Bentley, A. F. (1938). Physicists and fairies. Philosophy of Science, 5, 132–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse and Solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical, and ideological messages. In McGarty, C. & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.), The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society (pp. 36–53). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. & Hewstone, M. (2004). Introduction. In Brewer, M. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), Social Cognition (pp. xi–xii). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carr, H. A. (1915). Review of J. B. Watson (1914). Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 308–312.Google Scholar

Connelly, J. & Costall, A. (2000). R. G. Collingwood and the idea of an historical psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costall, A. (1988). A closer look at direct perception. In Gellatly, A., Rogers, D., & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.), Cognition and Social Worlds (pp. 10–21). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1990). Picture perception as “indirect” perception. In Landwehr, K. (Ed.), Ecological Perception Research, Visual Communication and Aesthetics (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1991). Graceful degradation: Cognitivism and the metaphors of the computer. In Still, A.. & Costall, A. (Eds.), Against Cognitivism (pp. 151–170). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory and Psychology, 5, 467–481.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior & Philosophy, 32, 179–195.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2006a). “Introspectionism” and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 634–654.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2006b). On being the right size: Affordances and the question of scale. In Lock, G. & Molyneaux, B. (Eds.), Confronting Scale in Archaeology: Issues of Theory and Practice (pp. 15–26). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2007). Bringing the body back to life: James Gibson's ecology of agency. In Zlatev, J., Ziemke, T., Frank, R., & Dirven, R. (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 1: Embodiment (pp. 241–270). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2012). Introspection and the myth of methodological behaviourism. In Clegg, J. W. (Ed.), Self-observation in the Social Sciences (pp. 67–80). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2013). The unconscious theory in modern cognitivism. In Racine, T. P. & Slaney, K. L. (Eds.), A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology (pp. 312–327). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costall, A. & Dreier, O. (2006). Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Objects. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Costall, A., Leudar, I., & Reddy, V. (2006). Failing to see the irony in “mind-reading.” Theory & Psychology, 16, 163–167.Google Scholar

Costall, A. P. & Still, A. W. (1989). James Gibson's theory of direct perception and the problem of cultural relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 433–441.Google Scholar

Cronon, W. (Ed.) (1996). Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Danziger, K. (1997). The varieties of social construction. Theory & Psychology, 7, 399–416.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy. In The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays (pp. 1–19). New York: Henry Holt & Co. (First published in Popular Science Monthly, July 1909.)Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1914/1977). Psychological doctrine and philosophical teaching. In Morgenbesser, S. (Ed.), Dewey and His Critics (pp. 439–445). New York: Journal of Philosophy. (First published in the Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1914, 11(19).)Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In Dewey, J. (Ed.), Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude (pp. 3–69). New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. New York: Dover. (Based on the Paul Carus lectures of 1925.)Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1969). The Quest for Certainty. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar

Duncker, K. (1947). Phenomenology and epistemology of consciousness of objects. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7, 505–542.Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1995). A commentary on discursive and cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology, 1, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellen, R. (1996). Introduction. In Ellen, Roy & Fukui, Katsuyoshi (Eds.), Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Falmagne, R. J. (1995). The abstract and the concrete. In Martin, L. M. W., Nelson, K., & Tobach, E. (Eds.), Sociocultural Psychology: Theory and Practice of Doing and Knowing (pp. 205–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, W. J. & Nunez, R. (2001). Restoring to cognition the forgotten primacy of action, intention and emotion. In Nunez, R. & Freeman, W. J. (Eds.), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion (pp. ix–xix). Thoverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1975). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1950). The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In Miller, J. G. (Ed.), Experiments in Social Process (pp. 120–133). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gregory, R. L. (1989). Dismantling reality. In Lawson, H. & Appignanesi, L. (Eds.), Dismantling Truth: Reality in the Post-modern World (pp. 93–100). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997a). Introduction. In Hall, Stuart (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 1–11). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997b). The work of representation. In Hall, Stuart (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 13–64). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Hammond, H. & Keat, R. (1991). Understanding Phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive Science: A Philosophical Introduction. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Heft, H. (2001). Ecological Psychology in Context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James's Radical Empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven Psychologies. New York: Century.Google Scholar

Hirsch, P. D. (2000). Beyond discipline: toward effective partnerships between conservation biologists and ecological anthropologists. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Ecology, University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Holt, E. B. (1914). The Concept of Consciousness. London: George Allen.Google Scholar

Holt, E. B., Marvin, W. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., & Spaulding, E. G. (1912). The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441–456.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Janlert, L. E. (1987). Modeling change: the frame problem. In Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.), The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Joerges, B. (1988). Technology in everyday life: Conceptual queries. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour; 18, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. (1988). The Computer and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joravsky, D. (1989). Russian Psychology: A Critical History. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kessen, W. (1981). Early settlements in new cognition. Cognition, 10, 167–171.Google Scholar

Kwa, C. (1987). Representations of nature mediating between ecology and science policy: The case of the International Biological Programme. Social Studies of Science, 17, 413–442.Google Scholar

Leeper, R. (1951). Cognitive processes. In Stevens, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (pp. 730–757). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.Google Scholar

Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (Eds.). (2004a). Theory of mind. Theory & Psychology (special issue), 14(5), 571–752.Google Scholar

Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2004b). On the persistence of the problem of other minds’ in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and “theory of mind.” Theory & Psychology, 14, 603–662.Google Scholar

Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2009). Against Theory of Mind. London: Macmillan Palgrave.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. (1929). The Revolt against Dualism: An Inquiry Concerning the Existence of Ideas. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

MacMurray, J. (1961). Persons in Relation. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Marshall, H. H. (1996). Clarifying and implementing contemporary psychological perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 31, 29–34.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1938). The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mead, M. (1975). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In Hoskins, P. (Ed.), Principles of Visual Anthropology (pp. 3–10). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Pribram, K., & Galanter, E. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Nadler, S. (1997). Descartes's dualism? Philosophical Books, 38(3), 157–169.Google Scholar

Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. (1986). Computation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1999). Reason. Linacre Journal, 3, 71–84.Google Scholar

Schiffer, M. B. (with Miller, A. R.). (1999). The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shalin, D. N. (1993). Modernity, postmodernism, and pragmatist inquiry: An introduction. Symbolic Interaction, 16, 303–332.Google Scholar

Shaw, R. E. (2003). The agent–environment interface: Simon's indirect or Gibson's direct coupling. Ecological Psychology, 15, 37–106.Google Scholar

Shweder, R. A. & Sullivan, M. A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In Previn, L. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 399–416). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Smith, E. R. & MacKie, D. M. (2000). Social Psychology (2nd edn.). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. (Ed.). (1997). Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Still, A. & Costall, A. (1991a). The mutual elimination of dualism in Vygotsky and Gibson. In Still, A.. & Costall, A. (Eds.), Against Cognitivism (pp. 225–236). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Still, A. & Costall, A. (Eds.). (1991b). Against Cognitivism. London: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (1994). Social Psychology (8th edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1999). Some problems with the notion of external symbolic storage, and the case of Neolithic material culture in Britain. In Renfrew, C., & Scarre, C. (Eds.), Cognition and Material Culture. Oxford: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1995). Foreword. In Baron-Cohen, S., Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind (pp. ix–xviii). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1976). Knowing and Acting: An Invitation to Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1996). The Role of Abstract Rationality in Vygotsky's Image of Mind. In Tryphon, A. & Voneche, J. (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought (pp. 25–43). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar