2 results
The Order of Being and the Order of Ideas: The Historical Context of Herder's Essay on Being
- from Part II - Critical Essays
-
- By Wolfgang Pross, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Università degli Studi, Pavia, and St. John's College, Oxford
- Edited by John K. Noyes
-
- Book:
- Herder's Essay on Being
- Published by:
- Boydell & Brewer
- Published online:
- 13 April 2019
- Print publication:
- 01 December 2018, pp 89-107
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Nemo potest cupere beatum esse, bene agere, et bene vivere, qui simul non cupiat, esse, agere, et vivere, hoc est, actu existere.
—Spinoza, Ethica (1677)One of the greatest Reasons why so few People understand themselves, is, that most Writers are always teaching Men what they should be, and hardly ever trouble their Heads with telling them what they really are.
—Bernard de Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (1714)Being is not a thought, not an opinion; it is Being.
—Herder to Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1792)Dasein ist Pflicht, und wärs ein Augenblick.
—Goethe, Faust: Der Tragödie zweiter Teil (1832)IT WOULD APPEAR THAT the Essay on Being has now come to occupy a similar central position in the research on Herder's philosophical development as The Oldest Systematic Program of German Idealism (1797) of the Tübingen Circle in the history of German Idealism—even though it has never been fully decided whether the authorship of the latter document is to be attributed to Georg Wilhelm Hegel (1770–1831), Friedrich Hölderlin (1770–1843), or Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling (1775–1854). One particular problem in interpreting Herder's Essay is to be found in the text itself, as evidenced in the new transcription by Hans-Dietrich Irmscher and Heinrich Clairmont. In the rich discussion of the existing research by Marion Heinz in this volume, she shows how important the Essay on Being was for Herder, in which he staked out an independent position on the basis of his altercation with Kant and thereby set the direction for his further writings. This is certainly correct. However, his equally important engagement with the Leibniz of the posthumously published Nouveaux Essais only began in 1765, that is, one year after the Essay on Being. Subsequently his studies of the hitherto unknown text added new nuances to his work, as he continued to distance himself from his Königsberg training under Kant and Hamann. Following Herder's excerpts from the Nouveaux Essais, the results were to become apparent in the no less significant sketch Zum Sinn des Gefühls (On the Sense of Feeling, 1769). Here, he gives the Essay on Being a decisive new dimension with the tenet “I feel! I am!” (“Ich fühle mich! Ich bin!”), which Herder places in opposition to the Cartesian “Cogito, ergo sum,” which is now basic for the constitution of knowledge itself.
8 - Naturalism, anthropology, and culture
- from Part II - The new light of reason
- Mark Goldie, Robert Wokler
-
- Book:
- The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
- Published online:
- 28 March 2008
- Print publication:
- 31 August 2006, pp 218-248
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
A Counter-Enlightenment?
When the roots of Romanticism are traced to the age of Enlightenment, they are often located in the hinterland of Europe, where, at the margins of civilisation, solitary thinkers like Vico in Naples, Rousseau in Neuchâtel, or Herder in Lithuania are portrayed as having cast themselves adrift from the prevailing intellectual currents of their day. In opposing the idea of progress such proponents of what in the late nineteenth century came to be termed the Counter-Enlightenment are alleged to have subscribed to diverse notions of primitivism, preferring ancient mythology over modern science, popular intuitions over abstract ideas, and uncouth human nature over the refinements of culture. In confronting Enlightenment philosophy they are taken to have undermined its most central premises and subverted its aims in the manner of prophets harking back to a world we have lost, betrothed to fictitious ideals of uncultivated simplicity which, while derided by their contemporaries, have made their doctrines seem peculiarly post-modern and thereby apposite to a post-Enlightenment world.
Such perspectives, however, do grave injustice to the careers of Vico, Rousseau, Herder, and their disciples. When he put forward his now-celebrated notion of ‘ricorso’ – that is, of ‘repetition’ or ‘return’ – in just the last of his three formulations of a New Science of the laws of development of human society (Scienza nuova, 1725, 1730, and 1744), Vico was not advocating mankind’s reversion to a state of barbarism. As the Italian scholar Giuseppe Giarrizzo remarked, Vico’s political science was actually conceived ‘to save mankind from the return of barbarism’ (Giarrizzo 1981, p. 21).