5 results
27 Green’s Word Memory Test (WMT) Immediate Recall as a Screening Tool for Performance Invalidity
- Jonathan D Sober, Nicholas J Pastorek, J. Parks Fillauer, Brian I Miller, Cheyanne C Barba
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 709-710
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Assessment of performance validity during neuropsychology evaluation is essential to reliably interpret cognitive test scores. Studies (Webber et al., 2018; Wisdom, et al., 2012) have validated the use of abbreviated measures, such as Trial 1 (T1) of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), to detect invalid performance. Only one study (Bauer et al., 2007) known to these authors has examined the utility of Green’s Word Memory Test (WMT) immediate recall (IR) as a screening tool for invalid performance. This study explores WMT IR as an independent indicator of performance validity in a mild TBI (mTBI) veteran population.
Participants and Methods:Participants included 211 (Mage = 32.1, SD = 7.4; Medu = 13.1, SD = 1.64; 94.8% male; 67.8% White) OEF/OIF/OND veterans with a history of mTBI who participated in a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at one of five participating VA Medical Centers. Performance validity was assessed using validated cut scores from the following measures: WMT IR and delayed recall (DR); TOMM T1; WAIS-IV reliable digit span; CVLT-II forced choice raw score; Wisconsin Card Sorting Test failure to maintain set; and the Rey Memory for Fifteen Items test, combo score. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each IR score compared with failure on DR. In addition, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each WMT IR score compared to failure of at least one additional performance validity measure (excluding DR), two or more measures, and three or more measures, respectively.
Results:Results indicated that 46.8% participants failed to meet cut offs for adequate performance validity based on the standard WMT IR cut score (i.e., 82.5%; M = 81.8%, SD = 17.7%); however, 50.2% participants failed to meet criteria based on the standard WMT DR cut score (M = 79.8% SD = 18.6%). A cut score of 82.5% or below on WMT IR correctly identified 82.4% (i.e., sensitivity) of subjects who performed below cut score on DR, with a specificity of 94.2%. Examination of IR cutoffs compared to failure of one or more other PVTs revealed that the standardized cut score of 82.5% or below had a sensitivity of 78.2% and a specificity of 72.4%; whereas, a cut score of 65% or below had a sensitivity of 41% and a specificity of 91.3%. Similarly, examination of IR cutoffs compared to failure of two or more additional PVTs revealed that the cut score of 60% or below had a sensitivity of 45.7% and specificity of 93.1% ; whereas, a cut score of 57.5% or below had a sensitivity of 57.9% and specificity of 90.9% when using failure of three or more PVTs as the criterion.
Conclusions:Results indicated that a cut score of 82.5% or below on WMT IR may be sufficient to detect invalid performance when considering WMT DR as criterion. Furthermore, WMT IR alone, with adjustments to cut scores, appears to be a reasonable way to assess symptom validity compared to other PVTs. Sensitivity and specificity of WMT IR scores may have been adversely impacted by lower sensitivity of other PVTs to independently identify invalid performance.
90 Cognitive Success in the Setting of Performance Validity Failure
- Anastasia Matchanova, Savanna M Tierney, Brian I Miller, Nicholas J Pastorek
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 762-763
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Although studies have shown unique variance contributions from performance invalidity, it is difficult to interpret the meaning of cognitive data in the setting of failed performance validity tests (PVT). Furthermore, a clearer understanding of the clinical utility of cognitive data in the context of invalid PVTs is necessary to inform decisions about battery length once PVTs are failed. The primary aim of the current study is to broadly describe cognitive outcomes in the setting of PVT failure.
Participants and Methods:Two hundred and twenty-two veterans with a history of mild traumatic brain injury referred for clinical evaluation completed cognitive and performance validity measures. Standardized scores were characterized as Within Normal Limits and Below Normal Limits at the normative 16th percentile and number of Within Normal Limits scores were calculated for each participant. Cognitive outcomes are described across four commonly used PVTs. Rates of below normal limits cognitive performance, and PVT failure were assessed via student’s t tests among participants who were classified as productive or unproductive based on involvement in work and/or school.
Results:Among participants who performed in the invalid range on TOMM trial 1, 36-81% of cognitive data reflected within normal limits performance. Similarly, 47-81% of those who demonstrated performance invalidity based on the Word Memory Test (WMT) earned broadly within normal limits scores across cognitive testing. For those with invalid performance based on the normative digit span scaled score, 35-88% of cognitive data was at or above the 16th percentile. Within normal limits across cognitive tests ranged from 16-71% when the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition forced choice was used as an indicator of performance validity. In the context of PVT failure, the average number of cognitive performances below the 16th percentile ranged from 5-7 of 14 tasks depending on which PVT measure was applied. Within the total sample, there were no differences in the total number of below normal limits performances on cognitive measures between productive and unproductive participants (T = 1.65, p = 1.00). Additionally, there were no differences in the total number of PVTs failed between the productive and unproductive groups (T = 0.33, p = 0.743).
Conclusions:Results of the current study suggest that the range of within normal limits cognitive performance in the context of failed performance validity measures varies greatly. Importantly, findings indicate that neurocognitive data may still provide important practical information regarding cognitive abilities (i.e., that test takers can oftentimes perform within broadly normal limits on many cognitive tasks), despite poor PVT outcomes. Further, given that neither rates of below normal limits cognitive performance nor rates of PVT failures differed among productivity groups, results have important implications for decisions to continue testing and recommendations in a clinical setting.
57 Olfaction in Veterans with a History of Deployment-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- Maya Troyanskaya, Nicholas J Pastorek, Fariha Jamal, George R Jackson, Aliya I Sarwar, Elisabeth A Wilde, Randall S Scheibel
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 162-163
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Olfaction is a critical sensory function and changes in the ability to detect smells could affect quality of life by diminishing appreciation of food, drink, and other aroma-based experiences, increase danger of hazardous exposures, and cause a loss of employment. Additionally, decrements in olfaction have been related to onset of some neurodegenerative conditions. Olfactory impairments in military populations are highly prevalent and often attributed to the long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and chronic psychiatric disorders. The main goal of this investigation was to examine olfactory function in a cohort of combat veterans using a quantitative smell test.
Participants and Methods:Participants underwent a neurological examination using a revised version of the Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury. Olfactory function was examined using a set of essential oil vials with common odors. Based on the number of correctly identified odors, the following grading system was employed: no deficit; mild; moderate; severe deficit; and absence of smell detection. All study assessments were performed prior to March of 2020 (onset of COVID-19 pandemic). In addition, participants completed performance validity testing (PVT) and screening for ongoing substance misuse using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and Drug Abuse Screening Test-10. Lifetime history of brain injury, combat-related extracranial injuries, and deployment characteristics were assessed using structured interview. All available medical records were reviewed.
Results:Participants were 38 veterans with a deployment-related mTBI who passed the PVT and did not have ongoing substance misuse issues. Olfactory examination revealed normosmia in 20 participants and various degrees of deficit in 18 (11= mild; 4=moderate; and 3=severe). The groups did not differ in demographics, post-injury interval, or current clinical (non-psychiatric) conditions. Participants with hyposmia frequently reported being exposed to a higher number of blasts and being positioned closer to the nearest primary blast, and more often endorsed a period of loss of consciousness after the most serious mTBI. In addition, they more often reported tympanic membrane perforation, extracranial injuries, and histories of both blast and blunt force mTBI. Comorbid diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, chronic headaches, and pain were more common among these participants as well.
Conclusions:Several blast exposure and specific injury-related characteristics increase the likelihood of long-term olfactory impairments, comorbid psychiatric conditions, and chronic pain among veterans with a history of deployment-related mTBI. Notably, none of the participants with hyposmia had a clinical diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction or were receiving service-connected disability for a loss of sense of smell at the time of their assessment. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation care provided to combat veterans with history of mTBI and/or PTSD should include olfactory examination using both quantitative and qualitative smell tests, education regarding the adversities related to loss of smell, management of current psychiatric symptoms, and follow-up assessments. The lack of a comparison group without a history of mTBI and the small sample size were the main limitations of this investigation.
Postconcussive Symptoms After Blast and Nonblast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries in Afghanistan and Iraq War Veterans
- SARA M. LIPPA, NICHOLAS J. PASTOREK, JARED F. BENGE, G. MATTHEW THORNTON
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 16 / Issue 5 / September 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 04 August 2010, pp. 856-866
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Blast injury is common in current warfare, but little is known about the effects of blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Profile analyses were conducted investigating differences in self-reported postconcussive (PC) symptoms in 339 veteran outpatients with mTBI histories reporting current symptoms based on mechanism of injury (blast only, nonblast only, or both blast and nonblast), number of blast injuries, and distance from the blast. Veterans with any blast-related mTBI history were younger and reported higher posttraumatic stress symptoms than veterans with nonblast-related mTBI histories, with a marginally significant difference in posttraumatic stress symptom report between veterans reporting blast-related mTBI only and those reporting nonblast-related mTBI. The groups did not differ in terms of PC symptom severity or PC symptom cluster profiles. Among veterans with blast-related mTBI histories, PC symptom report did not vary by number of blast-related mTBIs or proximity to blast. Overall, posttraumatic stress symptoms accounted for a substantial portion of variance in PC symptom report. In veteran outpatients with remote mTBI histories who have enduring symptom complaints related to the mTBI, mechanism of injury did not clearly contribute to differential PC symptom severity or PC symptom cluster profile. Proximal rather than distal factors may be important intervention targets in returning symptomatic veterans with mTBI histories. (JINS, 2010, 16, 856–866.)
Prediction of global outcome with acute neuropsychological testing following closed-head injury
- NICHOLAS J. PASTOREK, H. JULIA HANNAY, CHARLES S. CONTANT
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 10 / Issue 6 / October 2004
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 October 2004, pp. 807-817
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Delaying assessment until emergence from post-traumatic amnesia increases completion rates, but this practice causes variable time delays from the date of injury to testing, which can complicate the interpretation of research findings. In the current study, the performance of 105 head injury survivors on simple tests of language comprehension and attention was used to predict global outcome. It was hypothesized that 1 month performance on these measures would aid in the prediction of Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores collected at 6 months post injury. Only raw scores on the modified Test of Complex Ideational Material accounted for a significant amount of the variance in DRS scores (4.4%) above that accounted for by age, education, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and pupil response. However, testability at 1 month post injury on all four tests consistently accounted for a larger portion of the variance in DRS scores (10.1–13.2%) and significantly improved prediction of GOS scores. Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test scores collected at 1 month post injury accounted for substantially less variance in DRS scores (7.7–8.4%). Neuropsychological data, including the testability of patients, collected uniformly at 1 month following injury can contribute to the prediction of global outcome. (JINS, 2004, 10, 807–817.)