Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2014
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Balance of Power in International RelationsMetaphors, Myths and Models, pp. 288 - 311Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
(1992), ‘The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control’, International Organization 46(1), 101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Making Sense of State Socialisation’, Review of International Studies 27(3), 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1977), ‘History, Quantitative Analysis and the Balance of Power’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, João Marques de (2006), ‘Hedley Bull, “Embedded Cosmopolitanism” and the Pluralist-Solidarist Debate’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David (2006), ‘The Nature of Law in an Anarchical Society’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. S. (1970), ‘Eighteenth-Century Theories of the Balance of Power’, in and , eds., Studies in Diplomatic History, London: Harlow Longmans.Google Scholar
(1910), The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to their Economic and Social Advantage, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond (1966), Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, trans. and , London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. (1955), ‘On the Use of Metaphors in the Description of Persons’, in , ed., On Expressive Language, Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (2004), ‘Power and International Relations’, in , , and , eds., Handbook of International Relations, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
(1975), ‘Models of Power: Past and Present’, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences 11: 211–22.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1988), Transforming Political Discourse: Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1974), Myths, Models and Paradigms: A Comparative Study in Science and Religion, San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
(1996), Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors and Meanings of Economic Space, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Daniel A. (1987), ‘British Strategy During the First World War in the Context of Four Centuries: Blue-Water Versus Continental Commitment’, in , ed., Naval History: The Sixth Symposium of the U.S. Naval Academy, Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
(1956), Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of America to World Power, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
and (2004a), eds., Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Francis A. and Christ'L De Landtsheer (2004b), ‘Introduction. Metaphors, Politics and World Politics’, in and , eds., Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(1962), Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Max (1979), ‘More about Metaphors’, in , ed., Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1990), Perplexities: Rational Choice, the Prisoner's Dilemma, Metaphor, Poetic Ambiguity and Other Puzzles, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
and (2007), The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna (2004), ‘New Tales from the Trenches’, The Independent Review Section, Friday, 3 September, p. 23.
Brookes, Adam (2005), ‘US Watches China Warily’, news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world /americas/4342527.stm, last downloaded 7 December 2005.
and (2005), ‘Hard Times for Soft Balancing’, International Security 30(1), 72–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976), ‘Social Theory as Metaphor: On the Logic of Discovery for the Sciences of Conduct’, Theory and Society 3, 169–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
and (1984) eds., The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1955), ‘The Balance of Power in Nineteenth Century South America: An Exploratory Essay’, Hispanic American Historical Review 35, February, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert (1966), ‘The Balance of Power’, in and , eds., Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization 47(3), 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004a), From International to World Society: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b), The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty First Century, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2006), ‘Rethinking Hedley Bull on the Institutions of International Society’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000), International Systems in History: Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2003), Regions and Power: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993), The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1999), Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Nationalizing International Theory: Race, Class and the English School’, Global Society 18(4), 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Paul (1982), ‘Frederich Nietzsche: The Use and Abuse of Metaphor’, in , ed., Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
(1966), The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol 2, Mythical Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics’, Review of International Politics 30(2), 229–44.Google Scholar
(1996), Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
and (1990), ‘Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity’, International Organization 44(2), 137–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the Theory that “Democracies” Do Not Go to War with Each Other’, Review of International Studies 20(3), 205–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau and Waltz, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe 900–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1968), ‘Power’ in , ed., International Encyclopedia for the Social Sciences Vol 12: 405–15, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1984a), Language and Politics: Why Does Language Matter to Political Philosophy, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
(1984b), Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Political Theory, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1979), ‘What Metaphors Mean’, in , ed., On Metaphor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1962), The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle, trans. , New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
(1967), Germany and World Politics in the Twentieth Century, trans. , New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari (1987), trans. , A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘The Scriptures of Security’, Mershon International Studies Review 42(1), 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies’, International Security 23(1), 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1964), ‘Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability’, World Politics 16(3), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Metaphors of Memory: A History of Ideas About the Mind, trans. , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), Why Life Speeds Up as You Get Older: How Memory Shapes Our Past, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998), Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘System, State and Society: How Does It All Hang Together?’, Millennium 34(1), 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1972), The Study of Politics, trans. , Sunbury-on Thames: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Eccleshall, Robert (1984), ‘Introduction: The World of Ideology’, in et al., Political Ideologies, London: Hutchinson and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Arthur M. (2007), ‘Intra-Greek Balancing, the Mediterranean Crisis of ca. 201–200 B.C. and the Rise of Rome’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist (2006), ‘The European Union in the World: Abroad Be Dangers’, 26 August, 29–30.
(1971), Politics As Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence, Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘Generalising the International’, Review of International Studies 31(3), 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983), ‘Collective Security as Political Myth: Liberal Internationalism and the League of Nations in Politics and History’, International History Review 5(4), 496–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1995), ‘History vs. Neorealism: A Second Look’, International Security 20(1), 182–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996a), ‘Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?’, Security Studies 6(1), 7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996b), ‘Cause, Effect and Consistency: A Response to Kenneth Waltz’, Security Studies 6(1), 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Extending Offensive Realism: The Louisiana Purchase and America's Rise to Regional Hegemony’, American Political Science Review 98(4), 563–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Explanatory Typologies in the Qualitative Study of International Politics’, International Organization 59(2), 293–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1903), ‘The Poet’, in and eds., Complete Works, Moston: Houghton.Google Scholar
(2000), A War of Words in the Discourse of Trade: The Rhetorical Constitution of Metaphor, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
(1996), Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(1945), The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth Century, England, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(1972), ‘The Field of International Relations: The View From Within’, Towson State Journal of International Affairs 7, 1–24.Google Scholar
(1969), The Concept of Empire in Western Europe from the Fifth to the Fourteenth Century, trans. , London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
and (1971), World Politics: Verbal Strategy Among the Superpowers, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1938), Foreign Policy in the Making: The Search for a New Balance of Power, New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
(1980), Man and Government: An Empirical Theory of Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Fry, Greg and Jacinta O'Hagan (2000), ‘Contending Images of World Politics: An Introduction’, in and , eds., Contending Images of World Politics, Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Ideology as a Cultural System’, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Gellman, Barton (1992), ‘Keeping the US first’, Washington Post, 11 March, zfacts.com/metaPage/lib/9203-Wolfowitz.pdf, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(1983), Managing US–Soviet rivalry: Problems of Crisis Prevention, Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1965), Machiavelli and Guicciardini: Politics and History in Sixteenth Century Florence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1), 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), The Standard of Civilization in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1948), American Diplomacy in the International Community, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
(1992), The Leverage of Seapower: The Strategic Advantage of Navies in War, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco (1984 [1561]), The History of Italy, trans. and ed., Princeton: Princton University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’, International Organization 47(3), 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 10(4), 533–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’, Millennium 33(3), 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1953), ‘The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept or Propaganda’, World Politics (4), 442–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Leonard Krieger: Historicization and Political Engagement in Intellectual History’, History and Theory 35: 80–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, London: David Fickling Books.Google Scholar
(2006), Compound Republics as Viable Political Systems: A Comparison of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation and the European Union, Phd Thesis, Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. (1966), ‘Introduction’, in Francesco Guicciardini, History of Italy and History of Florence, trans. , Chalfont St Giles: New English Library.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian (2006), ‘Diplomacy, Anti-Diplomacy and International Society’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Revolution and World Politics: The Rise and Fall of the Sixth Great Power, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1959), International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Herz, John H. (1969), ‘The Territorial State Revisited: Reflections on the Future of the Nation-State’, in , ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy,New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(2003), Political Ideologies: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Bringing States Back In’, from Review Symposium on Steven Lukes' Power: A Radical View, in Political Studies Review 4(2), 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Massing the Tropes: The Metaphorical Construction of American Nuclear Strategy, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1), 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960), ed., Contemporary Theory in International Relations, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
(1977), ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus 106 (Summer), 41–60.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley (2002), ‘Foreword to the Second Edition: Revisiting The Anarchical Society’, in , The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1970), The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory, London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1991), Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1973), Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances: Comparative Studies, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
and (1973), Structure and Process in International Politics, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘The Enigmatic Ends of Rhetoric: Churchill's Fulton Address as Great Art and Failed Persuasion’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 83(4), 416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Towards a Dynamic Theory of International Politics: Insights from Comparing Ancient China and Early Modern Europe’, International Organization 58 (Winter), 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Kenneth Waltz and the Limits of Explanatory Theory in International Relations, DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (1993) ‘International Society and the Study of International Regimes’, in , ed., Regime Theory in International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2002), ‘Foreword to the Third Edition: The Anarchical Society 25 Years On’, in , The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.
(1980), John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution, Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
(2001), After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2003), ed., America Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2000), The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997), System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles A. (2006), ‘War in the twenty-first century: An Institution in Crisis’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles A. (2007) ‘The Americas: 1400–1800’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘The Myth of the European Concert: The Realist–Institutionalist Debate and Great Power Behavior in the Eastern Question, 1821–41’, Security Studies 7(2), 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999), eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J., Richard Little and William C. Wohlforth (2007), ‘Conclusion’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), ‘Myth, Self-fulfilling Prophecy, and Symbolic Reassurance in East–West Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 9(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘Escalation of Regional Conflict: Testing the Shatterbelt Concept’, Political Geography Quarterly 5: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Checkerboards and Shatterbelts: The Geopolitics of South America, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, John F. (2004), ‘Joseph Jastrow and his Duck – or is it a Rabbit’, http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/JastrowDuck.htm, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(2002), ‘Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim's Positive International Law’, European Journal of International Law 13(2), 401–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1981), ‘Semantic Fields and the Structure of Metaphors’, Studies in Language 5, 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnstamm, Max (1992), ‘Time to Recall What European Union Is All About’, in International Herald Tribune 12 May, www.iht.com/articles/1992/05/12/edma_1.php, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1968), ‘Power and Responsibility: The Historical Assumptions’, in and , eds., The Responsibility of Power: Historical Essays in Honor of Hajo Holborn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics and the Constructivist Challenge’, Millennium 29(1), 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroker, Arthur (1984), ‘Modern Power in Reverse Image: The Paradigm Shift of Michel Foucault and Talcott Parsons’, in , ed., The Structural Allegory: Reconstructive Encounters with the New French Thought, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(1965), ‘The Effects of the Polish Insurrection of 1863 on American Civil War Diplomacy’, Historian 27(4), 560–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, and , eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
(1972), Political theory and Political Science: Studies in the Methodology of Political Inquiry, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1985), Foreign Policy in the Early Republic: The Law of Nations and the Balance of Power, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
(1985), Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (1950), Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy’, International Security 22(1), Summer, 86–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Offshore Balancing revisited’, The Washington Quarterly 25(2), 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002/3), ‘The “Poster Child for Offensive Realism”: America as a Global Hegemon’, Security Studies 12(2), 120–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present, Ithaca: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1992), A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘The Theoretical Foundations of Paul W. Schroeder's International System’, International History Review 14(4), 716–44.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack (2001a), ‘Balances and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions and Research Design’, in and , eds., Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack (2001b), ‘What do Great Powers Balance Against?,’ in , and , eds., Balance Of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (2004), ‘What do Great Powers Balance Against and When?’ in , and , eds., Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and William R. Thompson (2003), ‘Balancing at Sea: Do States Coalesce around Leading Maritime Powers’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Philadelphia.
and (2005), ‘Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is Not Pushing Back’, International Security 30(1), 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1977), Quest for Equilibrium: America and the Balance of Power on Land and Sea, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Little, Richard (1996), ‘Friedrich Gentz, Rationalism and the Balance of Power’, in and , Classical Theories of International Relations, Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or divided by a Common Language’, Review of International Studies 29(3), 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007a), ‘British Neutrality versus Offshore Balancing in the American Civil War: The English School Strikes Back’, Security Studies 16(1): 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard (2007b), ‘Greek City States in the Fifth Century BCE: Persia and the Balance of Power’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, Timothy W. (2004), ‘Megametaphorics: Rereading Globalization and Virtualization as Rhetorics of World Politics’, in and , eds. (2004a), Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds’, Millennium 33(3), 477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Confessions of a Philosopher: A Journey Through Western Philosophy, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
(2003), The Prison as a Metaphor: Re-imagining International Relations, New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
(2006a), ‘Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer Part 1’, in International Relations 20(1), 105–23.Google Scholar
(2006b), ‘Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer Part 2’, in International Relations 20(2), 231–43.Google Scholar
(1997), ed., Cold War Rhetoric: Strategy, Metaphor and Ideology, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), On the Shoulders of Giants: The Post-Italianate Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1979), ‘Metaphor and Political Knowledge’, The American Political Science Review 73(1), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Disinformation: 22 Media Myths that Undermine the War on Terror, Washington: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
Moore, F. C. T. (1982), ‘On Taking Metaphors Literally’, in , ed., Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
(1951), American Foreign Policy: A Critical Examination (published in the United States under the title In Defense of National Interest), London: Methuen.Google Scholar
(1971) ‘The Perils of Empiricism’, in his Politics in the Twentieth Century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1973), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Relative Gains Concerns when the Number of States in the International System Increases’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(5), 642–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates About Europe, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Intelligence Council (2004), Mapping the Global Future, Report of the NIC's 2020 Project, www.cia.gov/nic/NIC_associates.html, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(1943), ‘The Origins of Modern Balance-of-Power Politics’, Medievalia and Humanistica 1, 124–42.Google Scholar
and (1980), Subliminal Politics, Myths and Mythmakers in America, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘No Post-Mortems for Postmodernism, Please: Review Essay’, Diplomatic History 22(3), 451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969), Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, (1985), Metaphor: A Bibliography of Post-1970 Publications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990), Metaphor II: A Classified Bibliography of Publications from 1985 to 1990, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), ‘The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘When was the Law of International Society Born? An Inquiry into the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective’, Journal of the History of International Law 2, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005a), ‘Uzbekistan told US to Close Down Air Base “After Gas Deal with Russia”’, The Independent, 1 August, p. 22.Google Scholar
(2005b), ‘Russia and China Join Forces to challenge US Dominance’, The Independent, 19 August, p. 27.Google Scholar
(1994), The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and Conditions of International Stability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Before Sovereignty: Society and Politics in Ancien Regime Europe’, Review of International Studies 27, Special Issue, December, 119–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Soft Balancing Against the United States’, International Security 30(1), 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. (2004), ‘Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance’, in , and (2004), eds., Balance Of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy’, International Security 30(1), 46–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), eds., Balance Of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1972 [1942]), World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1977), Francesco Guicciardini: The Historian's Craft, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. F. (1922), ‘The Balance of Power’, in , ed., Essays on Liberalism, London: W. Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
(1923), ‘The Balance of Power’, Journal of British Institute of International Affairs 2, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), The Emergence of the Past: A Theory of Historical Explanation, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(1978), ‘The Churchill–Stalin Secret “Percentages” Agreement on the Balkans, Moscow, October 1944’, American Historical Review 83, 368–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), ‘Spheres of Influence in Soviet Wartime Diplomacy’, Journal of Modern History 53, 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Russia, the Concert of Europe, and Greece, 1821–29: A Test of Hypotheses About the Vienna System’, Security Studies 9(4), 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Restraint or Self-Restraint of Russia: Nicholas I, the Treaty of Unkiar Skelassi, and the Vienna System, 1832–1841’, International History Review 1, 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Defensive Realism and the Concert of Europe’, Review of International Studies 32(3), 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza (2005), ‘The Promise of Democratic Peace’, Washington Post, 11 December, p. B07 www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2005/12/09/AR2005120901711.html, last downloaded 5 June 2006.
Ricoeur, Paul (1978), The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. , London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Hesse and Davidson on Metaphors’, Proceedings on the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume 61, 283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy’, World Politics 51(1), 144–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996), ‘Balancing Stability and War: The Mysterious Case of the Napoleonic International System’, International Studies Quarterly 40(4), 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Explaining the Growth of Scientific Knowledge: Metaphors, Models and Meaning, Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. (1986), ‘Continuity and Transformation in World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, in , ed., Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1964), ‘Anxiety: The Reification of a Metaphor’, Archives of General Psychiatry 10: 630–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarbin, Theodore R. (1972), ‘Imagining as Muted Role-Taking: A Historical-Linguistic Analysis’, in , ed., The Function and Nature of Imagining, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The Metaphor-to-Myth Transformation with Special Reference to the “War on Terror”’, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 9(2), 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970), ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, International Political Science Review 64(4), 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Seeking the Geographies of Power’, Economy and Society 33(2), 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960), Semi Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York, London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1998), The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Discipinary History of International Relations, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schön, Donald A. (1979), ‘Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy’, in , ed., Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1977a), ‘Quantitative Studies in the Balance of Power: An Historian's Reaction’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977b), ‘A Final Rejoinder’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘The Nineteenth Century System: Balance of Power or Political Equilibrium’, Review of International Studies 15, 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘Did the Vienna Settlement Rest on a Balance of Power?’, American History Review 97, 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994b), ‘Historical Reality versus Neorealist Theory’, International Security 19 (summer), 108–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘A. J. P. Taylor's International System’, International History Review 23 (March), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. (2003), ‘Why Realism Does Not Work Well for International History (Whether or Not it Represents a Degenerate IR Research Strategy)’, in and (2003), Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1948), International Politics: The Destiny of the Western State System, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Tripolarity and the Second World War’, International Studies Quarterly 37, 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In’, International Security 19 (Summer), 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Neorealism's Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?’, Security Studies 5 (Spring), 90–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing’, International Security 29(2), 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance ofPower, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate’, Mershon International Studies Review 41(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘Metaphor in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences’, Cultural Critique 2, 191–214.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘The Place of the Balancer in Balance of Power Theory’, Review of International Studies 15, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), The Balance of Power: History and Theory, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Google Power: Unleash the Full Potential of Google, New York: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media.Google Scholar
(1971), Metaphor: An Annotated Bibliography and History, Whitewater, Wis.: Language Press.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Metaphors and Foreign Policy Decision Making’, Political Psychology 15(4), 655–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimko, Keith L. (2004), ‘The Power of Metaphors and the Metaphors of Power: The United States in the Cold War and After’, in and , eds., Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer and John Stuckey (1972), ‘Capability Distribution, Uncertainty and Major Power War, 1820–1965’, in , Peace, War and Numbers, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
and (1966), ‘The Composition and Status Ordering of the International System 1815–1940’, World Politics 18(2), 236–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), ‘Dominoes in Central America: Will they Fall? Does It Matter?’, International Security 12, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977), ‘Doing Diplomatic History by Numbers’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Mearsheimer's World: Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security’, International Security 27(1), 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘The Eighteenth Century International System: Parity or Primacy’, Review of International Studies 27, Special Issue, December 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), The Sovereign State and its Competitors, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stamato, Linda (2000), ‘Dispute Resolution and the Glass Ceiling: Ending Sexual Discrimination at the Top’, Dispute Resolution Journal, February, policy.rutgers.edu/CNCR/0200drjarticle.html, last downloaded 6 December 2006.
(2005), ‘Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality in the American Civil War’, Review of International Studies 31(3), 519–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Barry S. (1991), ‘Of Balances, Bandwagons, and Ancient Greeks’, in and , eds., Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1988), United States Expansionism and British North America 1775–1871, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Japan's Socialisation into Janus-Faced European International Society’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1), 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century, New York and London: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
(2003), The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations, London: Verso.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Sense and Sensibility in the Study of State Socialisation: a Reply to Kai Alderson’, Review of International Studies 29(4), 543–50.Google Scholar
(2000), Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Dehio, Long Cycles, and the Geohistorical Context of Structural Transition’, World Politics 45(1), 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Systemic Leadership, Evolutionary Processes, and International Relations Theory: The Unipolarity Question’, International Studies Review 8(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), A Constructed Peace: The Making of a European Settlement, 1945–1963, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1952), ‘Professor Morgenthau's Theory of Political Realism’, American Political Science Review 46(2), 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzoigwe, G. N. (1988), ‘The Results of the Berlin West Africa Conference: An Assessment’, in , and , Bismarck, Europe, and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1948), ‘The Balance of Power: Growth of an Idea’, World Politics 1(1), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979), ‘The Balance of Power in International Law: A History of an Idea’, American Journal of International Law 73(4), 555–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, Jeff (2005), ‘The War is lost’, www.jeffvail.net/index.html, last downloaded 10 October 2005.
(1997), ‘The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative Versus Progressive Research Programmes: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition’, American Political Science Review 91 (December), 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003), Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(2005), The British Committee on the Theory of International Politics (1954–1985): The Rediscovery of History, Milan: Edizioli Unicopoli.Google Scholar
(2005), Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1986), ‘A Response to My Critics’, in , Neorealism and Its Critics, 322–45, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory’, Journal of International Affairs 44(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘International Politics is Not Foreign Policy’, Security Studies 6(1), autumn, 54–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a), ‘Globalization and American Power’, The National Interest 59 (Spring): 46–56.Google Scholar
(2000b), ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War’, International Security 25(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1999), Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Anarchy is what States Make of It’, International Organization 46(2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesserling, H. L. (1988), ‘The Berlin Conference and the Expansion of Europe: A Conclusion’, in , and , Bismarck, Europe, and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1960), ‘The Role of Myth Systems in American–Soviet Relations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 4, 179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), The Western Hemisphere Idea: Its Rise and Decline, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Long-term Bandwagoning and short-term Balancing: The Lessons of Coalition Behaviour from 1792–1815’, Review of International Studies 27(2), 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966), ‘The Balance of Power’, in and , Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1977), Systems of States, edited and introduced by , Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. (1968), ‘A dynamic theory of inter-firm behavior’, in , ed., Economic Theories of International Politics, Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
(1980), Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 2, in and , trans. and , Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1993), The Elusive Balance of Power and Perceptions During the Cold War, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘The Stability of a Unipolar World’, International Security 24(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power 1486–1914: Selected European Writings, London: Dent.Google Scholar
and (1974), ‘The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political language’, Journal of Politics 36(2), 290–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control’, International Organization 46(1), 101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Making Sense of State Socialisation’, Review of International Studies 27(3), 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1977), ‘History, Quantitative Analysis and the Balance of Power’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, João Marques de (2006), ‘Hedley Bull, “Embedded Cosmopolitanism” and the Pluralist-Solidarist Debate’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David (2006), ‘The Nature of Law in an Anarchical Society’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. S. (1970), ‘Eighteenth-Century Theories of the Balance of Power’, in and , eds., Studies in Diplomatic History, London: Harlow Longmans.Google Scholar
(1910), The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to their Economic and Social Advantage, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond (1966), Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, trans. and , London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. (1955), ‘On the Use of Metaphors in the Description of Persons’, in , ed., On Expressive Language, Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (2004), ‘Power and International Relations’, in , , and , eds., Handbook of International Relations, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
(1975), ‘Models of Power: Past and Present’, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences 11: 211–22.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1988), Transforming Political Discourse: Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1974), Myths, Models and Paradigms: A Comparative Study in Science and Religion, San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
(1996), Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors and Meanings of Economic Space, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Daniel A. (1987), ‘British Strategy During the First World War in the Context of Four Centuries: Blue-Water Versus Continental Commitment’, in , ed., Naval History: The Sixth Symposium of the U.S. Naval Academy, Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
(1956), Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of America to World Power, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
and (2004a), eds., Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Francis A. and Christ'L De Landtsheer (2004b), ‘Introduction. Metaphors, Politics and World Politics’, in and , eds., Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(1962), Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Max (1979), ‘More about Metaphors’, in , ed., Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1990), Perplexities: Rational Choice, the Prisoner's Dilemma, Metaphor, Poetic Ambiguity and Other Puzzles, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2002), The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
and (2007), The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna (2004), ‘New Tales from the Trenches’, The Independent Review Section, Friday, 3 September, p. 23.
Brookes, Adam (2005), ‘US Watches China Warily’, news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world /americas/4342527.stm, last downloaded 7 December 2005.
and (2005), ‘Hard Times for Soft Balancing’, International Security 30(1), 72–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976), ‘Social Theory as Metaphor: On the Logic of Discovery for the Sciences of Conduct’, Theory and Society 3, 169–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
and (1984) eds., The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1955), ‘The Balance of Power in Nineteenth Century South America: An Exploratory Essay’, Hispanic American Historical Review 35, February, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert (1966), ‘The Balance of Power’, in and , eds., Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization 47(3), 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004a), From International to World Society: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b), The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty First Century, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2006), ‘Rethinking Hedley Bull on the Institutions of International Society’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000), International Systems in History: Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2003), Regions and Power: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993), The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1999), Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Nationalizing International Theory: Race, Class and the English School’, Global Society 18(4), 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Paul (1982), ‘Frederich Nietzsche: The Use and Abuse of Metaphor’, in , ed., Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
(1966), The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol 2, Mythical Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics’, Review of International Politics 30(2), 229–44.Google Scholar
(1996), Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
and (1990), ‘Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity’, International Organization 44(2), 137–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the Theory that “Democracies” Do Not Go to War with Each Other’, Review of International Studies 20(3), 205–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau and Waltz, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe 900–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1968), ‘Power’ in , ed., International Encyclopedia for the Social Sciences Vol 12: 405–15, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1984a), Language and Politics: Why Does Language Matter to Political Philosophy, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
(1984b), Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Political Theory, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1979), ‘What Metaphors Mean’, in , ed., On Metaphor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1962), The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle, trans. , New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
(1967), Germany and World Politics in the Twentieth Century, trans. , New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari (1987), trans. , A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘The Scriptures of Security’, Mershon International Studies Review 42(1), 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies’, International Security 23(1), 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1964), ‘Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability’, World Politics 16(3), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Metaphors of Memory: A History of Ideas About the Mind, trans. , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), Why Life Speeds Up as You Get Older: How Memory Shapes Our Past, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998), Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘System, State and Society: How Does It All Hang Together?’, Millennium 34(1), 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1972), The Study of Politics, trans. , Sunbury-on Thames: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Eccleshall, Robert (1984), ‘Introduction: The World of Ideology’, in et al., Political Ideologies, London: Hutchinson and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Arthur M. (2007), ‘Intra-Greek Balancing, the Mediterranean Crisis of ca. 201–200 B.C. and the Rise of Rome’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist (2006), ‘The European Union in the World: Abroad Be Dangers’, 26 August, 29–30.
(1971), Politics As Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence, Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘Generalising the International’, Review of International Studies 31(3), 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983), ‘Collective Security as Political Myth: Liberal Internationalism and the League of Nations in Politics and History’, International History Review 5(4), 496–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1995), ‘History vs. Neorealism: A Second Look’, International Security 20(1), 182–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996a), ‘Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?’, Security Studies 6(1), 7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996b), ‘Cause, Effect and Consistency: A Response to Kenneth Waltz’, Security Studies 6(1), 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Extending Offensive Realism: The Louisiana Purchase and America's Rise to Regional Hegemony’, American Political Science Review 98(4), 563–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Explanatory Typologies in the Qualitative Study of International Politics’, International Organization 59(2), 293–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1903), ‘The Poet’, in and eds., Complete Works, Moston: Houghton.Google Scholar
(2000), A War of Words in the Discourse of Trade: The Rhetorical Constitution of Metaphor, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
(1996), Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(1945), The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth Century, England, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(1972), ‘The Field of International Relations: The View From Within’, Towson State Journal of International Affairs 7, 1–24.Google Scholar
(1969), The Concept of Empire in Western Europe from the Fifth to the Fourteenth Century, trans. , London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
and (1971), World Politics: Verbal Strategy Among the Superpowers, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1938), Foreign Policy in the Making: The Search for a New Balance of Power, New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
(1980), Man and Government: An Empirical Theory of Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Fry, Greg and Jacinta O'Hagan (2000), ‘Contending Images of World Politics: An Introduction’, in and , eds., Contending Images of World Politics, Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Ideology as a Cultural System’, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Gellman, Barton (1992), ‘Keeping the US first’, Washington Post, 11 March, zfacts.com/metaPage/lib/9203-Wolfowitz.pdf, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(1983), Managing US–Soviet rivalry: Problems of Crisis Prevention, Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1965), Machiavelli and Guicciardini: Politics and History in Sixteenth Century Florence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1), 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), The Standard of Civilization in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1948), American Diplomacy in the International Community, Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
(1992), The Leverage of Seapower: The Strategic Advantage of Navies in War, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(2000), Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco (1984 [1561]), The History of Italy, trans. and ed., Princeton: Princton University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’, International Organization 47(3), 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 10(4), 533–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’, Millennium 33(3), 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1953), ‘The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept or Propaganda’, World Politics (4), 442–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Leonard Krieger: Historicization and Political Engagement in Intellectual History’, History and Theory 35: 80–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, London: David Fickling Books.Google Scholar
(2006), Compound Republics as Viable Political Systems: A Comparison of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation and the European Union, Phd Thesis, Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. (1966), ‘Introduction’, in Francesco Guicciardini, History of Italy and History of Florence, trans. , Chalfont St Giles: New English Library.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian (2006), ‘Diplomacy, Anti-Diplomacy and International Society’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Revolution and World Politics: The Rise and Fall of the Sixth Great Power, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1959), International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Herz, John H. (1969), ‘The Territorial State Revisited: Reflections on the Future of the Nation-State’, in , ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy,New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(2003), Political Ideologies: An Introduction, 3rd edn, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2006), ‘Bringing States Back In’, from Review Symposium on Steven Lukes' Power: A Radical View, in Political Studies Review 4(2), 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Massing the Tropes: The Metaphorical Construction of American Nuclear Strategy, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
and (2005), ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1), 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960), ed., Contemporary Theory in International Relations, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
(1977), ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus 106 (Summer), 41–60.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley (2002), ‘Foreword to the Second Edition: Revisiting The Anarchical Society’, in , The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1970), The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory, London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1991), Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1973), Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances: Comparative Studies, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
and (1973), Structure and Process in International Politics, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘The Enigmatic Ends of Rhetoric: Churchill's Fulton Address as Great Art and Failed Persuasion’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 83(4), 416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Towards a Dynamic Theory of International Politics: Insights from Comparing Ancient China and Early Modern Europe’, International Organization 58 (Winter), 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Kenneth Waltz and the Limits of Explanatory Theory in International Relations, DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (1993) ‘International Society and the Study of International Regimes’, in , ed., Regime Theory in International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2002), ‘Foreword to the Third Edition: The Anarchical Society 25 Years On’, in , The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.
(1980), John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution, Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
(2001), After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2003), ed., America Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2000), The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997), System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles A. (2006), ‘War in the twenty-first century: An Institution in Crisis’, in and , eds., The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles A. (2007) ‘The Americas: 1400–1800’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘The Myth of the European Concert: The Realist–Institutionalist Debate and Great Power Behavior in the Eastern Question, 1821–41’, Security Studies 7(2), 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999), eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J., Richard Little and William C. Wohlforth (2007), ‘Conclusion’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), ‘Myth, Self-fulfilling Prophecy, and Symbolic Reassurance in East–West Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 9(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘Escalation of Regional Conflict: Testing the Shatterbelt Concept’, Political Geography Quarterly 5: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Checkerboards and Shatterbelts: The Geopolitics of South America, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, John F. (2004), ‘Joseph Jastrow and his Duck – or is it a Rabbit’, http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/JastrowDuck.htm, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(2002), ‘Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim's Positive International Law’, European Journal of International Law 13(2), 401–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1981), ‘Semantic Fields and the Structure of Metaphors’, Studies in Language 5, 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnstamm, Max (1992), ‘Time to Recall What European Union Is All About’, in International Herald Tribune 12 May, www.iht.com/articles/1992/05/12/edma_1.php, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1968), ‘Power and Responsibility: The Historical Assumptions’, in and , eds., The Responsibility of Power: Historical Essays in Honor of Hajo Holborn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics and the Constructivist Challenge’, Millennium 29(1), 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroker, Arthur (1984), ‘Modern Power in Reverse Image: The Paradigm Shift of Michel Foucault and Talcott Parsons’, in , ed., The Structural Allegory: Reconstructive Encounters with the New French Thought, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(1965), ‘The Effects of the Polish Insurrection of 1863 on American Civil War Diplomacy’, Historian 27(4), 560–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, and , eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
(1972), Political theory and Political Science: Studies in the Methodology of Political Inquiry, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1985), Foreign Policy in the Early Republic: The Law of Nations and the Balance of Power, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
(1985), Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (1950), Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy’, International Security 22(1), Summer, 86–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Offshore Balancing revisited’, The Washington Quarterly 25(2), 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002/3), ‘The “Poster Child for Offensive Realism”: America as a Global Hegemon’, Security Studies 12(2), 120–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present, Ithaca: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1992), A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘The Theoretical Foundations of Paul W. Schroeder's International System’, International History Review 14(4), 716–44.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack (2001a), ‘Balances and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions and Research Design’, in and , eds., Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack (2001b), ‘What do Great Powers Balance Against?,’ in , and , eds., Balance Of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (2004), ‘What do Great Powers Balance Against and When?’ in , and , eds., Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and William R. Thompson (2003), ‘Balancing at Sea: Do States Coalesce around Leading Maritime Powers’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Philadelphia.
and (2005), ‘Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is Not Pushing Back’, International Security 30(1), 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1977), Quest for Equilibrium: America and the Balance of Power on Land and Sea, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Little, Richard (1996), ‘Friedrich Gentz, Rationalism and the Balance of Power’, in and , Classical Theories of International Relations, Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or divided by a Common Language’, Review of International Studies 29(3), 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007a), ‘British Neutrality versus Offshore Balancing in the American Civil War: The English School Strikes Back’, Security Studies 16(1): 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard (2007b), ‘Greek City States in the Fifth Century BCE: Persia and the Balance of Power’, in , and , eds., The Balance of Power in World History, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, Timothy W. (2004), ‘Megametaphorics: Rereading Globalization and Virtualization as Rhetorics of World Politics’, in and , eds. (2004a), Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds’, Millennium 33(3), 477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Confessions of a Philosopher: A Journey Through Western Philosophy, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
(2003), The Prison as a Metaphor: Re-imagining International Relations, New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
(2006a), ‘Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer Part 1’, in International Relations 20(1), 105–23.Google Scholar
(2006b), ‘Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer Part 2’, in International Relations 20(2), 231–43.Google Scholar
(1997), ed., Cold War Rhetoric: Strategy, Metaphor and Ideology, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(1993), On the Shoulders of Giants: The Post-Italianate Edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1979), ‘Metaphor and Political Knowledge’, The American Political Science Review 73(1), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Disinformation: 22 Media Myths that Undermine the War on Terror, Washington: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
Moore, F. C. T. (1982), ‘On Taking Metaphors Literally’, in , ed., Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
(1951), American Foreign Policy: A Critical Examination (published in the United States under the title In Defense of National Interest), London: Methuen.Google Scholar
(1971) ‘The Perils of Empiricism’, in his Politics in the Twentieth Century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1973), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Relative Gains Concerns when the Number of States in the International System Increases’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(5), 642–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates About Europe, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Intelligence Council (2004), Mapping the Global Future, Report of the NIC's 2020 Project, www.cia.gov/nic/NIC_associates.html, last downloaded 7 December 2006.
(1943), ‘The Origins of Modern Balance-of-Power Politics’, Medievalia and Humanistica 1, 124–42.Google Scholar
and (1980), Subliminal Politics, Myths and Mythmakers in America, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
(1998), ‘No Post-Mortems for Postmodernism, Please: Review Essay’, Diplomatic History 22(3), 451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969), Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, (1985), Metaphor: A Bibliography of Post-1970 Publications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990), Metaphor II: A Classified Bibliography of Publications from 1985 to 1990, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962), ‘The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind’, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
(2000), ‘When was the Law of International Society Born? An Inquiry into the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective’, Journal of the History of International Law 2, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005a), ‘Uzbekistan told US to Close Down Air Base “After Gas Deal with Russia”’, The Independent, 1 August, p. 22.Google Scholar
(2005b), ‘Russia and China Join Forces to challenge US Dominance’, The Independent, 19 August, p. 27.Google Scholar
(1994), The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and Conditions of International Stability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Before Sovereignty: Society and Politics in Ancien Regime Europe’, Review of International Studies 27, Special Issue, December, 119–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Soft Balancing Against the United States’, International Security 30(1), 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. (2004), ‘Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance’, in , and (2004), eds., Balance Of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy’, International Security 30(1), 46–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), eds., Balance Of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1972 [1942]), World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1977), Francesco Guicciardini: The Historian's Craft, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. F. (1922), ‘The Balance of Power’, in , ed., Essays on Liberalism, London: W. Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
(1923), ‘The Balance of Power’, Journal of British Institute of International Affairs 2, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), The Emergence of the Past: A Theory of Historical Explanation, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(1978), ‘The Churchill–Stalin Secret “Percentages” Agreement on the Balkans, Moscow, October 1944’, American Historical Review 83, 368–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981), ‘Spheres of Influence in Soviet Wartime Diplomacy’, Journal of Modern History 53, 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Russia, the Concert of Europe, and Greece, 1821–29: A Test of Hypotheses About the Vienna System’, Security Studies 9(4), 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Restraint or Self-Restraint of Russia: Nicholas I, the Treaty of Unkiar Skelassi, and the Vienna System, 1832–1841’, International History Review 1, 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Defensive Realism and the Concert of Europe’, Review of International Studies 32(3), 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza (2005), ‘The Promise of Democratic Peace’, Washington Post, 11 December, p. B07 www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2005/12/09/AR2005120901711.html, last downloaded 5 June 2006.
Ricoeur, Paul (1978), The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. , London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1987), ‘Hesse and Davidson on Metaphors’, Proceedings on the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary volume 61, 283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy’, World Politics 51(1), 144–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996), ‘Balancing Stability and War: The Mysterious Case of the Napoleonic International System’, International Studies Quarterly 40(4), 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997), Explaining the Growth of Scientific Knowledge: Metaphors, Models and Meaning, Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. (1986), ‘Continuity and Transformation in World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, in , ed., Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1964), ‘Anxiety: The Reification of a Metaphor’, Archives of General Psychiatry 10: 630–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarbin, Theodore R. (1972), ‘Imagining as Muted Role-Taking: A Historical-Linguistic Analysis’, in , ed., The Function and Nature of Imagining, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The Metaphor-to-Myth Transformation with Special Reference to the “War on Terror”’, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 9(2), 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970), ‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’, International Political Science Review 64(4), 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Seeking the Geographies of Power’, Economy and Society 33(2), 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960), Semi Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York, London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1998), The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Discipinary History of International Relations, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schön, Donald A. (1979), ‘Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy’, in , ed., Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1977a), ‘Quantitative Studies in the Balance of Power: An Historian's Reaction’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977b), ‘A Final Rejoinder’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘The Nineteenth Century System: Balance of Power or Political Equilibrium’, Review of International Studies 15, 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘Did the Vienna Settlement Rest on a Balance of Power?’, American History Review 97, 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994b), ‘Historical Reality versus Neorealist Theory’, International Security 19 (summer), 108–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘A. J. P. Taylor's International System’, International History Review 23 (March), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. (2003), ‘Why Realism Does Not Work Well for International History (Whether or Not it Represents a Degenerate IR Research Strategy)’, in and (2003), Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1948), International Politics: The Destiny of the Western State System, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
(1993), ‘Tripolarity and the Second World War’, International Studies Quarterly 37, 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In’, International Security 19 (Summer), 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), ‘Neorealism's Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?’, Security Studies 5 (Spring), 90–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing’, International Security 29(2), 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance ofPower, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate’, Mershon International Studies Review 41(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), ‘Metaphor in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences’, Cultural Critique 2, 191–214.Google Scholar
(1989), ‘The Place of the Balancer in Balance of Power Theory’, Review of International Studies 15, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996), The Balance of Power: History and Theory, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), Google Power: Unleash the Full Potential of Google, New York: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media.Google Scholar
(1971), Metaphor: An Annotated Bibliography and History, Whitewater, Wis.: Language Press.Google Scholar
(1994), ‘Metaphors and Foreign Policy Decision Making’, Political Psychology 15(4), 655–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimko, Keith L. (2004), ‘The Power of Metaphors and the Metaphors of Power: The United States in the Cold War and After’, in and , eds., Metaphorical World Politics, Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
(2004), Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer and John Stuckey (1972), ‘Capability Distribution, Uncertainty and Major Power War, 1820–1965’, in , Peace, War and Numbers, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
and (1966), ‘The Composition and Status Ordering of the International System 1815–1940’, World Politics 18(2), 236–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), ‘Dominoes in Central America: Will they Fall? Does It Matter?’, International Security 12, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977), ‘Doing Diplomatic History by Numbers’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 21(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Mearsheimer's World: Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security’, International Security 27(1), 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘The Eighteenth Century International System: Parity or Primacy’, Review of International Studies 27, Special Issue, December 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994), The Sovereign State and its Competitors, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stamato, Linda (2000), ‘Dispute Resolution and the Glass Ceiling: Ending Sexual Discrimination at the Top’, Dispute Resolution Journal, February, policy.rutgers.edu/CNCR/0200drjarticle.html, last downloaded 6 December 2006.
(2005), ‘Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality in the American Civil War’, Review of International Studies 31(3), 519–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Barry S. (1991), ‘Of Balances, Bandwagons, and Ancient Greeks’, in and , eds., Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
(1988), United States Expansionism and British North America 1775–1871, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
(2005), ‘Japan's Socialisation into Janus-Faced European International Society’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1), 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century, New York and London: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
(2003), The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations, London: Verso.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Sense and Sensibility in the Study of State Socialisation: a Reply to Kai Alderson’, Review of International Studies 29(4), 543–50.Google Scholar
(2000), Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Dehio, Long Cycles, and the Geohistorical Context of Structural Transition’, World Politics 45(1), 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Systemic Leadership, Evolutionary Processes, and International Relations Theory: The Unipolarity Question’, International Studies Review 8(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), A Constructed Peace: The Making of a European Settlement, 1945–1963, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1952), ‘Professor Morgenthau's Theory of Political Realism’, American Political Science Review 46(2), 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzoigwe, G. N. (1988), ‘The Results of the Berlin West Africa Conference: An Assessment’, in , and , Bismarck, Europe, and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1948), ‘The Balance of Power: Growth of an Idea’, World Politics 1(1), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979), ‘The Balance of Power in International Law: A History of an Idea’, American Journal of International Law 73(4), 555–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, Jeff (2005), ‘The War is lost’, www.jeffvail.net/index.html, last downloaded 10 October 2005.
(1997), ‘The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative Versus Progressive Research Programmes: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz's Balancing Proposition’, American Political Science Review 91 (December), 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003), Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(2005), The British Committee on the Theory of International Politics (1954–1985): The Rediscovery of History, Milan: Edizioli Unicopoli.Google Scholar
(2005), Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1986), ‘A Response to My Critics’, in , Neorealism and Its Critics, 322–45, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1990), ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory’, Journal of International Affairs 44(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
(1996), ‘International Politics is Not Foreign Policy’, Security Studies 6(1), autumn, 54–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a), ‘Globalization and American Power’, The National Interest 59 (Spring): 46–56.Google Scholar
(2000b), ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War’, International Security 25(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1999), Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘Anarchy is what States Make of It’, International Organization 46(2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesserling, H. L. (1988), ‘The Berlin Conference and the Expansion of Europe: A Conclusion’, in , and , Bismarck, Europe, and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1960), ‘The Role of Myth Systems in American–Soviet Relations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 4, 179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965), The Western Hemisphere Idea: Its Rise and Decline, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2001), ‘Long-term Bandwagoning and short-term Balancing: The Lessons of Coalition Behaviour from 1792–1815’, Review of International Studies 27(2), 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966), ‘The Balance of Power’, in and , Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1977), Systems of States, edited and introduced by , Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
(2005), The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. (1968), ‘A dynamic theory of inter-firm behavior’, in , ed., Economic Theories of International Politics, Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
(1980), Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 2, in and , trans. and , Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1993), The Elusive Balance of Power and Perceptions During the Cold War, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1999), ‘The Stability of a Unipolar World’, International Security 24(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975), Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power 1486–1914: Selected European Writings, London: Dent.Google Scholar
and (1974), ‘The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political language’, Journal of Politics 36(2), 290–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar