Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T20:18:03.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Lean Production Around the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2021

Thomas Janoski
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Darina Lepadatu
Affiliation:
Kennesaw State University, Georgia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
Diverging Theories and New Industries around the World
, pp. 421 - 638
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrahamson, E. 1996. Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aglietta, M. 2000. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience (Vol. 28). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Allied Consultants Europe (ACE). 2008. Operational and Lean Management. Brussels: Allied Consultants Europe.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Thompson, P. 2005. Postbureaucracy? In: Ackroyd, S., Batt, R., Thompson, P. & Tolbert, P. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 485507.Google Scholar
Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C. & Zajac, E. J. 2010. Made to fit: how practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 6792.Google Scholar
Anttila, T., Oinas, T., & Mustosmäki, A. 2019. Towards formalisation: the organisation of work in the public and private sectors in Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica, 62(3), 315333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, E. 2010. Institutions, firms, and the quality of jobs in low-wage labor markets. In: Gautié, J. & Schmitt, J. (eds.), Low-Wage Work in a Wealthy World. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 185210.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. L., & Bailey, T. A. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E. & Batt, R. L. 1994. The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Arundel, A., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B. Å., & Valeyre, A. 2007. How Europe’s economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 11751210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. 1974. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Benders, J. & van Bijsterveld, M. 2000. Leaning on lean: the reception of a management fashion in Germany. New Technology, Work & Employment, 15(1), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benders, J., van Grinsven, M., & Ingvaldsen, J. 2019. The persistence of management ideas. In: Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., & Strang, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 271.Google Scholar
Benders, J. & Van Veen, K. 2001. What’s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organization, 8(1), 3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, T. 2013. Management: still a fashion industry. In: Sandberg, Å. (ed.), Nordic Lights. Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS förlag, pp. 91125.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. 1998. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Carew, A. 1987. Labour Under the Marshall Plan: The Politics of Productivity and the Marketing of Management Science. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, B., Danford, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H., Smith, A., & Taylor, P. 2011. ‘All they lack is a chain’: lean and the new performance management in the British civil service. New Technology, Work and Employment, 26(2), 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (3 volumes). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cherns, A. B. & Davis, L. E. 1975. Assessment of the state-of-art. In: Davis, L. E. & Cherns, A. B. (eds.), The Quality of Working Life. Volume One: Problems, Prospects and the State of Art. New York: The Free Press, pp. 1254.Google Scholar
Clark, T. 2004. The fashion of management fashion: a surge too far? Organization, 11(2), 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C., Schröder, M., & Voelzkow, H. 2009. Regional and sectoral varieties of capitalism. Economy and Society, 38(4), 654678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, E. & Molloy, E. 1977. Improving Productivity and the Quality of Work Life. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
D’Andreamatteo, A., Ianni, L., Rangone, A., Paolone, F., & Sargiacomo, M. 2019. Institutional pressures, isomorphic changes and key agents in the transfer of knowledge of lean in healthcare. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 164184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davoine, L., Erhel, C., & Guergoat‐Larivière, M. 2008. Monitoring quality in work: European Employment Strategy indicators and beyond. International Labour Review, 147(2–3), 163198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drotz, E. & Poksinska, B., 2014. Lean in healthcare from employees’ perspectives. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 28(2), 177195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgell, S. 2011. The Sociology of Work: Continuity and Change in Paid and Unpaid Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. & Grönlund, A. 2008. Protection of mutual interests? Employment protection and skill formation in different labour market regimes. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 14(3), 245264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, Y. & Giauque, D. 2005. Employment in the public and private sectors: toward a confusing hybridization process. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(4), 639657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurofound. 2013. Employment Polarisation and Job Quality in the Crisis. European Jobs Monitor 2013. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
Eurofound. 2014. Drivers of Recent Job Polarization and Upgrading in Europe. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1997. Partnership for a New Organisation of Work – Green Paper. Supplement 4/97 to the Bulletin of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Gallie, D. 2007. Production regimes, employment regimes and the quality of work. In: Gallie, D. (ed.), Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, D. 2011. Production Regimes, Employee Job Control and Skill Development, Research paper 31. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies (LLAKES).Google Scholar
Grimshaw, D. & Lehndorff, S. 2010. Anchors for job quality: sectoral systems of employment in the European context. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation 4(1), 2440.Google Scholar
Grint, K. 2005. The Sociology of Work. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Guillén, M. F. 1994. Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gustavsen, B. 2007. Work Organization and the Scandinavian Model. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 28(4), 650671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn-Rasmussen, P. & Klethagen, P. 2019. International management concepts meeting Nordic working life. In: Hvid, H. & Falkum, E. (eds.), Work and Wellbeing in the Nordic Countries. Critical Perspectives on the World’s Best Working Lives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 92–114.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 2013. NPM in Sweden: the risky balance between bureaucracy and politics. In: Sandberg, Å. (ed.), Nordic Lights. Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS förlag.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Soskice, D. 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall, P. & Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haveman, H. A. 1993. Organizational size and change: diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 2050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebdon, R. & Kirkpatrick, I. 2005. Changes in the organization of public services and their effect on employment relations. In: Ackroyd, S., Batt, R., Thompson, P., & Tolbert, P. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 530553.Google Scholar
Holden, R. J. 2011. Lean thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 57(3), 265278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, J. R. & Lorenz, E. 2015. Has “Discretionary Learning” declined during the Lisbon Agenda? A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of work organization in European nations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(6), 11791214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J. R., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B. Å., & Valeyre, A. 2010. Organizational learning and systems of labor market regulation in Europe. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 11411173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, D. 2013a. Job types and job quality in Europe. Human Relations, 66(4), 475502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, D. 2013b. An explanation of cross-national variation in call centre job quality using institutional theory. Work, Employment, & Society, 27(1), 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmemo, M. D.-Q., Rolfsen, M., & Ingvaldsen, J. A. 2018. Lean thinking: outside-in, bottom-up? The paradox of contemporary soft lean and consultant-driven lean implementation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(1–2), 148160, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1171705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. & Dixon, R. 2015. A Government That Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtala, H. & Laakso, A. 2006. Kirjallisuuskatsaus johtamisen rakenneanalyyttiseen paradigmaan [Literature review to structural analytical paradigm]. Hallinnon tutkimus [Finnish Journal of Governance Research], 25(4), 418.Google Scholar
Janoski, T. & Lepadatu, D. 2014. Dominant Divisions of Labor: Models of Production that Have Transformed the World of Work. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, J., Abrahamsson, L., & Johansson, S. 2013. If you can’t beat them, join them? The Swedish trade union movement and lean production. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(3), 445460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P., Wood, G., Brewster, C., & Brookes, M. 2009. The rise of post-bureaucracy: theorists’ fancy or organizational praxis? International Sociology, 24(1), 3761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasvio, A., Gonäs, L., & Skorstad, E. J. 2012. In search of the Nordic working life model: introduction to the thematic issue. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2(4), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirov, V. & Ramioul, M. 2014. Quality of work in the cleaning industry: a complex picture based on sectoral regulation and customer-driven conditions. In: Hauptmeier, M. & Vidal, M. (eds.), Comparative Political Economy of Work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 290311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, A. & Lundvall, B.-A. 2007. The Learning organisation and national systems of competence building and innovation. In: Lorenz, N. & Lundvall, B.-A. (eds), How Europe’s Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 110139.Google Scholar
Le Roux, B. & Rouanet, H. 2010. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillrank, P. 1995. The transfer of management innovations from Japan. Organization Studies, 16(6), 971989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, C. & Payne, J. 2013. Changing job roles in the Norwegian and UK fitness industry: in search of national institutional effects. Work, Employment & Society, 27(1), 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E., & Valeyre, A. 2005. Organisational innovation, human resource management and labour market structure: a comparison of the EU-15. Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), 434442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, D. Ø., Storsveen, M., Klethagen, P., & Stenheim, T. 2016. The diffusion and popularity of lean in Norway: an exploratory survey. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), doi: 10.1080/23311975.2016.1258132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, N., Mullen, K. J., Powell, D., von Wachter, T., & Wenger, J. B. 2017. The American Working Conditions Survey Data: Codebook and Data Description. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL269.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makó, C. 2005. Neo- instead of post-Fordism: the transformation of labour processes in Hungary. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(2), 277289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martel, J.-P. & Dupuis, G. 2006. Quality of work life: theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77(2), 333368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzocato, P., Savage, C., Brommels, M., Aronsson, H., & Thor, J. 2010. Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19(5), 376382.Google ScholarPubMed
Peña-Casas, R. 2013. Are There Significant Differences in Quality of Work and Employment Between ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Europe? OSE Research Paper No. 12. Brussels: European Social Observatory.Google Scholar
Piore, M. J. & Sabel, C. F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Volume 4). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Radnor, Z. & Osborne, P. 2013. Lean: a failed theory for public services? Public Management Review, 15(2), 265287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasche, A. & Seidl, D. 2019. Management ideas as standards. In: Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., & Strang, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 337353.Google Scholar
Reed, M. 2019. Public sector professionals and new public management. In: Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., & Strang, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 446457.Google Scholar
Rees, G. H. & Gauld, R. 2017. Can lean contribute to work intensification in healthcare? Journal of Health Organization and Management, 31(3), 369384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, T. D. & Frangi, L. 2019. Acted upon and acted through: unions, consent and contestation vis-a-vis high performance work systems in the automobile industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy [online] doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19828811.Google Scholar
Sederblad, P. (ed.). 2013. Lean i arbetslivet [Lean in work life]. Solna, Sweden: Liber.Google Scholar
Strang, D. & Macy, M. W. 2001. In search of excellence: fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 147182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturdy, A. 2004. The adoption of management ideas and practices: theoretical perspectives and possibilities. Management Learning, 35(2), 155179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeyre, A., Lorenz, E., Cartron, D., Csizmadia, P., Gollac, M., Illéssy, M., & Makó, C. 2009. Working Conditions in the European Union: Work Organisation. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Vanselow, A., Warhurst, C., Bernhardt, A. & Dresser, L. 2010. Working at the wage floor: hotel room attendants and labor market institutions in Europe and the United States. In: Gautié, J. & Schmitt, J. (eds.), Low-Wage Work in a Wealthy World. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 269318.Google Scholar
Wittrock, C. 2015. Reembedding lean: the Japanese cultural and religious context of a world changing management concept. International Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womack, J., Jones, D., & Roos, D. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. The Story of Lean Production. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

References

Bartezzaghi, Emilio. 1999. “The Evolution of Production Models: Is a New Paradigm Emerging?International Journal of Production & Operation Management. 19(2): 229250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Sung-Jae, Lee, Byoung-Hoon, Hong, Jang-Pyo, Lim, Sang-Hoon, and Kim, Yong-Hyun. 2004. Subcontracting Structure and Hierarchy of Employment Relations in the Auto Industry. Seoul: Korea Labor Institute, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Chung, Myeong-Kee. 1997. “Implementation of New Production System and Changes of Human Resource Management: A Case Study of Asan Plant of Hyundai Motor.Korean Labor Studies. 3(1): 81108, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Chung, Myeong-Kee. 2015. “Production System of Beijing Hyundai Motor in China: Catch up Strategy for a Latecomer.Korean Study of Economic Business. 33(2): 2351.Google Scholar
Gereffi, Gary, Humphrey, John, and Sturgeon, Timothy. 2005. “The Governance of Global Value Chains.Review of International Political Economy. 12(1): 78104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1965. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Soul. 2018. “Hyundai Motor’s Global Strategy from the Perspective of VoC and Industrial Organizations Theory.Human Society 21. 9(2): 983996, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey, Dicken, Peter, Hess, Martin, Coe, Neil, and Yeung, Henry Wai-Chung. 2002. “Global Production Networks and the Analysis of Economic Development.Review of International Political Economy. 9(3): 436464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Wallace and Spearman, Mark. 2004. “To Pull or Not to Pull: What is the Question?Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 6(2): 133148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyun, Young-Seok. 2013. Hyundai Speed Management. Seoul, Korea: Korea Lean Management Research Institute, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Hyundai Motor Group. 2019. “Global Network and Performance of Hyundai and Kia Motors.” www.hyundai.co.kr/About-Us/Group-Performance.hub [in Korean], last accessed April 15, 2019.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je. 1998. “Flexible Production System and Changes in Work Organization.Economy & Society. 38: 244264, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je. 2001. “A Comparative Study of Green-field Factory in Japan and Korea; Focused on the Relations between Production System and Human Resource Management.Korean Journal of Sociology. 35(2): 147177, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je. 2010. “The Hyundai Way: the Evolution of a Production Model.Global Asia. 5(2): 102107.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je. 2016. Unpaved Roads: The Agile Production System of Hyundai Motor Company. Seoul: Hanul, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je and Jeong, Jun-Ho. 2016. “Whether or Not the Overseas Transferability of Hyundai Production System? A Focus of the Supplier Relations of Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Czech (HMMC).Trends and Prospect. 96: 4880, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je and Lee, Byoung-Hoon. 2008. “The Evolution of Hyundai Motor Production System: Focusing on the Adaption of Japanese Production Model.Trends and Prospect. 73: 231264, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Jo, Hyung-Je and You, Jong-Sung. 2011. “Transferring Production Systems: An Institutionalist Account of Hyundai Motor Company in the United States.Journal of East Asian Studies. 11(1): 4173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Myung-whan. 1986. Wacky Koreans Who Made Pony. Seoul: Jungwoo Publisher, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Kim, Cheol-sik. 2010. “Changes in Modularization and Value Chains in the Korean Auto Industry.Korean Labor Studies. 16(1): 235273.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, Ananth. 2004. “Re-Examining the Performance of MRP and Kanban Material Control Strategies for Multi-Product Flexible Manufacturing Systems.”The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems. 16: 123150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansbury, Russell, Kwon, Seung-ho, and Suh, Chung-Sok. 2006. “Globalization and Employment Relations in the Korean Auto Industry: The Case of the Hyundai Motor Company in Korea, Canada and India.Asia Pacific Business Review. 12(2): 131147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon. 1997. “Workplace Transformation at Incrementalist Plants: A Cross-national Comparative Study of a US and a Korean Auto Plant.” PhD Thesis of the Industrial and Labor Relations School, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon. 2003. “Restructuring and Employment Relations in the Korean Auto Industry.Bulletin of Comparative Labor Relations. 45: 5994.Google Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon. 2011. “The Political Economics of Industrial Development in the Korean Automotive Sector.International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management. 11(2): 137150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon and Frenkel, Steve. 2004. “Divided Workers: Social Relations Between Contract and Regular Workers in a Korean Auto Company.Work, Employment and Society, 18(3): 507530.Google Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon and Jo, Hyung-Je. 2007. “The Mutation of the Toyota Production System: Adapting the TPS at Hyundai Motor Company.International Journal of Production Research. 45(16): 36653679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon and Kang, Hye-Young. 2012. “Hybridisation of Employment Relations in the Era of Globalisation? A Comparative Case Study of the Automotive and Banking Industries in South Korea.International Journal of Human Resource Management. 23(10): 20342050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon and Park, Young-bum. 2008. “Globalization and Employment Relations in the Korean Automotive Industry.Bulletin of Comparative Labor Relations. 64: 97116.Google Scholar
Lee, Byoung-Hoon and Yoo, Hyung-Geun. 2008. “A Study on the Wage Determination Mechanism in the Auto Industry.Korean Journal of Sociology. 43(2): 124 [in Korean].Google Scholar
Lee, Yoonkyung. 2011. Militants or Partisans: Labor Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael. 2000. “Lean Production and Sustainable Competitive Advantage.International Journal of Production & Operation Management. 20(8): 959978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, Jeffery, Fruin, Mark, and Adler, Paul. 1999. “Bringing Japanese Management Systems to the United States: Transplantation or Transformation?” pp. 338 in Liker, Jeffery, Fruin, Mark, and Adler, Paul (eds.) Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management System. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Tae-Joo. 2006. “Evaluation of Labor Relations at Hyundai Motor.” KLEI Working Report, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Shim, Jeong-Taek. 2015. Talking about Hyundai Motor Company. Seoul: RHK, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Song, Ho-Geun. 2017. Unpaved Roads: Korean Growth Dynamics and The Story of Hyundai Motors. Seoul: Nanam, [in Korean].Google Scholar
Taylor III, Alex. 2010. “Hyundai Smokes the Competition.” Fortune Magazine, 161, 6271.Google Scholar
Wright, Christopher, Suh, Chung-Sok, and Leggett, Christopher. 2009. “If At First You Don’t Succeed: Globalized Production and Organizational Learning at the Hyundai Motor Company.Asia Pacific Business Review. 15(2): 163180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliography

Bloom, Nick, Lemos, Renata, Sadun, Rafaella, Scur, Daniela, and van Reenen, John. 2019. World Management Survey. London: London School of Economics Research Laboratory: Centre for Economic Performance. https://worldmanagementsurvey.org/survey-data/download-data.Google Scholar
Gawande, Atul. 2013. “Slow Ideas.” The New Yorker, July 22.Google Scholar
Hammer, Michael and Champy, James. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Harbour and Associates, Inc., “Comparison and Analysis of Manufacturing Productivity in the North American and Japanese Auto Industry: Final Report”. November 24, 1980 [unpublished document, United States Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center].Google Scholar
Harbour, Ron, The Harbour Report, New York: Oliver Wyman Group, annually.Google Scholar
Hino, Satoshi. 2001. Inside the Mind of Toyota: Management Principles for Enduring Growth. Boca Raton, FL: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Holweg, Matthias and Pil, Frits. 2004. The Second Century: Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain Through Build-to-Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskela, Lauri. 1992. “Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction,” Technical Report #72, Center for Integrated Facilities Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Krafcik, John. 1988. “The Triumph of the Lean Production System. Sloan Management Review. 30(1): 4152.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Jim. 2017. The Work of Management. Cambridge, MA: The Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey. 2004. The Toyota Way: Fourteen Secrets from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Convis, Gary. 2012. The Toyota Way to Lean Leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Hoseus, Mike. 2008. Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Meier, David. 2006. The Toyota Way Fieldbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Meier, David. 2007. Toyota Talent: Developing Your People the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Ross, Karyn. 2016. The Toyota Way to Service Excellence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Monden, Yasuhiro. 1983. Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-in-Time. Norcross, GA: Engineering and Management Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, James and Liker, Jeffrey. 2005. The Toyota Product Development System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Morgan, James and Liker, Jeffrey, 2018. Designing the Future, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ohno, Taiichi. 1978. The Toyota Production System. Norwalk, CT: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Ries, Eric. 2011. The Lean Startup. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Rother, Mike and Shook, John. 1998. Learning to See. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Sargent, John F. Jr. 2018. “The Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program,” Congressional Research Service, August 10.Google Scholar
Schein, Edgar. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Schonberger, Richard. 1982. Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Shimokawa, Koichi and Fujimoto, Takahiro (eds.). 2012. The Birth of Lean: Conversations with the Founders of TPS. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Isao. 1985. NPS New Production System: JIT Crossing Industry Boundaries. Boca Raton, FL: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Shook, John. 2008. Managing to Learn. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Shook, John. 2010. “How to Change a Culture: Lessons from NUMMI.Sloan Management Review, 51(2): 6368.Google Scholar
Sugimori, Y. K. Kusunoki, F. Cho, and Uchikawa, S.. 1977. “Toyota Production System and Kanban System: Materialization of Just-in-Time System and Respect-for-Human System.International Journal of Production Research. 15(6): 553564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Jeff. 2015. Scrum. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Michikazu. 2019. “What I Learned from Taiichi Ohno: A Talk by Michikazu Tanaka,” pp. 2170 in Shimokawa, Koichi and Fujimoto, Takahiro (eds.) The Birth of Lean. Cambridge: MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2017. Management and Organizational Practices Survey, 2015. Management and Organizational Practices Survey 2015 Survey Release. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census. www.census.gov/data/tables/2015/econ/mops/2015-survey-release.html.Google Scholar
Womack, James P. 1982. “Public Policy for a Mature Industrial Sector: The Auto Case.” PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Womack, James P. 2013. Gemba Walks, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Womack, James P. and Jones, Daniel T.. 1996. Lean Thinking. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

References

Baker, Mark and Taylor, Ian. 2009. Making Hospitals Work. Lean Enterprise Academy: Goodrich, UK.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark, Taylor, Ian and Jones, Daniel T. 2010. The NHS Bermuda Triangle: And How to Escape It. LEA Discussion Paper. Lean Enterprise Academy: Goodrich, UK.Google Scholar
Balle, Michael, Beauvallet, Godefroy, Smalley, Art and Sobek, Durwood K. 2006. “The thinking production system.” Reflections: The SOL Journal, 7(2): 113.Google Scholar
Balle, Michael, Chaise, Jacques and Jones, Daniel T. 2013. “Learning to learn: knowledge as a system of questions.” Reflections: The SOL Journal, 14(1): 1018.Google Scholar
Balle, Michael, Chartier, Nicolas, Coignet, Pascale, Olivienca, Sandrine, Powell, Darren and Reke, Eivind. 2019. The Lean Sensei. Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Balle, Michael, Jones, Daniel, Chaize, Jacques and Fiume, Orest. 2017. The Lean Strategy. McGraw-Hill Education: New York.Google Scholar
Barlow, Susan, Parry, Stephen and Faulkner, Mike. 2005. Sense and Respond: The Journey to Customer Purpose. AIAA: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, Dave and Kiff, John. 2007. Creating Lean Dealers. Lean Enterprise Academy: Goodrich, UK.Google Scholar
Burgess, Nicola, Currie, Graeme, Crump, Bernard, Richmond, John and Johnson, Mark. 2019. “Improving together: collaboration needs to start with the regulators.” British Medical Journal, 367(l6392).Google ScholarPubMed
Burgess, Nicola, Radnor, Zoe J. and Furnival, Joy. 2015. “Delivery not departments: a case study of a whole organisation approach to lean implementation across an English hospital.” In Radnor, Zoe, Bateman, Nicola, Esain, Ann, Kumar, Maneesh, Williams, Sharon J. and Upton, David M. (eds.), Public Service Operations Management (pp. 32845). Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Byrne, Art. 2013. Lean Turnaround. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office. 2012. Civil Service Reform Plan. Cabinet Office: London.Google Scholar
Dennis, Pascal. 2009. Getting the Right Things Done. Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). 2012. Continuous Improvement Strategy for DEFRA. DEFRA: London.Google Scholar
Egan, Sir John. 1998. Rethinking Construction: Report of the Construction Task Force. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: London.Google Scholar
Erskine, Jonathan, Hunter, David J., Small, Adrian, Hicks, Chris, McGovern, Tom, Lugsden, Ed, Whitty, Paula, Steen, Nick and Eccles, Martin Paul. 2013. “Leadership and transformational change in healthcare organisations: a qualitative analysis of the North East Transformation System.” Health Services Management Research, 26(1): 2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, Barry and Mason, Robert. 2019. The Lean Supply Chain: Managing the Challenge at Tesco. Kogan Page: London.Google Scholar
Fillingham, David. 2007. “Can lean save lives?Leadership in Health Services, 20(4): 23141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food Chain Centre (FCC). 2007. Completion Report. Institute for Grocery Distribution: London.Google Scholar
Glenday, Ian. 2005. Breaking Through to Flow. Lean Enterprise Academy: Goodrich, UK.Google Scholar
Global Commerce Initiative (GCI). 2008. 2016 Future Supply Chain Report. Cap Gemini: London.Google Scholar
Hines, Peter, Lamming, Richard, Jones, Daniel, Cousins, Paul and Rich, Nick. 2000. Value Stream Management. Financial Times/Prentice Hall: London.Google Scholar
Home Office. 2013. Continuous Improvement Strategy. Home Office: London.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel T. 2007. “The invisible opportunity.” International Commerce Review: 7(1): 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel T. and Clarke, Philip. 2002. “Creating a customer driven supply chain.” ECR Journal, 2(1): 2837.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel T. and Mitchell, Alan. 2006. Lean Thinking for the NHS. The NHS Confederation: London.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel T. and Womack, James P. 2011. Seeing the Whole Value Stream. Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kiff, John, Chieux, Thomas and Simons, David. 1998. Parts Supply Systems in the Franchise After Market. ICDP: Solihull, UK.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Jim. 2017. The Work of Management: A Path to Sustainable Improvement. Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Leahy, Terry. 2012. Management in 10 Words. Random House Business Books: London.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey K. 2004. The Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Matsuo, Hirofumi and Ozawa, Susumu. 2007. “Innovating innovation: the Case of Seven-Eleven Japan.” ECR Journal, 7(2): 10514.Google Scholar
Matsuo, Hirofumi and Tanaka, Yasaki. 2002. “ECR: a ‘fresh’ look from Japan.” ECR Journal, 2(2): 1727.Google Scholar
Morgan, James M. and Liker, Jeffrey K. 2019. Designing the Future. McGraw-Hill Education: New York.Google Scholar
Murray, Mike and Langford, David. 2003. Construction Reports: 1944–1998. Blackwell Science: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Audit Office (NAO). 2001. Modernising Construction. National Audit Office: London.Google Scholar
National Audit Office (NAO). 2007. Transforming Logistics Support for Fast Jets. National Audit Office: London.Google Scholar
National Audit Office (NAO). 2011. Pacesetter: HMRC’s Programme to Improve Business Operations. National Audit Office: London.Google Scholar
National Audit Office (NAO). 2015. Managing Business Operations: What Government Needs to Get Right. National Audit Office: London.Google Scholar
Oliver, Nick, Jones, Daniel and Τhayer, Betty. 1993. The Lean Enterprise Benchmarking Report. Andersen Consulting: London.Google Scholar
Oliver, Nick, Jones, Daniel and Thayer, Betty. 1994. Worldwide Manufacturing Competitiveness Study: The Second Lean Enterprise Report. Andersen Consulting: London.Google Scholar
Øvretveit, John, Bate, Paul and Cleary, Paul. 2002. “Quality collaboratives: lessons from research.” Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11(4): 34551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robert, Glen, Sartre, Sylvie, Mason, Jill, Griffiths, Peter and Chable, Rosemary. 2019. “Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10 year impact of the Productive Ward: releasing time to care programme in English acute hospitals.BMJ Quality and Safety: 29(1): 3140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, Bertel. 2019. “Inside Toyota’s Takaoka #2 Line: the most flexible line in the world.” The Drive, 24 March.Google Scholar
Senge, Peter M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday: New York.Google Scholar
Shook, John. 2010. Managing to Learn. Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Smalley, Art. 2018. Four Types of Problems. Lean Enterprise Institute: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Stark, Cameron and Hookway, Gavin. 2019. Applying Lean in Health and Social Care Services. Productivity Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, David and Brunt, David. 2001. Manufacturing Operations and Supply Chain Management: The Lean Approach. Thomson Learning: London.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff, Henderson, John and Brown, Jonathan. 1998. European New Car Supply and Stocking Systems. ICDP: Solihull, UK.Google Scholar
WiredGOV. 2010. Spotlight Report on Lean in the Public Sector. WiredGOV: London.Google Scholar
Womack, James. P. and Jones, Daniel T. 2003 [1996]. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Womack, James P. and Jones, Daniel T. 2005a. Lean Solutions: How Companies and Customers Can Create Value and Wealth Together. Simon and Schuster: New York.Google Scholar
Womack, James P. and Jones, Daniel T. 2005b. “Lean consumption.” Harvard Business Review, 83(3): 5868.Google ScholarPubMed
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T. and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. Rawson Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar

References

Acatech. 2015. Smart Maintenance für Smart Factories. Munich/Berlin: Acatech.Google Scholar
Adler, Paul. 1995. “‘Democratic Taylorism’: The Toyota Production System at NUMMI.” pp. 207219 in: Babson, Steve (Ed.), Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Eileen and Batt, Rosemary. 1994. The New American Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Babson, Steve. 1993. “Lean or mean: the MIT model and lean production at Mazda”, Labor Studies Journal 18(1): 324.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, Lisanne. 1983. “Ironies of automation. Analysis, design and evaluation of man–machine systems”, Automatica 19(6): 775779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, James. 1993. “Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams.Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 408437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batt, Rosemary and Doellgast, Virginia. 2006. “Groups, Teams, and the Division of Labor: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Organization of Work”, pp. 138161 in Ackroyd, Stephen, Batt, Rosemary, Thompson, Paul and Tolbert, Paul (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benassi, Chiara and Dorigatti, Lisa. 2015. “Straight to the core – explaining union responses to the casualization of work: the IG Metall campaign for agency workers”. British Journal of Industrial Relations 53(3): 533555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bispinck, Reinhard. 2000. Tarifentgelt nach Leistung und Erfolg [Regulating Performance-based Pay in Collective Agreements]. Düsseldorf, Germany: WSI.Google Scholar
Buer, Sven-Vegard, Strandhagen, Jan Ola and Chan, Felix T. S.. 2018. “The link between Industrie 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda”. International Journal of Production Research 56(8): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butollo, Florian, Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2018. “From Lean Production to Industrie 4.0. More Autonomy for Employees?” WZB Discussion Paper SP II 2018–303, Berlin: WZB.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Susan and Bailey, Diane. 1997. “What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite”. Journal of Management 23(3): 230290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Thomas. 1978. “Self-regulating work groups: a socio-technical synthesis”. The Academy of Management Review 3(3): 625634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doellgast, Virginia and Greer, Ian. 2007. “Vertical disintegration and the disorganization of German industrial relations”. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1): 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohse, Knuth, Jürgens, Ulrich and Malsch, Thomas. 1985. “From ‘Fordism’ to ‘Toyotism’? The social organization of the labor process in the Japanese automobile industry”. Politics & Society 14(2): 115146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, Uwe, Palluck, Markus and Schmidt, Stefan. 2006. “Strukturelle Analyse Ganzheitlicher Produktionssysteme” [Structural analysis of holistic production systems]. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 101(3): 114118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, Uwe, Richter, Thomas and Krenkel, Philipp. 2017. “Interdependencies of Industrie 4.0 & lean production systems: a use cases analysis”. Procedia Manufacturing 11: 10611068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Carsten, Fleig, Jürgen, Harnischfeger, Monika and Klimmer, Matthias. 1995. Neue Produktionskonzepte in der deutschen Industrie [New Production Concepts in the German Manufacturing Sector]. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderle, Peter. 1994. “Das Opel-Produktionssystem im Werk Eisenach” [The Opel Production System in the Eisenach Plant], pp. 160166 in: Brokmann, Wilfried (Ed.), Lean Production II. Erfahrungen und Erfolge in der M+E-Industrie [Lean Production II. Experiences and Achievements in the Metal and Electrotechnical Industry]. Köln, Germany: Institut für angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft.Google Scholar
Evers, Maren, Krzywdzinski, Martin and Pfeiffer, Sabine. 2018. “Designing wearables for use in the workplace: the role of solution developers”, WZB Discussion Paper SP III 2018–301, Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Fricke, Werner. 2003. “Dreißig Jahre staatlich geförderte Arbeitsgestaltung – eine Bilanz” [Taking Stock of Thirty Years of State-supported Work Design], pp. 5166 in: Peters, Jürgen and Schmitthenner, Horst (Eds.),Gute Arbeit”: Menschengerechte Arbeitsgestaltung als gewerkschaftliche Zukunftsaufgabe [Good Work: Human-focused Work Design as a Future Task for Trade Unions]. Hamburg, Germany: VSA.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Takahiro. 1999. The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerst, Detlef. 2011. “Sind ganzheitliche Produktionssysteme und Gute Arbeit vereinbar?” [Can we combine holistic production systems and good work?] Arbeit 20(3): 246250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerst, Detlef, Hardwig, Thomas, Kuhlmann, Martin and Schumann, Michael. 1999. “Group Work in the German Automobile Industry: The Case of Mercedes-Benz”, pp. 366394 in: Durand, Jean-Pierre, Stewart, Paul and Carillo, Jorge (Eds.), Teamwork in the Automobile Industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, Ian and Hauptmeier, Marco. 2016. “Management whipsawing: the staging of labor competition under globalization”. ILR Review 69(1): 2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, Georg, Benisch, Michael, Dankl, Andreas and Isopp, Jutta. 2015. Roadmap der Instandhaltung 4.0. [Maintenance 4.0 roadmap]. Salzburg, Austria: Salzburg Research.Google Scholar
Haipeter, Thomas, Korflür, Inger and Schilling, Gabi. 2018. “Neue Koordinaten für eine proaktive Betriebsratspolitik. Erfahrungen aus dem Gewerkschaftsprojekt ‘Arbeit 2020 in NRW’” [ New directions for active works councils: Experiences from the trade union project “Work 2020 in Northrine-Westfalia”]. WSI-Mitteilungen 70(3): 219226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heßler, Martina. 2014. “Die Halle 54 bei Volkswagen und die Grenzen der Automatisierung. Überlegungen zum Mensch-Maschine-Verhältnis in der industriellen Produktion der 1980er Jahre”. [Plant 54 at Volkswagen and the limits of automation. Reflections on the human–machine relation in the industrial production in the 1980s]. Zeithistorische Forschungen 11(1): 5676.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut. 2018. “Arbeit 4.0: Pfadabhängigkeit statt Disruption”, Soziologisches Arbeitspapier 52/2018 [Work 4.0: Path dependency or disruption]. Dortmund, Germany: Technical University Dortmund.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut, Schultz-Wild, Rainer, Köhler, Christoph and von Behr, Marhild. 1990. Einstieg in die rechnerintegrierte Produktion: alternative Entwicklungspfade der Industriearbeit im Maschinenbau. [First Steps Towards Computer-integrated Production: Alternative Development Paths of Manufacturing Work in the Machine-building Industry]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
Holweg, Matthias. 2007. “The genealogy of lean production”. Journal of Operations Management 25(2): 420437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance. 1996. Autonomous Maintenance for Operators. Portland, OR: Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich. 1995. “Group work and the Reception of Uddevalla in German Car Industry”, pp. 199213 in: Sandberg, Ake (Ed.), Enriching Production. Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla Plant as an Alternative to Lean Production. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich. 1997a. “Rolling Back Cycle Times: The Renaissance of the Classic Assembly Line in Final Assembly”, pp. 255273 in: Shimokawa, Koichi, Jürgens, Ulrich and Fujimoto, Takahiro (Eds.), Transforming Automobile Assembly. Experience in Automation and Work Organization. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich. 1997b. “Germany: Implementing Lean Production”, pp. 109116 in: Kochan, Thomas, Lansbury, Russell and MacDuffie, John Paul (Eds.), After Lean Production. Evolving Employment Practices in the World Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich. 1998. “Implanting Change: The Role of ‘Indigenous Transplants’ in Transforming the German Productive Model”, pp. 319341 in: Boyer, Robert, Charron, Elsie, Jürgens, Ulrich and Tolliday, Steven (Eds.), Between Imitation and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2008. “Relocation and east–west competition: the case of the European automotive industry”. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 8(2): 145169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2009. “Changing East-West division of labour in the European automotive industry”. European Urban and Regional Studies 16(1): 2742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2013. “Breaking off from local bounds: human resource management practices of national players in the BRIC countries”. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 13(2): 114133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2015. “Competence development on the shop floor and industrial upgrading. Case studies of auto makers in China”. International Journal of Human Resource Management 26(9): 12041225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2016. New Worlds of Work. Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich, Krzywdzinski, Martin and Teipen, Christina. 2006. “Changing work and employment relations in German industries: breaking away from the German model?”, WZB Discussion Paper No. SP III 2006–302, Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich, Malsch, Thomas and Dohse, Knuth. 1993. Breaking from Taylorism. Changing Forms of Work in the Automobile Industry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Naschold, Frieder. 1992. “Arbeitsregulierung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Spannungsfeld zwischen nationalen Gestaltungsstrategien und internationaler Produktivitätskonkurrenz” [Labour regulation in Germany between national strategies and international productivity competition], pp. 361394 in: Grimmer, Klaus, Häusler, Jürgen, Kuhlmann, Stefan and Simonis, Georg (Eds.), Politische Techniksteuerung [Politics of Technology]. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich, Naumann, Katrin and Rupp, Joachim. 2000. “Shareholder value in an adverse environment: the German case”. Economy and Society 29(1): 5479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kädtler, Jürgen and Sperling, Hans Joachim. 2002. “After globalisation and financialisation: logics of bargaining in the German automotive industry”. Competition & Change 6(2): 149168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagermann, Henning. 2014. “Chancen von Industrie 4.0 nutzen” [Using the Chances of Industry 4.0], pp. 603614 in: Bauernhansl, Thomas, ten Hompel, Michael and Vogel-Heuser, Birgit (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik [Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing, Automation and Logistics]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Horst and Schumann, Michael. 1984. Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung. Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion. Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Krafcik, John. 1988. “Triumph of the lean production system”. Sloan Management Review 30(1): 4152.Google Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2011. “Exporting the German work model to Central and Eastern Europe”, pp. 99116 in: Contrepois, Silvie, Delteil, Violaine, Dieuaide, Patrick and Jefferys, Steve (Eds.), Globalizing Employment Relations, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2017. “Accounting for cross‐country differences in employee involvement practices: comparative case studies in Germany, Brazil and China”. British Journal of Industrial Relations 55(2): 321346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Martin and Jürgens, Ulrich. 2019. “Transfer deutscher und japanischer Ansätze der Facharbeiterausbildung an die BRIC-Standorte: Volkswagen und Toyota im Vergleich” [ Transfer of German and Japanese Approaches to Skilled Work to the BRIC Countries: Volkswagen and Toyota in Comparison], pp. 281319 in: Gessler, Michael, Fuchs, Martina and Pilz, Matthias (Eds.), Konzepte und Wirkungen des Transfers Dualer Berufsausbildung [Concepts and Outcomes of the Transfer of Dual Vocational Training]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, Martin. 2004. Modellwechsel? Die Entwicklung betrieblicher Arbeits- und Sozialstrukturen in der deutschen Automobilindustrie [Model Change? The Development of Workplace Social Structures in the German Automobile Industry]. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, Martin. 2006. “Good Practice einer integrierten Fabrikorganisation” [Good Practice of an Integrated Factory Organisation] pp. 90117 in: Schumann, Michael, Kuhlmann, Martin, Sanders, Frauke and Sperling, Hans Joachim (Eds.), VW Auto5000: ein neues Produktionskonzept. Die deutsche Antwort auf den Toyota-Weg? [VW Auto5000: A New Production Concept. The German Answer to the Toyota Way?]. Hamburg, Germany: VSA Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, Martin, Sperling, Hans Joachim and Balzert, Sonja. 2004. Konzepte innovativer Arbeitspolitik. Good-Practice-Beispiele aus dem Maschinenbau, der Automobil-, Elektro- und Chemischen Industrie. [Concepts of Innovative Work Policy. Good Practices from the Machine-building, Automobile, Electrotechnical and Chemical Industry]. Berlin: sigma.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, Martin, Splett, Barbara and Wiegrefe, Sascha. 2018. “Montagearbeit 4.0? Eine Fallstudie zu Arbeitswirkungen und Gestaltungsperspektiven digitaler Werkerführung” [Assembly work 4.0? A case study on work design and work outcomes of digital assistance systems]. WSI-Mitteilungen 70(3): 182188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacher, Michael and Springer, Roland. 2002. “Leistungspolitik und Co-Management in der Old Economy” [Performance politics and co-management in the “Old Economy”]. WSI-Mitteilungen 54(6): 353359.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey. 2004. The Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Meier, Klaus-Jürgen. 2017. “Lean QRM 4.0 –Das Beste aus Lean Production, QRM und Industrie 4.0 vereint in einem gemeinsamen Managementansatz” [Lean QRM 4.0 – The Best of Lean Production, QRM and Industry 4.0 in a Unified Management Approach], pp. 119135 in: Koether, Reinhard and Meier, Klaus-Jürgen (Eds.), Lean Production für die variantenreiche Einzelfertigung [Lean Production for High-Variant Single-Piece Production]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Mitlacher, Lars. 2007. “The role of temporary agency work in different industrial relations systems – a comparison between Germany and the USA”. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(3): 581606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muster, Manfred. 1988. “Zum Stand der Gruppenarbeit in der Automobilindustrie in der Bundesrepublik” [The State of Group Work in the German Automobile Industry], pp. 259281 in: Roth, Siegfried and Kohl, Heribert (Eds.), Perspektive Gruppenarbeit [Perspectives on Group Work]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Bund Verlag.Google Scholar
Orsburn, Jack, Moran, Linda, Musselwhite, Ed and Zenger, John. 1990. Self-Directed Work Teams: The New American Challenge. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rinehart, James, Huxley, Christopher and Robertson, David. 1997. Just Another Car Factory? Lean Production and its Discontents. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Siegfried. 1996. “Wiederentdeckung der eigenen Stärke? Lean-Production-Konzepte in der deutschen Autoindustrie” [Rediscovering Own Strengths? Lean Production Concepts in the German Automobile Industry], pp. 109139 in: Kißler, Leo (Ed.), Toyotismus in Europa: schlanke Produktion und Gruppenarbeit in der deutschen und französischen Automobilindustrie. [Toyotism in Europe: Lean Production and Group Work in the German and French Automobile Industry]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
Roth, Siegfried. 1997. “Germany: Labor’s Perspective on Lean Production”, pp. 117136 in: Kochan, Thomas, Lansbury, Russell and MacDuffie, John Paul (Eds.), After Lean Production. Evolving Employment Practices in the World Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Rüttimann, Bruno and Stöckli, Martin. 2016. “Lean and Industry 4.0 –twins, partners, or contenders? A due clarification regarding the supposed clash of two production systems”. Journal of Service Science and Management 9(6): 485500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Frauke. 2006. “Verknüpfung von Arbeit und Lernen” [Combining Work and Learning], pp. 7989 in: Schumann, Michael, Kuhlmann, Martin, Sanders, Frauke and Sperling, Hans Joachim (Eds.), VW Auto5000: ein neues Produktionskonzept. Die deutsche Antwort auf den Toyota-Weg? [VW Auto5000: A New Production Concept. The German Answer to the Toyota Way?]. Hamburg, Germany: VSA.Google Scholar
Schlick, Jochen, Stephan, Peter, Loskyll, Matthias and Lappe, Dennis. 2014. “Industrie 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung” [Industry 4.0 in Practice], pp. 5784 in: Bauernhansl, Thomas, ten Hompel, Michael and Vogel-Heuser, Birgit (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik. [Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing, Automation and Logistics]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, Michael. 1994. “Gruppenarbeit und neue Produktionskonzepte” [ Group Work and New Production Concepts], pp .186203 in: Binkelmann, Peter, Braczyk, Hans-Joachim and Seltz, Rüdiger (Eds.), Entwicklung der Gruppenarbeit in Deutschland. Stand und Perspektiven. [Development of Group Work in Germany. State and Perspectives]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
Schumann, Michael. 2003. “Frisst die Shareholder-Value-Ökonomie die Modernisierung der Arbeit?” [Does the Shareholder Value Approach Roll Back the Modernization of Work?], in: Schumann, Michael (Ed.), Metamorphosen von Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewusstsein. [Metamorphoses of Manufacturing Work and Workers’ Consciousness]. Hamburg, Germany: VSA.Google Scholar
Schumann, Michael, Baethge-Kinsky, Volker, Kuhlmann, Martin, Kurz, Constanze and Neumann, Uwe. 1994. Trendreport Rationalisierung. Automobilindustrie, Werkzeugmaschinenbau, Chemische Industrie. [Rationalisation Report. Automobile Industry, Machine-Tool Industry, Chemical Industry]. Berlin: sigma.Google Scholar
Schumann, Michael, Kuhlmann, Martin, Sanders, Frauke and Sperling, Hans Joachim (Eds.). 2006. VW Auto5000: ein neues Produktionskonzept. Die deutsche Antwort auf den Toyota-Weg? [VW Auto5000: A New Production Concept. The German Answer to the Toyota Way?]. Hamburg, Germany: VSA.Google Scholar
Seibold, Bettina, Schwarz-Kocher, Martin and Salm, Rainer. 2016. Ganzheitliche Produktionssysteme [Holistic Production Systems], HBS Study No. 340. Düsseldorf, Germany: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Seltz, Rüdiger. 1994. “Gruppenarbeit in der Produktion. Ein Beitrag zur Systematisierung von Entwicklungsstand und –perspektiven” [Group Work in Production. Developments and Perspectives], pp. 3373 in: Binkelmann, Peter, Braczyk, Hans-Joachim and Seltz, Rüdiger (Eds.), Entwicklung der Gruppenarbeit in Deutschland. Stand und Perspektiven. [Development of Group Work in Germany. State and Perspectives]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
Shimokawa, Koichi and Fujimoto, Takahiro. 2009. The Birth of Lean: Conversations with Taiichi Ohno, Eiji Toyoda, and Other Figures who Shaped Toyota Management. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Shirose, Kunio. 1996. TPM –Total Productive Maintenance: New Implementation Program in Fabrication and Assembly Industries. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Plant Management.Google Scholar
Smith, Chris and Meiskins, Peter. 1995. “System, society and dominance effects in cross-national organisational analysis”. Work, Employment and Society 9(2): 241267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorge, Arndt and Streeck, Wolfgang. 1988. “Industrial Relations and Technical Change: The Case for an Extended Perspective”, pp. 1944 in: Hyman, Richard and Streeck, Wolfgang (Eds.), New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorge, Arndt and Streeck, Wolfgang. 2018. “Diversified quality production revisited: its contribution to German socio-economic performance over time”. Socio-Economic Review 16(3): 587612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, Hans Joachim. 2006. “Flexibilisierte und beteiligungsorientierte Lohn-Leistungspolitik” [Flexible and Participatory Wage-Performance Policy], pp. 7278 in: Schumann, Michael, Kuhlmann, Martin, Sanders, Frauke and Sperling, Hans Joachim (Eds.), VW Auto5000: ein neues Produktionskonzept. Die deutsche Antwort auf den Toyota-Weg? [VW Auto5000: A New Production Concept. The German Answer to the Toyota Way?]. Hamburg, Germany: VSA Verlag.Google Scholar
Springer, Roland. 1996. “Neue Formen der Arbeitsorganisation – Ursachen, Ziele und aktueller Stand in der Mercedes-Benz AG” [New Forms of Work Organization – Origins, Goals and Current State at the Mercedes Benz AG], pp. 6180 in: Kißler, Leo (Ed.), Toyotismus in Europa: schlanke Produktion und Gruppenarbeit in der deutschen und französischen Automobilindustrie. [Toyotism in Europe: Lean Production and Group Work in the German and French Automobile Industry]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
Springer, Roland. 1997. “Rationalization also Involves Workers – Teamwork in the Mercedes-Benz Lean Concept”, pp. 274288 in: Shimokawa, Koichi, Jürgens, Ulrich and Fujimoto, Takahiro (Eds.), Transforming Automobile Assembly. Experience in Automation and Work Organization. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, Roland. 1999. Rückkehr zum Taylorismus? Arbeitspolitik in der Automobilindustrie am Scheideweg [Comeback of Taylorism? Work Policies in the Automobile Industry at the Crossroads]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 1996. “Lean Production in the German Automobile Industry: A Test Case for Convergence Theory”, pp. 138170 in: Berger, Susan and Dore, Ronald (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Lowell. 1991. Democracy at Work. Changing World Markets and the Future of Labor Unions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Lowell and Auer, Peter. 1994. “A diversity of new work organization. Human-centered, lean, and in-between”. Industrielle Beziehungen 1(1): 3961.Google Scholar
Weltz, Friedrich. 1997. “Anspruch und Wirklichkeit von arbeitspolitischen Ansätzen: das Beispiel Gruppenarbeit” [Claims and Reality of Work Design: The Case of Group Work]. Arbeit 6(4): 379391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyer, Johannes. 1997. “Die Risiken der Automationsarbeit” [The Risks of Work in Automated Environments]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 26(4): 239257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyer, Johannes. 2007. “Autonomie und Kontrolle. Arbeit in hybriden Systemen am Beispiel der Luftfahrt” [Autonomy and Control. Work in Hybrid Systems in the Aviation Industry]. Technikfolgenabschätzung − Theorie und Praxis 16(2): 3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wireman, Terry. 1991. Total Productive Maintenance: An American Approach. New York: Industrial Press.Google Scholar
Womack, James, Jones, Daniel and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson.Google Scholar

References

Algoé Consultants. 2008. Etude Management Opérationnel et Lean. [Operational Management and Lean Study]. Ecully, France: Algoé Consultants.Google Scholar
Alves, Anabela C., Dinis-Carvalho, José, and Sousa, Rui M.. 2012. “Lean Production as Promoter of Thinkers to Achieve Companies’ Agility.Learning Organization 19(3): 219237. doi.org/10.1108/09696471211219930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baglin, Gérard and Capraro, Mario. 1999. L’entreprise Lean: production [Lean Production Company]. Lyon, France: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Ballé, Freddy. 2016. “1976–2016: quarante années de recherche de la voie Lean” [Forty years of research on the Lean pathway]. Conference presentation at the 25ième séance du Séminaire Lean en France, Télécom Paris, June 24. www.lean.enst.fr/wiki/pub/Lean/LesPresentations/F_Ball_-_La_Voie_du_Lean.pdf.Google Scholar
Ballé, Michael, Beauvallet, Godefroy, Smalley, Art, and Sobek, Durward K.. 2006. “The Thinking Production System.Reflections 7(2): 112.Google Scholar
Ballé, Michael, Chartier, Nicolas, Coignet, Pascale, Olivencia, Sandrine, Powell, Daryl, and Reke, Eivind. 2019. The Lean Sensei. Boston, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Ballé, Michael, Jones, Daniel, Chaize, Jacques, and Fiume, Orest. 2017. The Lean Strategy: Using Lean to Create Competitive Advantage, Unleash Innovation, and Deliver Sustainable Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Beauvallet, Godefroy and Houy, Thomas. 2010a. “Research on HRM and Lean Management: A Literature Survey.International Journal of Human Resources Development & Management 10(1): 1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvallet, Godefroy and Houy, Thomas 2010b. “L’adoption des pratiques de gestion lean” [The adoption of lean management practices]. Revue française de gestion, no. 197 (January): 83106.Google Scholar
Belekoukias, Ioannis, Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, and Kumar, Vikas. 2014. “The Impact of Lean Methods and Tools on the Operational Performance of Manufacturing Organisations.International Journal of Production Research 52(18): 53465366. doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.903348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Thierry and Stimec, Arnaud. 2011. “Santé au travail” [Occupational health]. Revue francaise de gestion 214(5): 127144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolotti, Thomas, Boscari, Stefania, and Danese, Pamela. 2015. “Successful Lean Implementation: Organizational Culture and Soft Lean Practices.International Journal of Production Economics 160 (February): 182201. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounine, Jean and Suzaki, Kiyoshi. 1986. Produire Juste à Temps – Les Sources de La Productivité Industrielle Japonaise – Préface de François Dalle, 2nd ed. [Just-in-Time Production – The Sources of Japanese Industrial Productivity – An Introduction by François Dalle]. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Freyssenet, Michel. 2000. Les Modèles productifs. [The Productive Models]. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Freyssenet, Michel. 2001. “The World That Changed the Machine: Synthesis of GERPISA Research Programs 1993–1999.Actes Du GERPISA 31: 771.Google Scholar
Bozdogan, Kirk, Milauskas, Ronald, Mize, Joe, Nightingale, Deborah, Taneja, Abhinav, and Tonaszuck, David. 2000. Transitioning to a Lean Enterprise: A Guide for Leaders, Volume III, Roadmap Explorations. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/81894.Google Scholar
Byrne, Art. 2012. The Lean Turnaround: How Business Leaders Use Lean Principles to Create Value and Transform Their Company. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Chabiron, Catherine. 2018. “An Interview with Lean Thinking Pioneer Freddy Ballé.” Planet Lean [blog], May 21. https://planet-lean.com/freddy-balle-lean-management-toyota.Google Scholar
Chemla-Lafay, Annie. 2011. “La Lean Administration: Un Choix Managérial Dangereux” [Lean Administration: A Dangerous Managerial Choice]. Cadres-CFDT 445–446 (September): 4351.Google Scholar
Coriat, Benjamin. 1991. Penser à l’envers: Travail et organisation dans l’entreprise japonaise, nouv. éd. [Thinking Backwards: Work and Organization in the Japanese Company]. Paris: Christian Bourgois Editeur.Google Scholar
Crabill, John, Harmon, Ed, Meadows, Don, Milauskas, Ron, Miller, Craig, Nightingale, Deborah, Schwartz, Brian, Shields, Tom, and Torrani, Bob. 2000. Production Operations Level Transition to Lean Roadmap: Production Operations Transition-To-Lean Team. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Dorigatti, Lisa and Rinaldini, Matteo. 2019. “World Class Involvement: Workers’ Participation in a 4.0 Lean Production System.” Presented at the 27th International Colloquium of GERPISA, Paris, June 12–14.Google Scholar
Dorison, Alain. 2009. Rapport Sur l’enseignement de l’excellence Opérationnelle Dans Les Grandes Écoles d’ingénieurs et de Management [Report on Operational Excellence Teaching in Engineering and Business Schools]. Paris: Ministère de l’économie de l’industrie et de l’emploi, Juin. https://archives.entreprises.gouv.fr/2012/www.industrie.gouv.fr/portail/pratique/qualite/rapport-dorison.pdf.Google Scholar
Frerejean, Alain. 2006. Les Peugeot: Deux siècles d’aventure. [The Peugeots : Two Centuries of Adventure]. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Gaudichau, Olivier, Matsumoto, Eduardo Hiroshi, and Magnani, Florian. 2019. 540° to Lean: When Common Sense Doesn’t Work, Turn 180° and Explore in 360°. Paris: AFNIL.Google Scholar
Getz, Isaac and Carney, Brian. 2016. Liberté & cie: Quand la liberté des salariés fait le succès des entreprises. [Freedom, Inc.: How Corporate Liberation Unleashes Employee Potential and Business Performance]. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Goutard, Noël. 1994. “Réussir Par La Fermeté” [Succeed Through Firmness]. Séminaire Vie des affaires. Paris: L’école de Paris du management. www.ecole.org/fr/seance/8-reussir-par-la-fermete.Google Scholar
Haour, Georges. 2004. “The CEO as Innovation Champion,” in: Resolving the Innovation Paradox: Enhancing Growth in Technology Companies, edited by Haour, Georges, pp. 1529. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi.org/10.1057/9780230510555_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermel, Philippe. 1997. “The New Faces of Total Quality in Europe and the US.Total Quality Management 8(4): 131143. doi.org/10.1080/0954412979578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermel, Philippe, Edgeman, Rick, and Dahlgaard, Jens. 1999. “History and Specifics of the Quality Movement in France.Quality Engineering 11(4) (June): 619624. doi.org/10.1080/08982119908919282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, Peter, Rich, Nick, Bicheno, John, Brunt, David, Taylor, David, Butterworth, Chris, and Sullivan, James. 1998. “Value Stream Management.The International Journal of Logistics Management 9(1): 2542. doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Annie-Pierre. 2004. “Implementation of Lean Processes at a High-Mix Low-Volume Aerospace Manufacturing Facility in France.” Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34795.Google Scholar
Ikeda, Masayoshi and Nakagawa, Yoichiro. 2002. “Globalization of the Japanese Automobile Industry and Reorganization of Keiretsu-Suppliers.Actes Du GERPISA 33: 2940.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. 2018. “The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certifications.” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. www.iso.org/the-iso-survey.html.Google Scholar
Jacot, Jacques-Henri. 1998. Du fordisme au toyotisme? / les voies de la modernisation du systeme automobile en France et au Japon [From Fordism to Toyotism? The Paths of Modernization of the Automotive System in France and Japan]. Collection Etudes et Recherches n°78. Paris: La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel T., Hines, Peter, and Rich, Nick. 1997. “Lean Logistics.International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 27(3/4): 153173. doi.org/10.1108/09600039710170557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Martin, Butollo, Florian, and Jürgens, Ulrich. 2018. “The Role of Labor in Lean Production and Industrie 4.0: Continuities and Differences.” Presented at the 26th International Colloquium of GERPISA, Paris, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey. 2008. Le modèle Toyota. [The Toyota Way]. Paris: Pearson.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey, Meier, David, Ballé, Michael, and Sperry, Monique (translator). 2008. Talent Toyota: Les hommes au coeur de la réussite. [Toyota Talent : Developing Your People the Toyota Way]. Paris: Pearson.Google Scholar
Lorino, Philippe. 2014. “La fuite managériale devant la complexité: l’exemple historique du ‘lean management’” [Managerial evasion in the face of complexity: the historical example of ‘lean management’]. ESSEC Working paper 1410. https://hal-essec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01023701/document.Google Scholar
Loubet, Jean-Louis. 1990. Automobiles Peugeot: une réussite industrielle, 1945–1974. [Peugeot Automotive: An Industrial Success]. Paris: Économica. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k33282765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loubet, Jean-Louis 1998. “Citroën et l’innovation (1915–1996)” [Citroënand innovation]. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 57(1): 4556. doi.org/10.3406/xxs.1998.3709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnani, Florian. 2016. “Historical Evolution of a Lean System: Case Study of the PSA Group.Logistique & Management 24(3–4): 199206. doi.org/10.1080/12507970.2016.1269620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnani, Florian, Carbone, Valentina, and Moatti, Valérie. 2019. “The Human Dimension of Lean: A Literature Review.Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 20(2): 132144. doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1570653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marodin, Giuliano Almeida and Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu. 2013. “Implementing Lean Production Systems: Research Areas and Opportunities for Future Studies.International Journal of Production Research 51(22): 66636680. doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.826831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute. 2002. Dynamiser La Productivité En France et En Allemagne. [Boosting Productivity In France and Germany]. New York: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute 2006. Donner Un Nouvel Élan à l’industrie En France [Giving a New Impetus to the Industry in France]. New York: McKinsey & Company, revised in 2008.Google Scholar
Mostafa, Sherif, Dumrak, Jantanee, and Soltan, Hassan. 2013. “A Framework for Lean Manufacturing Implementation.Production & Manufacturing Research 1(1): 4464. doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2013.862159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neirotti, Paolo. 2018. “Work Intensification and Employee Involvement in Lean Production: New Light on a Classic Dilemma.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 31(15): 19581983. doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netland, Torbjørn H. 2012. “Managing Strategic Improvement Programs: The XPS Program Management Framework.Journal of Project, Program & Portfolio Management 3(1): 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netland, Torbjørn H. and Ferdows, Kasra. 2014. “What to Expect From a Corporate Lean Program.MIT Sloan Management Review 55(4): 8389.Google Scholar
Netland, Torbjørn H. and Powell, Daryl J.. 2016. The Routledge Companion to Lean Management, 1st ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohno, Taiichi. 1989. L’esprit Toyota. [Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-scale Production]. Paris, France: Masson.Google Scholar
Pardi, Tommaso. 2013. “Crise et Rejet de La Greffe Toyota à Valenciennes?” [Crisis and Rejection of the Toyota graft in Valenciennes]. Le Journal de l’école de Paris Du Management 1(99): 2936.Google Scholar
Pellerin, François and Cahier, Marie-Laure. 2019. Organisation et Compétences Dans l’usine Du Futur: Vers Un Design Du Travail? [Organization and Competencies in the Factory of the Future: Towards a Work Design?]. Paris: Presses des Mines, p. 132.Google Scholar
Pettersen, Jostein. 2009. “Defining Lean Production: Some Conceptual and Practical Issues.TQM Journal 21(2): 127142. doi.org/10.1108/17542730910938137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, Eric. 2012. Lean Start-Up. Paris: Pearson.Google Scholar
Rosin, Frédéric, Forget, Pascal, Lamouri, Samir, and Pellerin, Robert. 2019. “Impacts of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Lean Principles.International Journal of Production Research 58(6): 16441661. doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1672902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Adam, Subramanian, Karthik R. K., Redlich, Tobias, and Wulfsberg, Jens P.. 2017. “Industry 4.0 and Lean Management – Synergy or Contradiction?” in: Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing, edited by Lödding, Hermann, Riedel, Ralph, Thoben, Klaus-Dieter, von Cieminski, Gregor, and Kiritsis, Dimitris, pp. 341349. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. New York: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Rachna and Ward, Peter T.. 2007. “Defining and Developing Measures of Lean Production.Journal of Operations Management 25(4): 785805. doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, Koichi. 1999. Le Toyotisme [Toyotism]. La Découverte. Paris: Cairn.info. www.cairn.info/le-toyotisme–9782707129215.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, Khim L. and Rogers, John W.. 2009. “Implementing Lean Production Systems: Barriers to Change.Management Research News 32(1): 3749. doi.org/10.1108/01409170910922014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulié, Olivier. 2007. “Que Sais-Je? Sur Le Développement et La Conception Chez Toyota” [What Do I Know? About Development and Design at Toyota]. Internal document from Groupe PSA.Google Scholar
The Boston Consulting Group. 2018. “The Most Innovative Companies 2018: Innovators Go All In on Digital.” Paris: The Boston Consulting Group. www.bcg.com/fr-fr/publications/collections/most-innovative-companies-2018.aspx.Google Scholar
Tortorella, Guilherme Luz, Marodin, Giuliano, Fettermann, Diego, and Fogliatto, Flavio. 2015. “Relationships between Lean Product Development Enablers and Problems.International Journal of Production Research 54(10)(November): 28372855. doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1106020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukada, Osamu and Ibusuki, Ugo. 2018. “Can the Toyota Production System Be Implemented Abroad? A Case Study of the Brazilian Automobile Industry.” Presented at the 26th International Colloquium of GERPISA, Paris, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Ughetto, Pascal. 2009. “Une Réorganisation Au Concret: L’implantation Du Lean Manufacturing Comme Travail Managérial” [A Concrete Reorganization: Implementing Lean Manufacturing as Managerial Work]. Actes des XIIèmes journées internationales de sociologie du travail, halshs–00376835. Nancy, France. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00376835.Google Scholar
Ughetto, Pascal 2015. “Le lean représente-t-il le travail du futur?” [Does Lean represent the work of the future?] Colloque Quel travail dans l’usine du futur? GERPISA et ENS Cachan, Cachan, France, March. https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal–01247255.Google Scholar
Womack, James and Jones, Daniel. 2009. Système Lean: Penser l’entreprise au plus juste [Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation]. Paris: Pearson.Google Scholar
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production, reprint ed. 2000. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

References

Andors, Stephen. 1977. China’s Industrial Revolution: Politics, Planning, and Management, 1949 to the Present. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Babson, Steve. 1995. “Lean Production and Labor: Empowerment and Exploitation,” pp. 137 in Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry, edited by Babson, S.. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Berggren, Christian. 1993. “Lean production – the end of history?Work, Employment and Society 7(2): 165188.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett and O’Rourke., Dara 2007. “Lean manufacturing comes to China: a case study of its impact on workplace health and safety.International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 13(3): 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Chris and Hui, Elaine. 2014. “The development of collective bargaining in China: from ‘collective bargaining by riot’ to ‘party state-led wage bargaining’.The China Quarterly 217: 221242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Feng. 2009. “Union power in China: source, operation, and constraints.Modern China 35(6): 662689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Lixia and Meng, Bo. 2010. “Why most Chinese enterprises fail in deploying lean production.Asian Social Science 6(3): 5257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China Association of Automobile Manufactures (CAAM). 2017. “Economic performance of the automobile industry in 2016.” January 12. www.caam.org.cn/chn/1/cate_16/con_5203997.html.Google Scholar
China Automotive Technology Research Center (CATRC). 1995–2017. China Automotive Industry Yearbook. Tianjin, China: China Automotive Industry Yearbook Press.Google Scholar
China Labour Bulletin. 2017. “One year on, the struggle continues for Volkswagen workers in Changchun.” November 8. www.clb.org.hk/content/one-year-struggle-continues-volkswagen-workers-changchun.Google Scholar
Cui, Zhiyuan. 1996. “An’gang Constitution and post-Fordism. [“Angang Xianfa yu Hou Fute Zhuyi].Du Shu No. 3: 1121.Google Scholar
Gordon, Andrew. 1996. “Conditions for the Disappearance of the Japanese Working-Class Movement,” pp. 1152 in Putting Class in Its Place: Worker Identities in East Asia, edited by Perry, E. J.. Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Laurie. 1995. On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese Model and the American Worker. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Bennett. 1997[1994]. Lean and Mean: Why Large Corporations Will Continue to Dominate the Global Economy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Harwit, Eric. 1995. China’s Automobile Industry. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hiraoka, L. S. 2001. “Foreign development of the China’s motor vehicle industry.International Journal of Technology Management 21(5/6): 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, Adriana Rossiter, Hofer, Christian, Eroglu, Cuneyt, Waller, Matthew A.. 2011. “An institutional theoretic perspective on forces driving adoption of lean production globally: China vis-à-vis the USA.The International Journal of Logistics Management 22(2): 148178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Charles. 1974. The Chinese Worker. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Richard. 1987. “Strategy or structure? Capital, labour and control.Work, Employment and Society 1(1): 2555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, Thomas and Lepadatu, Darina. 2014. Dominant Divisions of Labor: Models of Production That Have Transformed the World of Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2016. New Worlds of Work: Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochan, Thomas A., Lansbury, Russell D., and MacDuffie, John Paul, eds. 1997. After Lean Production: Evolving Employment Practices in the World Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ching Kwan. 2007. Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Nelson. 1989. “‘The Man in the Middle’: A Social History of Automobile Industry Foreman,” pp. 153–89 in On the Line: Essays in the History of Auto Work, edited by Lichtenstein, N. and Meyer, S.. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth. 2004[1995]. Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Mehri, Darius. 2005. Notes From Toyota Land: An American Engineer in Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehri, Darius. 2006. “The darker side of lean: an insider’s perspective on the realities of the Toyota Production System.” Academy of Management Perspectives 20(2): 2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Mike and Slaughter, Jane. 1995. “Unions and Management by Stress,” pp. 4153 in Lean Work, Employment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry, edited by Babson, S.. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Price, John. 1995. “Lean Production at Suzuki and Toyota: A Historical Perspective,” pp. 81107 in Lean Work, Employment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry, edited by Babson, S.. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Rinehart, James, Huxley, Chris, and Robertson, David. 1995. “Team Concept at CAMI,” pp. 220234 in Lean Work, Employment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry, edited by Babson, S.. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Ronald A. 1996. “Industrial Relations in the Korean Auto Industry: The Implications of Industrial Sector Requirements and Societal Effects for International Competitiveness,” pp. 87135 in Social Reconstructions of the World Automobile Industry, edited by Deyo., F. C. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Rachna and Ward, Peter. 2007. “Defining and developing measures of lean production.” Journal of Operations Management 25(4): 785805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Beverly. 2003. Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taj, Shahram. 2008. “Lean manufacturing performance in China: assessment of 65 manufacturing plants.Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 19(2): 217234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treece, James. 1997. “China takes hard road to a market economy.” Automotive News. July 14, p. 1.Google Scholar
Turner, Lowell and Auer, Peter. 1996. “A Diversity of New Work Organization: Human-centered, Lean and In-Between,” pp. 233–57 in Social Reconstructions of the World Automobile Industry, edited by Deyo, F. C.. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Walder, Andrew. 1986. Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Malcolm. 1995. “Human Resources in the People’s Republic of China: The ‘Three Systems’ Reforms.” Human Resource Management Journal 6(2): 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Malcolm. 2000. Changing Workplace Relations in the Chinese Economy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womack, James, Jones, Daniel, and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson and Associates.Google Scholar
Yu, Jianrong. 2010. Kangzhengxing Zhengzhi: Zhongguo Zhengzhi Shehuixue Jiben Wenti [Contentious Politics: Fundamental Issues in Chinese Political Sociology]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Zhang, Lu. 2011. “The Paradox of Labor Force Dualism and State-Labor-Capital Relations in the Chinese Automobile Industry,” pp. 107137 in From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China, edited by Kuruvilla, S., Lee, C. K., and Gallagher, M.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Lu. 2015a. “Lean production ‘with Chinese characteristics’: a case study of China’s automobile industry.” International Journal of Sociology 45(2): 152170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Lu. 2015b. Inside China’s Automobile Factories: The Politics of Labor and Worker Resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xiaodan. 2005. “Bargaining without union: paternalist labor relations in China’s reform era.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar

References

Abo, T. 1994. Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P.. 2015. “Culture and institutions.” Journal of Economic Literature, 53(4): 898944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babson, S. 1995. “Restructuring the workplace: post-Fordism or return of the foreman?” pp. 227256 in Asher, R. and Edsforth, R. (Eds.), Autowork. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bamber, J. G., Stanton, P., Bartram, T., and Ballardie, R.. 2014. “Human resource management, lean processes and outcomes for employees: towards a research agenda.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25: 28812891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhadury, B. 1991. “Work culture: an exposition in the Indian context.” Vikalpa, 16(4): 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, M. 2006. Is Toyota’s 15 per cent market share by 2015 achievable?” www.domain-b.com/companies_t/toyota_kirloskar/20060825_market_share.html (last accessed February 12, 2009).Google Scholar
Bowden, B. 2011. “The rise and decline of Australian unionism: a history of industrial labour from the 1820s to 2010.” Labour History, No. 100, May: 5182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnes, B. 2000. Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
Business Line. 2008. “Toyota Kirloskar to build second plant near Bangalore, 2008.” https://global.toyota/en/detail/297837 (last accessed on October 10, 2010).Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. 1993. Families of Nations: Pattern of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chalmers, N. 2006. Industrial Relations in Japan: The Peripheral Workforce. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combe, C. 2014. Introduction to Management. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, R. and Sewell, G.. 2000. “Lean down under: reflections on the implementation of an epoch-making model in Australia.” International Workshop, University of Calabria, Rende (Italy).Google Scholar
Couyoumdjian, J. P. 2012. “Are institutional transplants viable? An examination in light of the proposals by Jeremy Bentham.” Journal of Institutional Economics, 8(4): 489509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullinane, N. and Dundon, T.. 2012. “Unitarism and employer resistance to trade unionism.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18): 25732590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P. 1999. The Long Run Toyota: The First 40 Years in Australia. South Hurstville, NSW, Australia: Forte NSW Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
DeBroux, P. 2014. “Human resource management in Japan,” Chapter 4 in Varma, A. and Budhwar, P. S. (Eds.), Managing Human Resources in Asia Pacific, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Jong, M., Lalenis, K., and Mamadouh, V.. 2002. The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elger, T. and Smith, C.. 1994. Global Japanization: The Transnational Transformation of the Labour Process. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emiliani, W. 2011. “Lean management failure at HRMC.” Management Services, 55: 1315.Google Scholar
Florida, R. and Kenney, M. 1991. “Transplanted organizations: the transfer of Japanese industrial organizations to the US.” American Sociological Review, 56(3): 381398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, A. 2014. “Canada and Australia: a tale of two car industries.” The Conversation, June 9.Google Scholar
Fox, A. 1966. “Industrial sociology and industrial relations.” Research Paper 3, Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employer Association. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Geare, A., Edgar, F., and McAndrew, I.. 2006. “Employment relationships: ideology and HRM Practice.” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7): 11901208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. E. 2004. “A rhetorical theory of diffusion.” Academy of Management Review, 29(4): 653669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., and Hinings, C. R.. 2002. “Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields.” Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 5880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S. 2008. “Indian and Japanese HRM Practices: Similarities and Differences with Analysis of Automobile Sector in India.” www.aima-ind.org/ejournal/articlesPDF/Shruti_Gupta_ 692320081433269.pdf (last accessed June 3, 2009).Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 2006. “What are institutions?Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, A., Hofer, R., Eroglu, C., and Waller, M. A.. 2011. “An institutional theoretic perspective on forces driving adoption of lean production globally: China vis-à-vis the USA.” The International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(2): 148178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummels, H. and Leede, J.. 2000. “Teamwork and morality: comparing lean production and socio technology.Journal of Business Ethics, 26: 7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchens, G. 2016. “Adversarial industrial relations model doesn’t work, says business chief.” The Guardian, May 31. www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/31/adversarial-industrial-relations-model-doesnt-work-says-business-chief (last accessed October 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Jain, H. 1987. “The Japanese system of human resource management: transferability to the Indian industrial environment.” Asian Survey, 27(9): 10231035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R. P. 2012. “International transference of lean production systems: managerial lessons from Toyota transplants in the USA, Australia, and India.” PhD dissertation, Faculty of Business and Enterprise, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
James, R. P. 2019. “The Toyota Way or the unions’ way? Examining the nexus between lean and unions in Toyota Australia.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management [online], doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1513413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R. P. and Jones, R.. 2014. “Transferring the Toyota lean cultural paradigm into India: implications for human resource management.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(15): 21742191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, J., Abrahamsson, L., and Johansson, S.. 2013. “If you can’t beat them join them? The Swedish trade union movement and lean production.” Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(3): 445460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R., Betta, M., and Latham, J.. 2009. “The lean empire strikes back: employing the discourse of ‘learning’ to suppress pluralism in a lean system.” Critical Management Studies Conference, CMS6, University of Warwick, July 2009.Google Scholar
Jones, R., Latham, J., Betta, M., and Liu, L.. 2008. “Discourse strategies in lean manufacturing: transforming others in an overseas affiliate company.” 24th EGOS Colloquium, Amsterdam, July.Google Scholar
Kamata, S. 1983. Japan in the Passing Lane: An Insider’s Account of Life in a Japanese Auto Factory. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Lammers, J. C. and Barbour, J. B.. 2006. “An institutional theory of organizational communication.” Communication Theory, 16(3): 356377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.-H. and Jo, H.-J.. 2007. “The mutation of the Toyota Production System: adapting the TPS at Hyundai Motor Company.” International Journal of Production Research, 45(16): 36653679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, J., Fruin, W., and Adler, P.. 1999. “Bringing Japanese management systems to the United States: transplantation or transformation?” pp. 335 in: Liker, J., Fruin, W., and Adler, P. (eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, J. and Hoseus, M.. 2008. Toyota Culture. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liu, L. 2009. Building an Organisational Learning Architecture for Strategic Renewal. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Liu, R.-J. and Brookfield., J. 2006. “Japanese subcontracting in mainland China: a study of Toyota and Shanghai Koito.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(2): 99103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamadouh, V., De Jong, M., and Lalenis, K.. 2003. “An introduction to institutional transplantation.” Discussion Paper Series 9(13): 273292.Google Scholar
Mathew, S. K. and Jones, R.. 2012. “Toyotism and Brahminism.Employee Relations, 35(2): 200221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattera, P. 2015. “Toyota: corporate rap sheet/corporate research project.” www.corp-research.org/toyota (last accessed July 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Osono, E., Shimizu, N., and Takeuchi, H.. 2008. Extreme Toyota: Radical Contradictions That Drive Success at the World’s Best Manufacturer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Palthe, J. 2014. “Regulative, normative, and cognitive elements of organizations: Implications for managing change.” Management and Organization Studies, 1(2): 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardi, T. 2005. “Where did it go wrong? Hybridisation and crisis of Toyota Motor Manufacturing UK, 1989–2001.” International Sociology, 20(1): 93118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. and Slaughter, J.. 1988. “Management by stress.” Technology Review, 91(7): 3644.Google Scholar
Parker, M. and Slaughter, J.. 1994. “Lean production is mean production.”Canadian Dimension, 28(1): 2122.Google Scholar
Pil, F. and MacDuffie, J.. 1999. “Transferring competitive advantage across borders: a study of Japanese auto transplants in North America,” pp. 3974 in Liker, J., Fruin, W., and Adler, P. (eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, D. and Jones, R.. 2010. “Human resource development and management in lean production.” International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 10(1): 113.Google Scholar
Recht, R. and Wilderom, C.. 1998. “Kaizen and culture: on the transferability of Japanese suggestion systems.” International Business Review, 7(1): 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, P. and Bamber, G. J.. 2009. “Strategic choices in pluralist and unitarist employment relations regimes: a study of Australian telecommunications.” Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 63(1): 2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, S., Jones, R., Selvarajah, C., and Gramberg, B. V.. 2014. “Organisational justice: a Senian perspective.” Journal of Business Ethics, 135: 99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, P., Gough, R., Ballardie, R., Bartam, T., Bamber, G. J., and Sohal, A.. 2014. “Implementing lean management/six Sigma in hospitals: beyond empowerment or work intensification?The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(21): 29262940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugimori, Y., Kusunoki, K., Cho, F., and Uchikawa, S.. 1977. “Toyota production system and Kanban system: materialisation of just-in-time and respect-for-human system.” International Journal of Production Research 15(6): 553564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Y. 2010. An Introduction to Japanese Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Tribune. 2006. “Toyota eyes small car segment.” The Tribune, December 23. www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20061224/biz.htm (last accessed August 2, 2010).Google Scholar
Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC). 2001. The Toyota Way. Tokyo: Toyota Motor Corporation.Google Scholar
Ward, S. 1999. “The international diffusion of planning: a review and a Canadian case study.” International Planning Studies, 4(1): 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westney, D. 1999. “Organization theory perspectives on the cross-border transfer of organizational patterns,” pp. 385408 in Liker, J., Fruin, W., and Adler, P. (eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weststar, J. 2015. “Organizers set union drive to cruise at Toyota plant.” The London Free Press, August 20. www.lfpress.com/2015/08/20/organizers-set-union-drive-to-cruise-at-toyota-plant.Google Scholar
Wilms, W., Hardcastle, A., and Zell, D.. 1994. “Cultural transformation at NUMMI.” Sloan Management Review, 36(1): 99113.Google Scholar
Yokozawa, K., Steenhuis, H., and de Bruijn, E. J.. 2010. “The influence of national culture on Kaizen transfer: an exploratory study of Japanese subsidiaries in the Netherlands.” Paper presented at the 15th Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium, Cambridge, UK, September 23–24.Google Scholar
Yui, T. 2008. “The significance of management philosophy,” pp. 322 in Shibusawa, E. L. and Japanese Academy of Management Philosophy (Eds.), Practice of Management Philosophy. Tokyo: Bunshindo.Google Scholar

References

Abo, T. (ed.). 1994. Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abo, T. (ed.). 2007. Japanese Hybrid Factories: A Comparison of Global Production Strategies. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abo, T. 2014. “Researching international transfer of the Japanese-style management and production system: hybrid factories in six continents.” Asian Business & Management. 14(1): 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegría, T., Carrillo, J., and Alonso, J. 1997. “Restructuring of production and territorial change: a second industrialization hub in Northern México.” CEPAL Review. 61: 187205.Google Scholar
Babson, S. 1998. “Mazda and Ford at Flat Rock: transfer and hybridization of the Japanese model,” pp. 161188 in Tolliday, S., Charron, E., and Jurgens, U. (eds.). Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bair, J. and Gereffi, G. 2001. “Local clusters in global chains: the causes and consequences of export dynamism in Torreon: the blue jeans industry.World Development. 29(11): 18851903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensusán, G. and Middlebrook, K. 2012. “Organized labor and politics in Mexico,” pp. 335364 in Camp, R. A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195377385.013.0015.Google Scholar
Bizberg, I. 1999. “Le syndicalisme mexicain face à la mondialisation et à la décomposition du régime politique” [Mexican trade unionism in the face of globalization and the breakdown of the political system]. La revue de l’IRES. 29: 131165.Google Scholar
Boyer, R., Charron, E., Jurgens, U., and Tolliday, S. (eds.). 1998. Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, R. and Freyssenet, M. 2000. “A new approach of productive models. The world that changed the machine.Industrielle Beziehungen. 7(4): 385413.Google Scholar
Brito, J. 2014. “Situación actual y prospectiva de la industria de televisores en Baja California” [Current and prospective situation of the television industry in Baja California]. PhD Dissertation (Doctorado en Administración, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración). México: UNAM.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 1989. “Calidad con Consenso en las maquiladoras ¿Asociación factible?” [Quality with consensus in the maquiladoras. a feasible association?] en Frontera Norte 1(2), El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, pp. 105132.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 1993. “Estructura Ocupacional en Plantas Maquiladoras” [Occupational Structure in Maquiladora Plants], pp. 47133 in Jorge, C. (ed.). Condiciones de empleo y capacitación en las maquiladoras de exportación en México [Conditions of Employment and Training in Export Maquiladoras in Mexico]. Tijuana, México: Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social[Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare]/El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 1995. “Flexible production in the auto sector: industrial reorganization at Ford-México.World Development. 23(1): 87101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Ramírez, M. A. 1990. “Modernización tecnológica y cambios organizacionales en la industria maquiladora” [Technological modernization and organizational changes in the maquiladora industry]. Estudios Fronterizos. 23: 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Montiel, Y. 1998. “Ford’s Hermosillo Plant: The Trajectory of Development of a Hybrid Model,” pp. 295318 in Boyer, R., Charron, E., Jurgens, U., and Tolliday, S. (eds.). Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Hualde, A. 1998. “Third generation Maquiladoras? The Delphi-General Motors Case.” Journal of Borderlands Studies. XIII. 1: 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J., Mortimore, M., and Alonso, J. 1998. El impacto de las Empresas Transnacionales en la Reestructuración Industrial de México. El caso de las industrias de partes para vehículos y de televisores. [The Impact of Transnational Companies on the Industrial Restructuring of Mexico. The Case of the Vehicle Parts and Television Industries]. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Hinojosa, R. 2001. “Cableando el Norte de México: La evolución de la industria maquiladora de arneses” [Wiring Northern Mexico: The Evolution of the Harness Maquila Industry]. Región y Sociedad. XIII. 21: 79116.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Gomis, R. 2005. “Generaciones de maquiladoras: un primer acercamiento a su medición” [Generations of maquiladoras: a first approach to its measurement]. Frontera Norte. 17(33): 2551.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J., Martínez, J. and Lara, J. 2005. “El comportamiento de la maquila en Querétaro” [The Behavior of the Maquila in Querétaro], pp.80102 in Enrique, G. (ed.). Modelos de producción en la maquila de exportación: la crisis del toyotismo precario [Production Models in the Export Maquiladora: The Crisis of Precarious Toyotism]. México, D. F.: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Lara, A. 2005. “Mexican Maquiladoras: new capabilities coordination and the emergence of new generation of companies.Innovation and Economic Development. 7(2–3): 256273.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 2009. “Cómo interpretar el modelo de maquila? Cuatro décadas de debate” [How to Interpret the Maquila Model? Four Decades of Debate], pp. 81108 in Rosio, B., Grijalba, G., Lara, B., Velázquez, L., Rodríguez, L., and Zuñiga, M. (eds.). Cuatro décadas del modelo maquilador en el norte de México [Four Decades of the Maquiladora Model in Northern Mexico]. Tijuana, México: COLEF/COLSON.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Zárate, R. 2009. “The evolution of Maquiladora best practices: 1965–2008.Journal of Business Ethics. 88(S2): 335348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Torres, B. 2010. “De qué modernización hablamos? Trayectorias productivas en la industria de alimentos y bebidas en Yucatán” [What Modernization Are We Talking About? Productive Trajectories in the Food and Beverage Industry in Yucatán], pp. 1546 in Maeecela, H. (ed.). Estudios laborales en México [Labor Studies in Mexico]. México, D. F.: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Gomis, R. 2011. “Un estudio sobre prácticas de empleo en firmas multinacionales en México: Un primer mapeo” [A study on employment practices in multinational firms in Mexico: a first mapping]. Frontera Norte. 23(46): 3560.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Hualde, A. 2013. “Una maquiladora diferente? Competencias laborales y profesionales en la industria aeroespacial en Baja California” [A Different Maquiladora? Labor and Professional Skills in the Aerospace Industry in Baja California], pp. 163197 in Mónica, C. (ed.). La industria aeroespacial. Complejidad productiva e institucional [The Aerospace Industry. Productive and Institutional Complexity]. México, D. F.: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Abo, T. 2014. “Comparative Study of Application-Adaptation of Japanese Production System at Auto Subsidiaries in Developing Countries: Nissan and GM in South Africa, Egypt and Mexico.” Paper presented at the 22nd International Colloqium of GERPISA, Kyoto, June 4–6.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J., Bensusán, G. and Micheli, J. (eds.). 2017. Es posible innovar y mejorar laboralmente? Estudio de trayectorias de empresas multinacionales en México [Is It Possible to Innovate and Improve Labor? Study of Trajectories of Multinational Companies in Mexico]. México City, México: UAM-Azcapotzalco.Google Scholar
Casalet, M. and González, L. 2006. “La maquila de exportación en Chihuahua: Hacia la construcción de un entorno institucional diverso y complejo” [The export maquila in Chihuahua: towards the construction of a diverse and complex institutional environment]. Paper presented at V Congreso Nacional AMET, Oaxtepec, Morelos, Mexico, May 16–17. www2.izt.uam.mx/amet/vcongreso/webamet/indicedemesa/ponencias/MESA7/Casaletgonzm7.pdf.Google Scholar
Contreras, O., Olea, J., Fuentes, M., and Robles, R. 2018. Formación y escalamiento de pymes mexicanas intensivas en conocimiento [Report] [Training and Upgrading of Knowledge-Intensive Mexican SMEs]. Tijuana, México: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.Google Scholar
De la Garza, E. 2007. “The crisis of the Maquiladora model in Mexico.Work and Occupations. 34(4), 399448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Garza, E. and Bouzas, A. 1998. “Flexibilidad del trabajo y contratación colectiva en México” [Labor flexibility and collective bargaining in Mexico]. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 3: 87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L. and Brown, F. 2004. “Medición de las capacidades tecnológicas en la industria mexicana” [Measurement of technological capabilities in the Mexican industry]. Revista de la CEPAL. 83: 135151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutrénit, G. and Vera-Cruz, A. 2002. “Technological capability accumulation in the ‘maquila industry’ in Mexico.” Cadernos EBAPE.BR [online]. 3(n. spe.): 0116. doi: 10.1590/S1679-39512005000500016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutrénit, G. and Vera-Cruz, A. 2004. La IED y Las Capacidades de Innovación y Desarrollo Locales: Lecciones del Estudio de los Casos de la Maquila Automotriz y Electrónica en Ciudad Juárez [FDI and Local Innovation and Development Capacities: Lessons from the Study of the Cases of the Automotive and Electronic Maquila in Ciudad Juárez]. México D. F.: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Dutrénit, G., Vera-Cruz, A., Arias, A., Sampedor, J. L. and Uriostegui, A. 2006. Acumulación de capacidades tecnológicas en subsidiarias de empresas globales en México. El caso de la industria maquiladora de exportación. México [Accumulation of Technological Capabilities in Subsidiaries of Global Companies in Mexico. The Case of the Export Maquiladora Industry. México], ed. Miguel Ángel Porrúa. México, D. F.: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Kelly, M. P. 1983. For We Are Sold, I and my People: Women and Industry in Mexico’s Frontier. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 1991. “The ‘old’ and ‘new’ Maquiladoras industries in Mexico: what is their contribution to national development and North American integration?Nuestra Economía. 2(8): 3963.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 1996. “Mexico’s ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Maquiladora Industries: Contrasting Approaches to North American Integration,” pp. 85105 in Otero, G. (ed.), Mexico’s Future(s): Economic Restructuring and Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Helper, S. 2019. “Complements or substitutes? Management of labor and technology in the U.S. autoparts industry.” Paper presented at the International Seminar USMCA/T-MEC/CUSMA, Trade protectionism, regional integration and labor disparities in the North American automotive industry, FLACSO-Mexico, México, November 8.Google Scholar
Helper, S. 2000. “Disruptive technical change and the location of production” [draft document]. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Hernández, M. 2017. “Las configuraciones y estrategias productivas de relaciones laborales y sindicales en grandes corporaciones en México” [The Configurations and Productive Strategies of Labor and Union Relations in Large Corporations in Mexico], pp. 175248 in de la Garza Toledo, E. and Hernandez Romo, M. (eds.). Configuraciones productivas y relaciones laborales en empresas multinacionales en América Latina [Productive Configurations and Labor Relations in Multinational Companies in Latin America]. Ciudad de México: UAM-Iztapalapa/Gedisa.Google Scholar
Hualde, A. and Carrillo, J. 2007. La industria aeroespacial en Baja California. Caracteristicas productivas y competencias laborales y profesionales [The Aerospace Industry in Baja California. Productive Characteristics and Labor and Professional Skills]. Tijuana, México: Colef.Google Scholar
Iammarino, S., Padilla-Perez, R., and von Tunzelmann, N. 2008. “Technological capabilities and global–local interactions: the electronics industry in two Mexican regions.World Development. 36(10): 19802003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itagaki, H. (ed.). 1997. The Japanese Production System: Hybrid Factories in East Asia. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kamiyama, K. 1994. “The typical Japanese overseas factory,” pp. 5881 in Abo, T. (ed.). Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, T. (ed.). 2011. Hybrid Factories in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, M. and Florida, R. 1993. Beyond Mass Production, The Japanese System and its Transfer to the U.S. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, M. and Florida, R. 1994. “Japanese maquiladoras: production, organization and global commodity chains.World Development. 22(1): 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koido, A. 1992. Between Two Forces of Restructuring: US–Japanese Competition and the Transformation of Mexico´s Maquiladora Industry. Baltimore, MD: Johns-Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Kumon, H. and Abo, T. (eds.). 2004. The Hybrid Factory in Europe: The Japanese Management and Production System Transferred. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, A. 2003. “Redes y competencia tecnológica en la construcción de estándares” [Networks and technological competence in the construction of standards]. Análisis Económico 18(38): 209228.Google Scholar
Lara, A., Hernández, C., Sánchez, L., and Villavicencio, D. 2004. “Dilemas de la evolución del cluster maquilador eléctrico-electrónico del Norte de México: Una exploración” [Dilemmas of the evolution of the electric-electronic maquiladora cluster of northern Mexico: an exploration], UAM-X, México, reporte Proyecto Conacyt no 31902 (Documento Interno).Google Scholar
Lévesque, C., Gomis, R., Emilien, B., and Carrillo, J. 2020. “Power Dynamics in Regional Aerospace Clusters in Mexico: A Comparison of Baja California and Querétaro,” in Fairbrother, P. et al. Unions at Work in Regions and Sectors: Mobilizing and Recasting Governance for Economic and Social Development. Oxford: Oxford Press [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Lung, Y. 1998. “Is the rise of emerging countries as automobile producers an irreversible phenomenon?” Paper presented at Sixth International Colloquium GERPISA, Paris, June 4, 5, and 6.Google Scholar
Maynez-Guaderrama, A., Valles-Monge, L., and Hernández, J. 2018. “Capacidades organizacionales y ventaja competitiva: análisis en empresas mexicanas exportadoras de autopartes” [Organizational capabilities and competitive advantage: analysis in Mexican auto parts exporting companies]. Revista Entreciencias. 6(17): 1733.Google Scholar
Mertens, L. and Palomares, L. 1988. “El surgimiento de un nuevo tipo de trabajador en la industria de alta tecnología. El caso de la electrónica” [The Emergence of a New Kind of Worker in the High Tech Industry. The Case of Electronics], pp. 170198 in Gutiérrez, E. (ed.). Reestructuración Productiva y Clase Obrera. [Productive Restructuring and the Working Class]. México, D. F.: Editorial Siglo XXI-UNAM.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, K. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Montoya, B., Dowell, A., and Escobedo, C. 2014. Desarrollo de un modelo de implementación de Manufactura Esbelta en empresas maquiladora [Development of a Lean Manufacturing implementation model in maquiladora companies], paper presented at XIX Congreso Internacional de Investigación en Ciencias Administrativas, April 21–24, Durango, Mexico: ACACIA (Academia de Ciencias Administrativas) [Academy of Administrative Sciences].Google Scholar
Oliver, N. and Wilkinson, B. 1988. The Japanization of British Industry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sandoval, S. 2017. “Procesos de innovación en la planta Ford de Hermosillo: centros de responsabilidad regional y gestión del conocimiento” [Innovation Processes at the Ford de Hermosillo Plant: Regional Responsibility and Knowledge Management Centers], pp. 163195 in Sandoval, S. and Covarrubias, A., Rumbo al auto de futuro. Innovación, sistemas de calidad y trabajo en la industria automotriz de México [Towards the Car of the Future. Innovation, Quality Systems and Work in Mexico’s Automotive Industry]. Mexico City, Mexico: Clave Editorial/AM Editores.Google Scholar
Shaiken, H. and Browne, H. 1991. “Japanese Work Organization in Mexico,” pp. 2550 in Székely, G. (ed.), Manufacturing Across Borders and Oceans. Japan, The United States and Mexico. San Diego, CA: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 1992. Exports and Local Development Mexico’s New Maquiladoras. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Womack, J., Jones, D., and Roos, D. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Won Choi, D. and Kenney, M. 1997. “The globalization of Korean industry: Korean maquiladoras in Mexico.Frontera Norte. 9(17): 522. doi:10.17428/rfn.v9i17.1456.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, K., Wooseok, J., and Abo, T. (eds.). 2013. Hybrid Factories in Latin America: Japanese Management Transferred. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Adler, Paul S. 2012. “The sociological ambivalence of bureaucracy: from Weber via Gouldner to Marx.Organization Science 23(1): 244–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S. and Borys, Bryan. 1996. “Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive.Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 6189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S. and Cole, Robert E.. 1993. “Designed for learning: a tale of two auto plants.Sloan Management Review 34(3): 8594.Google Scholar
Adler, Paul S., Goldoftas, Barbara, and Levine, David I.. 1999. “Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota Production System”. Organization Science 10(1): 4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhramovich, Aleksey, Borisova, Ekaterina, and Odinokov, Sergey. 2017. “Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo v Rossii: mif ili realnost?” [Lean Manufacturing in Russia: Myth or Reality?], Kachestvo. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie Quality. Innovations. Education. 10: 7075.Google Scholar
Alasheev, Sergei. 1995. “Informal relations in the Soviet system of production”, pp. 2868 in Management and Industry in Russia: Formal and Informal Relations in the Period of Transition, edited by Clarke, S.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Altman, Yochanan and Morrison, Claudio. 2015. “Informal economic relations and organizations. Everyday organizational life in Soviet and post-Soviet economies”. Journal of Organizational Change Management 28(5): 749–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreeva, Tatiana E. 2006. “Upravlenie personalom v period izmeneniy v rossiyskiy kompaniyakh: metodiki rasprostranennye i rezul’tativnye” [Personnel management in the period of transition in Russian companies: popular and effective methods]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal] 4(2): 2548.Google Scholar
Andreeva, Tatiana, Festing, Marion, Minbaeva, Dana B., and Muratbekova-Touron, Maral. 2014. “The Janus faces of IHRM in Russian MNEs”. Human Resource Management 53(6): 967–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, Eileen, Bailey, Thomas, and Berg, Peter. 2001. “Do High Performance Work Systems Pay Off?” pp. 85107 in The Transformation of Work, edited by Vallas, S. P., first ed. Amsterdam: JAI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artemieva, Vera V., Kayl, Yakov Y., and Bakhracheva, Yulia S.. 2015. “Otsenka effektivnosti raboty Volgogradskogo otdela materialno-tekhnicheskogo obespechenia OAO “RZHD” za schet optimizatsii tekhnologicheskikh protsessov” [Evaluating the impact of optimisation of technological processes on the effectiveness of the Volgograd department of material and technical support of OAO “RZHD]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta [Bulletin of Volgograd State University] 17(2): 613.Google Scholar
Barley, Stephen R. and Kunda, Gideon. 1992. “Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse”. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 363–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyshev, Konstantin V., Vandyshev, Michail N., and Priamikova, Elena V.. 2006. “Kachestvo v rossiyskoi promyshlennosti: mechanizmy obespechenia” [Quality in the Russian industry: the mechanisms to assure it]. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologia [Economic Sociology] 7(3): 5368.Google Scholar
Campbell, Robert W. 1972. “Management spillovers from Soviet space and military programs”. Soviet Studies 23(4): 586607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Bob, Danford, Andy, Howcroft, Debra, Richardson, Helen, Smith, Andrew, and Taylor, Phil. 2011. “‘All they lack is a chain’: lean and the new performance management in the British civil service.” New Technology, Work and Employment 26(2): 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Simon, ed. 1995. Management and Industry in Russia: Formal and Informal Relations in the Period of Transition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Clarke, Simon. 2007. The Development of Capitalism in Russia. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Simon and Pringle, Tim. 2011. The Challenge of Transition: Trade Unions in Russia, China and Vietnam. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dixon, Sarah E. A., Day, Marc, and Brewster, Chris. 2014. “Changing HRM systems in two Russian oil companies: Western hegemony or Russian spetsifika?The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25(22): 3134–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgopyatova, Tatiana G. and Khomyakova, Evgenia V.. 2016. “Stimuly, effekty i problemy vnedrenia sistemy berezhlivogo proizvodstva: primer PAO ‘KAMAZ’” [The motives, effects, and problems related to the implementation of lean production systems: the case of PAO KAMAZ]. Rossiyskiy Zhurnal Menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal] 14(2): 4976.Google Scholar
Donova, Inna. 2005. “Izmenenia v sistemakh oplaty truda” [Changes in the work remuneration systems], pp. 116–36 in Praktiki upravlenia personalom na sovremennykh rossiyskikh predpriatiakh [Personnel Management Practices in Contemporary Russian Enterprises] edited by Kabalina, Veronika. I.. Moscow: ISITO.Google Scholar
Fey, Carl F. 2008. “Overcoming a leader’s greatest challenge: involving employees in firms in Russia”. Organizational Dynamics 37(3): 254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, Jessica. 2012. “Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in postcommunist countries”. Comparative Political Studies 45(7): 903–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Theodore P. and Hout, Michael. 1998. “More shock than therapy: market transition, employment, and income in Russia, 1991–1995”. The American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Vipin and Hanges, Paul J.. 2004. “Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures”, pp. 178218 in Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, edited by House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gurkov, Igor, Morgunov, Evgeny, and Saidov, Zokirzhon. 2017. “Robustness and flexibility of human resource management practices.” Employee Relations 39(5): 594625, doi:10.1108/ER-07-2016-0138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurkov, Igor B., Zelenova, Olga I., Goldberg, Arkadiv. S., and Saidov, Zokirzhon B.. 2009. “Sistema upravleniya personalom na rossiyskikh firmakh v zerkale mezhdunarodnogo sravneniya” [Personnel management system in Russian companies in the mirror of international comparison]. Mir Rossii Russia’s Universe 3: 132–50.Google Scholar
Gurkov, Igor B., Zelenova, Olga I., and Saidov, Zokirzhon B.. 2012. “Mutation of HRM practices in Russia: an application of CRANET methodology”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(7): 1289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Malcolm R. 1985. “Soviet product quality and soviet state standards”. International Journal for Quality and Reliability Management 2(1): 4964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2016. New Worlds of Work: Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich, Malsch, Thomas, and Dohse, Knuth. 1993. Breaking from Taylorism: Changing Forms of Work in the Automobile Industry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapelyushnikov, Rostislav, Kuznetsov, Andrei, and Kuznetsova, Olga. 2011. “Diversity within capitalism: the Russian labour market model”. Employee Relations 33(4): 395412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimova, Svetlana G. and Clement, Carine. 2004. “Rol’ novogo Trudovogo kodeksa v reglamentatsii trudovykh otnoshenii v Rossii” [The role of the new Labour Code in the regulation of labour relations in Russia], pp. 1223 in Stanovlenie trudovykh otnoshenii v postsovetskoi Rossii [The Formation of Labour Relations in post-Soviet Russia], edited by DeBardeleben, J., Klimova, S., and Yadov, V.. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt.Google Scholar
Kononova, Vera. Y. 2006. “Modernizatsiya Proizvodstvennykh Sistem Na Rossiiskikh Promyshlennykh Predpriyatiyakh: Sovremennoe Sostoyanie i Perspektivy” [Modernization of production systems in Russian industrial enterprises: contemporary state and prospects]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal] 4(4): 119–32.Google Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2018. Consent and Control in the Authoritarian Workplace: Russia and China Compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, David and Myant, Martin, eds. 2007. Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey K., and Hoseus, Michael. 2008. Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Luque, de, Mary S. and Javidan, Mansour. 2004. “Uncertainty avoidance”, pp. 602653 in Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, edited by House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McCann, Leo. 2014. International and Comparative Business: Foundations of Political Economies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Leo and Schwartz, Gregory. 2006. “Terms and conditions apply: management restructuring and the global integration of post-socialist societies”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 17(8): 1339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michailova, Snejina. 2002. “When common sense becomes uncommon: participation and empowerment in Russian companies with Western participation”. Journal of World Business 37(3): 180–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Claudio and Bizyukov, Petr. 2017. “Informal and uncertain: employment relations through the broken mirror of Russian social sciences”. Work, Employment and Society 31(3): 553–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulzhenko, Elena. 2012. “Human Resource Management and Labour Relations in Post-Socialist Russia”, pp. 63102 in AutoUni-Schriftenreihe, Vol. 29, Human Resource Management and Labour Relations in the BRICs: A Review of the Research Literature, edited by Jürgens, U.. Berlin: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
Shulzhenko, Elena. 2017. Reforming the Russian Industrial Workplace: International Management Standards Meet the Soviet Legacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siegelbaum, Lewis H. 1988. Stakhanovism and the Politics of Productivity in the USSR, 1935–1941. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Natalya and Thomas, Ekaterina. 2015. “Determinants of Russia’s informal economy: the impact of corruption and multinational firms”. Journal of East-West Business 21(2): 102–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolev, Eduard N. 2008. Sotsial’no-trudovye otnosheniya v Rossii:istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy [Social and Labour Relations in Russia: History, Contemporary State and Prospects]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.Google Scholar
Sochor, Zinovia A. 1981. “Soviet Taylorism revisited”. Soviet Studies 33(2): 246–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Paul, Mrozowicki, Adam, Danford, Andy, and Murphy, Ken. 2016. “Lean as ideology and practice: a comparative study of the impact of lean production on working life in automotive manufacturing in the United Kingdom and Poland”. Competition & Change 20(3): 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiaglov, Sergei and Takmasheva, Irina. 2017. “Ispolzovanie tekhnologiy berezhlivogo proizvodstva v kachestve osnovy innovatsionnogo razvitia regionov” [Applying lean production technologies as a basis for innovative development of the regions].Voprosy regulirovania ekonomiki [Issues in Regulation of Economy] 8(2): 97110.Google Scholar
Upchurch, Martin, Croucher, Richard, Danilovich, Hanna, and Morrison, Claudio. 2015. “The transformation of work and industrial relations in the post-Soviet bloc: 25 years on from 1989”. Work, Employment and Society 29(3): NP1–NP11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
Woolfson, Charles 2007. “Pushing the envelope: the ‘informalization’ of labour in post-communist new EU member states”. Work, Employment and Society 21(3): 551–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaslavskaya, Tatyana I. and Shabanova, Marina A.. 2002. “Nelegalnye trudovye praktiki i socialnye transformacii v Rossii” [Illegal labour practices and social transformations in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania [Sociological Studies] 6: 317.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×