Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T12:21:07.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Kinship and Relatedness as Vital Lens

from Part One - Openings and Orientations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

By
Resto Cruz
Edited by
Cecilia McCallum ,
Silvia Posocco  and
Martin Fotta
Cecilia McCallum
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil
Silvia Posocco
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Martin Fotta
Affiliation:
Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

Focusing on key themes, this chapter highlights how kinship and relatedness constitute a vital lens for understanding gender. First, the everyday is the principal ground for examining relatedness. It illumines how gender shapes our lives and is, in turn, formed, maintained, and altered over time. The borders between gender and other aspects of life can be porous. Second, the seemingly merely domestic or intimate can be generative – a theme that builds on earlier feminist insights. Kinship has wider consequences, including for politics or economics. Finally, kinship is imbued with the potential for hierarchy and inequality, ambivalence, ruptures, and failure. Its generativity includes its less amiable aspects. Gendered inequities and enmities arise from these aspects. Breaks in the fabric of kinship, however, imply the possibility of repair, which may depend on gendered forms of labor. Threading through these themes is care, a key aspect of everyday life and relatedness alike. Care encompasses whole economies and traverses national borders. Care speaks, too, to the vulnerability that is at the heart of what it means to be human. It mirrors, and at times heightens, the difficulties inherent in kinship.

Keywords

kinshiprelatednesssiblingshipcaresocial mobilitytransnational labor migrationsubjectivitiesenmitiesinequalitiesnorms
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality , pp. 94 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilar, F. V. (2013). Brother’s keeper? Siblingship, overseas migration, and centripetal ethnography in a Philippine village. Ethnography, 14(3), 346–68.Google Scholar
Aguilar, F. V., with Peñalosa, J. E. Z., Liwanag, T. B. T., Cruz, R. S., and Melendrez, J. M. (2009). Maalwang Buhay: Family, Overseas Work, and Cultures of Relatedness in Barangay Paraiso. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Alber, E., Coe, C., and Thelen, T., eds. (2013). The Anthropology of Sibling Relations: Shared Parentage, Experience, and Exchange. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alber, E., and Drotbohm, H., eds. (2015). Anthropological Perspectives on Care: Work, Kinship, and the Life-Course. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alipio, C. (2015). Filipino children and the affective economy of saving and being saved: remittances and debts in transnational migrant families. In Hoang, L. A. and Yeoh, B. S. A., eds., Transnational Labour Migration, Remittances and the Changing Family in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 227–54.Google Scholar
Alipio, C. (2020). Money, maturity, and migrant aspirations: “morality-in-motion” among young people in the Philippines. In Hoang, L. A. and Alipio, Cheryll, eds., Money and Moralities in Contemporary Asia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
Allerton, C. (2013). Potent Landscapes: Place and Mobility in Eastern Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allerton, C., ed. (2016). Children: Ethnographic Encounters. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Amarasuriya, H., Kelly, T., Maunaguru, S., Oustinova-Stjepanovic, G., and Spencer, J., eds. (2020). The Intimate Life of Dissent: Anthropological Perspectives. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Amrith, M. (2021). Ageing bodies, precarious futures: the (im)mobilities of “temporary” migrant domestic workers over time. Mobilities, 16(2), 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrith, M., and Coe, C. (2022). Disposable kin: shifting registers of belonging in global care economies. American Anthropologist, 124(2), 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asis, M. M. B., and Ruiz-Marave, C. (2013). Leaving a legacy: parental migration and school outcomes among young children in the Philippines. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 22(3), 349–75.Google Scholar
Astuti, R. (1995). People of the Sea: Identity and Descent among the Vezo of Madagascar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulino, F. (2019). Rituals of Care: Karmic Politics in an Aging Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Balthazar, A. C. (2017). Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 220–4.Google Scholar
Bamford, S., and Leach, J., eds. (2009). Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Banerjee, D. (2020). Enduring Cancer: Life, Death, and Diagnosis in Delhi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bautista, J. (2015). Export-quality martyrs: Roman Catholicism and transnational labor in the Philippines. Cultural Anthropology, 30(3), 424–47.Google Scholar
Bear, L. (2007). Lines of the Nation: Indian Railway Workers, Bureaucracy, and the Intimate Self. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bear, L. (2013). “This body is our body”: Vishwakarma puja, the social debts of kinship, and theologies of materiality in a neoliberal shipyard. In McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., eds., Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, pp. 155–77.Google Scholar
Bear, L. (2014). Capital and time: uncertainty and qualitative measures of inequality. British Journal of Sociology, 65(4), 639–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bear, L., Ho, K., Tsing, A. L., and Yanagisako, S. (2015). Gens: a feminist manifesto for the study of capitalism. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights, March 30. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/gens-a-feminist-manifesto-for-the-study-of-capitalism.Google Scholar
Besky, S. (2017). Fixity: on the inheritance and maintenance of tea plantation houses in Darjeeling, India. American Ethnologist, 44(4), 617–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, E. (2005). Wedding bell blues: marriage, missing men, and matrifocal follies. American Ethnologist, 32(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc-Szanton, C. (1990). Collision of cultures: historical reformulations of gender in the lowland Visayas, Philippines. In Atkinson, J. M. and Errington, S., eds., Power and Difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 345–83.Google Scholar
Borneman, J. (2001). Caring and being cared for: displacing marriage, kinship, gender, and sexuality. In Faubion, J. D., ed., The Ethics of Kinship: Ethnographic Inquiries. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckermann, C. (2017). Caring claims and the relational self across time: grandmothers overcoming reproductive crises in rural China. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 23(2), 356–75.Google Scholar
Burton, O. (2021). Captivity, kinship, and Black masculine care work under domestic warfare. American Anthropologist 123(3), 621–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cabalquinto, E. C. (2020). Elastic carework: the cost and contradictions of mobile caregiving in a transnational household. Continuum: Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 34(1), 133–45.Google Scholar
Cannell, F. (1999). Power and Intimacy in the Christian Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carby, H. (1982). White woman listen: Black feminism and the boundaries of sisterhood. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, The Empire Strikes Back. London: Hutchinson, pp. 211–34.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (1997). The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J., ed. (2001). Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2004). After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J., ed. (2007a). Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. (2007b). Connections and disconnections of memory and kinship in narratives of adoption of reunions in Scotland. In Carsten, J., ed., Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. (2018). House-lives as ethnography/biography. Social Anthropology, 26(1), 103–16.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2019a). The stuff of kinship. In Bamford, S., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–50.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. (2019b). Blood Work: Life and Laboratories in Penang. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J., Chiu, H.-S., Magee, , S., Papadaki, E., and Reece, K. M., eds. (2021). Marriage in Past, Present and Future Tense. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J., and Hugh-Jones, S., eds. (1995). About the House: Lévi-Strauss and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ceniza Choy, C. (2003). Empire of Care: Nursing and Migration in Filipino American History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Colen, S. (1995). “Like a mother to them”: stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In Ginsburg, F. and Rapp, Reyna, eds., Conceiving the New World Order. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 78–102.Google Scholar
Collantes, C. F. (2018). Reproductive Dilemmas in Metro Manila: Faith, Intimacies and Globalization. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collier, J., and Rosaldo, M. (1981). Politics and gender in simple societies. In Ortner, S. and Whitehead, H., eds., Sexual Meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–329.Google Scholar
Constable, N. (2003). A transnational perspective on divorce and marriage: Filipina wives and workers. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10(2), 163–80.Google Scholar
Course, M. (2018). Houses of Uist: memory and dwelling in the Outer Hebrides. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 25(1), 51–65.Google Scholar
Cruz, R. (2012). Figures of migration: gender, kinship, and the politics of representation. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 60(4), 513–54.Google Scholar
Cruz, R. (2019). An inheritance that cannot be stolen: schooling, kinship, and personhood in post-1945 central Philippines. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 61(4), 894–924.Google Scholar
Cruz, R. (2020). Siblingship beyond siblings? Cousins and the shadows of social mobility in the central Philippines. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 26(2), 321–42.Google Scholar
Cruz, R. (in preparation). The lives of inheritance: siblings and the shadows of social mobility in post-1945 Philippines (manuscript).Google Scholar
Cruz, R., Tinkler, P., and Fenton, L. (2022). The kinship of bioinformation: relations in an evolving archive. In Gonzalez-Polledo, EJ and Posocco, S, eds., Bioinformation: Worlds and Futures. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 54–74.Google Scholar
Das, V. (1995). Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2007). Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2010). Engaging the life of the Other: love and everyday life. In Lambek, M., ed., Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 376–99.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2015). Affliction: Health, Disease, Poverty. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2018). On singularity and the event: further reflections on the ordinary. In Bodenhorn, B. and Holbraad, M., eds., Recovering the Human Subject: Freedom, Creativity and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
Das, V. (2020). Textures of the Ordinary: Doing Anthropology after Wittgenstein. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. (2012). (Res)sentiment and practices of hope: the labours of Filipina live-in caregivers in Filipino Canadian families. In Coloma, R. S., McElhinny, B., Tungohan, E., Catungal, J. P. C., and Davidson, L. M., eds., Filipinos in Canada: Disturbing Invisibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 142–60.Google Scholar
Day, S. (2012). Demographies in flux. In Fardon, R., Harris, O., Marchand, T. H. J., et al., eds., The Sage Handbook of Social Anthropology, vol. 2. London: Sage Publications with the Association of Social Anthropologists of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth, pp. 341–53.Google Scholar
Delaney, C. (1995). Father state, motherland, and the birth of modern Turkey. In Yanagisako, S. J. and Delaney, C., eds., Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
Dow, K. (2016). Making a Good Life: An Ethnography of Nature, Ethics, and Reproduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (2018). A feel for genealogy: “family treeing” in the North of England. Ethnos, 83(4), 724–43.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., and Strathern, M. (2000). Including our own. In Carsten, J., ed., Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–66.Google Scholar
Errington, S. (1990). Recasting sex, gender, and power: a theoretical and regional overview. In Atkinson, J. M. and Errington, S., eds., Power and Difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Flores, A. (2018). The descendant bargain: Latina youth remaking kinship and generation through educational sibcare in Nashville, Tennessee. American Anthropologist, 32(4), 73–13.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. (1969). Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2001). Biologization revisited: kinship theory in the context of the new biologies. In Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 302–22.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2013). Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (2019). The anthropology of biology: a lesson from the new kinship studies. In Bamford, S., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–32.Google Scholar
Franklin, S., and McKinnon, S. (2001). Introduction. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. In Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. (2014). Entrepreneurial Selves: Neoliberal Respectability and the Making of a Caribbean Middle Class. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, S. (2016). Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. The Sociological Review, 64(1), 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, S., and Laurison, D. (2019). The Class Ceiling: Why It Pays to Be Privileged. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Galam, R. (2017). Relational autonomy: kinship and daughters-in-law negotiating affinity with their mothers-in-law. Families, Relationships and Societies, 6(3), 357–73.Google Scholar
Gallo, E. (2018). The Fall of Gods: Memory, Kinship, and Middle Classes in South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gamburd, M. R. (2020). Linked Lives: Elder Care, Migration, and Kinship in Sri Lanka. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. (2014). Regeneration: love, drugs and the remaking of Hispano inheritance. Social Anthropology, 22(2), 200–12.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. (2020). Fragments of relatedness: writing, archiving, and the vicissitudes of kinship. Ethnos, 85(4), 717–29.Google Scholar
Garciá-Sánchez, I. M. (2018). Children as interactional brokers of care. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47, 167–84.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, L. (2018). A gendered ethnography of elites. Focaal, 81, 16–28.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, K. E., and Schuster, C. E. (2016). Introduction: (de)materializing kinship – holding together mutuality and difference. Social Analysis, 60(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, A. (2015). Gay Fathers, Their Children, and the Making of Kinship. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., ed. (1958). The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gow, P. (1989). The perverse child: desire in a native Amazonian subsistence economy. Man (N.S.), 24(4), 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, G. (2014). Eavesdropping on Bourdieu’s philosophers. In Das, V., Jackson, M., Kleinman, A., and Singh, B., eds., The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 138–58.Google Scholar
Han, C. (2012). Life in Debt: Times of Care and Violence in Neoliberal Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Han, C. (2021). Seeing like a Child: Inheriting the Korean War. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Han, C., and Brandel, A. (2020). Genres of witnessing: narrative, violence, generations. Ethnos, 85(4), 629–46.Google Scholar
Hann, C. (2008). Reproduction and inheritance: Goody revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37(1), 145–58.Google Scholar
Hayden, C. P. (1995). Gender, genetics, and generation: reformulating biology in lesbian kinship. Cultural Anthropology, 10(1), 41–63.Google Scholar
Heiman, R., Freeman, C., and Liechty, M., eds. (2012). The Global Middle Classes: Theorizing through Ethnography. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Heron, A. P. (2018). Being said/seen to care: masculine silences and emerging visibilities of intimate fatherhood in Dominica, Lesser Antilles. In Esposito, L., Pérez-Arredondo, C., and Ferreiro, J. M., eds., Discourses from Latin America and the Caribbean: Current Concepts and Challenges. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 267–98.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. (2002). Love and gold. In Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A. R., eds., Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. London: Granta Books, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
Holy, L. (1996). Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Howell, S. (2009). Adoption of the unrelated child: some challenges to the anthropological study of kinship. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1), 149–66.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (2018). Cutting the face: kinship, state, and social media conflict in networked Jordan. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 2(1), 49–71.Google Scholar
Hunleth, J. (2017). Children as Caregivers: The Global Fight against Tuberculosis and HIV in Zambia. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, S. E. (2000). Identity and substance: the broadening bases of relatedness among the Nuer of southern Sudan. In Carsten, Janet, ed., Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. J. (2021). Worlds of Care: The Emotional Lives of Fathers Caring for Children with Disabilities. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
James, D. (2015). Money from Nothing: Indebtedness and Aspiration in South Africa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2012). Women in the middle: femininity, virtue, and excess in Indonesian discourses of middle classness. In Heiman, R., Freeman, C., and Liechty, M., eds., The Global Middle Classes: Theorizing through Ethnography. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, pp. 145–68.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (2010). Caregiving: the divided meaning of being human and the divided self of the caregiver. In Molina, J. M. and Swearer, D. K., with McGarry, S. L., eds., Rethinking the Human. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Lambek, M. (2011). Kinship as gift and theft: acts of succession in Mayotte and Israel. American Ethnologist, 38(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
Lambek, M. (2013). Kinship, modernity, and the immodern. In McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., eds., Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, pp. 241–60.Google Scholar
Lan, P.-C. (2006). Global Cinderellas: Migrant Domestics and Newly Rich Employers in Taiwan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Laugier, S. (2015). The ethics of care as a politics of the ordinary. New Literary History, 46(2), 217–40.Google Scholar
Lazar, S. (2017). The Social Life of Politics: Ethics, Kinship, and Union Activism in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leacock, E. (1978). Women’s status in egalitarian society: implications for social evolution. Current Anthropology, 19(2), 247–75.Google Scholar
Leinaweaver, J. B. (2010). Outsourcing care: how Peruvian migrants meet transnational family obligations. Latin American Perspectives, 37(5), 67–87.Google Scholar
Leinaweaver, J. B. (2013a). Adoptive Migration: Raising Latinos in Spain. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Leinaweaver, J. B. (2013b). Toward an anthropology of ingratitude: notes from Andean kinship. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 55(3), 554–78.Google Scholar
Leonardo, M. di. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12(3), 440–53.Google Scholar
Liebelt, C. (2011). Caring for the “Holy Land”: Filipina Domestic Workers in Israel. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
MacCormack, C., and Strathern, M., eds. (1980). Nature, Culture and Gender: A Critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: the role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12(3), 277–95.Google Scholar
Madianou, M., and Miller, D. (2012). Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magee, S. (2015). Of love and fur: grandmothers, class, and pre-mortem inheritance in a southern Polish city. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 21(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, S. (2018). Inheritance. In Callan, H., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, vol. 6. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3270–6.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. (2005). The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mallman, M. (2018). Disruption in the working-class family: the early origins of habitus clivé. In Lawler, S. and Payne, G., eds., Social Mobility for the 21st Century: Everyone a Winner? Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar
Manalansan, M. (2003). Global Divas: Filipino Gay Men in the Diaspora. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Manalansan, M. (2006). Queer intersections: sexuality and gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 224–49.Google Scholar
Manalansan, M. (2014). The “stuff” of queer lives: mess, migration, and queer lives. Radical History Review, 120, 94–107.Google Scholar
Maqsood, A. (2021). Love as understanding: marriage, aspiration, and the joint family in middle-class Pakistan. American Ethnologist, 48(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Mayblin, M. (2010). Gender, Catholicism, and Morality in Brazil: Virtuous Husbands, Powerful Wives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McKay, D. (2012). Global Filipinos: Migrants’ Lives in the Virtual Village. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McKay, D. (2017). Sent home: mapping the absent child into migration through polymedia. Global Networks, 18(1), 133–50.Google Scholar
McKay, S. C. (2015). “So they remember me when I’m gone”: remittances, fatherhood and gender relations of Filipino migrant men. In Hoang, L. A. and Yeoh, B. S. A., eds., Transnational Labour Migration, Remittances and the Changing Family in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 111–35.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1981). Cain and Abel on the Malay peninsula. In Marshall, M., ed., Siblingship in Oceania: Studies in the Meaning of Kin Relations. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 335–87.Google Scholar
McKinnon, S. (2017a). Kinship particularism and the project of anthropological comparison. In Remme, J. H. Z. and Sillander, K., eds., Human Nature and Social Life: Perspectives on Extended Sociality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–65.Google Scholar
McKinnon, S. (2017b). Doing and being: process, essence, and hierarchy in making kin. In Coleman, S. H., Hyatt, S. B., and Kingsolver, A., eds., The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 161–82.Google Scholar
McKinnon, S., and Cannell, F., eds. (2013). Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). What is a relationship? Is kinship negotiated experience? Ethnos, 72(4), 535–54.Google Scholar
Mody, P. (2020). Care and resistance. Anthropology and Humanism, 45(2), 194–201.Google Scholar
Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In Mohanty, C. T., ed., Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 51–80.Google Scholar
Moore, H. L. (1994). A Passion for Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moore, H. L. (2007). The Subject of Anthropology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (1995). Performance theory and the new anthropology of sex and gender. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 567–92.Google Scholar
Needham, R. (1971). Introduction. In Needham, R., ed., Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. London: Tavistock, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Ong, A., and Peletz, M., eds. (1995). Bewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ortiga, Y. (2020). Learning to leave: Filipino families and the making of the global Filipino nurse. In Seki, K., ed., Ethnographies of Development and Globalization in the Philippines: Emergent Socialities and the Governing of Precarity. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 98–113.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Rosaldo, M. Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., Women, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 68–87.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (1989). High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B., and Whitehead, H. (1981). Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pauli, J. (2013). Sharing made us sisters. In Alber, E., Coe, C., and Thelen, T., eds., The Anthropology of Sibling Relations: Shared Parentage, Experience, and Exchange. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar
Peletz, M. (2001). Ambivalence in kinship since the 1940s. In Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 413–44.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pingol, A. T. (2001). Remaking Masculinities: Identity, Power, and Gender Dynamics in Families with Migrant Wives and Househusbands. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Center for Women’s Studies.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1950). Introduction. In Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. and Forde, D., eds., African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute, pp. 1–85.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, R. M. (2010). Migrants for Export: How the Philippine State Brokers Labor to the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rofel, L., and Yanagisako, S. J. (2019). Fabricating Transnational Capitalism: A Collaborative Ethnography of Italian-Chinese Global Fashion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1974). Women, culture and society: a theoretical overview. In Rosaldo, M. Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., Women, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Roth, C. (2014). The strength of badenya ties: siblings and social security in old age – the case of urban Burkina Faso. American Ethnologist, 41(3), 547–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. (2013). What Kinship Is – And Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saria, V. (2021). Hijras, Lovers, Brothers: Surviving Sex and Poverty in Rural India. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. M. (1968). American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. M. (1984). A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Segal, L. B. (2018). Tattered textures of kinship: the effects of torture among Iraqi families in Denmark. Medical Anthropology, 37(7), 553–67.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. (2020). Tender labor: transnational young people and continuums of familial care. Anthropology of Work Review, 41(1), 14–23.Google Scholar
Shever, E. (2013). “I am a petroleum product”: making kinship work on the Patagonian frontier. In McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., eds., Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, pp. 85–107.Google Scholar
Shohet, M. (2021). Silence and Sacrifice: Family Stories of Care and the Limits of Love in Vietnam. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stafford, C. (2000). Chinese patriliny and the cycles of yang and laiwang. In Carsten, J., ed., Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. (2009). Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, L. (2014). Life beside Itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. (2010). Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1992a). After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1992b). Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1996). Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 2(3), 517–35.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (2020). Relations: An Anthropological Account. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sufrin, C. (2018). Making mothers in jail: carceral reproduction of normative motherhood. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society, 7, 55–65.Google Scholar
Tacoli, C. (1999). International migration and the restructuring of gender asymmetries: continuity and change among Filipino labor migrants in Rome. International Migration Review, 33(3), 658–82.Google Scholar
TallBear, K. (2018). Making love and relations beyond settler sex and family. In Clarke, A. E. and Haraway, D., eds., Making Kin Not Population. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, pp. 145–64.Google Scholar
Thelen, T., and Alber, E., eds. (2018). Reconnecting State and Kinship: Temporalities, Scales, Classifications. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, T., and Coe, C. (2019). Political belonging through elderly care: temporalities, representations and mutuality. Anthropological Theory, 19(2), 279–99.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2005). Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tinkler, P., Cruz, R., and Fenton, L. (2021). Recomposing persons: scavenging and storytelling in a birth cohort archive. History of the Human Sciences, 34(3–4), 266–89.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B. (1979). Trobriand kinship from another view: the reproductive power of women and men. Man (N.S.), 14(2), 328–48.Google Scholar
Weismantel, M. (1995). Making kin: kinship theory and Zumbagua adoptions. American Ethnologist, 22(1), 685–704.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. (2019). We Have Never Been Middle Class: How Social Mobility Misleads Us. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Weston, K. (1991). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, A. (2020). Making kin from gold: dowry, gender, and Indian labor migration to the Gulf. Cultural Anthropology, 35(3), 435–61.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. J. (2002). Producing Culture and Capital: Family Firms in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. (2015). Kinship: still at the core. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1), 489–94.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. J., and Collier, J. F., eds. (1987). Gender and Kinship: Essays towards a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. J., and Delaney, C., eds. (1995). Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yarris, K. (2017). Care across Generations: Solidarity and Sacrifice in Transnational Families. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yates-Doerr, E., and Carney, M. A. (2016). Demedicalizing health: the kitchen as a site of care. Medical Anthropology, 35(4), 305–21.Google Scholar
Zaloom, C. (2019). Indebted: How Families Make College Work at Any Cost. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×