Auld, F. Jr., & White, A. M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. The Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 273–281. doi:10.1080/00223980.1956.9713040CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., Quera, V., & Gnisci, A. (2009). Observer agreement for timed-event sequential data: A comparison of time-based and event-based algorithms. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 137–147. doi:10.3758/brm.41.1.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Addison-Wesley Press Inc. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from https://archive.org/stream/interactionproce00baleGoogle Scholar

Berg, D. M. (1967). A thematic approach to the analysis of the task-oriented, small group. Communication Studies, 18(4), 285–291. doi:10.1080/10510976709362891Google Scholar

Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 399–410.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1991). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bilandzic, H., Koschel, F., & Scheufele, B. (2001). Theoretisch-heuristische Segmentierung im Prozeß der empiriegeleiteten Kategorienbildung. In Wirth, W. & Lauf, E. (Eds.), Inhaltsanalyse (pp. 98–116). Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem Verlag.Google Scholar

The British National Corpus. (2007). (Version 3, BNC XML Edition). JA6. Retrieved using BNCweb (CQP-edition), Lancaster University Computing Services, Lancaster, from http://bncweb.lancs.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Burtscher, M. J., Kolbe, M., Wacker, J., & Manser, T. (2011). Interactions of team mental models and monitoring behaviors predict team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 257–269. doi:10.1037/a0025148Google ScholarPubMed

Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conroy, R. (2001). Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. University College London, London.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183–199. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollard, J., & Auld, F. Jr. (1959). Scoring human motives: A manual. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Downing, A. (2015). English grammar: A university course (3rd edn.). Abingdon, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. Jr (1975). Interaction units during speaking turns in dyadic, face-to-face conversations. In Kendon, A., Harris, R. M., & Key, M. R. (Eds.), Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction (pp. 199–214). The Hague & Paris: Mouton Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faßnacht, G. (1995). Systematische Verhaltensbeobachtung: Eine Einführung in die Methologie und Praxis [Systematic behavioral observation: An introduction into the methodology and practice] (2nd ed.). Munich: Reinhardt.Google Scholar

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. doi:10.1093/applin/21.3.354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(117), 1–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gamsky, N. R., & Farwell, G. F. (1966). Counselor verbal behavior as a function of client hostility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 13(2), 184–190. doi:10.1037/h0023397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, S., & Nelson, G. (2002). An introduction to English grammar (2nd edn.). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar

Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 47–58. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195001)6:1%3C47::AID-JCLP2270060111%3E3.0.CO;2-I3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatfield, J. D., & Weider‐Hatfield, D. (1978). The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis. Communications Monographs, 45(1), 44–50. doi:10.1080/03637757809375950CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbst, T., Heath, D., Roe, I. F., & Götz, D. (2004). A valency dictionary of English: A corpus-based analysis of the complementation patterns of English verbs, nouns and adjectives (Vol. 40). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face‐to‐face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13(2), 225–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00104.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication research: Considerations for the use of interaction analysis. In Tardy, C. H. (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication processes (pp. 229–245). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1987). Hedging, fencing and other conversational gambits: An analysis of gender differences in New Zealand speech. In Pauwels, A. (Ed.), Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society (pp. 59–79). Sydney, Australia: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2008). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kasper, G. (1998). Analysing verbal protocols. Tesol Quarterly, 32(2), 358–362. doi:10.2307/3587591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keyton, J., & Beck, S. J. (2009). The influential role of relational messages in group interaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(1), 14–30. doi:10.1037/a0013495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klonek, F. E., Quera, V., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Coding interactions in Motivational Interviewing with computer-software: What are the advantages for process researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 284–292. doi:org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klonek, F. E., Quera, V., Burba, M., & Kauffeld, S. (2016). Group interactions and time: Using sequential analysis to study group dynamics in project meetings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20(3), 209–222. doi:10.1037/gdn0000052CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Boos, M., Stein, A., & Strack, M. (2016). SYNSEG–Eine Methode zur syntaxgeleiteten Segmentierung von Kodiereinheiten für die Analyse von Gruppenprozessen. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 47(4), 335–344. doi:10.1007/s11612-016-0345-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, M. W., Kuo, C. L., & Dailey, J. C. (1997). The impact of brainstorming techniques on subsequent group processes: Beyond generating ideas. Small Group Research, 28(2), 218–242. doi:10.1177/1046496497282003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (1981). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA, and London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar

Kvale, S. (1988). The 1000-page question. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 6(2), 90–106.Google Scholar

Langdridge, D., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2009). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology (2nd edn.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus‐oriented research. Language Learning, 50(4), 675–724. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J. A., & Meinecke, A. L. (2014). Observing culture: Differences in US-American and German team meeting behaviors. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(2), 252–271. doi:10.1177/1368430213497066CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A. L., Rowold, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1017–1033. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady, 10(8), 707–710.Google Scholar

Magnusson, M. S. (1996). Hidden real-time patterns in intra-and inter-individual behavior: description and detection. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 112–123. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.12.2.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (8th edn.). Weinheim and Basel, Switzerland: UTB.Google Scholar

Murphy, M. L., & Koskela, A. (2010). Key terms in semantics. London, UK, and New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Oh, H. J., Myaeng, S. H., & Jang, M. G. (2007). Semantic passage segmentation based on sentence topics for question answering. Information Sciences, 177(18), 3696–3717. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, W. C., & Cunningham, E. M. (1934). Time-sampling techniques. Child Development, 5(1), 41–58. doi:10.2307/1125795Google Scholar

Poland, B. D. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 290–310. doi:10.1177/107780049500100302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quera, V., Bakeman, R., & Gnisci, A. (2007). Observer agreement for event sequences: Methods and software for sequence alignment and reliability estimates. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 39–49. doi:10.3758/bf03192842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riethmüller, M., Fernandez Castelao, E., Eberhardt, D., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55(1), 55–68. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenberg, H., & Bonoma, T. V. (1974). A social influence rating method for group interaction and some pilot results on group therapy process. Proceedings of the Division of Personality and Society Psychology, 1(1), 259–262. doi:10.1177/014616727400100188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, R. L., & Staszewski, C. (1988). The unit problem: Some systematic distinction and critical dilemmas for psychotherapy process research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 25(2), 191–200. doi:10.1037/h0085333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srnka, K. J., & Koeszegi, S. (2007). From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59, 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk: A taxonomy of verbal response modes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Stinson, C. H., Milbrath, C., Reidbord, S. P., & Bucci, W. (1994). Thematic segmentation of psychotherapy transcripts for convergent analyses. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 31(1), 36–48. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.31.1.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Rochat, S., & Zapf, D. (2005). It’s not only clients: Studying emotion work with clients and co-workers with an event-sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(2), 195–220. doi:10.1348/096317905X39666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J. C., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102(13), 1718–1725. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1982). Categories and sequences of behavior: Methods of description and analysis. In Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P. (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 362–439). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waller, M. J. (1999). The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 127–137. doi:10.2307/257088CrossRefGoogle Scholar