Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization
- cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Revisiting Models and Theories of Language Standardization
- Part II Legitimacy, Authority and the Written Form
- Part III Norms, Literacy and Education
- Part IV Beyond the National
- 19 Transnational Standards of Languages
- 20 Standardization across State Boundaries
- 21 Language Modernization in the Chinese Character Cultural Sphere
- 22 Linguistic Norms, Centre–Periphery Dynamics and the Tension between Uniformity and Diversity in Processes of Standardization
- 23 When Ethnic Boundaries and Language Boundaries Mismatch
- 24 The Standardization of a Stateless Language
- Part V Standardization in Late Modernity
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
24 - The Standardization of a Stateless Language
from Part IV - Beyond the National
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2021
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization
- cambridge handbooks in language and linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Revisiting Models and Theories of Language Standardization
- Part II Legitimacy, Authority and the Written Form
- Part III Norms, Literacy and Education
- Part IV Beyond the National
- 19 Transnational Standards of Languages
- 20 Standardization across State Boundaries
- 21 Language Modernization in the Chinese Character Cultural Sphere
- 22 Linguistic Norms, Centre–Periphery Dynamics and the Tension between Uniformity and Diversity in Processes of Standardization
- 23 When Ethnic Boundaries and Language Boundaries Mismatch
- 24 The Standardization of a Stateless Language
- Part V Standardization in Late Modernity
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
The chapter outlines standardization efforts in Romani, where geographical dispersion and the absence of strong community institutions pose challenges to efforts towards unification, status regulation and domain expansion. Initial standardization efforts were localized and partly state sponsored, while others were promoted by networks of activists and supported by civil society initiatives as well as by European governance institutions. Transnational mobility since the mid-1990s, the expansion of electronic communication and the proliferation of both political networking and religious missionary activities among Romani communities have provided incentives and means for domain expansion. Romani literacy is characterized by the use of multiple variants in the choice of dialect and orthography. I show how the key features of ‘standardization beyond the state’, such as the role of networking among multiple actors and pluralism of form, are reinforced through the growing role of multinational institutions, increased mobility and the rise of electronic communication.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization , pp. 645 - 664Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Balić, S., Jauk-Pinhak, M., Kisić, Č., Šipka, M. & Uhlik, R., eds. (1989). Jezik i Kultura Roma. Sarajevo: Svetlost/Institut na proučavanje nacionalnih odnosa.Google Scholar
Chua, C. S. K. & Baldauf, R. B. (2011). Micro language planning. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Vol. II. New York: Routledge, pp. 936–51.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2003). Training Modules for Teachers in the History, Culture and Language of the Roma. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Courthiade, M. (1989). La langue Romani (Tsigane): Évolution, standardisation, unification, réforme. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C., eds., Language Reform: History and Future, Vol. IV. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
Courthiade, M. (1992). Research and action group on Romani linguistics. Interface, 8, 4–11.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (2003). Standard English and the Politics of Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davies, W. V. & Ziegler, E., eds. (2015). Language Planning and Microlinguistics: From Policy to Interaction and Vice Versa. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elšík, V. & Matras, Y. (2006). Markedness and Language Change: The Romani Sample. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (2005). The Romani language in Macedonia in the third millennium: progress and problems. In Schrammel, B., Halwachs, D. W. & Ambrosch, G., eds., General and Applied Romani Linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europa, pp. 163–73.Google Scholar
Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y. (2016). Language Provisions in Access to Hospital and Primary Care in Manchester. Manchester: Multilingual Manchester.Google Scholar
García, O. & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Granqvist, K. (2006). (Un)wanted institutionalization: the case of Finnish Romani. Romani Studies, 5(16), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halwachs, D. W. (2012). Functional expansion and language change: the case of Burgenland Romani. Romani Studies, 5(22), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halwachs, D. W., Klinge, S. A. & Schrammel-Leber, B. (2013). Romani: Education, Segregation and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Graz: GLM.Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F. (1991). Vlax phonological divergence from common Romani: implications for standardization and orthography. In Boltz, W. G. & Shapiro, M.C., eds., Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 102–18.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (2011). Paths to Post-Nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hübschmannová, M. & Neustupný, J. V. (1996). The Slovak-and-Czech dialect of Romani and its standardization. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 120, 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. (1999). Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, N. & Cañadas, A. (2012). Sar san? ¿Cómo esta´s? Rromani chibaqo ku`rso. Curso de Romanó. Madrid: Instituto de Cultura Gitana.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (2004). Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. (1996). Romani literacy at the crossroads. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 119, 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimová-Alexander, I. (2005). The Romani Voice in World Politics: The United Nations and Non-State Actors. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kochanowski, V. (1989). Problems of the Common Romany – problems of an international language. In Balić, S., Jauk-Pinhak, M., Kisić, Č, Šipka, M. & Uhlik, R., eds., Jezik i Kultura Roma. Sarajevo: Svetlost/Institut na proučavanje nacionalnih odnosa, pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
Kuzar, R. (2001). Hebrew and Zionism: A Discourse Analytic Cultural Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leggio, D. V. (2015). Radio Romani Mahala: Romani identities and languages in a virtual space. In Alietti, A., Olivera, M. & Riniolo, V., eds., Virtual Citizenship? Roma Communities, Inclusion Policies, Participation and ICT Tools. Milan: MacGraw-Hill Education, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Leggio, D. V. & Matras, Y. (2017). Orthography development on the Internet: Romani on YouTube. In Jones, M. C. & Mooney, D., eds., Creating Orthographies for Endangered Languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–75.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J. & Baldauf, R. B. (2008). Language planning in local contexts: agents, contexts and interactions. In Liddicoat, A. J. & Baldauf, R. B., eds., Language Planning in Local Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Marushiakova, E. & Popov, V. (2017). Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 48–59.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (1999). Writing Romani: the pragmatics of codification in a stateless language. Applied Linguistics, 20, 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. (2002). Romani: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (2005). The Status of Romani in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Language Policy Division.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (2010). Romani in Britain: The Afterlife of a Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (2013). Scholarship and the politics of Romani identity: strategic and conceptual issues. In Spiliopoulou Åkermark, S., Bloed, A., Hofmann, R. et al., eds., European Yearbook of Minority Issues, Vol. X. Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 209–45.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. (2015). Transnational policy and ‘authenticity’ discourses on Romani language and identity. Language in Society, 44, 295–316.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. & Reershemius, G. (1991). Standardization beyond the state: the case of Yiddish, Kurdish and Romani. In von Gleich, U. & Wolff, E., eds., Standardization of National Languages. Hamburg: UNESCO-Institut für Pädagogik, pp. 103–23.Google Scholar
Matras, Y., Leggio, D. V. & Steel, M. (2015). Roma education as a lucrative niche: ideologies and representations. Zeitschrift fu¨r internationale Bildung und Entwicklungspa¨dagogik, 38(1), 11–17.Google Scholar
Nahir, M. (1998). Micro language planning and the revival of Hebrew: a schematic framework. Language in Society, 27, 335–57.Google Scholar
New, W. S., Kyuchukov, H. & de Villiers, J. (2017). ‘We don’t talk Gypsy here’: minority language policies in Europe. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, B. (2013). New Soviet Gypsies: Nationality, Performance, and Selfhood in the Early Soviet Union. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Payne, M. (2017). The inclusion of Slovak Roma pupils in secondary school: contexts of language policy and planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(2), 161–80.Google Scholar
Rajah-Carrim, A. (2009). Use and standardization of Mauritian Creole in electronically mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 484–508.Google Scholar
Rodell Olgaç, C. (2013). The education of Roma in Sweden – an interplay between policy and practice. In Hornberg, S. & Brüggemann, C., eds., Die Bildungssituation von Roma in Europa. Münster: Waxmann, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
Rus, C. (2004). The Training of Roma School Mediators and Assistants. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Safran, W. (2005). Language and nation-building in Israel: Hebrew and its rivals. Nations and Nationalism, 11, 43–63.Google Scholar
Sergievski, M. V. (1931). Cyganski Jazyk. Moscow: Centraljnoe Izdateljstvo Narodov S.S.S.R.Google Scholar
Siiner, M., Koreinik, K. & Brown, K. D. (2017). Language Policy beyond the State. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Toma, S. (2013). Actori, roluri s¸i percept¸ ii ıˆn predarea limbii romani ıˆn Romaˆnia. Cluj: Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (2004). Language Policy and Language Planning: From Nationalism to Globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar