Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T20:05:28.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Role of Affect and Its Regulation for Creativity and Innovation

from Part II - Workplace Affect and Individual Worker Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

By
Maike Hundeling  and
Kathrin Rosing
Edited by
Liu-Qin Yang ,
Russell Cropanzano ,
Catherine S. Daus  and
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Liu-Qin Yang
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Russell Cropanzano
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Catherine S. Daus
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Get access

Summary

Creativity and innovation play an important role in today’s work life as they are key to enhancing organizations’ competitiveness (e.g. Amabile, 1988; Anderson, Potočnik, & Zhou, 2014; Bledow, Frese, Anderson, Erez, & Farr, 2009). Creativity may be defined as a facet of innovation that refers to the generation and development of new and useful ideas (Amabile, 1983, 1996). Innovation, in contrast, is “the intentional introduction and application within a role, group or organization of ideas, processes, products or procedures, new to the relevant unit of adoption, designed to significantly benefit the individual, the group, the organization or wider society” (West & Farr, 1990, p. 9). In other words, whereas creativity refers to the generation of ideas, innovation additionally includes the implementation of those ideas.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect , pp. 131 - 145
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akbari Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2012). Creative mood swings: Divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychological Research, 76(5), 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011–0358-zGoogle Scholar
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044–8325.1990.tb00506.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.45.2.357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Stew, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Volume 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367Google Scholar
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128Google Scholar
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529Google Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011a). Creative production by angry people peaks early on, decreases over time, and is relatively unstructured. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.009Google Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011b). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022981Google Scholar
Baron, R. A., & Tang, J. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.002Google Scholar
Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.90.6.1054Google Scholar
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N. R., Erez, M., & Farr, J. L. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754–9434.2009.01154.xGoogle Scholar
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bledow, R., Schmitt, A., Frese, A., & Kühnel, J. (2011). The affective shift model of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1246–1257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024532Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302294Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In Vohs, K. D. & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (Volume 2, pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.94.5.739Google Scholar
De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870144Google Scholar
Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798182Google Scholar
Foo, M.-D., Uy, M. A., & Baron, R. A. (2009). How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1086–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015599Google Scholar
Frederickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089–2680.2.3.300Google Scholar
Frederickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022–3514.81.6.1001Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good – doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work–organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.112.2.310Google Scholar
George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.87.4.687Google Scholar
George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525934Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089–2680.2.3.271Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781Google Scholar
Herman, A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018587Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280Google Scholar
Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood–cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.94.2.94.2.214Google Scholar
Hirt, E. R., Levine, G., McDonald, H., Melton, R., & Martin, L. L. (1997). The role of mood in quantitative and qualitative aspects of performance: Single or multiple mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(6), 602–629. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. M., & Shea, C. M. (2001). Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: Key predictors of project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540–5885.1810015Google Scholar
Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In Lewis, M & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 261–277). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. In Dalgleish, T & Power, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 521–539). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.52.6.1122Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039826Google Scholar
James, K., Brodersen, M., & Eisenberg, J. (2004). Workplace affect and workplace creativity: A review and preliminary model. Human Performance, 17(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1702_3Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G. (2003). The effect of mood on creativity in the innovation process. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 191–203). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). “Paradoxical” mood effects on creative problem-solving. Cognition & Emotion, 11(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999397379971Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (2002). The effects of mood on early and late idea production. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_3Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In Boekaerts, M, Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–169). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Interactions of psychological systems]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Lam, T. W. H., & Chiu, C. Y. (2002). The motivational function of regulatory focus on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162–6057.2002.tb01061.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindebaum, D., & Jordan, P. J. (2014). When it can be good to feel bad and bad to feel good: Exploring asymmetries in workplace emotional outcomes. Human Relations, 67(9), 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714535824Google Scholar
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.131.6.803Google Scholar
Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.64.3.317Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080404Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.120.3.323Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403Google Scholar
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323Google Scholar
Rank, J., & Frese, M. (2008). The impact of emotions, moods and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative. In Ashkanasy, N & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations (pp. 103–119). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2012). Optimism predicting employees’ creativity: The mediating role of positive affect and the positivity ratio. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 244–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.550679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings-as-information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Volume 2, pp. 527–561). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2001). Feelings-as-information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. In Martin, L. L. & Clore, G. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 159–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
To, M. L., Fisher, C. D., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Unleashing angst: Negative mood, learning goal orientation, psychological empowerment and creative behaviour. Human Relations, 68(10), 1601–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714562235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
To, M. L., Fisher, C. D., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Rowe, P. A. (2012). Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026097Google Scholar
Weiss, H., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Volume 18, pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×