Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T13:02:46.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Functional-Typological Approaches to Hispanic Linguistics

from Part I - Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2018

By
Rosa Vallejos
Edited by
Kimberly L. Geeslin
Kimberly L. Geeslin
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

This article explores the close partnership between functional linguistic and linguistic typology, as well as their contributions to Hispanic linguistics. One of the most striking facts about the languages of the world is that they are both similar and unique at the same time. To explain this fact, functionalism stars with the fundamental assumption that languages are the way they are because they have evolved so as to serve their users’ demands. Language is a tool for conceptualization, communication and socialization among human beings. Typology focuses on recurrent patterns in a large number of languages which allows generalizations as to what is possible in human languages. It compares patterns in genetically unrelated languages and categorizes linguistic systems into types. On the basis of this categorization, typological studies arrive at implicational universals, which are then explained in terms of functional pressures, iconic principles, processing and learning constraints, and diachronic changes. Functional-typological approaches play a prominent role in language change studies, and Spanish linguistics has made contributions to this area of research. Studies on synchronic variation and change in progress had shed light on the mechanisms of change, plausible diachronic pathways, and the circumstances under which universal principles influence emerging structures.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics , pp. 72 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aissen, Judith. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–448.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. (2007). Typology in the 21st Century: Major Current Developments. Linguistic Typology, 11, 239–251.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. (2015). Distributional Typology: Statistical Inquiries into the Dynamics of Linguistic Diversity. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 901–923.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1960). Linguistic Science and Linguistic Engineering. Word, 16, 374–391.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1961). Syntactic Blends and Other Matters. Language, 37: 3, 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Esther and Cortés-Torres, Mayra. (2012). Syntactic and Pragmatic Usage of the [estar + Adjective] Construction in Puerto Rican Spanish: ¡Está brutal! In Geeslin, Kimberly and Díaz-Campos, Manuel (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 61–74.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2006). From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language, 82 (4), 711–733.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Eddington, David. (2006). A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of “Becoming.” Language, 82 (2), 323–355.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. (1970). Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clements, J. C. (2006a). Primary and Secondary Object Marking in Spanish. In Clements, J. C. and Yoon, J. (eds.), Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax: Lexical Semantics, Discourse and Transitivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, J. C. (2006b). Ser–estar in the Predicate Adjective Construction. In Clements, J. C. and Yoon, J. (eds.), Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax: Lexical Semantics, Discourse and Transitivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–202.Google Scholar
Clements, J. C. (2006c). Transitivity and Spanish Non-Anaphoric se. In Clements, J. C. and Yoon, J. (eds.), Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax: Lexical Semantics, Discourse and Transitivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 236–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Company Company, C. (2012). Historical Morphosyntax and Grammaticalization. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 673–692.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. (1993). Argument Structure. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 903–914.Google Scholar
Croft, William. (1993). Case Marking and the Semantics of Mental Verbs. In Pustejovsky, James (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon. Boston, MA and London: Kluwer, pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. (2003). Typology and Universals (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. (2016). Comparative Concepts and Language-Specific Categories: Theory and Practice. Linguistic Typology, 20 (2), 377–393. doi:10.1515/lingty-2016–0012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William and Poole, K. T. (2008). Inferring Universals from Grammatical Variation: Multidimensional Scaling for Typological Analysis. Theoretical Linguistics, 34, 1–37.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy and Travis, Catherine. (2008). Locational Adverbs in Non-Spatial Settings: The Case of ahí in Colombian Spanish Conversations. In Curnow, Timothy Jowan (ed.), Selected Papers from the 2007 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, pp. 1–15. www.als.asn.au.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein and Fedriani, Chiara. (2012). The Argument Structure of Experience: Experiential Constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek, and Early Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society, 110 (3), 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2011. Grammaticalization and Syntax: A Functional View. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–377.Google Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole and Maldonado, Ricardo. (2009). Ya. Ancla conceptual de una visión programática. In Puig, Luisa (ed.), El discurso y sus espejos. Mexico City: Siglo XXI, pp. 189–235.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. (1972). Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar: Part 1. The Structure of the Clause, ed. Hengeveld, Kees. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, Wichmann, Søren, and Albu, Mihai. (2008). Typology, Areality, and Diffusion. Oceanic Linguistics, 47 (1), 223–232.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. (1991). Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language 67, (3), 547–619. doi: 10.2307/415037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. (2006). Functionalism and the Metalanguage–Theory Confusion. In Wiebe, Grace, Libben, Gary, Priestly, Tom, Smyth, Ron, and Wang, Sam (eds.), Phonology, Morphology, and the Empirical Imperative: Papers in Honour of Bruce Derwing. Taipei: Crane, pp. 27–59.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. (2007). Clause Types. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 224–275.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. (2016). Crosslinguistic Categories, Comparative Concepts, and the Walman Diminutive. Linguistic Typology, 20 (2), 305–331. doi: 10.1515/lingty-2016–0009.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) (2013). The World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. (1980). Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse. In Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 203–274.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, Domnita. (1997). El parámetro discursivo en la expresión del objeto directo lexical: español madrileño vs. español porteño. Signo y Seña, 7, 305–354.Google Scholar
Dumont, Jenny. (2013). Another Look at the Present Perfect in an Andean Variety of Spanish: Grammaticalization and Evidentiality in Quiteño Spanish. In Amaro, Jennifer Cabrelli et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 279–291.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael J., Terrill, Angela, Reesink, Ger P., Foley, Robert A., and Levinson, Stephen C. (2005). Structural Phylogenetics and the Reconstruction of Ancient Language History. Science, 309, 2072–2075.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (ed.) (2002). Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Anna María. (2012). Spanish in Contact with Amerindian Languages. In Hualde, José Ignacio, Olarrea, Antxon, and O’Rourke, Erin (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. (2003). Context, Culture, and Structuration in the Languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 13–40.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. (2007). Insubordination and its Uses. In Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 366–431.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Levinson, Stephen C. (2009). The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, (5), 429–448.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Watanabe, Honoré. (2016). Insubordination. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins .Google Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly and Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro. (2008). Variation in Contemporary Spanish: Linguistic Predictors of estar in Four Cases of Language Contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, (3), 365–380.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1981). Typology and Functional Domains. Studies in Language, 5 (1), 163–193.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1985). Iconicity, Isomorphism and Non-Arbitrary Coding in Language in Syntax. In Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction, vols. 1–2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2008). The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
González Fernández, María and Maldonado, Ricardo. (2006). Syntactic Determinants of Pragmatic Markers of Closure. In Cornillie, Bert and Delbecque, Nicole (eds.), Pragmaticalization and Modalization in Language and Discourse. Special Issue of the Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Gras, Pedro. (2016). Revisiting the Functional Typology of Insubordination: Insubordinate que-Constructions in Spanish. In Evans, Nicholas and Watanabe, Honoré (eds.), Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113–144.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) (1966). Universals of Language (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. (1961). Categories of the Theory of Grammar. Word, 17 (3), 241–292.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. (2010). Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Cross-Linguistic Studies. Language, 86, 663–687.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. (2016). The Challenge of Making Language Description and Comparison Mutually Beneficial. Linguistic Typology, 20 (2), 299–303. doi:10.1515/lingty-2016–0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennemann, Anja. (2015). A Constructionist Approach to the Development of the Spanish Topic Marker en cuanto a “in terms of.” Constructions, 2015 (1), 1–13. www.constructions-journal.com.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (2016). What about Typology Is Useful for Language Documentation? Linguistic Typology, 20 (3) 473–478. doi: 10.1515/lingty-2016–0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul (1979). Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. In Givón, Talmy (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 213–241.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul (1987). Emergent Grammar. In Aske, Jon, Beery, Natasha, Michaelis, Laura, and Filip, Hana (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, pp. 139–157.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 56 (2), 251–299.Google Scholar
Iggesen, Oliver A. (2013). Asymmetrical Case-Marking. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available from wals.info/chapter/50 (last access May 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. (1977). Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda. (2002). Gramaticalización y variabilidad – propiedades inherentes y factores contextuales en la evolución del acusativo preposicional en español. In Wesch, Andreas, Weidenbusch, Waltraud, Kailuweit, Rolf, and Laca, Brenda (eds.), Sprachgeschichte als Varietätengeschichte/Historia de las variedades lingüísticas. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 195–203.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1985). Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity. In Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 109–150.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. (2016). On Categorization: Stick to the Facts of the Languages. Linguistic Typology, 20 (2), 365–375. doi:10.1515/lingty-2016–0011.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
López Meirama, B. (2006). Semantic and Discourse-Pragmatic Factors in Spanish Word Order. In Clements, J. C. and Yoon, J. (eds.), Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax: Lexical Semantics, Discourse and Transitivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7–52.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev, Chang, Will, and Stark, Tammy. (2014). Exploring Phonological Areality in the Circum-Andean Region Using a Naive Bayes Classifier. Language Dynamics and Change, 4 (1), 27–86. doi:10.1163/22105832–00401004.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin, and Huber, Magnus (eds.). (2013). The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures (APiCS). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://apics-online.info/.Google Scholar
Miglio, Viola, Gries, Stefan Th., Harris, Michael J., Wheeler, Eva M., and Santana-Paixão, Raquel. (2013). Spanish lo(s)–le(s) Clitic Alternations in Psych Verbs: A Multifactorial Corpus-Based Analysis. In Amaro, Jennifer Cabrelli, Lord, Gillian, de Prada Pérez, Ana, and Aaron, Jessi Elana (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 268–278.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. (1997). Modeling Ancient Population Structures and Population Movement in Linguistics and Archeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 359–384.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. (2007). What, if Anything, is Typology? Linguistic Typology, 11, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocampo, F. (2009). Mirá: From Verb to Discourse Particle in Rioplatense Spanish. In Collentine, J. et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 254–267.Google Scholar
Olarrea, A. (2012). Word Order and Information Structure. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley and Son, pp. 603–628.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo. (2011). Functional Adaptation and Conceptual Convergence in the Analysis of Language Contact in the Spanish of Bilingual Communities in New York. In Díaz-Campos, Manuel Antonio (ed.), Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 504–529.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo. (2014). Remarks on Pronominal Perseveration and Functional Explanation. In Enrique-Arias, Andrés, Gutiérrez, Manuel, Landa, Alazne, and Ocampo, Francisco (eds.), Perspectives in the Study of Spanish Language Variation, pp. 373–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/va.2014.701Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo and Lapidus, Naomi. (2003). An Adaptive Approach to Noun Gender in New York Contact Spanish. In Cameron, Richard, López, Luis and Núñez-Cedeño, Rafael (eds.), A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 209–229Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. (1999). What Counts as Explanation? A Functionalist Approach to Word Order. In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, Newmeyer, Frederick, Noonan, Michael, and Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pensado, Carmen (ed.). (1995). El complemento directo preposicional. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. (2006). Null Objects across South America. In Face, T. and Klee, C. A. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. (2016). Independent si-Clauses in Spanish: Functions and Consequences for Insubordination. In Evans, Nicholas and Watanabe, Honore (eds.), Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
Shin, Naomi L. (2014). Grammatical Complexification in Spanish in New York: 3sg Pronoun Expression and Verbal Ambiguity. Language Variation and Change, 26 (3), 303–330.Google Scholar
Smolensky, P. (2006). Harmony in Linguistic Cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 779–801.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. (1997). Intransitive Predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2001). From Lexical to Grammatical to Social Meaning. Language in Society, 30 (3), 443–478.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine. (2005). Discourse Markers in Colombian Spanish: A Study in Polysemy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. (2012). Discourse Syntax. In Hualde, J. I., Olarrea, A., and O’Rourke, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley and Son, pp. 653–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallejos, Rosa. (2014). Peruvian Amazonian Spanish: Uncovering Variation and Deconstructing Stereotypes. Spanish in Context, 11 (3), 425–453.Google Scholar
Vázquez Rozas, Victoria. (2012). Construyendo emociones: sintaxis, frecuencia y función comunicativa. In Jiménez, T., López Meirama, B., Vázquez Rozas, V., and Veiga, A. (eds.), Cum corde et in nova grammatica. Estudios ofrecidos a Guillermo Rojo. Santiago de Compostela: USC Editor, pp. 841–854.Google Scholar
Wilson, Damián V. (2013). One Construction, Two Source Languages: hacer with an English Infinitive in Bilingual Discourse. In Carvalho, A. M. and Beaudrie, S. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 123–134.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×