Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-04T23:37:08.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Attitude Change Experiments in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Allyson L. Holbrook
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
James N. Druckman
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Donald P. Greene
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James H. Kuklinski
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Arthur Lupia
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

The importance of attitudes and the processes by which they are formed and changed is ubiquitous throughout political science. Perhaps the most obvious example is research exploring citizens' attitudes toward candidates, how these attitudes are influenced by political advertising and other persuasive messages, and how these attitudes influence decisions and behavior (see McGraw's chapter in this volume). Attitudes toward candidates are fundamental to the democratic process because they help voters make vote choices, perhaps the most basic way in which citizens can express their opinions and influence government (e.g., Rosenstone and Hansen 1993). Other key attitudes in the political domain include attitudes toward specific policies that also help voters make important decisions about voting, vote choice, and activism (e.g., Rosenstone and Hansen 1993). Attitudes toward institutions such as political parties and government entities also influence people's view of government. Finally, attitudes toward other groups in society (e.g., African Americans, women) may help determine support for specific policies (e.g., Transue 2007). Thus, attitudes play a central role in many of the democratic processes studied by political scientists reviewed in this volume (e.g., Gadarian and Lau; Hutchings; Lodge and Tabor; McGraw; Nelson; Wilson and Eckel).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Robert P., Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., and Fiske, Susan T.. 1982. “Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 619–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, Icek, and Fishbein, Martin. 2005. “The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior.” In The Handbook of Attitudes, eds. Albarracín, Doris, Johnson, Blair T., and Zanna, Mark P.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 173–221.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. 1935. “Attitudes.” In A Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Murchison, Carl. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press, 798–844.Google Scholar
Andreoli, Virginia, and Worchel, Stephen. 1978. “Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Position on Attitude Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Hans, and Jan-Benedict, E.Steenkamp, M.. 2001. “Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation.” Journal of Marketing Research 38: 143–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belli, Robert F., Traugott, Michael W., Young, Margaret, and McGonagle, Katherine A.. 1999. “Reducing Vote Over-Reporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63: 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, Daryl J. 1970. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human Affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2002. “Political Context and the Survey Response: The Dynamics of Racial Policy Opinion.” Journal of Politics 64: 567–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizer, George Y., and Petty, Richard E.. 2005. “How We Conceptualize Our Attitudes Matters: The Effects of Valence Framing on the Resistance of Political Attitudes.” Political Psychology 26: 553–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boninger, David S., Brock, Timothy C., Cook, Thomas D., Gruder, Charles L., and Romer, Daniel. 1990. “Discovery of Reliable Attitude Change Persistence Resulting from a Transmitter Tuning Set.” Psychological Science 1: 268–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A., and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 959–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilyn. 2000. “Research Design and Issues of Validity.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, eds. Reis, Harry T. and Judd, Charles M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–16.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C.. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cantril, Hadley. 1934. “Attitudes in the Making.” Understanding the Child 4: 13–15.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101: 637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press, 206–61.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1970. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. Tufte, Edward R.. Reading: MA: Addison-Wesley, 168–89.Google Scholar
Davis, James A., Smith, Tom W., and Marsden, Peter V.. 2007. General Social Surveys, 1972–2006 Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98: 671–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2000. “Preference Formation.” American Review of Political Science 3: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 729–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Forgette, Richard, and Morris, Jonathan S.. 2006. “High-Conflict Television News and Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 59: 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffié, B. 1992. “The Processes of Minority Influence in an Ideological Confrontation.” Political Psychology 13: 407–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2008. “The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach.” American Political Science Review 102: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, James M. 2003. “Social Context and Inter-Group Political Attitudes: Experiments in Group Conflict Theory.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 607–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, P. J., and Sears, David O.. 2002. “The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale.” Political Psychology 23: 253–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelfarb, Samuel, and Lickteig, Carl. 1982. “Social Desirability and the Randomized Response Technique.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 710–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Li-Ning, and Price, Vincent. 2001. “Motivations, Goals, Information Search, and Memory about Political Candidates.” Political Psychology 22: 665–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2007. “Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 957–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review 76: 848–58.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Boydston, John. 1987. “An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertisements.” Communication Quarterly 35: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27: 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, eds. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner. New York: McGraw-Hill, 778–867.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., Holbrook, Allyson L., Berent, Matthew K., Carson, Richard T., Hanemann, W. Michael, Kopp, Raymond J., Mitchell, Robert Cameron, Presser, Stanley, Rudd, Paul A., and Smith, V. Kerry. 2002. “The Impact of ‘No Opinion’ Response Options on Data Quality: Prevention of Non-Attitude Reporting or an Invitation to Satisfice?” Public Opinion Quarterly 66: 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., Holbrook, Allyson L., and Visser, Penny S.. 2000. “The Impact of the Fall 1997 Debate about Global Warming on American Public Opinion.” Public Understanding of Science 9: 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., and Petty, Richard E.. 1995. “Attitude Strength: An Overview.” In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, eds. Petty, Richard E. and Krosnick, Jon A.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1–24.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Cobb, Michael D.. 1998. “When White Southerners Converse about Race.” In Perception and Prejudice, eds. Hurwitz, Jon and Peffley, Mark. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 35–57.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Hurley, Norman L.. 1994. “On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-Taking.” Journal of Politics 56: 729–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen, and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83: 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1986. “Stability and Change in Political Attitudes: Observed, Recalled, and Explained.” Political Behavior 8: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Hasecke, Edward, and Conger, Kimberly. 2003. “Ambivalence, Uncertainty, and Processes of Candidate Evaluation.” Political Psychology 24: 421–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2004. “Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment.” Political Psychology 25: 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard B., and Wright, David W.. 1995. “Detecting and Correcting Attrition Bias in Longitudinal Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and Family 57: 921–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12: 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C., and Reeves, Byron. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91: 567–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., and Garst, Jennifer. 2005. “Values-Based Political Messages and Persuasion: Relationships among Speaker, Recipient, and Evoked Values.” Political Psychology 26: 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Hurwitz, Jon. 2007. “Persuasion and Resistance: Race and the Death Penalty in America.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 996–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1986. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Krosnick, Jon A., and Breuning, Marijke. 1994. “Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 582–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taris, Toon. 2000. A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, Louis L., ed. 1931. The Measurement of Social Attitudes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Transue, John E. 2007. “Identity Salience, Identity Acceptance, and Racial Policy Attitudes: American National Identity as a Uniting Force.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and White, Ismail K.. 2002. “Cues That Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 96: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Penny S., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1998. “Development of Attitude Strength over the Life Cycle: Survey and Decline.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 1389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Stanley L. 1965. “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolosin, Robert J., Sherman, Steven J., and Cann, Arnie. 1975. “Predictions of Own and Other's Conformity.” Journal of Personality 43: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×