Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T02:37:35.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Elephant in the Room

Constantine at the Council

from Part II - The Council

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Young Richard Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access

Summary

Constantine's role in calling the Council of Nicaea has long been recognized. But theological interests have overshadowed the political side of his decision-making. In the nineteenth century scholars coined the word “Caesaropapism” for imperial interference that they saw as a threat to the purity of the Church. But the ancient state operated on a different set of principles, and a political approach fills in important blanks in our understanding of the council. By the time Constantine took control of the eastern empire he had learned that the best way to deal with conflict in the Church was to assemble the largest number of bishops possible and have them settle the problem. This is the thinking behind his decision to ask all the bishops in the empire to settle the Arian question. This is why Nicaea became known as the first ecumenical (“world-wide”) council, though in reality almost all of the bishops present came from the East. Publicly, Constantine treated the bishops at Nicaea with respect and humility, but behind the scenes he worked to bring the opposing parties into agreement. The result was the Nicene Creed, still recited (in slightly different form) by Christians today.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select References

Bjornlie, M. Shane, ed. 2017. The Life and Legacy of Constantine: Traditions Through the Ages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil, and Hall, Stuart G.. 1999. Eusebius: Life of Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A., trans. 1976. In Praise of Constantine: A Historical Study and New Translation of Eusebius’ Tricennial Orations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2000. Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gwynn, David M. 2007. The Eusebians: The Polemics of Athanasius of Alexandria and the Construction of the “Arian Controversy.” Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieu, Samuel N. C., and Montserrat, Dominic, eds. 1998. Constantine: History, Historiography and Legend. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Sabine. 1981. Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. 2006. Voting About God in Early Church Councils. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pietras, Henryk. 2016. Council of Nicaea (325): Religious and Political Context, Documents, Commentaries. Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Devin. 2013. “Disciplining Eusebius: Discursive Power and Representation of the Court Theologian.” StPatr 62: 89101.Google Scholar
Singh, Devin. 2015. “Eusebius as Political Theologian: The Legend Continues.” HTR 108(1): 129–54.Google Scholar
Torres Guerra, José B. 2017. “Image and Word in Eusebius of Caesarea (VC 3.4–24): Constantine in Nicaea.” In Rhetorical Strategies in Late Antique Literature: Images, Metatexts and Interpretation, ed. Quiroga Puertas, Alberto J., 7389. Mnemosyne, Supplements 406. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Weiss, Peter. 2003. “The Vision of Constantine.” Trans. A. R. Birley. Journal of Roman Archaeology 16: 237–59.Google Scholar
Whitby, Mary, ed. 1988. The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Mnemosyne, Supplements 183. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wienand, Johannes, ed. 2015. Contested Monarchy: Integrating the Roman Empire in the Fourth Century AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×