Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T23:10:01.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Fiduciary duty and the search for a shared conception of sustainable investment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

By
Gordon L. Clark
Edited by
James P. Hawley ,
Andreas G. F. Hoepner ,
Keith L. Johnson ,
Joakim Sandberg  and
Edward J. Waitzer
Gordon L. Clark
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
James P. Hawley
Affiliation:
St Mary's College, California
Andreas G. F. Hoepner
Affiliation:
ICMA Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading
Keith L. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Joakim Sandberg
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Edward J. Waitzer
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The trust is a means of conserving and transferring assets to nominated beneficiaries (Langbein 1997). Regulating the behavior of trustees, the principle of fiduciary duty governs the relationship between trustees and beneficiaries (Thomas and Hudson 2004: s. 1.56). In some jurisdictions, it also enables intermediaries to represent the interests of beneficiaries, providing the former with authority to invest on behalf of the latter. There are a variety of definitions of fiduciary duty ranging from the abstract through to the domain-specific. Atiyah (1995: 255) observed that a fiduciary relationship binds trustees to beneficiaries such that “the person in the fiduciary position is under a duty not to abuse that position, and this duty involves the duty to disclose all material facts.” Stapleton (1996: 13) noted, in relation to company directors and senior executives, being a fiduciary also involves “honesty and loyalty, and a duty of care and skill.” Langbein (2007: 1075) observed the “core fiduciary principle … is the duty of impartiality”; a rule conceived and policed so as to regulate conflicts of interest.

The chapter begins with the historical significance of fiduciary duty (see also Hawley and Williams 2001). This allows us to understand fiduciary duty in relation to functionally efficacious common law norms and conventions. Whereas some might suggest that fiduciary duty evolved as the standard of behavior because of its effectiveness in maximizing social welfare, it is important to acknowledge the idealism about past communities of practice, which is embedded in such claims. This is illustrated by a rereading of two landmark cases that effectively defined the nature and scope of fiduciary duty, relevant to investment management. I suggest that whatever its ideal conception, it has proven insufficient as the golden rule governing the trust institution. Government policies designed to define and regulate the governance of the trust institution represent attempts to solve problems evident in the practice of investment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Institutional Investment and Fiduciary Duty , pp. 265 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberts, R. J. and Poon, P. S.. 1996. “The New Prudent Investor Rule and the Modern Portfolio Theory: A New Direction for Fiduciaries,” American Business Law Journal 34: 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P. S. 1995. An Introduction to the Law of Contract. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, C. 2011. Protecting our Best Interests: Rediscovering Fiduciary Obligation. London: Fair Pensions.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 1989. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G. 1982. A Common Law for the Age of Statutes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. L. 1985. Judges and the Cities: Interpreting Local Autonomy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. L. 2007. “Expertise and Representation in Financial Institutions: UK Legislation on Pension Fund Governance and US Regulation of the Mutual Fund Industry,” Contemporary Social Science 2: 1–23.Google Scholar
Clark, G. L. 2013. “The Kay Review on Long-Horizon Investing: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management 6 (1): 58–63.CrossRef
Clark, G. L. and Monk, A. H. B.. 2013. “The Scope of Financial Institutions: In-sourcing, Outsourcing, and Off-shoring,” Journal of Economic Geography 13 (2): 278–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L. and Urwin, R.. 2008. “Best-practice Investment Management,” Journal of Asset Management 9 (1): 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. 2001. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatic Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. 2005. A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment. London.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. 1964. “The Dynastic Trust,” Yale Law Journal 73: 547–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, J. P. and Williams, A. T.. 2001. The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism: How Institutional Investors Can Make America More Democratic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, J. P., Johnson, K., and Waitzer, E.. 2011. “Reclaiming Fiduciary Duty Balance,” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management 4 (2): 4–16.Google Scholar
HM Government. 1980. Committee to Review the Functioning of Financial Institutions: Report. [Wilson Report]. Cmnd. 7937. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
HM Government 2012a. The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision-making. London: Department of Business, Innovation & Skills.Google Scholar
HM Government 2012b. Ensuring Equity Markets Support Long-Term Growth: The Government Response to the Kay Review. London: Department of Business, Innovation & Skills.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.. 1998. “Law and Finance,” Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, J. H. 1997. “The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce,” Yale Law Journal 107: 165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, J. H. 2007. “Why Did Trust Law Become Statute Law in the United States?” University of Alabama Law Review 58: 1069–82.Google Scholar
Langbein, J. H. and Posner, R. A.. 1976. “The Revolution in Trust Investment Law,” American Bar Association Journal 62: 887–91.Google Scholar
Merton, R. and Bodie, Z.. 2005. “The Design of Financial Systems: Towards a Synthesis of Function and Structure,” Journal of Investment Management 3: 1–23.Google Scholar
Myners Report. 2001. Institutional Investment in the United Kingdom: A Review. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Survey of Investment Regulation of Pension Funds. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Peston, M. 1980. “The Wilson Report,” Political Quarterly 51: 481–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. 1990. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. J. 2011. “From Fiduciary Duties to Fiduciary Relationships for Socially Responsible Investing: Responding to the Will of Beneficiaries,” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 1 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, M. J. 2006. “Legal Origins, Politics, and Stock Markets,” Harvard Law Review 120: 460–527.Google Scholar
Schanzenbach, M. and Sitkoff, R. H.. 2007. “Did Reform of Prudent Trust Investment Laws Change Trust Portfolio Allocation?” Journal of Law and Economics 50: 681–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R. J. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. 2002. “Bubbles, Human Judgement, and Expert Opinion,” Financial Analysts Journal 58 (3): 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, G. P. 1996. Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. and Hudson, A.. 2004. The Law of Trusts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. 2008. “Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjoined Thinking,” Cambridge Law Journal 67: 396–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, C. 2011. Intergenerational Equity and Sustainable Investment. DPhil Thesis: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Woods, C. and Urwin, R.. 2010. “Putting Sustainable Investing into Practice,” Journal of Business Ethics 92: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×