. K. and McFall-Ngai, M. J., ‘The Muscle-derived Lens of a Squid Bioluminescent Organ is Biochemically Convergent with the Ocular Lens’, Journal of Biological Chemistry 267 (1992), pp. 20,999–21,003.Google ScholarPubMed
Wessler, I., Kirkpatrick, C. J. and Racke, K., ‘The Cholinergic “Pitfall”: Acetylcholine, a Universal Cell Molecule in Biological Systems, including Humans’, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 26 (1999), pp. 198–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baluška, F., Mancuso, S. and Volkmann, D. (eds.), Communication in Plants: Neuronal Aspects of Plant Life (Berlin: Springer, 2006).CrossRef
Vogeley, L., Sineshchekov, O. A., Trivedi, V. D., Sasaki, J., Spudich, J. L. and Luecke, H., ‘Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin: A Photochromic Color Sensor at 2.0 Å’, Science 306 (2004), pp. 1,390–1,393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catania, K. C., ‘A Nose that Looks like a Hand and Acts as an Eye: The Unusual Mechanosensory System of the Star-nosed Mole’, Journal of Comparative Physiology A 185 (1999), pp. 367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, H. E., Roitblat, H. L. and Nachtigall, P. E., ‘Object Representation in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Integration of Visual and Echoic Information’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 22 (1996), pp. 164–174.Google ScholarPubMed
Nieder, A. and Miller, E. K., ‘Coding of Cognitive Magnitude: Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex’, Neuron 37 (2003), pp. 149–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, I., The Evolution of Biological Organization as a Function of Information (Manaus: INPA, 2005)Google Scholar
Skrbina, D., Panpsychism in the West (Boston: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T., Biographia Literaria, or Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions (London: Everyman's Library, 1965).Google Scholar
Owen, A. M., Coleman, M. R., Boly, M., Davis, M. H., Laureys, S. and Pickard, P., ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’, Science 313 (2006), p. 1,402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×