Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T13:57:35.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Language and the Anglo-Saxon Landscape: Towards an Archaeological Interpretation of Place-Names in Wiltshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Simon Draper
Affiliation:
University of the West of England
Nicholas J. Higham
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Martin J. Ryan
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

The disciplines of place-name study and archaeology have long been central to our understanding of the Anglo-Saxon landscape. However, place-name scholars and archaeologists have not always seen eye-to-eye and mutual mistrust has occasionally prevailed. In this chapter I aim to demonstrate that the study of place-names in conjunction with archaeology can reveal new and important relationships between places and people in Anglo-Saxon England. Case studies are drawn from Wiltshire, where place-names containing a variety of Brittonic and Old English elements inform our understanding of such topics as the British cultural presence and the form and location of Anglo-Saxon settlements.

Place-Name Study and Archaeology: A Personal View

One need only turn to the introduction to the first edition of Margaret Gelling's Signposts to the Past to discover that place-name specialists and archaeologists have not always appreciated each other's point of view:

archaeologists may feel that philologists lack the practical sense needed for the realistic interpretation of names bestowed by peasant farmers. Philologists, for their part, are acutely aware that historians and archaeologists are embarrassingly disaster-prone when discussing place-names.

As a landscape archaeologist with a keen interest in place-names, I am often frustrated by the apparent tensions between the two fields and wonder where and when the problems evident in the above quotation began. The answer appears to lie with the ‘great revision’ of the 1960s, when place-name scholars sought to distance themselves from the ‘clean sweep’ view of Anglo-Saxon England held by leading archaeologists and historians of the day.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×