Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T21:49:48.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Norman Blake
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, H. E. (1931). English Writings of Richard Rolle Hermit of Hampole. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Allen, R. (1984). King Horn: an Edition Based on Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27(2). New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. J. (1977). Cleanness. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Arngart, O. S. A. (1942). The Proverbs of Alfred. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Arnold, T. (1869–71). Select English Works of John Wyclif. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Arnold, T. (1882–5). Symeonis Monachi Opera Omnia. 2 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Babington, C. & Lumby, J. R. (1865–8). Polychronicon Ranulphi Higden Monachi Cestrensis. 9 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Baker, D. C., Murphy, J. L. & Hall, L. B. Jr (1982). The Late Medieval Religious Plays of Bodleian MSS Digby 133 and E Museo 160. (EETS 283.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnicle, M. E. (1927). The Seege or Batayle of Troye. (EETS 172.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, M. (1899). Records of the Borough of Leicester 1103–1327. London: Clay.Google Scholar
Bateson, M. (1904). Borough Customs I. (Publications of the Selden Society 18.) London: Quaritch.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. W. & Smithers, G. V. (1966). Early Middle English Verse and Prose. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Benson, L. D. (1987). The Riverside Chaucer. (Based on F. N. Robinson's The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer.) 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1973). Caxton's Own Prose. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1980). The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bliss, A. J. (1966). Sir Orfeo. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Blunt, J. H. (1873). The Myrroure of Oure Ladye. (EETS e.s. 19.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, C. G. O. (1916). The Burton Abbey twelfth-century surveys. Collections for a History of Staffordshire edited by the William Salt Archæological Society, 209–310.Google Scholar
Brie, F. W. D. (1906–8). The Brut or The Chronicles of England. 2 vols. (EETS 131, 136.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brook, G. L. & Leslie, R. F. (1963–78). Lazamon: Brut. 2 vols. (EETS 250, 277.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. N. L. & Postan, M. M. (1960). Carte Nativorum. (Publications of the Northamptonshire Record Society 20.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, C. (1932). English Lyrics of the XIIIth Century. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Brunner, K. (1933). The Seven Sages of Rome (Southern Version). (EETS 191.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bunt, G. H. V. (1985). William of Palerne: an Alliterative Romance. Groningen: Bouma's Boekhuis.Google Scholar
Cameron, K., Barley, M. W. & W. Stevenson, H. (1956). Documents relating to the Manor and Soke of Newark-on-Trent. (Thornton Society Records Series 16.) Nottingham: Derry.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. W. & Daunt, Marjorie (1931). A Book, of London English 1384–1425. Oxford: Clarendon. (Rptd 1967.)Google Scholar
Clark, Cecily (1958/1970). The Peterborough Chronicle 1070–1154. 2nd edn., 1970. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cockayne, O. (1864–6). Leechdoms, Wort-cunning, and Starcraft. 3 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
College, , Edmund, O. S. P. & Walsh SJ, J. (1978). A Book of Showings to the Anchoress Julian of Norwich. Part I. Toronto: Pontifical Institute.Google Scholar
Crotch, W. J. B. (1928). The Prologues and Epilogues of William Caxton. (EETS 176.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culley, M. T. & Furnivall, F. J. (1890). Caxton's Eneydos 1490 (EETS e.s. 57.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
d'Ardenne, S. R. T. O. (1936). An Edition of þe Liflade ant te Passiun of Seinte Iulienne. (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophic et Lettres de l'Université de Liège LXIV.) Liege: Université de Liège; Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
D'Ardenne, S. R. T. O. & Dobson, E. J. (1981). Seinte Katerine. (EETS s.s. 7.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman (1971–6). Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century. 2 parts. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H. C. (1954). The Kalendar of Abbot Samson of Bury St Edmunds and Related Documents. (Camden 3rd Series 84.) London: Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Day, M. (1952). The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle edited from Cotton Nero A. xiv. (EETS 225.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dickens, B. & Wilson, R. M. (1956). Early Middle English Texts. 3rd edn. London: Bowes & Bowes.Google Scholar
Dimock, J. F. (1868). Giraldi Cambrensis Opera. 6 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1972). The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle edited from B.M. Cotton MS. Cleopatra C. vi. (EETS 267.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, D. & Panton, G. A. (1869–74). The Gest Hystoriale of the Destruction of Troy: an Alliterative Romance. 2 vols. (EETS 39, 56.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Douglas, D. C. (1932). Feudal Documents from the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds. London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1951). Two Early London Subsidy Rolls. (Acta Regis Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis 48.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
England, G. & Pollard, A. W. (1897). The Towneley Plays. (EETS e.s. 71.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.Google Scholar
Fauroux, M. (1961). Recueil des actes des ducs de Normandie (911–1066). (Mémoires de la Société des Antiquaires de Normandie 36.) Caen: Caron.Google Scholar
Fisher, , John, H., Richardson, Malcolm & Fisher, Jane L. (1984). An Anthology of Chancery English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Forshall, J. & Madden, F.Sir (1850). The Holy Bible, made from the Latin Vulgate by John Wycliffe and his Followers. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
French, W. H. & Hale, C. B. (1964). The Middle English Metrical Romances. 2 vols. New York: Russell & Russell. (First published 1930.)Google Scholar
Furnivall, F. J. (1882). The Fifty Earliest English Wills of the Court of Probate, London, A.D. 1387–1439. (EETS 78.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Furnivall, F. J. (1901–3). Robert of Brunne's Handlyng Synne. 2 vols. (EETS 119, 123.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.Google Scholar
Gairdner, J. (1910). The Paston Letters 1422–1509 AD. 4 vols. Edinburgh: Grant.Google Scholar
Wales, Gerald (1978). The Journey through Wales and the Description of Wales, tr. Thorpe, Lewis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. V. (1953). Pearl. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gough, A. B. (1901). Emaré. (Old and Middle English Texts 2.) London: Low Marston.Google Scholar
Greet, W. C. (1927). The Reule of Crysten Religioun by Reginald Pecock D.D. (EETS 171.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. P. & Ravensdale, J. R. (1976). The West Fields of Cambridge. (Cambridge Antiquarian Society 3.) Cambridge: Cambridge Antiquarian Record Society.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (1920). Selections from Early Middle English 1130–1250. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hamelius, P. (1919–23). Mandeville's Travels. 2 vols. (EETS 153, 154.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, N. E. S. A. (1870). Willelmi Malmesburiensis Monachi de Gestis Pontificum Anglorum Libri Quinque. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hanham, A. (1975). The Cely Letters 1472–1488. (EETS 273.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, W. H. & Lyons, P. A. (1884–93). Cartularium Monasterii de Rameseia. 3 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. D. A. (1974). Manorial Records of Cuxham, Oxfordshire, c. 1200–1359. (Oxfordshire Record Society 50.) Oxford: Oxfordshire Record Society.Google Scholar
Hodgson, P. (1982). The Cloud of Unknowing and Other Treatises. (Analecta Cartusiana 3.) Salzburg: Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik.Google Scholar
Holt, N. R. (1964). The Pipe Roll of the Bishopric of Winchester 1210–1211. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Holthausen, F. (1888–1921). Vices and Virtues. 2 vols. (EETS 89, 159.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horstmann, C. (1878–81). Sammlung altenglische Legenden. 2 vols. Heilbronn: Henniger.Google Scholar
Horstmann, C. (1887). Osbern Bokenham: Mappula Angliae. Englische Studien 10: 1–34.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E. (1882). Liber Henrici de Soliaco Abbatis Glaston. London: Roxburghe Club.Google Scholar
Kane, G. (1960). Piers Plowman: the A Version. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Kane, G. & Talbot Donaldson, E. (1975). Piers Plowman: the B Version. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Keller, C. (1914). Die mittelenglische Gregoriuslegende. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kingsford, C. L. (1919). The Stonor Letters and Papers 1290–1483. 2 vols. (Camden Society 3rd series 29–30.) London: Camden Society.Google Scholar
Kinsley, J. (1979). The Poems of William Dunbar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kölbing, E. (1885–94). The Romance of Sir Beues of Hamtoun. 3 vols. (EETS e.s. 46, 48, 65.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.Google Scholar
Lester, G. (1988). The Earliest English Translation of Vegetius' De Re Militari. (Middle English Texts 21.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lodge, B. & Herrtage, S. J. H. (1873–9). Palladius on Husbondrie. 2 vols. (EETS 52, 72.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Lucas, P. J. (1983). John Capgrave's Abbreuiacion of Chronicles. (EETS 285.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, G. C. (1900). The English Works of John Gower. 2 vols. (EETS e.s. 81, 82.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, G. C. (1902). John Gower: the Complete Works, vol. IV: Vox clamantis. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mack, F. M. (1934). Seinte Marherete þe Meiden ant Martyr. (EETS 193.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mack, F. M. (1963). The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle edited from Cotton Titus D. xviii. (EETS 252.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macrae-Gibson, O. D. (1973–9). Of Arthour and Merlin. 2 vols. (EETS 268, 279.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madden, F. Sir (1847). Lazamon's Brut or Chronicle of Britain. 3 vols. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Manzalaoui, M. A. (1977). Secretum Secretorum. (EETS 276.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meech, S. B. & Allen, H. E. (1940). The Book of Margery Kempe. (EETS 212.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Millett, B. (1982). Hali Meiðhad. (EETS 284.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, A. D. (1971). The Dorset Lay Subsidy Roll of 1332. (Dorset Record Society 4.) Dorchester: Dorset Record Society.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (1872). An Old English Miscellany. (EETS 49.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (1873a). Genesis and Exodus. (EETS 7.) London: Triibner.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (1873b.). Old English Homilies of the Twelfth Century. 2nd series. (EETS 53.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (1874–92). Cursor Mundi (The Cursor o the World). 6 vols. (EETS 57, 59, 62, 66, 68, 99.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Morris, R. & Gradon, P. (1965–79). Dan Michel's Ayenbite of Inwyt. 2 vols. (EETS 23 (reissue) and 278.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mossé, F. (1957). A Handbook of Middle English. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Napier, A. S. (1916). Jacob and Josep: a Middle English Poem of the Thirteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nicolas, H. Sir (1837). Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy Council of England. (Record Commission Publications 16.) London: Record Commission.Google Scholar
Norton-Smith, J. (1966). John Lydgate: Poems. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Offord, M. Y. (1959). The Parlement of the Thre Ages. (EETS 246.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ogilvie-Thomson, S. J. (1988). Richard Rolle: Prose and Verse. (EETS 293.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, D. M. (1984). The Making of King's Lynn: a Documentary Survey. (Records of Social and Economic History n.s. 9.) London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. A. (1978). Piers Plowman by William Langland: an Edition of the C-Text. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Robinson, F. N. (1957). The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Ross, W. O. (1940). Middle English Sermons edited from British Museum MS. Royal 18 B. xxiii. (EETS 209.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. R. (1980). The Dorset Lay Subsidy Roll of 1327. (Dorset Record Society 6.) Dorchester: Dorset Record Society.Google Scholar
Scattergood, V. J. (1975). The Works of Sir John Clanvowe. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Searle, E. (1980). The Chronicle of Battle Abbey. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shepherd, G. (1959). Ancrene Wisse Parts Six and Seven. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Sisam, K. (1955). Fourteenth Century Verse and Prose. 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1865). Lancelot of the Laik. (EETS 6.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1867). William of Palerne. (EETS e.s. 1.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1874–89). The Bruce. 2 vols. (EETS e.s. 11, 55.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1886). The Wars of Alexander. (EETS e.s. 47.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1897). Thomas Usk: The Testament of Love. In Supplement to the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smithers, G. V. (1952–7). Kyng Alisaunder. 2 vols. (EETS 227, 237.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smithers, G. V. (1987). Havelok. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Stanley, E. G. (1960). The Owl and the Nightingale. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Steele, R. & Henderson, T. (1898). Three Prose Versions of the Secreta Secretorum. (EETS e.s. 74.) London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. (1845). Libellus de Vita et Miraculis S. Godrici. (Surtees Society 20.) London: Nichols.Google Scholar
Stubbs, W. (1887–9). Willelmi Malmesbiriensis Monachi de Gestis Regum Anglorum Libri Quinque. 2 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. M. (1958). þe Wohunge of Ure Lauerd. (EETS 241.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1962). The Ancrene Wisse edited from MS. Corpus Christi College Cambridge 402. (EETS 249.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. & Gordon, E. V. (1967). Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, rev. by Davis, Norman. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Urry, W. (1967). Canterbury under the Angevin Kings. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Vinaver, E. (1967). The Works of Sir Thomas Malory. 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, R. M. (1878). The Ormulum, rev. by Holt, R.. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (1857). A Volume of Vocabularies. London: privately printed by Mayer.Google Scholar
Wright, W. A. (1887). The Metrical Chronicle of Robert of Gloucester. 2 vols. (Rolls Series.) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Zupitza, J. (1875–91). The Romance of Guy of Warwick. 5 vols. (EETS e.s. 25, 26, 42, 49, 59.) London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1964). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In Abercrombie, et al., 216–22Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., McCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. & Trim, J. L. M. (eds.) (1964). In Honour of Daniel Jones. Papers contributed on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday, 12 September 1961. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Adams, V. (1973). An Introduction to Modern English Word-formation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Adamska-Salaciak, A. (1984). Some notes on the origins of Middle English /a/. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia 17: 51–62.Google Scholar
Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. & Wright, S. (eds.) (1990). Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adigard des Gautries, J. (1954). Les Noms de personne scandinaves en Normandie de 911 à 1066. (Nomina Germanica 11.) Lund: Blom.Google Scholar
Aebischer, P. (1924). L'Anthroponymie wallone d'après quelques anciens cartulaires. Bullétin du dictionnaire ivallon 13: 73–168.Google Scholar
Aertsen, H. (1987). Play in Middle English: a Contribution to Word Field Theory. Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
Ahlqvist, A. (ed.) (1982). Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (1971). The source of There in existential sentences. Foundations of Language 7: 1–18.Google Scholar
Allen, C. L. (1986). Reconsidering the history of like. Journal of Linguistics 22: 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1965). Vox Latina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language 49: 765–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1986). A note on Old English impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 22: 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Ewen, C. J. (1987). Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds.) (1974). Historical Linguistics. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Edinburgh, 2–7 September 1973. 2 vols. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1977). Phonological Structure and the History of English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1972). An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Árnason, K. (1980). Quantity in Historical Phonology. Icelandic and Related Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arngart, O. (1978). Three English hundred-names. Namn och Bygd 66: 13–17.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. H. (1943). English Literary Criticism: the Medieval Phase. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Auwera, J. (1984). More on the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 171–84.Google Scholar
Baghdikian, S. (1979). Ne in ME and EModE. English Studies 60: 673–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. & Maroldt, K. (1977). The French lineage of English. In Meisel, , 21–53.Google Scholar
Baker, A. R. H. & Butlin, R. A. (eds.) (1973). Studies of Field-sjstems in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bammesberger, A. (ed.) (1985). Problems of Old English Lexicography. Studies in Memory of Angus Cameron. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet.Google Scholar
Barley, N. F. (1974). Old English colour classification: where do matters stand?Anglo-Saxon England: 15–28.Google Scholar
Barlow, F. (1986). Thomas Beeket. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Barron, W. R. J. (1965). Luf-daungere. In Whitehead, F., Diverres, A. H. & Sutcliffe, F. E. (eds.) Medieval Miscellany Presented to Eugene Vinaver.Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Bates, D. (1982). Normandy before 1066. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bates, D. (1986). A Bibliography of Domesday Book. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Bauer, G. (1970). Studien zum System und Gebrauch der ‘Tempora’ in der Sprache Chaucers und Gowers. (Wiener Beiträge zur englischen Philologie 73.) Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1983). English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, A. C. (1935). The chronology of French loan-words in English. Modern Language Review 50: 90–3.Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. (1959). Improvisation in the Middle English romance. Proceedings of the American Philological Society 103: 418–54.Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. & Cable, T. (1978). A History of the English Language. 3rd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bean, M. C. (1983). The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Beech, G. T. (1974). Les Noms de personne poitevins du IXe au XIIe siècle. Revue Internationale d'onomastique 26: 81– 100.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (1979). Spiritual kinship and the baptismal name in traditional European society. In Frappell, L. O. (ed.) Principalities, Power and Estates. Adelaide: Adelaide University Union Press, 1–13.Google Scholar
Bennett, P. A. (1980). English passives: a study in syntactic change and relational grammar. Lingua 51: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. H. (1955). The southern English development of Germanic initial *[f s þ]. Language 31: 367–71. (Rptd Lass, 1969.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bense, J. F. (1926–39). A Dictionary of the Low Dutch Element in the English Vocabulary. London and The Hague: Nijhoff and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benskin, M. & Laing, M. (1981). Translations and Mischsprachen in Middle English manuscripts. In Benskin, & Samuels, , 55–106.Google Scholar
Benskin, M. & Samuels, M. L. (1981). So meny people, longages and tonges : Philological Essays in Scots and Medieval English Presented to Angus McIntosh. Edinburgh: privately printed.Google Scholar
Benson, L. D. (1961). Chaucer's historical present, its meaning and use. English Studies A2: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, M. W. (1963). Lay Subsidies and Poll Taxes. Canterbury: Phillimore.Google Scholar
Beresford, M. W. (1967). New Towns of the Middle Ages: Town Plantation in England, Wales and Gascony. London: Lutterworth.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms. Berkeley and Los Angeles: California University Press.Google Scholar
Berndt, R. (1965). The linguistic situation in England from the Norman Conquest to the loss of Normandy. Philologica Pragensia 8: 145–63. (Rptd Lass, 1969.)Google Scholar
Berndt, R. (1972). The period of the final decline of French in medieval England (fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries). Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20: 314–69.Google Scholar
Berndt, R. (1976). French and English in thirteenth-century England: an investigation into the linguistic situation after the loss of the Duchy of Normandy and other continental dominions. In Aspekte des anglistischen Forschungen in der DDR: Martin Lehnert zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 129–50.Google Scholar
Biddle, M. & Keene, D. J. (1976). The early place-names of Winchester. In their Winchester in the Early Middle Ages. (Winchester Studies 1.) Oxford: Clarendon, 231–9.Google Scholar
Björkmann, E. (1900–2). Scandinavian Loan-words in Middle English. 2 vols. Halle: Karras.Google Scholar
Björkmann, E. (1910). Nordische Personennamen in England. (Studien zur englischen Philologie 37.) Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Björkmann, E. (1912). Zur englischen Namenkunde. (Studien zur englischen Philologie 47.) Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1968). Caxton and courtly style. Essays and Studies n.s. 21: 29–45.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1969a). Caxton and his World. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1969b). Rhythmical alliteration. Modern Philology 67: 118–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1969c). Some Low Dutch loan-words in fifteenth-century English. Notes and Queries 16: 251–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1974). The Form of Living in prose and poetry. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 211: 300–8.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1976). Born in Kent. Lore and Language 2, 5: 5–9.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1977). The English Language in Medieval Literature. London: Dent. (Rptd London: Methuen, 1979.)Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1988). Literary and other languages in Middle English. In Torti, A. & Boitani, P. (eds.). Themes and Images in Middle English Literature. Cambridge: Brewer, 166–85.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.) (1984). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development. Sheffield: Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language (Sheffield University).Google Scholar
Blatt, F. (1957). Latin influence on European syntax. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague 11: 33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt. (Also London: Allen & Unwin, 1935.)Google Scholar
Bock, H. (1931). Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem TO-Infinitiv. Anglia 55: 114–249.Google Scholar
Bødtker, A. T. (1908–10). Critical Contributions to Early English Syntax. 2 series. Christiania: Videnskabsselskabets Skrifter.Google Scholar
Bøgholm, N. (1944). The Layamon Texts. A Linguistic Investigation. (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Copenhague 3.) Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Bornstein, D. (1978). Chaucer's Tale of Melibee as an example of ‘style clergial’. ChR 12: 236–54.Google Scholar
Borst, E. (1910). Zur Stellung des Adverbs bei Chaucer. Englische Studien 42: 339–62.Google Scholar
Bourcier, G. (1981). An Introduction to the History of the English Language, tr. and arranged by Clark, C.. Cheltenham: Thornes.Google Scholar
Breal, M. (1964). Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning, tr. Cust, N.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Breivik, L. E. (1981). On the interpretation of existential there. Language 57: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breivik, L. E., Hille, A. & Johansson, S. (eds.) (1989). Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (1983). Criteria for distinguishing the non-aspectual functions of ME ginnen. General Linguistics23–4: 235–45.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Postverbal Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (1990). The stylistic function of ME gan reconsidered. In Adamson, et al., 31–53.Google Scholar
Brook, G. L. (1972). A piece of evidence for the study of Middle English spelling. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73: 25–8.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1977). Listening to Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1982). The spoken language. In Carter, R. (ed.) Linguistics and the Teacher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 75–87.Google Scholar
Brunner, K. (1962). Die englische Sprache. 2nd edn. Tubingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brunner, K. (1963). An Outline of Middle English Grammar, tr. Johnston, G. K. W.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bryan, W. R. (1921). The Midland present plural indicative ending in -en(n). Modern Philology 18:457–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1977). Chaucer's termes. Yearbook of English Studies 7: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1979). Chaucer's Language and the Philosophers' Tradition. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1983). A Guide to Chaucer's Language. London and Norman, OK: Macmillan and Oklahoma University Press. (Reissued as The Language of Chaucer 1989.)Google Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1984). Picked terms. English Studies 65: 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnley, J. D. (1986). Curial style. Speculum 61: 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, J. A. (1984). Essays on Medieval Literature. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. & Dahl, Ö. (1989). The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13: 51–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. & Pagliuca, W. (1987). The evolution of future meaning. In Ramat, A. G., Carruba, O. & Bernini, G. (eds.) Papers from the Vllth International Congress on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynon, T. (1977). Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, M. (1913). The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
Caluwé Dor, J. (1979). The chronology of the Scandinavian loan-verbs in the Katherine Group. English Studies 60: 680–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caluwé Dor, J. (1983). Chaucer's contribution to the English vocabulary: a chronological survey of French loan-words. North-Western European Language Evolution 2: 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cam, H. M. (1930). The Hundred and the Hundred Rolls. London: Merlin. (Rptd 1963.)Google Scholar
Cameron, K. (1973). Early field-names in an English-named Lincolnshire village. In Sandgren, , 38–43.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. (1975). Scandinavian settlement in the territory of the Five Boroughs. In Cameron, K. (ed.) Place-name Evidence for the Anglo-Saxon Invasion and Scandinavian Settlements: Eight Studies. Nottingham: English Place-Name Society, 115–38.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. (1978). The minor names and field-names of the Holland division of Lincolnshire. In Anderson, T. & Sandred, K. I. (eds.) The Vikings. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 81–8.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. (1988). English Place-names. 4th edn. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1959). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Carr, C. T. (1939). Nominal Compounds in Germanic. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, H. H. (1961). A Dictionary of Middle English Musical Terms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. D. (1964). Laxton: the Last English Open-field Village. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Chaytor, H. J. (1945). From Script to Print. Cambridge: Heffer. (Rptd London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1966.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chédeville, A. (1974). L'Immigration bretonne dans le royaume de France du XIe au début du XIVe siècle. Annales de Bretagne 81: 301–43.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982). Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. (1979). From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. (1983). England and its Rulers 1066–1272: Foreign Lordship and National Identity. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1952–3). Studies in the vocabulary of the ‘Peterborough Chronicle’, 1070–1154. English and Germanic Studies 5: 67–89.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1957). Gender in the Peterborough Chronicle. English Studies 35: 109–15, 174.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1976a). People and languages in post-Conquest Canterbury. Journal of Medieval History 2: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1976b). Some early Canterbury surnames. English Studies 57: 294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1977–8). Winchester in the early Middle Ages. Archives 13: 84–9. (Review article based on Biddle et al. 1976.)Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1978a). Women's names in post-Conquest England: observations and speculations. Speculum 53: 223–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1978b). Thoughts on the French connections of Middle English nicknames. Nomina: 2 38–44.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1978c). ‘Wiþ scharpe sneateres’: some aspects of colloquialism in Ancrene Wisse. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 79: 341–53.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1979). Clark's first three laws of applied anthroponymics. Nomina 3: 13–19.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1980a). Battle c. 1110: an anthroponymist looks at an Anglo-Norman new town. In Brown, R. A., (ed.) Proceedings of the Battle Conference on Anglo-Norman Studies 1979. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 21–41 and 168–72.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1980b). Review of Reaney 1967 (rptd 1980). Nomina 4: 88–90.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1982a). The early personal names of King's Lynn: an essay in socio-cultural history, Part I: baptismal names. Nomina 6: 51–71.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1982b). Review of Jönsjö 1979. English Studies 63: 168–70.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1983a). The early personal names of King's Lynn: an essay in sociocultural history, Part 2: by-names. Nomina 7: 65–89.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1983b). On dating The Battle of Maldon: certain evidence reviewed. Nottingham Medieval Studies 27: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1983–4). Starting from Youlthorpe (East Riding of Yorkshire): an onomastic circular tour. journal of the English Place-Name Society 16: 25–37.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1984a). L'Angleterre anglo-normande et ses ambivalences socio-culturelles. In Foreville, R. (ed.) Les mutations socio-culturelles au tournant des XIe–XIIIe siècles. (Spicilegium Beccense 2.) Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 99–110.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1984b). L'Anthroponymie cantorbérienne du XIIe siècle: quelques examples de l'influence normanno-picarde. Nouvelle revue d'onomastique 3–4: 157–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1985). Certains éléments francais de l'anthroponymie anglaise du Moyen Age: essai méthodologique. In Taverdet, G. (ed.) L'Onomastique, témoin de I'activité humaine. Fontaine les Dijons: Association Bourguignonne de Dialectologie et d'Onomastique, 259–67.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1987a). Willelmus Rex? vel alius Willelmus?Nomina 11: 7–33.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1987b). English personal names ca. 650–1300. Medieval Prosopography 8, 1: 31–60.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1987c). Spelling and grammatically in the Vespasian homilies: a reassessment. Manuscripta 31, 1: 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1990). Historical linguistics – linguistic archaeology. In Adamson, S., Law, V. A., Vincent, N. & Wright, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 55–68.Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1991). Towards a reassessment of ‘Anglo-Norman influence on English place-names’. In Ureland, P. S. & Broderick, G. (eds.) Eighth International Symposium on Language Contact in Europe: Language Contact in the British Isles. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 275–93.Google Scholar
Clark, C. & Owen, D. (1978). Lexicographical notes from King's Lynn. Norfolk Archaeology 37: 56–69.Google Scholar
Clay, C. (1961). Master Aristotle. English Historical Review 76: 303–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, R. (1987). Pragmatic sources of analogical formation. Journal of Linguistics 23: 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghill, N. (1966). Chaucer's narrative art in The Canterbury Tales. In Brewer, D. S. (ed.) Chaucer and Chaucerians. London: Nelson, 114–39.Google Scholar
Colman, F. (1981). The name-element Æðel and related problems. Notes and Queries 206: 195–201.Google Scholar
Colman, F. (1984). Anglo-Saxon pennies and Old English phonology. Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 91–143.Google Scholar
Colman, F. (1989a). Neutralisation: on characterizing distinctions between Old English proper names and common names. Leeds Studies in English n.s. 22: 249–70.Google Scholar
Colman, F. (1989b). The crunch is the key: on computer research on Old English personal names. In Odenstedt, B. & Persson, G. (eds.) Instead of Flowers. Umeå: Umeå University PressGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (1687). The English Teacher, ed. Sundby, B., 1952. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1967). Lexical structures and the teaching of vocabulary. In Haigh, A. (ed.) Linguistic Theories and their Application. Strasburg and London: AIDELA and Harrap, 9–123.Google Scholar
Crosby, R. (1936). Oral delivery in the Middle Ages. Speculum 11: 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1985). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English Style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Curme, G. O. (1912). A history of the English relative construction. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 11: 10–29, 180–204, 355–80.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1953). European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, tr. Trask, W. R.. (Bollingen Series 36.) New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Dal, I. (1952). Zur Entstehung des englischen Participium Praesentis auf -ing. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16: 5–116.Google Scholar
Dauzat, A. & Rostaing, C. A. (1963). Dictionnaire étymologique des noms de lieux en France. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Davenport, M., Hansen, E. & Nielsen, H.-F. (eds.) (1983). Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, G. R. C. (1958). Medieval Cartularies of Great Britain: a Short Catalogue. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Davis, N. (1969). Sheep-farming terms in medieval Norfolk. Notes and Queries 214: 404–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, N. (1972). Margaret Paston's uses of do. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73: 55–62.Google Scholar
Davis, N. & Wrenn, C. L. (eds.) (1962). English and Medieval Studies presented to J. R. R. Tolkien. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Debrabandere, F. (1980). Kortrikse Naamkunde 1200–1300. (Anthroponymics 22.) Leuven: Instituut voor Naamkunde.Google Scholar
Dees, A. (1980). Atlas des formes et des constructions des chartes françaises du 13e siècle. (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 178.) Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, X. (1986). Romance loans in Middle English: a reassessment. In Kastovsky, & Szwedek, , I, 253–65.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1985a). Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 66: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, D. (1985b). The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Eaton, et al., 45–60.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1985c). The origins of the completive up in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 37–61.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1986). On word order in Old English. Dutch Quarterly Review 16: 277–95.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1990a). The Old English impersonal revived. In Adamson, et al., 111–40.Google Scholar
Denison, D. (1990b). Auxiliary + impersonal in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 139–66.Google Scholar
DeWindt, A. R. & DeWindt, E. B. (1981). Royal justice and the Medieval English Countryside. (Studies and Texts 57.) Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Dickens, B. (1941–2). The Names of Grim's children in the Havelok story. Studia Neophilologica 14: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekstra, F. N. M. (1984). Ambiguous that-clauses in Old and Middle English. English Studies 65: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diensberg, B. (1985). The lexical fields boy/girl – servant – child in Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 328–36.Google Scholar
Dieth, E. (1955). Hips: a geographical contribution to the she puzzle. English Studies 36: 208–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1962). The affiliations of the manuscripts of Ancrene Wisse. In Davis, & Wrenn, , 128–63.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1968). English Pronunciation 1500–1700. 2nd edn. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1976). The Origins of Ancrene Wisse. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dodgson, J. McN. (1968). Place-names and street-names at Chester. journal of the Chester Archaeological Society 55: 29–61.Google Scholar
Dodgson, J. McN. (1985a). Some Domesday personal-names, mainly post-Conquest. Nomina: 941–51.Google Scholar
Dodgson, J. McN. (1985b). The Welsh element in the field-names of Cheshire. In Schützeichel, , 154–64.Google Scholar
Dodgson, J. McN. (1987). Domesday Book: place-names and personal names. In Holt, , 121–35.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. T. (1951). Idiom of popular poetry in the Miller's Tale. In Downer, A. S. (ed.) English Institute Essays 1950. New York: Columbia University Press, 116–40. (Rptd Donaldson, 1970, 13–29.)Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. T. (1970). Speaking of Chaucer. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Donner, M. (1986). The gerund in Middle English. English Studies 67: 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubislav, G. (1916). Studien zur mittelenglischen Syntax I and II. Anglia 40: 263–96, 297–321.Google Scholar
Duchácek, O. (1960). Le Champ conceptuel de la beauté en français moderne. (Opera Universitatis Brunensis, Facultas Philosophica 71.) Prague: Státní Pedagogické Nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Duggan, H. N. (1986). Alliterative patterning as a basis for emendation in Middle English alliterative poetry. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 8: 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, P. (1972). Forms of the feminine pronoun in modern English dialects. In Wakelin, , 182–200.Google Scholar
Duncan, T. G. (1981). A Middle English linguistic reviser. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 82: 162–74.Google Scholar
Eaton, R., Fischer, O., Koopman, W. & Leek, F. (1985). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 10–13 April 1985. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, P. J. (1983). Commercial language and the commercial outlook in the General Prologue. The Chaucer Review 18: 161–74.Google Scholar
Ebin, L. (1977). Lydgate's views on poetry. Annuale Medievale 18: 76–105.Google Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1887). Streifzüge durch die mittelenglische Syntax miter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Sprache Chaucer's. Münster: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1914). Die Entwicklung des englischen Gerundiums. Anglia 38: 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einenkel, E. (1916). Geschichte der englischen Sprache, II: Historische Syntax. 3rd edn. Strasburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Eitle, H. (1914). Die Satzyerknüpfung bei Chaucer. (Anglistische Forschungen 44.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1913). Die Ortnamensforschung ein Hilfsmittel für das Studium der englische Sprachgeschichte. Germanisch-romanische Monats-schrift 5: 592–608.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1917). Contributions to the History of Old English Dialects. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1930). How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England? In Bøgholm, N., Brusendorff, A. & Bodelsen, C. A. (eds.) A Grammatical Miscellany offered to Otto Jespersen on his Seventieth Hirthday. Copenhagen : Levin and Munksgaard, 17–30. (Rptd in Selected Papers, 1963. Lund: Gleerup, 54–67.)Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1933). Names of trades in English place-names. In Edwards, J. G., Galbraith, V. H. & Jacob, E. F. (eds.) Historical Essays in Honour of James Tail. Manchester: privately printed79–89.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1944–5a). Variation in surnames in medieval London. Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapssamfundet i Lund Årsberättelse 1944–1945. Lund: Gleerup, 207–62.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1944–5b). Notes on some Middle English place-names. Studia Neophilologica 17: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1947). Early London Personal Names. (Acta Regiae Societatis Humaniora Litterarum Lundensis 43.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1954). Street-names of the City of London. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1956). Studies on the Population of Medieval London. (Kungliga Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademiens Handlingar, Filologisk–Filosofiska Serien 2.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1960). Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-names. 4th edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1962). Variation and change in English place-names. Vetenskaps-Societetens i Lund Årsbok, 3–49.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1964). Some cases of variation and change in English place-names. In English Studies Presented to R. W. Zandvoort on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. (Supplement to English Studies 45.) Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 44–9.Google Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1965). Some early London by-names and surnames. English Studies 46: 113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekwall, E. (1975). A History of Modern English Sounds and Morphology, tr. and ed. Ward, Alan. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, B. (1974). On Middle English mots savants. Studia Neophilologica 46: 142–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenberger, B. (1977). The Latin Element in the Vocabulary of the Earlier Makars Henryson and Dunbar. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ellegård, A. (1953). The Auxiliary ‘do’: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. W. V. (1974). Chaucer's English. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Elmer, W. (1981). Diachronic Grammar: the History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmison, F. G. (1969). Guide to the Essex Record Office. 2nd edn. (Essex Record Office Publications 51.) Chelmsford: Essex County Council.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (1976). A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-preserving and Local Transformations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Engblom, V. (1938). On the Origin and Early Development of the Auxiliary ‘Do’. (Lund Studies in English 6.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Erlebach, P. (1979). Die zusammengesetzten englischen Zunamen französischer Herkunft. (Anglistische Forschungen 137.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Erdmann, P. (1980). On the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 139–70.Google Scholar
Evans, W. M. (1967). Dramatic use of the second-person singular pronoun in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Studia Neophilologica 39: 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1937). The Pre-Conquest Personal Names of Domesday Book. (Nomina Germanica 3.) Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1939). Notes on Old English bynames. Namn och Bygd 27: 116–30. (Review article based on Tengvik 1938.)Google Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1945). Some unrecorded Old and Middle English personal names. Namn och Bygd 33: 69–98.Google Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1963). Some continental Germanic personal names in England. In Brown, A. & Foote, P. (eds.) Early English and Norse Studies presented to Hugh Smith. London: Methuen, 46–61.Google Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1964). Notes on some Scandinavian personal names in English twelfthcentury records. In Personnamnstudier 1964 tillägnade minnet av Ivar Modéer 1904–1960. (Anthroponymica Suecana 6.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 52–68.Google Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1968). Some Old English uncompounded personal names and bynames. Studia Neophilologica 40: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feilitzen, O. Von (1976). The personal names of the Winton Domesday. In Biddle, M. & Keene, D. J. (eds.) Winchester in the Early Middle Ages. (Winchester Studies 1.) Oxford: Clarendon, 143–229.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1968). Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire. (Navnestudier udgivet af Institut for Navneforskning 7.) Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1972). Scandinavian Settlements in Yorkshire. (Navnestudier 11.) Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1973). The names of the Lincolnshire tenants of the Bishop of Lincoln c. 1225. In Sandgren, , 86–95.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1974). English field-names and the Danish settlement. In Andersen, P. et al.(eds.) Festskrift til Kristian Hald. (Navnestudier udgivet af Institut for Navneforskning 13.) Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 45–55.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1975a). The surnames of the tenants of the Bishop of Lincoln in nine English counties c. 1225. In Andersson, T. (ed.) Binamn och Släktnamn Avgränsning och Ursprung: Handlingar fråsn NORNA's tredje Symposium i Uppsala 27–28 April 1974. (NORNA-Rapporter 8.) Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 39–65.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1975b). The Vikings in England: a review. Anglo-Saxon England 4: 181–206.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1978). Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands. (Navnestudier 16.) Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1979). Hungate: some observations on a common street-name. Ortnamssällskapets i Uppsala Årsskrift:44–51.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1980). On the study of Middle English by-names. Namn och Bygd 68: 102–15. (Review article of Jönsjö 1979.)Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1984). Place-names and settlements: some problems of dating as exemplified by place-names in -by. Nomina 8: 28–39.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G. (1988). Review of Hjerstedt 1987. Namn och Bygd 76: 220–3.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15: 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (1972). English Field-names: a Dictionary. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Field, J. (1975). Size and shape in English field-nomenclature. Names 23: 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (1976–7). Derogatory field-names. journal of the English Place-Name Society 9: 19–25.Google Scholar
Field, J. (1986). Compliment and Commemoration in English Field-names. 2nd edn. Hemel Hempstead and Edinburgh: Dacorum College and Council for Name Studies in Great Britain and Ireland.Google Scholar
Field, P. J. C. (1971). Romance and Chronicle: a Study of Malory's Prose Style. London: Barrie & Jenkins.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T. (1963). ‘You’ and ‘Thou’. Studien zur Anrede im Englischen. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T. & Wolff, D. (1973). Ordered Profusion: Studies in Dictionaries and the English Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt, T., Leisi, E. & Wolff, D. (eds.) (1970). A Chronological English Dictionary. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics, 1934–51. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1968). Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 1952–59, ed. Palmer, F. R.. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (1979). A comparative study of philosophical terms in the Alfredian and Chaucerian Boethius. Neopbilologus 63: 622–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (1985). Gower's Tale of Florent and Chaucer's Wife of Bath's Tale: a stylistic comparison. English Studies 66: 205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (1988). The rise of the for noun phrase to V construction: an explanation. In Nixon, G. & Honey, J. (eds.) An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strong. London: Routledge, 67–88.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (1989). The origin and spread of the accusative and infinitive construction in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 143–217.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (1990). Syntactic Change and Causation: Developments in Infinitival Constructions in English. (Amsterdam Studies in Generative Grammar 2.) Amsterdam: Faculteit der Letteren.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (1991). The rise of the passive infinitive in English. In Kastovsky, , 141–88 (prepublished in Amsterdam Papers in English 1, 2 (1988): 54–107).Google Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. (forthcoming a). Syntactic change and borrowing: the case of the accusative and infinitive construction in English.
Fischer, O. C. M. (forthcoming b). Factors influencing the choice of infinitive marker in late Middle English.
Fischer, O. C. M. & Leek, F. C. (1981). Optional vs radical re–analysis: mechanisms of syntactic change. Lingua 55: 301–50. (Review of Lightfoot, 1979.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. & Leek, F. C. (1983). The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19: 337–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. C. M. & Leek, F. C. (1987). A ‘case’ for the Old English impersonal. In Koopman, W., Leek, F., Fischer, O. & Eaton, R. (eds.) Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 79–120.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H. (1977). Chancery and the emergence of standard written English in the fifteenth century. Speculum 52: 870–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1965). Morphemic Structure of Chaucer's English. University: Alabama University Press.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1968). A Short Grammar of Middle English. Part One: Graphemics, Phonemics and Morphemics. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1977). Sociolinguistics and Middle English: some socially motivated changes in the history of English. Kwartalnik Neofilolgiczny 24: 247–59.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1978). Recent Developments in Historical Phonology. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1984a). Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1984b). The voicing of initial fricatives in Middle English. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia 17: 3–16.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1985). Historical Semantics. Historical Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1987). A Bibliography of Writings for the History of the English Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1988). Historical Dialectology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forssner, T. (1916). Continental-Germanic Personal Names in England in Old and Middle English Times. Uppsala: Appelberg.Google Scholar
Förster, M. (1925). Die Französierung des englischen Personennamenschatzes. In Germania: Festschrift für Eduard Sievers. Halle an der Saale: Niemeyer, 327–40.Google Scholar
Forström, G. (1948). The Verb ‘to be’ in Middle English: a Survey of the Forms. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Foster, R. (1975). The use of þa in Old English and Middle English narratives. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 76: 404–14.Google Scholar
Foxall, H. D. G. (1980). Shropshire Field-names. Shrewsbury: Shropshire Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. (1962). Graphemic analysis of late Middle English manuscripts. Speculum 37: 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankis, J. (1983). Word-formation by blending in the vocabulary of Middle English alliterative verse. In Stanley, E. G. & Gray, D. (eds.) Five Hundred Years of Words and Sounds: a Festschrift for E. J. Dobson. Cambridge: Brewer, 29–38.Google Scholar
Franklin, P. (1986). Norman saints and politics: forename-choices among fourteenth-century Gloucestershire peasants. Local Population Studies 36: 19–26.Google Scholar
Fransson, G. (1935). Middle English Surnames of Occupation, with an Excursus on Toponymical Surnames. (Lund Studies in English 3.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Fridén, G. (1948). Studies on the Tenses of the English Verb from Chaucer to Shakespeare with Special Reference to the Late Sixteenth Century. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundeqvistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Fridén, G. (1957). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Studia Linguistica 11: 54–6.Google Scholar
Fried, V. (1969). The notion of diacritics in Modern English graphology. Brno Studies in English 8: 62–7.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1940). On the development of the structural use of word–order in Modern English. Language 16: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funke, O. (1922). Die Fügung ginnen mit dem Infinitiv im Mittelenglischen. Englische Studien 56: 1–27.Google Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1904). The Transition from the Impersonal to the Personal Construction in Middle English. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1927). A friend of mine. Neophilologus 12: 18–31.Google Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1928a). The predicative passive infinitive. English Studies 10: 107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1928b). The post-adjectival passive infinitive. English Studies 10: 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1929). The conversion of the indirect personal object into the subject of a passive construction. English Studies 11: 1–11, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1930). The passive of a verb accompanied by a preposition. English Studies 12: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1932). The absolute genitive. English Studies 14: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaaf, W. (1933). The split infinitive in Middle English. English Studies 15: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1940). The Theory of Proper Names: a Controversial Essay. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gay, L. M. (1899). Anglo-French words in English. Modern Language Notes 14: 40–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geckeler, H. (1971). Strukturelle Semantik und Wortfeldtheorie. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Geipel, J. (1971). The Viking Legacy: the Scandinavian Influence on the English and Gaelic Languages. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Gelling, M. (1978). Signposts to the Past: Place-names and the History of England. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Gelling, M. (1984). Place-names in the Landscape. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Gelling, M. (1989). The early history of Western Mercia. In Bassett, S. (ed.) The Origins of the Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 184–201.Google Scholar
Gelling, M., Nicolaisen, W. S. H. & Richards, M. (1970). The Names of Towns and Cities in Britain. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Geoghegan, S. G. (1975). Relative clauses in Old, Middle and New English. Working Papers in Linguistics (Dept. of Linguistics, University of Ohio) 18: 30–71.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, M. (1984). Divergent word order developments in Germanic languages: a description and a tentative explanation. In Fisiak, , 107–35.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, M. (1988). Naar een atlas van de Nederlandse dialektsyntaksis. Unpublished paper read at the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Dutch Linguistic Society at Leiden on 23 January 1988.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. (1985). Metrical Phonology and Phonological Structure: German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1981). On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneuss, H. (1972). The origin of standard Old English and Æthelwold's school at Winchester. Anglo-Saxon England 1: 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L. (1984). The interplay of syntax and semantics in the development of the English modals. In Blake, & Jones, , 140–59.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. (1986). Middle English – a Creole? In Kastovsky, & Szwedek, I., 329–44.Google Scholar
Graves, E. B. (ed.) (1975). A Bibliography of English History to 1485. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Green, A. (1914). The analytic agent in Germanic. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 13: 514–52.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (1969). Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.) Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73–113.Google Scholar
Greenslade, M. W. (ed.) (1970). A History of the County of Stafford. Vol. III. (Victoria History of the Counties of England.) Oxford: Institute of Historical Research.Google Scholar
Guiraud, P. (1971). Modern linguistics looks at rhetoric: free indirect style. In Strelka, J. P. (ed.) Patterns of Literary Style. (Yearbook of Comparative Criticism 3.) University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 77–89.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropology 66, 2: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1969). Communication in multilingual societies. In Tyler, S. (ed.) Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Holt Rinehart, 435–49.Google Scholar
Guy, G. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: the case of final stop deletion. In Labov, , 1–36.Google Scholar
Gysseling, M. (1966). Overzicht over de Noordnederlandse Persoonsnamen tot 1225. (Anthroponymica 16.) Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar
Haas, L. (1989). Social connections between parents and godparents in late medieval Yorkshire. Medieval Prosopography 10, 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1970). Phono-graphic Translation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. P. (1976–7). Application of field-names in the Cambridge West Fields. journal of the English Place-Name Society 9: 12–18.Google Scholar
Hallam, H. E. (1965). Settlement and Society: a Study of the Early Agrarian History of South Lincolnshire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hallé, M. & Keyser, S. J. (1971). English Stress: its Form, its Growth, and its Role in Verse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. (eds.) (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hamp, E. (1982). Thwaite. In Anderson, J. (ed.) Language Form and Linguistic Variation: Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 161–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B. H. (1984). The historical implications of the Scandinavian linguistic element in English: a theoretical evaluation. North-Western European Language Evolution 4: 53–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, H. (1966). Wyclif's prose. Essays and Studies 19: 1–17.Google Scholar
Harmer, F. E. (1950). Chipping and market: a lexicographical investigation. In Fox, C. & Dickins, B. (eds.) The Early Cultures of North-west Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–60.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1984). Syntactic variation and dialect divergence. Journal of Linguistics 20: 303–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. (1985). Phonological Variation and Change: Studies in Hiberno-English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1978). The Evolution of French Syntax: a Comparative Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1989). Concessive clauses in English and Romance. In Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. (Typological Studies in Language 18.) Amsterdam: Benjamins, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. D. A. (1965). A Medieval Oxfordshire Village: Cuxham 1240–1400. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. D. A. (1984). Manorial Records. (Archives and the User 5.) London: British Records Association.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language 20: 210–31. (Rptd in Lass, 1969.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, H. W. (1930). Studien zu den Aktionsarten in Frühmittelenglischen. (Wiener Beiträge zur englischen Philologie 54.) Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Hausmann, R. B. (1974). The origin and development of Modern English periphrastic do. In Anderson, & Jones, , I, 159–89.Google Scholar
Healey, A. & Venezky, R. L. (1980). A Microfiche Concordance to Old English. Toronto: Center for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Heltveit, T. (1953). Studies in English Demonstrative Pronouns: a Contribution to the History of English Morphology. Oslo: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Heltveit, T. (1964). Dialect words in the Seven Sages of Rome. English Studies 45: 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Héraucourt, W. (1939). Die Wertwelt Chaucers, die Wertwelt einer Zeitwende. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hill, A. A. (1940). Early loss of [r] before dentals. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 55: 308–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. A. (1983b). Syntactic variation in the early history of the English phrasal verb. In Jacobson, S. (ed.) Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 95–108.Google Scholar
Hines, J. (1984). The Scandinavian Character of Anglian England in the Pre-Viking Period. (BAR British Series.) Oxford: British Archaeological Records.Google Scholar
Hines, J. (forthcoming). Scandinavian English: a Creole in context.
Hjertstedt, I. (1987). Middle English Nicknames in the Lay Subsidy Rolls for Warwickshire. (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 63.) Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hoad, T. F. (1984). English etymology: problematic areas in the vocabulary of the Middle English period. Transactions of the Philological Society27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, H. H. (1982). Aux-cliticization as a motivation for word order change. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12: 91–101.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. (1986). Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M. (1934). Die Französierung des Personennamenschatzes im Domesday Book der Grafschaften Hampshire und Sussex. Munich: Buchdrückerei Furst.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. & McCully, C. B. (1987). Metrical Phonology: a Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, C. (ed.) (1986). Domesday Essays. Exeter: Exeter University.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. (1982). What's in a Name? Family Nomenclature and the Norman Conquest. (Stenton Lecture, 1981.) Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C. (ed.) (1987). Domesday Studies. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Homann, E. R. (1954). Chaucer's use of ‘gan’. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 53: 389–98.Google Scholar
Horst, J. M. (1981). Kleine Middelnederlandse Syntaxis. Amsterdam: Huis aan de drie Grachten.Google Scholar
Hoskins, W. G. (1955). The Making of the English Landscape. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (1981). A Lollard sect vocabulary? In Benskin, & Samuels, , 15–30.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (1983). Observations on a northerner's vocabulary. In Stanley, E. G. & Gray, D. (eds.) Five Hundred Years of Words and Sounds: a Festschrift for Eric Dobson. Cambridge: Brewer, 74–83.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (1985). Lollards and their Books. London: Hambledon.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulbert, J. R. (1946). A thirteenth-century English literary standard. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 45: 411–14.Google Scholar
Hunnisett, R. F. (1971). The reliability of inquisitions as historical evidence. In Bullough, D. A. & Storey, R. L. (eds.) The Study of Medieval Records: Essays in Honour of Kathleen Major. Oxford: Clarendon, 206–35.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. & Heasley, B. (1983). Semantics: a Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1977–8). Addenda to the survey of English place-names: personal names in field- and minor names. journal of the English Place-Name Society 10: 41–72.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1979). Regional variation in Scandinavian personal nomenclature in England. Nomina 3: 52–60.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1981–2). Review of K. Forster's Englische Familiennamen aus Ortsnamen, Nuremberg, 1978. journal of the English Place-Name Society 14: 37–44.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1982). Some Scandinavian personal names from south-west England. Namn och Bygd 70: 77–93.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1985a). The names of the tenants of the Bishop of Ely in 1251. Ortnamnssällskapets i Uppsala Årsskrift58–78.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1985b). Some Scandinavian personal names from south-west England from post-Conquest records. Studia Anthroponymica Scandinavica 3: 23–58.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1985c). Field-names and the Scandinavian settlement of England: a comparative study of the evidence provided by the English Place-Name Society's survey of Northamptonshire. In Schützeichel, , 113–28.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1986). Ortsnamen und Besitzwechsel im Altenglischen und Mittelenglischen. In Schützeichel, R. (ed.) Ortsnamenwechsel. (Beiträge zur Namenforschung, n.s. supplement 24.) Heidelberg: Winter, 83–95.Google Scholar
Insley, J. (1987). Some aspects of regional variation in early Middle English personal nomenclature. Leeds Studies in English n.s. 18: 183–99.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, H. (1986a). Case and rhyme in Lazamon's Brut. In Kastovsky, & Szwedek, , 387–96.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, H. (1986b). A few notes on the vocabulary of Lazamon's Brut. Poetica (Tokyo) 24: 1–15.Google Scholar
Jack, G. B. (1975). Relative pronouns in language AB. English Studies 56: 100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, G. B. (1978a). Negation in later Middle English prose. Archivum Linguisticum n.s. 9: 58–72.Google Scholar
Jack, G. B. (1978b). Negative adverbs in early Middle English. English Studies 59: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, G. B. (1978c). Negative concord in early Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 50: 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S. (1981). Preverbal Adverbs and Auxiliaries: a Study of Word Order Change. (Stockholm Studies in English 55.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, B. (1951). Inversion in English with Special Keference to the Early Modern English Period. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, U. (1962). Phonological Dialect Constituents in the Vocabulary of Standard English. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1929). Remarques sur l'évolution phonologiques du Russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 2.) Nendeln: Kraus. (Rptd 1968.)Google Scholar
Janda, R. D. (1980). On the decline of declensional systems: the overall loss of Old English nominal case inflections and the Middle English reanalysis of -ES as HIS. In Traugott, E. C., Labrum, R. & Shepherd, S. (eds.) Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 243–52.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1909–49). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1935). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1962). The Growth and Structure of the English Language. 9th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joly, A. (1982). The system of negation in later Middle English prose. In Ahlqvist, , 176–89.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1967). The grammatical category of gender in early Middle English. English Studies 48: 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. (1972). An Introduction to Middle English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1988). English Grammatical Gender 950–1200. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Jones, S. & Sinclair, J. McH. (1974). English lexical collocations: a study in computational linguistics. Cahiers de Lexicologie 24: 15–61.Google Scholar
Jönsjö, J. (1979). Studies on Middle English Nicknames, i: Compounds. (Lund Studies in English 55.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. (1906). Eigentümlichkeiten des englischen Wortschatzes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. (1934). Handbuch der mittelenglischen Grammatik, i: Lautlehre, rev. edn by Matthes, Charles, 1968. Heidelberg: Winter. (English tr. Cook, E. J., 1974, as Handbook of Middle English Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.)Google Scholar
Jud-Schmid, E. (1956). Der indefinite Agens von Chaucer bis Shakespeare: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘Man’. (Schweizer anglistische Arbeiten 39.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Kaartinen, A. & Mustanoja, T. F. (1958). The use of the infinitive in A book of London English 1384–1425. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 59: 179–92.Google Scholar
Kain, R. J. P. & Prince, H. C. (1985). The Tithe Surveys of England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, R. (1937). Zur Geographic des mittelenglischen Wortschatzes. Leipzig: Mayer & Müller.Google Scholar
Kaplan, T. J. (1932). Gower's vocabulary. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 31: 395–402.Google Scholar
Karlberg, G. (1954). The English Interrogative Pronouns: a Study of their Syntactic History. (Gothenburg Studies in English 3.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Käsmann, H. (1961). Studien zum kirchlichen Wortschatz des Mittelenglischen 1100–1350. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (ed.) (1991). Papers from the Kellner Conference on English Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. & Szwedek, A. (eds.) (1986). Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries in Honour of Jacek Fisiakh, I: Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. (1981). ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 93–135.Google Scholar
Keene, C. H. (1976). Field-names of the London Borough of Ealing. (English Fieldname Studies 1.) Nottingham: English Place-name Society.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. (1985). Old English infinitival complements and West-Germanic V-raising. In Eaton, et al., 73–84.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. (1989). Syntactic change and the history of English modals. Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 16: 1–27.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. A. (ed.) (1972). John Wallis, Grammar of the English Language with an Introductory Grammatico-physical Treatise on Speech. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. M. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. G. (1920). The Modern English Verb–Adverb Combination. (Stanford University Publications in Language and Literature 1.) Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J. S. (1909). The Syntax of the Infinitive in Chaucer. 2nd edn. Leiden: Brill and Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Kerkhof, J. (1982). Studies in the Language of Geoffrey Chaucer. 2nd edn. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J. & O'Neil, W. (1985). Rule Generalization and Optimality in Language Change. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. (1973). Peterborough Abbey 1086–1310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1988). Phonological change. In Newmeyer, , I, 362–414.Google Scholar
Kirkman, K. (1983–4). Field-names at Woodhall, Pinner, Middlesex. journal of the English Place-Name Society 16: 50–7.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, K. (1966). Þe and þat as clause connectives in early Middle English with special consideration of the emergence of the pleonastic þat. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 39, 1: 1–271.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, K. (1967). The pleonastic that in relative and interrogative constructions in Chaucer's verse. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 39, 2: 1–37.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.) The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 246–323.Google Scholar
Klöpzig, W. (1922). Der Ursprung der to be to Konstruktion. Englische Studien 56: 378–89.Google Scholar
Knispel, E. (1932). Der altenglische Instrumental bei Verben und Adjektiven und sein Ersatz im Verlaufe der englischen Sprachgeschichte. Breslau: Eschenhagen.Google Scholar
Knudsen, G. & Kristensen, M. (1936–48). Danmarks Gamle Personnavne, I: Fornavne. Copenhagen: Gad.Google Scholar
Knudsen, G., Kristensen, M. & Hornby, R. (1949–64). Danmarks Gamle Personnavne, II: Tilnavne. Copenhagen: Gad.Google Scholar
Kökeritz, H. (1961). A Guide to Chaucer's Pronunciation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
König, E. (1985a). On the history of concessive connectives in English. Diachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 66: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, E. (1985b). Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In Fisiak, , 263–82.Google Scholar
Kolb, E. (1965). Skandinavisches in den nordenglischen Dialekten. Anglia 83: 127–53.Google Scholar
Koopman, W. F. (1985). The syntax of verb and particle combinations in Old English. In Bennis, H. & Beukema, F. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands, 1985. Dordrecht: Foris, 91–100.Google Scholar
Koopman, W. F. (1990a). The double object construction in Old English. In Adamson, et al., 225–43.Google Scholar
Koopman, W. F. (1990b). Word Order in Old English, with Special Reference to the Verb Phrase. (Amsterdam Studies in Generative Grammar 1.) Amsterdam: Faculty of Arts.Google Scholar
Koopman, W. F. (forthcoming). Old English clitic pronouns: some remarks. In Colman, F. (ed.) Edinburgh Studies in English. 2.
Koskenniemi, I. (1968). Repetitive Word Pairs in Old and Early Middle English. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Kosminsky, E. A. (1956). Studies in the Agrarian History of England in the Thirteenth Century. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1967). A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: the Six Northern Counties and Lincolnshire. (Lund Studies in English 35.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1969). Studies on Middle English local surnames containing elements of French origin. English Studies 50: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1970). Studies on Middle English Topographical Terms. (Acta Universitatis Lundensis I, 13.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1976). Lay subsidy rolls and dialect geography. English Studies 57: 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1979). A piece of Middle English word geography. English Studies 60: 254–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1987). A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: the West Midland Counties. (Publications of the New Society of Letters at Lund 78.) Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensson, G. (1989). Place names and linguistic geography. In Breivik, et al., 55–64.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. S. (1989). Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic do. In Fasold, R. W. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.) Language, Change and Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 133–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. (1968). The preface to a fifteenth-century concordance. Speculum 43: 258–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, H. (1956). The loss of long consonants and the rise of voiced fricatives in Middle English. Language 32: 435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, H., Kuhn, S. M. & Lewis, R. E. (eds.) (1954–). Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. In his Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 65–129.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (ed.) (1980). Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1981). Resolving the neo-grammarian controversy. Language 57: 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerquist, L. M. (1985). The impersonal verb in context: Old English. In Eaton, et al., 123–36.Google Scholar
Laing, M. (1988). Dialectal analysis and linguistically composite texts in Middle English. Speculum 63: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, M. (ed.) (1989). Middle English Dialectology. Essays on some Principles and Problems by Angus McIntosh, M. L. Samuels and Margaret Laing. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Laing, M. (1990). A linguistic atlas of early Middle English: the value of texts surviving in more than one copy. Paper delivered at the Sixth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, May 1990, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Langenfelt, G. (1954). Street-names, old and new. In Sahlgren, J., Hasselrot, B. & Hellborg, L. (eds.) Quatrième congrès international de sciences onomastiques. Lund: Blom, 331–40.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (ed.) (1969). Approaches to English Historical Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1973). Review article of Reaney 1967. Foundations of Language 9: 392–402.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1974). Linguistic orthogenesis? Scots vowel quantity and the English length conspiracy. In Anderson, & Jones, , II, 311–52.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English Phonology and Phonological Theory: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1977a). On the phonetic characterisation of Old English /r/. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia 9: 3–16.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1977b). ‘Centers of gravity’ in language evolution. Die Sprache 23: 11–19.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1980). On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1981). John Hart vindicatus? A study in the interpretation of early phoneticians. Folia Linguistica Historica 1: 75–96.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1983). Velar /r/ and the history of English. In Davenport, et al., 67–94.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984a). Quantity, resolution and syllable geometry. Folia Linguistica Historica 4: 151–80.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984b). Phonology: an Introduction to the Basic Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1985). Minkova noch einmal: MEOSL and the resolved foot. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 245–6.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1986). On schwa. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 15: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1987). The Shape of English: Structure and History. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & Anderson, J. M. (1975). Old English Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & Wright, S. (1986). Endogeny vs. contact: ‘Afrikaans influence’ on South African English. English World-Wide 7: 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassaut, J. & Dekeyser, X. (1977). Aspects of sentence embedding in Old and Middle English. Leuvense Bijdragen 66: 327–44.Google Scholar
Lassiter, M. (1983). Our Names, Our Selves: the Meaning of Names in Everyday Life. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Legge, M. D. (1941–2). Anglo-Norman and the historian. History n.s. 26: 163–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge, M. D. (1980). Anglo-Norman as a spoken language. In Brown, R. Allen (ed.) Proceedings of the Battle Conference on Anglo-Norman Studies II, 1979. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 108–17.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.) (1968). Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Leith, D. (1983). A Social History of English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Leonard, A. G. K. (1984). Stories of Southampton Streets. Southampton: Paul Cave.Google Scholar
Le Pesant, M. (1956). Les Noms de personne à Évreux du XIIe au XIVe siècle. Annales de Normandie 6: 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leys, O. (1958). La Substitution de noms Chrétiens aux noms préchrétiens en Flandre occidentale avant 1225. In Cortés, L. et al. (eds.) Actes et mémoires du Ve congrès international de toponymie et d'anthroponymie. (Acta Salmanticensia, filosofia y letras 11.) Salamanca: University of Salamanca, I, 403–12.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1979). The English passive: an argument for historical rule stability. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 667–88.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1981a). The history of noun phrase movement. In Baker, C. L. & McCarthey, J. (eds.) The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 86–119.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1981b). A reply to some critics. Lingua 55: 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. H. (1905–15; 1931). Norsk-isländska Dopnamn ock fingerade Namn från Medeltiden; with Supplementband. Uppsala: Lundequistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Lind, E. H. (1920–1). Norsk-isländska Personbinamn från Medeltiden. Uppsala: Lundequistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Lindahl, C. (1987). Earnest Games: Folkloric Patterns in the Canterbury Tales. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lobel, M. D. (ed.) (1969–75). Historic Towns: Maps and Plans of Towns and Cities in the British Isles, with Historical Commentaries, from Earliest Times to 1800. 2 Vols. London: Lovell Johns & Cook, Hammond & Kell.Google Scholar
Löfvenberg, M. T. (1942). Studies on Middle English Local Surnames. (Lund Studies in English 11.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lohmander, I. (1981). Old and Middle English Words for ‘Disgrace’ and ‘Dishonour’. (Gothenburg Studies in English 49). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis.Google Scholar
Long, M. M. (1944). The English Strong Verb from Chaucer to Caxton. Menasha: Banta.Google Scholar
Longnon, A. (ed.) (1886–95). Polyptyque de l'abbaye de Saint-Germain des Prés. 2 vols. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Loyd, L. C. (1951). The Origins of some Anglo-Norman Families. (Publications of the Harleian Society 103.) Leeds: Harleian Society.Google Scholar
Luhmann, A. (1906). Die Überlieferung von Lazamons Brut nebst einer Darstellung der betonten Vokale und Diphthonge. (Studien zur englischen Philologie 22.) Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1914–40). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. 2 vols. Stuttgart: Tauchnitz. (Rptd 1964: Oxford: Blackwell.)Google Scholar
Lund, N. (1975). Personal names and place-names: the persons and places. Onoma 19: 468–85.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, N. (1976). From OE/ME ‘impersonal’ to ‘personal’ constructions: what is a ‘subjectless’ S? In Steever, S. B., Walker, C. A. & Mufwene, S. S. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 192–204.Google Scholar
McClure, P. (1973). Lay subsidy rolls and dialect phonology. In Sandgren, , 188–94.Google Scholar
McClure, P. (1978). Surnames from English place-names as evidence for mobility in the Middle Ages. Local Historian 13: 80–6.Google Scholar
McClure, P. (1979). Patterns of migration in the late Middle Ages: the evidence of English place-name surnames. Economic History Review 32: 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, P. (1981). The interpretation of Middle English nicknames. Nomina 5: 95–104. (Review article of Jönsjö 1979.)Google Scholar
McClure, P. (1982). The origin of the surname Waterer. Nomina 6: 92.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1940). Middle English ‘Gannockes’ and some place name problems. Review of English Studies 16: 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1948). The relative pronouns þe and þat in early Middle English. English and Germanic Studies 1: 73–87.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1956). The analysis of written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society26–55. (Rptd Lass, 1969 and Laing, 1989.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1963). A new approach to Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44: 1–11. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1966). ‘Graphology’ and meaning. In McIntosh, & Halliday, , 98–110.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1972). Some words in the Northern Homily Collection. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73: 196–208.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1973). Word geography in the lexicography of medieval English. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 211: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1974). Towards an inventory of Middle English scribes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75: 602–24. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1975). Scribal profiles from Middle English texts. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 76: 218–35. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1976). The language of the extant versions of Havelok the Dane. Medium Ævum 45: 36–49. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1978). The Middle English poem The Four Foes of Mankind: some notes on the language and text. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 79: 137–44.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1979). Some notes on the language and textual transmission of the Scottish Troy Book. Archivum hinguisticum 10: 1–19. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. & Halliday, M. A. K. (eds.) (1966). Patterns and Ranges: Papers in General, Descriptive, and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. & Wakelin, M. F. (1982). John Mirk's Festial and Bodleian MS Hatton 96. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 83: 443–50. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)Google Scholar
McIntosh, A., SamuelsBenskin, M. L. M., with assistance of Laing, M. and Williamson, K. (1986). A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, B. A. (1928). The Early London Dialect. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, F. (1939). Les Relations de l' Angleterre et de la France d'après le vocabulaire. 2 vols. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1975). Norfolk and Suffolk Surnames in the Middle Ages. (English Surnames Series 2.) Chichester: Phillimore.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1976). The study of English surnames. In Voitl, , 119–25.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1977). The Surnames of Oxfordshire. (English Surnames Series 3.) London: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1981). The Surnames of Lancashire. (English Surnames Series 4.) London: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1988). The Surnames of Suffolk. London: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
McKinley, R. (1989). The Surnames of Sussex. (English Surnames Series 5.) London: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J. C. (1963). A Graphemic–Phonemic Study of a Middle English Manuscript. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
MacLeish, A. (1969). The Middle English Subject–Verb Cluster. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Malone, K. (1930). When did Middle English begin? In Hatfield, J. T., Leopold, W. & Zieglschmid, A. J. F. (eds.) Curme Volume of Linguistic Studies. (Language Monographs 7.) Baltimore, MD: Waverley Press, 110–17.Google Scholar
Manabe, K. (1989). The Syntactic and Stylistic Development of the Infinitive in Middle English. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1939). Review of Engblom 1938. English Studies 21: 121–5.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Martin, G. H. (1960–4). The origins of borough records. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2: 147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. H. (1963). The English borough in the thirteenth century. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 5th ser. 13: 123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. D. (1978). The Cartularies and Registers of Peterborough Abbey. (Northamptonshire Record Society 28.) Peterborough: Northamptonshire Record Society.Google Scholar
Marynissen, C. (1986). Hypekoristische Suffixen in Oudnederlandse Persoonsnamen, inz. de -z- en –l- Suffixen. Ghent: Secretariaat van den Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar
Matheson, L. (1978). An example of ambiguity and scribal confusion in ‘Piers Plowman’. English Language Notes 15: 263–7.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology: an Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mätzner, E. (1874). An English Grammar: Methodological, Analytical, and Historical, tr. Grece, C. J.. 3 vols. London: Murray; Boston, MA: Roberts.Google Scholar
Mausch, H. (1986). A note on late Middle English gender. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia 18: 89–100.Google Scholar
Mawer, A. (1930). Some unworked sources for English lexicography. In Bogholm, N., Brusendorff, A. & Bodelsen, C. A. (eds.) A Grammatical Miscellany Offered to Otto Jespersen on his Seventieth Birthday. London: Allen & Unwin, 11–16.Google Scholar
Mawer, A. (1932). The Scandinavian settlement of Northamptonshire. Namn och Bygd 20: 109–23.Google Scholar
Mawer, A. (1933). The study of field-names in relation to place-names. In Edwards, J. G., Galbraith, V. H. & Jacob, E. F. (eds.) Historical Essays in Honour of James Tait. Manchester: privately printed, 189–200.Google Scholar
Meer, H. J. 1929. Main Facts concerning the Syntax of Mandeville's Travels. Utrecht: Kemink.Google Scholar
Meier, H. H. (1953). Der indefinite Agens im Mittelenglischen 1050–1350: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘Man’. (Schweizer anglistische Arbeiten 34.) Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Meier, H. H. (1967) The lag of the relative ‘who’ in the nominative. Neophilologus 51: 277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (ed.) (1977). Langues en contact: pidgins, Créoles. (TBL 75.) Tübingen: TBL-Verlag Narr.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, J. C. (1919). Aureate Terms: a Study in the Literary Diction of the 15th Century. Lancaster, PA: Wickersham Print.Google Scholar
Menner, R. (1936). The conflict of homonyms in English. Language 12: 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menner, R. (1945). Multiple meaning and change of meaning in English. Language 21: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersand, J. (1937). Chaucer's Romance Vocabulary. Brooklyn: Comet.Google Scholar
Mertens-Fonck, P. (1984). The place of the Vespasian Psalter in the history of English. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia 17: 17–28.Google Scholar
Michaëlsson, K. (1947). Questions de méthode anthroponymique. Onomastica 1: 190–204.Google Scholar
Michaëlsson, K. (1954). L'Anthroponymie et la statistique. In Sahlgren, J., Hasselrot, B. & Hellborg, L. (eds.) Quatrième congrès international de sciences onomastiques. Lund: Blom, 308–94.Google Scholar
Mills, A. D. (1968). Notes on some Middle English occupational terms. Studia Neophilologica 40: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. D. (1988). Review of Hjertstedt 1987. Studia Anthroponymica Scandinavica 6: 171–4.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1981). Regional Accents of English: Belfast. Belfast: Blackstaff Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (1983). On the sociolinguistic history of /h/- dropping in English. In Davenport, et al., 37–54.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (forthcoming). Social network and prestige arguments in sociolinguistics. In Kwok, H. & Bolton, K. (eds.) Papers from the First Hong Kong Conference on Language in Society. London: Routledge.
Milroy, J. & Harris, J. (1980). When is a merger not a merger? The MEAT/MATE problem in a present-day English vernacular. English World-Wide 1: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1978). Belfast: change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Trudgill, , 19–36.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milory, L. (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkova, D. (1982). The environment for open syllable lengthening in Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3: 29–58.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. (1983). Middle English final -e from a phonemic point of view. In Davenport, et. al., 191–210.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. (1984). Early Middle English metric elision and schwa deletion. In Blake, & Jones, , 56–66.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. (1991). The History of Final Vowels in English: the Sound of Muting. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnis, A. (1984). Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. London: Scolar.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1964). Syntax and word-order in the Peterborough Chronicle 1122–1154. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 65: 113–44.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1979). Visser, F. Th., An Historical Syntax of the English Language: some caveats concerning Old English. English Studies 60: 537–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1984). The origin of Old English conjunctions: some problems. In Fisiak, , 271–99.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English Syntax. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyabe, K. (1954). On the development of the perfect infinitive. Studies in English Literature 31, 1: 51–70.Google Scholar
Miyabe, K. (1956). Some notes on the perfect infinitive in early Middle English. Anglica 2: 13–19.Google Scholar
Moessner, L. (1984). Some English relative constructions. La Linguistique 20: 57–79.Google Scholar
Moessner, L. (1989). Early Middle English Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (1918). Robert Mannyng's use of do as auxiliary. Modern Language Notes 33: 385–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (1921). Grammatical and natural gender in Middle English. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 36: 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (1927). Loss of final -n in inflectional syllables of Middle English. Language 3: 232–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (1928). Earliest morphological changes in Middle English. Language 4: 238–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. & Marckwardt, A. H. (1964). Historical Outlines of English Sounds and Inflections. Ann Arbor, MI: Wahr.Google Scholar
Moore, S., Meech, S. B. & Whitehall, H. (1935). Middle English dialect characteristics and dialect boundaries. Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1–60.Google Scholar
Morlet, M.-T. (1967). Étude d'anthroponymie picarde: les noms de personne en Haute Picardie aux XIIe, XIVe, XVe siècles. Amiens: Musee de Picardie.Google Scholar
Morlet, M.-T. (1968–72). Les Noms de personne sur le territoire de l'ancienne Gaule. 2 vols. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Mosse, F. (1938). Histoire de la forme périphrastique ‘être + participe present’ en germanique: I Partie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Mosse, F. (1945). Manuel de l' anglais de moyen âge. I.1–2 Vieil Anglais. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Mosse, F. (1952). A Handbook of Middle English, tr. Walker, J. A.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mosse, F. (1957). Refléxions sur le genèse de la forme progressive. In Korninger, S. (ed.) Studies in English Language and Literature Presented to Professor Karl Brunner on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. (Wiener Beiträge 65). Vienna and Stuttgart: Braumüller, 155–74.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. (1986). Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mullins, E. L. C. (1958). Texts and Calendars: an Analytical Guide to Serial Publications. (Royal Historical Society Guides and Handbooks 7.) London: Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Muscatine, C. (1981). Courtly literature and vulgar language. In Burgess, G. S. & Deyermond, A. D. (eds.) Court and Poet. Selected Papers of the Third Congress of the International Courtly Literature Society. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Musset, L. (1975). Pour l'étude comparative de deux fondations politiques des vikings: le royaume d'York et le duché de Rouen. Northern History 10: 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musset, L. (1976). L'Aristocratie normande au XIe siècle. In Contamine, P. (ed.) La Noblesse au Mqyen Age, XIe–XVe siècles: essais à la mémoire de Robert Botruche. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 71–96.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1958). The English Syntactical Type ‘One the Best Man’ and its Occurrence in other Germanic Languages. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1960). A Middle English Syntax Part I. (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 23.) Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1983). Chaucer's use of gan: some recent studies. In Gray, D. & Stanley, E. G. (eds.) Middle English Studies Presented to Norman Davis in Honour of his Seventieth Birthday. Oxford: Clarendon, 59–64.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1985). Some features of syntax in Middle English main clauses. In Am, M.-J. & Wirtjes, H. (eds.) Historical and Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English for Johan Gerritsen. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 73–6.Google Scholar
Nehls, D. (1974). Synchron–diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.) (1988). Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey. 4 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nickel, G. (1966). Die Expanded Form im Altenglischen: Vorkommen, Funktion und Herkuntft der Umschreibung ‘beon/wesan’ + Partizip Präsens. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz.Google Scholar
Niles, P. (1982). Baptism and naming of children in late medieval England. Medieval Prosopography 3: 95–107.Google Scholar
Norman, J. (1988). Chinese. (Cambridge Language Surveys.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakden, J. P. (1930). Alliterative Poetry in Middle English: Dialectical and Metrical Survey. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Oakden, J. P. (1935). Alliterative Poetry in Middle English: a Survey of the Traditions. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1983). Planned and unplanned discourse. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B.Acquiring Conversational Competence. London: Routledge, 129–57.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, W. R. & Todd, L. (1980). Variety in Contemporary English. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (1949). The Meaning of Meaning. 10th edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ogura, M. (1986). Old English ‘Impersonal’ Verbs and Expressions. (Anglistica 24.) Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger.Google Scholar
Ogura, M. (1989). Verbs with the Reflexive Pronoun and Constructions with ‘Self’ in Old and Early Modern English. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Ohlander, U. (1941). A study on the use of the infinitive sign in Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 14: 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlander, U. (1981). Notes on the non-expression of the subject pronoun in Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 53: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olszewska, E. S. (1935). Types of Norse borrowing in Middle English. Saga-book of the Viking Society for Northern Research 11: 153–60.Google Scholar
Orton, H. & Wright, N. (1974). A Word Geography of England. London and New York: Seminar.Google Scholar
Orton, H., Sanderson, S. & Widdowson, J. (eds.) (1978). A Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Orton, H., Halliday, W. J., Barry, M., Wakelin, M. & Tilling, P. M. (eds.) (1962–71). Survey of English Dialects. 4 vols. Leeds: Arnold for University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Orwin, C. S. & Orwin, C. S. (1967). The Open Fields. 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon. (1st edn 1938.)Google Scholar
Owen, D. (1976). The muniments of Ely cathedral priory. In Brooke, C. N. L., Luscombe, D. E., Martin, G. H. & Owen, D. (eds.) Church and Government in the Middle Ages: Essays Presented to C. R. Cheney on his 70th Birthday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page, R. I. (1971). How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England? In Clemoes, P. & Hughes, K. (eds.) England before the Conquest: Studies in Primary Sources Presented to Dorothy Whitelock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–81.Google Scholar
Palliser, D. M. (1978). The medieval street-names of York. York Historian 2: 2–16.Google Scholar
Palmatier, R. A. (1969). A Descriptive Syntax of the Ormulum. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics: a New Outline. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. (1985). The Canterbury Tales. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Perrott, A. M. J. (1980). The field-names of the parishes of Deepingate, Northborough and Maxey. Northamptonshire Archaeology 15: 133–7.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U., Steele, S. & Tanz, C. (eds.) (1987). Language, Gender and Sex in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipps, K. C. (1965). Asyndetic relative clauses in late Middle English. English Studies 46: 323–9.Google Scholar
Phillipps, K. C. (1966a). Adverb clauses in the fifteenth century. English Studies 47: 355–65.Google Scholar
Phillipps, K. C. (1966b). Absolute construction in late Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 67: 282–90.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. S. (1983). Middle English diphthongization, phonetic analogy and lexical diffusion. Word 34: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilch, H. (1955). Der Untergang des Präverbs e- im Englischen. Anglia 73: 37–64.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1983). Coming into being among the Anglo-Saxons. In Davenport, et al., 239–78.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1984). The modals story retold. Studies in Language 8: 305–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, C. (1976). The English Medieval Town. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Pope, M. K. (1952). From Latin to Modern French, with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. 2nd edn. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. (1982). The evolution of early standard English: the creolization hypothesis. Stadia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 69–85.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. (1988). The relative what: two kinds of evidence. In Fisiak, , 443–74.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. (1990). A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE–Celtic contact. In Adamson, et al., 407–34.Google Scholar
Poutsma, H. (1929). A Grammar of Late Modern English, Part I: The Sentence. 2nd edn. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Prins, A. A. (1952). French Influence in English Phrasing. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.Google Scholar
Prins, A. A. (1959). French influence in English phrasing: a supplement. English Studies 40: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, A. A. (1960). French influence in English phrasing (continued). English Studies 41: 1–17.Google Scholar
Prior, O. H. (ed.) (1924). Cambridge Anglo-Norman Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1957). Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies 38: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. & Svartvik, J. (1970). Types and uses of non-finite clauses in Chaucer. English Studies 51: 393–411.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. & Wrenn, C. L. (1957). An Old English Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftis, J. A. (1982). A Small Town in Late Medieval England: Godmanchester 1278–1400. (Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies: Studies and Texts 52.) Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Rantavaara, I. (1962). On the development of the periphrastic dative in late Middle English prose. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 63: 175–203.Google Scholar
Reaney, P. H. (1952). Pedigrees of villeins and freemen. Notes and Queries 197: 222–5.Google Scholar
Reaney, P. H. (1953). Notes on the survival of Old English personal names in Middle English. Studier i Modern Språkvetenskap 18: 84–112.Google Scholar
Reaney, P. H. (1967). The Origins of English Surnames. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Reaney, P. H. (1976). A Dictionary of British Surnames. 2nd edn, rev. Wilson, R. M.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Redmonds, G. (1973). Yorkshire: West Riding. (English Surname Series 1.) Chichester: Phillimore.Google Scholar
Redmonds, G. (1973). (1976). English surnames research. In Voitl, , 75–82.Google Scholar
Reed, D. W. (1950). The history of inflectional n in English verbs before 1500. University of California Publications in English 7, 4: 157–328.Google Scholar
Reszkiewicz, A. (1962). Main Sentence Elements in the Book of Margery Kempe: a Study in Major Syntax. Warsaw: Komitet Neofilologiczny Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Reszkiewicz, A. (1966). Ordering of Elements in hate Old English Prose in Terms of their Size and Structural Complexity. Wroclaw: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Reszkiewicz, A. (1971). The elimination of the front rounded and back unrounded vowel phonemes from medieval English: a reinterpretation. Kwartalnik Neofiloligiczny 18: 279–95.Google Scholar
Rettger, J. F. (1934). The Development of Ablaut in the Strong Verbs of the East Midland Dialects of Middle English. (Language Dissertations 18.) Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. (1937). Some notes on the origin of the relative combination ‘the which’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 38: 146–88.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. (1938). On continuative relative clauses in English. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 9, 3: 1–61.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. G. (1942). Letters of the Oxford dictatores. In Salter, H. E., Pantin, W. A. & Richardson, H. G. (eds.) Formularies which Bear on the History of Oxford. Oxford: Historical Society n.s. 5: 331–450.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. (1984). The dictamen and its influence on fifteenth-century English prose. Rhetorica 2: 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, M. (1979). Sprache und Gesellschaft im Mittelalter: Untersuchungen zur mündliches Kommunikation in England von der Mitte des elften bis zum Beginn des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts. (Monographien zur Geschichte des Mittelalters 18.) Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Richter, M. (1985). Towards a methodology of historical socio-linguistics. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 41–61.Google Scholar
Riehle, W. (1981). The Middle English Mystics, tr. Standring, B.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rigg, A. G. (1983). Clocks, dials and other terms. In Gray, D. & Stanley, E. G. (eds.) Middle English Studies Presented to Norman Davis. Oxford: Clarendon, 255–74.Google Scholar
Rigg, A. G. (1987). Nigel of Canterbury: what was his name?Medium Ævum 56: 304–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, M. (1967). The Uses of ONE in Old and Early Middle English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Robinson, F. N. (1985). Metathesis in the dictionaries: a problem for lexicographers. In Bammesberger, , 245–66.Google Scholar
Robinson, I. (1971). Chaucer's Prosody: a Study of Middle English Verse Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. (1911). Gilbert Crispin, Abbot of Westminster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-historical Linguistics, its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984). The socio-linguistic history of t/d deletion. Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 221–55.Google Scholar
Rooth, E. (1941–2). Zur Geschichte der englischen Partizip-Praesens-Form auf-ing. Studia Neophilologica 14: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooy, J. (1988). Van HEBBEN naar ZIJN. Amsterdam: Publikaties van het P. J. Meertens Institut.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1947–8). The vocabulary of the records of the Grocers' Company. English and Germanic Studies 1: 91–100.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1963). Three lexicographic notes. English Philological Studies 8: 30–5.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1970). The rare words of the Ormulum. English Philological Studies 12: 42–7.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1974). Dub. Notes and Queries 219: 209–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, T. W. (1972). Chaucer's Bawdy. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Ross, T. W. & Brooks, E. Jr (1984). English Glosses from BL Additional Manuscript 37075. Norman, OK: Pilgrim.Google Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1966). A study of the prefix de / des in Anglo-Norman. Transactions of the Philological Society24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1968). The teaching of French in medieval England. Modern Language Review 63: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1975–6). The role of French in thirteenth-century England. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 58: 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1978). A quelle époque a-t-on cessé de parler français en Angleterre? In Mélanges de philologie romane offerts à Charles Camproux. Montpellier: Université Paul-Valéry, 1075–89.Google Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1980–1). Lexical borrowing in a medieval context. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 63: 118–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1983). Language and government in medieval England. Zeitschrift für französischen Sprache und Literatur 93: 258–90.Google Scholar
Rothwell, W. (1985). Stratford atte Bowe and Paris. Modern Language Review 80: 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royster, J. F. (1915). The do auxiliary 1400–1500. Modern Philology 12: 189–96, 449–56.Google Scholar
Royster, J. F. (1918). The causative use of hatan. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 17: 82–93.Google Scholar
Rudskoger, A. (1952). ‘Fair, Foul, Nice, Proper’: a Contribution to the Study of Polysemy. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rudskoger, A. (1970). Plain: a Study in Co-text and Context. (Stockholm Studies in English 22.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ruggiers, P. G. (ed.) (1984). Chaucer: the Great Tradition. Norman, OK: Pilgrim.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. R. (1973–4). Onomastic and topographical sources in English local record offices, September 1970: a summary guide. journal of the English Place-Name Society 6: 7–43.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. R. (1984). The status of written sources in English onomastics. Nomina 8: 41–56.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. R. (1985). The personal-name material. In Keene, D. & Rumble, A. R. (eds.) Survey of Medieval Winchester. (Winchester Studies 2.) Oxford: Clarendon, 1405–11.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. R. (1987). The Domesday manuscripts: scribes and scriptoria. In Holt, , 79–99.Google Scholar
Russom, J. H. (1982). An examination of the evidence of OE indirect passives. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 677–80.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. (1979). An Introduction to the Historical Study of English Syntax. (Stockholm Studies in English 51.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rumble, A. R. (1983). The emergence of who as a relativiser. Studia Linguistica 37: 126–34.Google Scholar
Rydén, M. & Brorström, S. (1987). The Be / Have Variation with Intransitives in English, with Special Reference to the Late Modern Period. (Stockholm Studies in English 70.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Rygiel, D. (1981). Ancrene Wisse and ‘colloquial’ style. Neophilologus 65: 137–43.Google Scholar
Rynell, A. (1948). The Rivalry of Scandinavian and Native Synonyms in Middle English, especially TAKEN and NIMEN. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1959). Some connotations of ‘cold’ in Old and Middle English. Modern Language Notes 74: 314–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, E. (1978). Alliterative modes and affiliations in the fourteenth century. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 79: 25–35.Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1949). The ge- prefix in the Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. Transactions of the Philological Society, 62–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1963). Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44: 81–94. (Rptd Lass, 1969 and Laing, 1989.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1972). Linguistic Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1985). The great Scandinavian belt. In Eaton, et al., 269–81. (Rptd Laing, 1989.)Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. (1987). The status of the functional approach. In Koopman, W., Leek, F., Fischer, O. & Eaton, R. (eds.) Explanation and Linguistic Change. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 45.) Amsterdam: Benjamins, 239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. & Smith, J. J. (1981). The language of Gower. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 82: 295–304. (Rptd Smith, 1989.)Google Scholar
Sandahl, B. (1951–82). Middle English Sea Terms. 3 vols. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. (1915). Der syntaktische Gebrauch des Infinitivs im Frühmittelenglischen. (Kieler Studien zur englischen Philologie 7.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Sandgren, F. (ed.) (1973). Otium et Negotium: Studies in Onomatology and Library Science presented to Olof von Feilitzen. (Acta Bibliothecae Regiae Stock-holmiensis 16.) Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Sandred, K. I. (1973). Anglo–Saxon heritage in East Anglia. Namn och Bygd 61: 83–92. (Review article based on Seltén 1972.)Google Scholar
Sandred, K. I. (1979). Scandinavian place-names and appellatives in Norfolk: a study of the medieval field-names of Flitcham. Namn och Bygd 67: 98–122.Google Scholar
Sandred, K. I. (1982). Scandinavian place-names and appellatives in Norfolk : a study of the microtopy of Flitcham. In Rymut, K. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Cracow: Universitas Iagellonica, 357–63.Google Scholar
Sandved, A. O. (1985). Introduction to Chaucerian English. (Chaucer Studies 11.) Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (ed.) (1978). Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Sauer, H. (1985). Lazamon's compound nouns and their morphology. In Fisiak, , 483–532.Google Scholar
Sauer, H. (1988). Compounds and compounding in early Middle English: problems, patterns, productivity. In Markus, M. (ed.) Historical English. Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck, 186–209.Google Scholar
Sawyer, P. H. (1971). The Age of the Vikings. 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Sawyer, P. H. (ed.) (1985). Domesday Book: a Reassessment. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Scheffer, J. (1975). The Progressive in English. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Schibsbye, K. (1974–7). Origin and Development of the English Language, II, III: Morphology and Syntax. Copenhagen: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
Schlauch, M. (1952). Chaucer's colloquial English: its structural traits. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67: 1103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaug, W. (1955). Studien zu den altsächsischen Personennamen des 11. und 12 jahrhunderts. (Lunder Germanistische Forschungen 30.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Schmittbetz, K. (1909). Das Adjektiv in ‘Sir Gawayn and the Grene Knyzt’. Anglia 32: 1–59, 163–89, 359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, P. R. (1983). Hidden depths: dialogue and characterization in Chaucer and Malory. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 98: 374–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schützeichel, R. (1983). Shakespeare und Verwandtes. In Münsteraner Familiennamen-Kolloquium: Natur, Religion, Sprache. (Schriftereihe der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster 7.) Münster: Aschendorff, 103–26.Google Scholar
Schützeichel, R. (ed.) (1985). Giessener Flurnamen-Kolloquium. (Beiträge zur Namenforschung n.s. Supplement 23.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Scragg, D. G. (1974). A History of English Spelling. (Mont Follick Series 3.) Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Seefranz-Montag, A. von (1983). Syntaktische Funktionen und Wortstelltungsveränderung: die Entwicklung ‘subjektloser’ Konstruktionen in einigen Sprache. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Sell, R. (1985a). Tellability and politeness in ‘The Miller's Tale’: first steps in literary pragmatics. English Studies 66: 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, R. (1985b). Politeness in Chaucer: suggestions towards a methodology for pragmatic stylistics. Studia Neophilologica 57: 175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltén, B. (1965). Some notes on Middle English by-names in independent use. English Studies 46: 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltén, B. (1969). Early East-Anglian Nicknames: ‘Shakespeare’ Names. (Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis 1968–9: 3.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Seltén, B. (1972). The Anglo-Saxon Heritage in Middle English Personal Names: East Anglia 1100–1399. Vol. I. (Lund Studies in English 43.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Seltén, B. (1975). Early East-Anglian Nicknames: Bahuvrihi Names. (Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis 1974–5: 3.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Seltén, B. (1979). The Anglo-Saxon Heritage in Middle English Personal Names: East Anglia 1100–1399. Vol. II. (Acta Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis 72.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, M. S. (1927). The dialects of the West Midlands in Middle English. Review of English Studies 3: 54–67, 186–203, 319–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serjeantson, M. S. (1935). A History of Foreign Words in English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Rptd 1961.)Google Scholar
Serjeantson, M. S. (1938). The vocabulary of cookery in the fifteenth century. Essays and Studies 23: 25–37.Google Scholar
Sheard, J. A. (1954). The Words We Use. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Shelly, P. D. (1921). English and French in England 1066–1100. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Shields, K. (1980). Fast speech and the origin of the standard English verbal suffix –s. Journal of English Linguistics 14: 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, I. (1979–80). On bilingualism in Anglo-Norman England. Romance Philology 33: 467–79.Google Scholar
Simko, J. (1957). Word Order in the Winchester Manuscript and in William Caxton's Edition of Thomas Malory's Morte Darthur: a Comparison. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sisam, K. (1915). Havelok the Dane. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1897). The proverbs of Alfred. Transactions of the Philological Society399–418.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. (1928–36). Early northern nicknames and surnames. Saga-book of the Viking Society for Northern Research 11: 30–60.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. (1956). English Place-name Elements. 2 vols. (English Place-name Society 25–6.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. J. (1989). The Language of Chaucer. Essays by Michael Samuels and J. J. Smith on the Language of Late Medieval Authors and Scribes. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. J. (forthcoming). Tradition and innovation in South-West Midland English.
Smyser, H. M. (1967). Chaucer's use of gin and do. Speculum 42: 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, J. K. (1983). Patronymics in Denmark and England. (Dorothea Coke Memorial Lecture in Northern Studies 1982.) London: University College.Google Scholar
Sørensen, K. (1957). Latin influence on English syntax. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique du Copenhague 11: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, J. G. (1954). Verses of Cadence. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Standing, R. W. (1984). Field-names of Angmering, Ferring, Rustington, East Preston and Kingston (West Sussex). (English Field-name Studies 2.) Nottingham: English Place-Name Society.Google Scholar
Steadman, J. M. (1917). The origin of the historical present in English. Studies in Philology 14: 1–46.Google Scholar
Steel, D. J. (1968–78). National Index of Parish Registers. 12 vols. London: Society of Genealogists.Google Scholar
Stein, D. (1990). The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Aspects of the Evolution of do in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, G. (1931). Meaning and Change of Meaning, with Special Reference to the English Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stevick, R. D. (1964). The morphemic evolution of Middle English she. English Studies 45: 381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1961). The Middle English ‘long close’ and ‘long open’ mid vowels. Texas Studies in Literature and Language 2: 250–68. (Rptd Lass, 1969.)Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1977). Motivations for exbraciation in Old English. In Li, C. (ed.) Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: Texas University Press, 291–314.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1978). Perseverance in the English vowel shift. In Fisiak, , 337–48.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1984). On the history of the verb-second rule in English. In Fisiak, , 575–92.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1985). Assessment of alternative explanations of the Middle English phenomenon of high vowel lowering when lengthened in the open syllable. In Eaton, et al., 303–18.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. & Minkova, D. (1991). Subordination and word order changem in the history of English. In Kastovsky, , pp. 367–408.Google Scholar
Stoelke, H. (1916). Die Inkongruenz zwischen Subjekt und Prädikat im Englischen und in den verwandten Sprachen. (Anglistische Forschungen 49.) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Stoffel, C. (1894). Studies in English Written and Spoken. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1970). A History of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1982). Aspects of the history of BE + ing construction. In Anderson, J. M. (ed.) Language Form and Linguistic Variation. Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 427–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suggett, H. (1945). The use of French in England in the later Middle Ages. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 28: 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundby, B. (1952). Some Middle English occupational terms. English Studies 33: 18–20.Google Scholar
Sundby, B. (1963). Studies in the Middle English Dialect Material of the Worcestershire Records. (Norwegian Studies in English 10.) Bergen & Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press; New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sundén, K. (1904). Contributions to the Study of Elliptical Words in Modern English. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Swieczkowski, W. (1962). Word Order Patterning in Middle English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tait, J. (1924). The feudal element. In Mawer, A. & Stenton, F. M. (eds.) Introduction to the Survey of English Place-names. (English Place-Name Society 1.1.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–32.Google Scholar
Tajima, M. (1975). The Gawain-poet's use of con as a periphrastic auxiliary. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 76: 429–38.Google Scholar
Tajima, M. (1985). The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan'un-do.Google Scholar
Tajima, M. (1888). Old and Middle English Language Studies: a Classified Bibliography 1923–1985. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tatlock, J. S. (1923). Lazamon's poetic style and its relations. In The Manly Anniversary Studies in Language and Literature. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 3–11.Google Scholar
Tavernier-Vereecken, C. (1968). Gentse Naamkunde van ca. 1100 tot 1252. Tongeren: Belgisch Interuniversitair Centrum voor Neerlandistiek.Google Scholar
Ten Brink, B. (1884). Chaucer's Sprache und Verskunst. Leipzig: Weigel. (English translation by Smith, M. Bentinck. 1901. The Language and Metre of Chaucer. London: Macmillan.)Google Scholar
Tengvik, G. (1938). Old English Bynames. (Nomina Germanica 4.) Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Terasawa, Y. (1974). Some notes on the Middle English ‘gan’ periphrasis. Poetica (Tokyo) 1: 89–105.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. M. (1987). A Yorkshire thegn and his descendants after the Conquest. Medieval Prosopography 8, 2: 1–22.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. M. (1980). The Archives of the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds. (Suffolk Record Society 21.) Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Thrupp, S. L. (1949). The Merchant Class of Medieval London 1300–1500. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Thuresson, B. (1950). Middle English Occupational Terms. (Lund Studies in English 19.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (1990). The origin and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatisation. North-Western European Language Evolution 16: 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, L. (1974). Pidgins and Creoles. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolkein, J. R. R. (1929). Ancrene Wisse and Hali Meiðhad. Essays and Studies 14: 104–26.Google Scholar
Toon, T. (1978). Lexical diffusion in Old English. In Farkas, D., Jacobsen, W. M. & Todrys, K. W. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 357–64.Google Scholar
Toon, T. (1983). The Politics of Early Old English Sound Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tout, T. F. (1922). France and England in the Middle Ages and Now. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1972). A History of English Syntax: a Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1982). From prepositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic–pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, U. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.) Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trier, J. (1931). Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Geschicbte eines sprachlichen Felde. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Trnka, B. (1930). On the Syntax of the English Verb from Caxton to Dryden. (Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 3.) Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974a). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974b). Sociolinguistics: an Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (ed.) (1978). Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (ed.) (1984). Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turville-Petre, T. (1977). The Alliterative Revival. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Tyrwhitt, T. (1798). Essay on the language and versification of Chaucer. The Canterbury Tales, I: Preface. London: Payne.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1957). The Principles of Semantics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1967). Semantics: an Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Upton, C., Sanderson, S. & Widdowson, J. D. A. (1987). Word Maps: a Dialect Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. (1945–9). Some remarks on writing and phonetic transcription. Acta Linguistica 5: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Draat, F. (1902–3). The loss of the prefix ze in the Modern English verb and some of its consequences. Englische Studien 31: 353–84; 32: 371–8.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Th. (1974). Topics, subjects and word order: from SXV to SVX via TVX. In Anderson, & Jones, , I, 339–76.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Th. (1984). Verb-second, verb late, and the brace construction: comments on some papers. In Fisiak, 627–36.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Th. (1963–73). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Voitl, H., Forster, K. & Insley, J. (eds.) (1976). The Study of the Personal Names of the British Isles. Erlangen: Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.Google Scholar
von Wartburg, W. (1969). Problems and Methods in Linguistics, rev. Ullmann, S., tr. Reid, J. M. H.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wainwright, F. T. (1945). Field–names of Amounderness hundred. Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire 97: 181–222.Google Scholar
Wainwright, F. T. (1962). Archaeology and Place–names and History: an Essay on Problems of Coordination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (1972a). English Dialects: an Introduction. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (ed.) (1972b). Patterns of Folk Speech in the British Isles. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. (1984). Rural dialects in England. In Trudgill, , 70–93.Google Scholar
Wakelin, M. F. & Barry, M. V. (1968). The voicing of initial fricative consonants in present-day dialectal English. Leeds Studies in English n.s. 2: 47–64.Google Scholar
Waldron, R. A. (1967). Sense and Sense Development. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Wales, K. (1985). Generic ‘your’ and Jacobean drama: the rise and fall of a pronominal usage. English Studies 66: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallner, B. (1969). A note on some Middle English medical terms. English Studies 50: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, K. (1988). Dialectology. In Newmeyer, , IV, 119–49.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. R. (1982). Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Warner, A. R. (1990). Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. In Adamson, et al., 537–58.Google Scholar
Warner, A. R. (forthcoming). English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Wasow, T. (1977). Transformations and the lexicons. In Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T. & Akmajian, A. (eds.) Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 327–60.Google Scholar
Watts, V. E. (1981–2). The place-names of Hindrelac. journal of the English Place-Name Society 15: 3–4.Google Scholar
Weerman, F. (1987). The change from OV to VO as a ‘possible change’. In Beukema, F. & Coopmans, P. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987. Dordrecht: Foris, 223–32.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York; The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundatiosns for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, & Malkiel, , 95–188.Google Scholar
Weisgerber, L. (1953). Von den Kräften der deutschen Sprache, ii: Vom Weltbild der deutschen Sprache. 2nd edn. Part I: Die inhaltbezogene Grammatik. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1984). English accents in England. In Trudgill, , 55–69.Google Scholar
West, F. (1973). Some notes on word order in Old and Middle English. Modern Philology 71: 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegand, N. (1982). From discourse to syntax: for in early English causal clauses. In Ahlqvist, , 385–93.Google Scholar
Willard, J. F. (1934). Parliamentary Taxes on Personal Property 1290–1334. (Monographs of the Medieval Academy of America 19.) Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Williams, E. R. (1944). The Conflict of Homonyms in English. (Yale Studies in English 100.) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. M. (1976). The Scandinavians in England. In Wilson, D. M. (ed.) The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England. London: Methuen, 393–403.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. M. (1943). English and French in England 1100–1300. History 28: 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withycombe, E. G. (1977). Oxford Dictionary of English Christian Names. 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wittig, S. (1978). Stylistic and Narrative Structures in the Middle English Romances. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1979). The conversational historical present alternation. Language 55: 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbine, G. E. (1943). The language of English law. Speculum 18: 395–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, S. K. (1940). Fifteenth Century Translation as an Influence on English Prose. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wrenn, C. L. (1943). The value of spelling as evidence. Transactions of the Philological Society14–39. (Rptd in Word and Symbol: Studies in English Language. London: Longman, 1967.)Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1905). The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford: Frowde.Google Scholar
Wright, J. & Wright, E. M. (1928). An Elementary Middle English Grammar. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wurff, W. (1987). Adjectives plus infinitive in Old English. In Beukema, F. & Coopmans, P. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987. Dordrecht: Foris, 233–42.Google Scholar
Wurff, W. (1990a). The ‘easy-to-please’ construction in Old and Middle English. In Adamson, et al. 519–36.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1913). The treatment of OE y in the dialects of the midland and south-eastern counties in ME. Englische Studien 47: 145–66.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1927). A Short History of English. 3rd edn. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1936). A History of Modern Colloquial English. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell; New York: Smith.Google Scholar
Zachrisson, R. E. (1909). A Contribution to the Study of Anglo-Norman Influence on English Place-names. (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift1 n.s. I.iv.3.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Zachrisson, R. E. (1924). The French Element. In Mawer, A. & Stenton, F. M. (eds.) Introduction to the Survey of English place-names. (English Place-Name Society I.I.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zandvoort, R. W. (1949). A note on inorganic for. English Studies 30: 265–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, J. (1908). The Accusative with Infinitive and some Kindred Constructions in English. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zettersten, A. (1965). Studies in the Dialect and Vocabulary of the Ancrene Riwle. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R. (1973). Structural change in the English auxiliary system: on the replacement of be by have. Folia Linguistica 6: 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Norman Blake, University of Sheffield
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Norman Blake, University of Sheffield
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Norman Blake, University of Sheffield
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.010
Available formats
×