1 results
14 - Reflective approaches to uncertainty assessment and communication
-
- By Jeroen P. van der Sluijs, Utrecht University, Arthur Petersen, VU University Amsterdam, Silvio Funtowicz, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC)
- Edited by Justus Lentsch, Peter Weingart, Universität Bielefeld, Germany
-
- Book:
- The Politics of Scientific Advice
- Published online:
- 25 October 2011
- Print publication:
- 02 June 2011, pp 259-269
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
Policy decisions in many areas involving science, including the environment and public health, are both complex and contested. Typically there are no facts that entail a unique correct policy. Furthermore, political decisions on these problems will need to be made before conclusive scientific evidence is available. Decision stakes are high: The impacts of wrong decisions based on the available limited knowledge can be huge. Actors disagree on the values that should guide the decision-making. The available knowledge bases are typically characterised by imperfect understanding (and imperfect reduction into models) of the complex systems involved. Models, scenarios and assumptions dominate assessment of these problems, and many (hidden) value loadings reside in problem frames, indicators chosen and assumptions made.
The evidence that is embodied in scientific policy advice under such post-normal (Funtowicz and Ravetz 1993) conditions requires quality assessment. Advice should be relevant to the policy issue, scientifically tenable and robust under societal scrutiny. Governmental and intergovernmental agencies that inform policy and the public about complex risks increasingly recognise that uncertainty and disagreement can no longer be suppressed or denied, but need to be dealt with in a transparent and effective manner. In response to emerging needs, several institutions that interface science and policy have adopted knowledge quality assessment approaches, where knowledge refers to any information that is accepted into a debate (UK Strategy Unit 2002; EPA 2003; MNP/UU 2003; IPCC 2005).