Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T07:01:41.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Therapeutic decision making in BMT/SCT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

Reinhold Munker
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, Shreveport
Gerhard C. Hildebrandt
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Hillard M. Lazarus
Affiliation:
Ireland Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University Hospital, Cleveland
Kerry Atkinson
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

FAB classification

  • ALL-L1: MPO-negative, with small cells predominating. Cells have a high nuclear–cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio (scant amount of cytoplasm), regular nuclear borders, and inconspicuous nucleoli. Tdt is usually positive

  • ALL-L2: MPO-negative heterogeneous population, often with larger blasts. The cells have a low N/C ratio (moderate amount of cytoplasm), with irregular nuclear borders and prominent nucleoli. Tdt is usually positive

  • ALL-L3, Burkitt type: MPO-negative, homogeneous population of large blasts. The cells have a moderate amount of deeply basophilic cytoplasm and prominent cytoplasmic vacuolation. The nuclei are regular, with one or more prominent nucleoli. The blasts are Tdt-negative and may be associated with t(2;8), t(8;14), or t(8;22) chromosomal abnormalities

Immune phenotype classification

ALL is also classified on the basis of the cell surface immune phenotype:

  • T-ALL

  • B-ALL, also designated as mature ALL

  • Pre-B-ALL

  • Pre-pre-B-ALL (or pro-B-ALL)

Note: “Null ALL” (CD10-, non-B, non-T, with expression of early B-cell antigens, e.g., CD19) predominantly represents pre-pre-B-ALL. The term “null ALL” is no longer in use.

Many conventional chemotherapy protocols for ALL currently stratify treatment according to risk status. This status, in turn, is determined by the immune phenotype and cytogenetic abnormality present.

Type
Chapter
Information
The BMT Data Book
Including Cellular Therapy
, pp. 41 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassan, R & Hoelzer, D. 2011. Modern therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29: 532–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassan, R, Spinelli, O, Oldani, E, et al. 2009. Improved risk classification for risk-specific therapy based on the molecular study of minimal residual disease (MRD) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blood 113: 4153–4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eapen, M, Rubenstein, P, Zhang, MJ, et al. 2006. Comparable survival after HLA-matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantations for acute leukemia in children younger than 18 months. J Clin Oncol 24: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, AK, Richards, SM, Chopra, R, et al. 2007. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 109: 944–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstone, AH. 2009. Transplants adult ALL – ? Allo for everyone. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15: S7–S10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, T, Wall, D, Camitta, B, et al. 2006a. The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: an evidence-based review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, T, Wall, D, & Camitta, B. 2006b. ASBMT position statement. The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12: 370–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunault, M, Harousseau, Jl, Delain, M, et al. 2004. Better outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia after early genoidentical allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) than after late high-dose therapy and autologous BMT: a GOELAMS trial. Blood 104: 3028–3037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khaled, SK, Thomas, SH, & Forman, SJ. 2012. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. Curr Opin Oncol 24: 182–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, RA. 2009. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is not recommended for all adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, DI, Aversa, F, & Lazarus, HM. 2006. Alternative donor transplants for adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a comparison of the three major options. Bone Marrow Transplant 38: 467–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mato, AR & Luger, SM. 2006. Autologous stem cell transplant in ALL: who should we be transplanting in first remission?Bone Marrow Transplant 37: 989–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, H, Gale, RP, Zhang, MJ, et al. 1998. Chemotherapy vs HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission. Bone Marrow Transplant 22: 253–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pui, CH & Evans, WE. 2006. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 354: 166–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramanujachar, R, Richards, S, Hann, I, et al. 2007. Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcome on UK National Paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48: 254–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saarinen-Pihkala, UM, Gustafsson, G, Ringdén, O, et al. 2001. No disadvantage in outcome of using matched unrelated donors as compared with matched sibling donors for bone marrow transplantation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission. J Clin Oncol 19: 3406–3414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellar, R, Goldstone, AH, & Lazarus, HM. 2011. Redefining transplant in acute leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol 12: 312–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×