Parallels and divergences in spoken word recognition between humans and a neural network model

23 November 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial neural networks have enabled the design of automatic speech recognition systems that perform comparably to human listeners in various speech recognition tasks. Careful analysis of the behavioural characteristics of such systems can reveal similarities and critical divergences between machine and human speech recognition. These insights may inspire testable hypotheses using purpose-built artificial neural networks, human psycholinguistic or neuroimaging experiments, and eventually further our understanding of speech perception. We used a recently published end-to-end model of human speech recognition and compared its behavioural characteristics to two aspects of human spoken word recognition; investigating whether the model exhibits similar behaviour when adapting to changing speech rates and speakers. We found that the network model responds similarly to humans to speech rate changes, but not to speaker changes. We are investigating which architectural features could explain the lack of speaker change effects and plan follow-up simulation and behavioural experiments.

Keywords

artificial neural network
speech recognition
language
human

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.