4 results
68 Associations between within-domain intraindividual variability and functional abilities in cognitively healthy older adults
- Stephanie M Simone, Sophia Holmqvist, Molly B Tassoni, Moira McKniff, Emma Pinsky, Tania Giovannetti
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 373-374
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Cognitive performance, particularly in the domains of memory and executive functioning (EF), have been shown in previous research to predict decline in everyday functioning in older adults. The goal-control model posits that episodic memory difficulties cause weak or decaying task goals that lead to the omission of every day task steps (low accomplishment). EF difficulties preclude control over the execution of task goals that lead to inefficient and error-prone performance (high errors). Intraindividual variability (IIV) in neuropsychological test performance has been proposed as a noninvasive early marker of dementia and has utility in cognitively healthy older adults. In this study we examined cross-sectional relations between within-domain IIV in memory and attention/EF with performance of everyday tasks in the lab. We expected greater memory IIV to be associated with task accomplishment (goal decay), and greater attention/EF IIV to be associated with errors (poor control over goals).
Participants and Methods:40 cognitively normal (CN) older adult (65+) participants (M age=71.44, SD=10.62; 73.8% women; 85.7% White; M education=18.55, SD=8.38) completed the Naturalistic Action Test (NAT), requiring completion of standardized, everyday tasks (i.e., breakfast, lunch) and scored for accomplishment of steps and various errors (micro-errors - misreach to distractor object, extra actions; overt -sequence, perseverative behaviors, etc.; motor errors). Within-domain IIV measures were calculated for 6 memory measures (HVLT-R, BVMT-R) and 6 attention/EF measures (Digit Span, Trail Making Test, Salthouse Letter/Pattern Comparison). First, raw scores for each test were z-transformed, then the intraindividual standard deviation of all z-scores was calculated. Bivariate Spearman’s rank-order correlations were used to examine associations between NAT performance and within-domain IIV, as well as mean performance. Linear regressions were used to examine the associations of IIV score with NAT scores, adjusting for age, sex, and mean cognitive performance.
Results:Among CN participants, higher memory IIV was significantly associated with lower NAT accomplishment (r=-.329, p=.038), and better mean memory performance was significantly associated with fewer errors (micro-errors r=-.509, p=.003; overt r=-.438, p=.012; motor errors r=-.463, p=.008). Regression models revealed that memory IIV, after controlling for mean memory performance, age, and sex, did not significantly predict NAT performance. High attention/EF IIV was significant associated with more errors (overt r=.377, p=.016), whereas mean attention/EF performance was not significantly correlated with any NAT measures. Attention/executive function IIV significantly predicted errors (micro-errors B=4.15, p=.03; Overall model: R2=0.285, F(4, 24)=2.393, p=.079; overt B=.562, p=.032; Overall model: R2=0.371, F(4, 24)=3.543, p=.021) after adjusting for mean attention/executive function performance, age, and sex.
Conclusions:Consistent with the goal-control model framework, greater variability in memory was associated with lower task accomplishment, whereas greater variability in attention/EF was associated with more errors. However, only attention/EF IIV predicted NAT performance, specifically errors (micro-errors, overt errors), after adjusting for age, sex, and mean attention/EF performance. Within-domain IIV can be used to predict mild functional difficulties in cognitively healthy older adults. Future research should examine within-domain IIV in a larger sample with more diversity to maximize generalizability, and in a longitudinal design to evaluate within-domain IIV predictive validity for cognitive/functional impairment.
85 Evaluating the Improvement on the Naturalistic Action Task After the Virtual Kitchen Intervention: A Case Study
- Molly B. Tassoni, Moira McKniff, Emma Pinsky, Ross Divers, Stephanie M Simone, Sophia Holmqvist, Rachel Mis, Katherine Hackett, Marina Kaplan, Giuliana Vallecorsa, Mijail Serruya, Takehiko Yamaguchi, Tania Giovannetti
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 186-187
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
The goal-control model of the functional impairment in dementia posits two different underlying mechanisms: decay of task goals (reduced task accomplishment) and poor control over goal execution (high error rates). Here we present a case series in which we explore the effects of a performance-based, functional intervention on two participants. Outcomes were evaluated using the goal-control framework.
Participants and Methods:Two participants with dementia (CS: age 70, 14 years of education; EM: age 93, 18 years of education) completed neuropsychological tests (scored using age, education, and IQ-adjusted norms) and baseline testing with the Naturalistic Action Task (NAT; a validated performance-based task of everyday function including a Breakfast and Lunch task). The Virtual Kitchen (VK) was used to train, through repeated performance, either the Breakfast (CS) or Lunch (EM) tasks for 30 minutes (or 10 total repetitions) per day over 5 days. After VK training, participants performed the NAT Breakfast and Lunch tasks again to evaluate improvement on the trained and untrained tasks. Baseline and post-training NATs were scored for task accomplishment and errors by two coders observing video recordings. Z scores were derived by calculating accomplishment and error change scores for each participant relative to the mean and standard deviations of change scores from a cohort of 36 healthy controls (mean age: 73.3, SD: 6.44; mean education: 17.42, SD: 2.17).
Results:Both participants exhibited similar cognitive profiles: high estimated IQ; low MMSE (total = 19 for both CS and EM; 1st percentile); anterograde amnesia, slowed processing speed and impaired executive function; average scores on tests of attention, language, and self-reported depression. Informant report of daily functioning (FAQ) suggested that EM (FAQ=28) exhibited greater functional impairment than CS (FAQ=9). Both participants completed all VK training sessions. Z scores of the change from pre- to post-training showed significant increases in task accomplishment on the trained task (trained condition change z scores: EM = +27.69; CS =+ 6.06), but significantly less improvement or worse task accomplishment on the untrained task (untrained condition change z scores: EM = +4.06; CS = -13.69). The training did not reduce errors, as error rates increased for both participants on the trained task.
Conclusions:The participants presented in this case study exhibited comparable cognitive profiles, including marked anterograde amnesia. Our results suggest that repeated training in a virtual context can improve specific aspects of functioning on real, life everyday tasks. Further, according to the goal-control framework, repeated practice reduces the decay of the task goal, as represented by greater task accomplishment, but does not improve executive control over the task execution. Important future directions are to determine if people with different cognitive profiles will demonstrate different benefits from VK training and to examine if virtual training of personally relevant, everyday tasks can promote independent living and improve quality of life.
3 Smartphone Digital Phenotyping for Unobtrusive and Continuous Assessment of Everyday Cognition and Movement Trajectories in Older Adults
- Katherine Hackett, Shiyun Xu, Moira McKniff, Emma Pinsky, Sophia Holmqvist, Giuliana Vallecorsa, Ian Barnett, Tania Giovannetti
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 207-208
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
To evaluate the feasibility, usability, and preliminary validity of a digital phenotyping protocol to capture everyday cognition and activities in vivo among older adults.
Participants and Methods:Eight participants (M age=69.1 + 2.6; M education=18.0 + 1.4; 50% female; 88% non-Hispanic White) with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment used an open-source smartphone application (mindLAMP) to passively and continuously capture sensor data including global positioning system (GPS) trajectories for a 4-week study period. Baseline neuropsychological tests and measures of depression, self-reported cognitive decline and mobility patterns were collected as external validators for digital data. Participants downloaded mindLAMP onto their smartphones and resumed their daily routines for 4 weeks before removing mindLAMP and completing a debriefing questionnaire. A cognitive composite was derived by averaging T-scores across domains of attention, executive functioning, processing speed, memory, and language. GPS raw data were processed to generate monthly average and standard deviation mobility metrics for each participant, including time spent at home, distance travelled, radius of gyration, flight length, and circadian routine. Feasibility and usability findings are presented along with correlation coefficients >.4 between GPS metrics and external validators.
Results:100% of enrolled participants completed the 4-week study without requesting to withdraw. Usability ratings ranged from poor to excellent. 75% of participants agreed that mindLAMP was easy to use, whereas only 1 participant enjoyed using mindLAMP. 100% of participants were satisfied with the study team’s explanation of procedures, privacy safeguards, data encryption methods and risks/benefits, reflected in an average score of 98.8% on the comprehension of consent quiz. No participants reported feeling uncomfortable, suspicious, or paranoid due to the study application running on their smartphone. No participants endorsed new problems using their smartphone, though 75% reported charging it more frequently during the study period. On average each day, participants spent 1121 + 227 minutes at home, travelled 38727 + 36210 geodesic units, and had 201 + 149 minutes of missing GPS data. Overall, greater amounts of activity (monthly average) and higher variability (monthly standard deviation) in GPS metrics were associated with better outcomes. Specifically, less time spent at home, greater distance travelled, larger radius of gyration, greater flight length, and greater variability in home time, distance travelled, radius of gyration and flight length were associated with less depression, less self-reported cognitive decline, better cognition, and greater self-reported mobility (.40< |r| <.69). On the other hand, greater circadian routine was associated with more self-reported cognitive decline (r=.66) and less self-reported mobility (r=-.43).
Conclusions:Smartphone digital phenotyping is a feasible and acceptable method to capture everyday activities in older adults. Continuous collection of data from personal devices warrants caution; however, participants denied privacy concerns and expressed an overall positive experience. High frequency GPS data collection impacts battery life and should be considered among relative risks and confounds to naturalistic assessment. Patterns of behavior from passive smartphone data show promise as an unobtrusive method to identify cognitive risk and resilience in older adults. Subsequent analyses will evaluate additional sensor metrics across a larger and more heterogeneous cohort.
Smartphone-Based Neuropsychological Assessment in Parkinson’s Disease: Feasibility, Validity, and Contextually Driven Variability in Cognition
- Emma L. Weizenbaum, Daniel Fulford, John Torous, Emma Pinsky, Vijaya B. Kolachalama, Alice Cronin-Golomb
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 28 / Issue 4 / April 2022
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 17 May 2021, pp. 401-413
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives:
The prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders demands methods of accessible assessment that reliably captures cognition in daily life contexts. We investigated the feasibility of smartphone cognitive assessment in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD), who may have cognitive impairment in addition to motor-related problems that limit attending in-person clinics. We examined how daily-life factors predicted smartphone cognitive performance and examined the convergent validity of smartphone assessment with traditional neuropsychological tests.
Methods:Twenty-seven nondemented individuals with mild–moderate PD attended one in-lab session and responded to smartphone notifications over 10 days. The smartphone app queried participants 5x/day about their location, mood, alertness, exercise, and medication state and administered mobile games of working memory and executive function.
Results:Response rate to prompts was high, demonstrating feasibility of the approach. Between-subject reliability was high on both cognitive games. Within-subject variability was higher for working memory than executive function. Strong convergent validity was seen between traditional tests and smartphone working memory but not executive function, reflecting the latter’s ceiling effects. Participants performed better on mobile working memory tasks when at home and after recent exercise. Less self-reported daytime sleepiness and lower PD symptom burden predicted a stronger association between later time of day and higher smartphone test performance.
Conclusions:These findings support feasibility and validity of repeat smartphone assessments of cognition and provide preliminary evidence of the effects of context on cognitive variability in PD. Further development of this accessible assessment method could increase sensitivity and specificity regarding daily cognitive dysfunction for PD and other clinical populations.