Abbazzi, L., Fanfani, F., Ferretti, M. P., Rook, L., Cattani, L., Masini, F., Mellegni, F., Negrino, F., and Tozzi, C.. 2000. New human remains of archaic Homo sapiens and Lower Palaeolithic industries from Visogliano (Duino Aurisina, Trieste, Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 1173–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alimen, H. 1958. Les formations quaternaire autour de Fontéchevade. Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine Mémoire 29: 164–184.Google Scholar

Amick, D. and Mauldin, R., (eds.). 1989. Experiments in Lithic Technology. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar

Arambourg, C. 1958. Les gros mammifères des couches tayaciennes. Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie HumaineMémoire 29: 185–229.Google Scholar

Ballesio, R. 1979. Le gisement pléistocène supérieur de la grotte de Jaurens à Nespouls, Corrèze, France: Les carnivores (Mammalia, Carnivora). 1. Canidae et Hyenidae. Nouvelles Archives du Museum d'Histoire naturelle de Lyon 17: 56–65.Google Scholar

Banerjee, S. K. 1996. Sediment reveals early Holocene climate change in China. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 77: 3 and 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bastin, B. 1976. Etude palynologique des couches E2, D et Bs de la grotte de Fontéchevade (Charente, France). Bulletin de la Société Royale Belge d'Anthropologie et de Préhistoire de Bruxelles 87: 15–27.Google Scholar

Baumler, M. 1988. Core reduction, flake production, and the Middle Paleolithic industry of Zobiste (Yugoslavia). In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, edited by Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 255–274. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Behm, J. A. 1983. Flake concentrations: Distinguishing between flintworking activity areas and secondary deposits. Lithics Technology 12: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrensmeyer, A. K. and Hill, A. P.. 1980. Fossils in the Making: Vertebrate Taphonomy and Paleoecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Benn, D. I. 1994. Fabric shape and the interpretation of sedimentary fabric data. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 64: 910–915.Google Scholar

Biberson, P. 1961. Le Paleolithique Inferieur du Maroc Atlantique. Public Service des Antiquites du Maroc 17, Rabat.Google Scholar

Bon, F. and Bodu, P.. 2002. Analyse technologique du débitage aurignacien. In L'Aurignacien de la Grotte du Renne: Les fouilles d'André Leroi-Gourhan à Arcy sur Cure (Yonne), edited by Schmider, B., pp. 115–133. Gallia Préhistoire, XXXIVe Supplément, Paris.Google Scholar

Bonatti, E. 1966. North Mediterranean climate during the last Würm glaciation. Nature 209: 984–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonifay, M. F. 1971. Carnivores quaternaires du Sud-Est de la France. Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, Mémoires, série C 21: 43–377.Google Scholar

Bonnichsen, R. and Sorg, M. H., (eds.). 1989. Bone Modification. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Institute of Quaternary Studies, University of Maine, Orono.

Bordes, F. 1947. Étude comparative des différentes techniques de taille du silex et des roches dures. L'Anthropologie 51: 1–29.Google Scholar

Bordes, F.. 1952. Stratigraphie du loess et évolution des industries paléolithiques dans l'ouest du bassin de Paris. II. Évolution des industries Paléolithiques. L'Anthropologie 56: 405–452.Google Scholar

Bordes, F.. 1953. Essai de classification des industries ‘moustériennes’. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 50: 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordes, F.. 1961. Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar

Bordes, F.. 1984. Leçons sur le Paléolithique, Tome I. Notions de Géologie Quaternaire. Cahiers du Qaternaire No. 7 (CNRS), Paris.Google Scholar

Bordes, F. and Bourgon, M.. 1951. Le complexe Mousterien: Mousterien, Levalloisien et Tayacien. L'Anthropologie 55: 1–23.Google Scholar

Bordes, J.-G. 2005. La séquence aurignacienne du nord de l'Aquitaine: Variabilité des productions lamellaires à Camindade-Est, Robib-89844-Combe, Le Piage et Corbiac-Vignoble II. In Productions lamellaires attribuées à l'Aurignacien: Chaînes opératoires et perspectives technoculturelles. XIVe Congrès de l'UISPP, Liège, 2–8 septembre 2001, pp. 123–154. Archéologiques 1, Luxembourg.Google Scholar

Bordes, J.-G. and Bon, F.. Unpublished. Analyse techno-typologique de l'industrie lithique de la grotte Dufour (Corrèze, France): Anciennes fouilles, nouvelles données. Paper presented at the international colloquiumEl Centenario de la Cueva de El Castillo: El Ocaso de los Neandertales, Santoña, September, 18–20 2003.Google Scholar

Bottema, S. 1994. The prehistoric environment of Greece: A review of the palynological record. In Beyond the Site: Regional Studies in the Aegean Area, edited by Kardulias, P. N., pp. 45–68. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar

Bourdier, F. 1967. Préhistoire de France. Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar

Bourgon, M. 1957. Les industries mousteriennes et pre-mousterniennes du Perigord. Archives de l'Institut de Paleontologie Humaine Memoire 27. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar

Bouvier, J.-M., Cremades, M., and Duport, L.. 1987. L'abri Paignon à Montgaudier (Montbron, Charente). Art et industrie, analogies et relations. Préhistoire de Poitou-Charentes. Problèmes actuels. Editions du CTHS, Paris.Google Scholar

Brace, C. L. 1964. The fate of the ‘Classic’ Neanderthals: A consideration of hominid catastrophism. Current Anthropology 5: 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brain, C. K. 1967. Hottentot food remains and their meaning in the interpretation of fossil bone assemblages. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station 32: 1–11.Google Scholar

Brain, C. K.. 1969. The Contribution of the Namib Desert Hottentots to an Understanding of Australopithecine Bone Accumulations. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station39.Google Scholar

Brain, C. K.. 1981. The Hunters or the Hunted?University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Brain, C. K.. 1985. Interpreting early hominid death assemblages: The rise of taphonomy since 1925. In Hominid Evolution: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Tobias, P. V., pp. 41–46. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar

Brennan, B. J., Schwarcz, H. P., and Rink, W. J.. 1997. Simulation of the gamma radiation field in lumpy environments. Radiation Measurements 27: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breuil, H. 1932. Les industries à éclat du Paléolithique ancien, I: Le Clactonien. Préhistoire 1: 125–190.Google Scholar

Breuil, H. and Lantier, R.. 1959. Les Hommes de la Pierre Ancienne. Payout, Paris.Google Scholar

Bunn, H. T. 1983. Comparative analysis of modern bone assemblages from a San hunter-gatherer camp in the Kalahari Desert, Botswana, and from a spotted hyena den near Nairobi, Kenya. In Animals and Archaeology 1. Hunters and their Prey, edited by Clutton-Brock, J. and Grigson, C., pp. 143–148. B.A.R. International Series S163, Oxford.Google Scholar

Byers, A. M. 1994. Symboling and the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition: A theoretical and methodological critique. Current Anthropology 35: 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, A. M.. 1999. Communication and material culture: Pleistocene tools as action cues. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaline, J. 1972. Le Quaternaire: L'Histoire humaine dans son environnement. Doin, Paris.Google Scholar

Chase, P. G. 1991. Symbols and Paleolithic artifacts: Style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, P. G.. 2006. The Emergence of Culture: Evolution of a Uniquely Human Way of Life. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, P. G., Debénath, A., Dibble, H. L., McPherron, S. P., Schwarcz, H. P., and Stafford, T. W. J.. 2007. New dates for the Fontéchevade (Charente, France) Homo remains. Journal of Human Evolution 52: 217–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chase, P. G. and Dibble, H. L.. 1987. Middle Paleolithic symbolism: A review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 263–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiotti, L. 2000. Lamelles Dufour et grattoirs aurignaciens (carénés et à museau) de la couche 8 de l'abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. L'Anthropologie 104: 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiotti, L.. 2003. Les productions lamellaires dans l'Aurignacien de l'abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. Gallia Préhistoire 45: 113–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiotti, L.. 2006. La production d'éclats dans l'Aurignacien ancien de l'abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. In Actes de la Table ronde ‘Autour des concepts de Protoaurignacien, d'Aurignacien initial et ancien: Unité et variabilité des comportements techniques des premiers groupes d'hommes modernes dans le Sud de la France et le Nord de l'Espagne’, Toulouse, 27 février-1er mars 2003. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie I, Prehistoria y Arqueología, Madrid 15: 195–214.Google Scholar

Clark, G. A. 1988. Some thoughts on the Black Skull: An archaeologist's assessment of WT-17000 (A. boisei) and systematics in human paleontology. American Anthropologist 90: 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clot, A. 1980. La grotte de la Carrière (Gerde, Hautes-Pyrénées). Stratigraphie, et paléontologie des carnivores. Thèse, 3ème cycle, Université Paul Sabatier.Google Scholar

Commont, V. 1910. Les différents niveaux de l'industrie de l'Age du Renne dans les limons du Nord de la France. Congrès Préhistorique de France, Tours.Google Scholar

Commont, V.. 1913. Les hommes contemporains du renne dans la vallée de la Somme. Memoire de la Societe des Antiquaires de Picardie 7: 207–646.Google Scholar

Corruccini, R. S. 1975. Metrical analysis of Fontéchevade II. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 42: 95–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cruz-Uribe, K. 1991. Distinguishing hyena from hominid bone alterations. Journal of Field Archaeology 18: 467–486.

Dart, R. A. 1957. The Osteodontokeratic Culture of Australopithecus prometheus. Transvaal Museum Memoirs, no. 10, Pretoria.Google Scholar

Darwin, R. L., Ferring, C. R., and Ellwood, B. B.. 1990, Geoelectric stratigraphy and subsurface evaluation of Quaternary deposits at Cooper Basin, northeast Texas, Geoarchaeology 5: 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, P. 1933. Communication. Bulletin et mémoires de la Société Archéologique et Historique de la Charente 23: 84–86.Google Scholar

Debénath, A. 1969. Le gisement prehistorique de La-Chaise-de-Vouthon (Charente). In Livret guide excursion A4, VIIIeme Congres INQUA, pp. 66–71, Paris.Google Scholar

Debénath, A.. 1974. Recherches sur les terrains quaternaires charentais et les industries qui leur sont associées. Docteur ès Sciences, Université de Borde-aux I.Google Scholar

Debénath, A.. 1976. Les gisements préhistoriques de la Chaise de Vouthon, commune de Vouthon. In L'excursion A 4, Sud-Ouest (Aquitaine et Charente), IXe Congrès de l'UISPP, Nice 13–18/O9/1976, edited by Rigaud, J.-P. and Vandermeersch, B., pp. 141–144.Google Scholar

Debénath, A. and Dibble, H. L. 1994. The Handbook of Paleolithic Typology. Vol. I. The Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. The University Museum. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Debénath, A. and L. Duport. 1986. Le Mousterien de la grotte de Montgaudier (Charente), note préliminaire. Bulletin de la Société Anthropologique du Sud-Ouest 21: 5–9.Google Scholar

Delagnes, A., Tournepiche, J.-F., Armand, D., Desclaux, E., Diot, M.-F., Ferrier, C., Fillâtre, V., and Vandermeersch, B.. 1999. Le gisement Pléistocène moyen et supérieur d'Artenac (Saint-Mary, Charente): Premier bilan interdisciplinaire. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 96: 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demars, P.-Y.L'industrie aurignacienne de la couche 2 de la grotte Bou rgeois-Delaunay. In Les gisements paléolithiques de La Chaise-de-Vouthon (Charente), edited by Debénath, A.. Forthcoming.

Demars, P.-Y. and Laurent, P.. 1989. Types d'outils du paléolithique supérieur en Europe. Cahiers du Quaternaire 14. Editions du CNRS, Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Denton, G. H. and Karlén, W.. 1973. Holocene climatic variations – their pattern and possible cause. Quaternary Research 3: 155–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, H. L. 1984. Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style, or sequence of reduction?Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, H. L.. 1987a. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52: 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, H. L.. 1987b. Measurement of artifact provenience with an electronic theodolite. Journal of Field Archaeology 14: 249–254.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L.. 1988. Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, edited by Dibble, H. L. and Monte-White, A., pp. 181–187. The University Museum. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L.. 1995. An assessment of the integrity of the archaeological assemblages. In The Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France), edited by Dibble, H. L. and Lenoir, M., pp. 245–258. University Museum Monograph 91.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L., Chase, P. G., Debénath, A., Farrand, W. R., and McPherron, S. P.. 2006. Taphonomy and the concept of Paleolithic cultures: The case of the Tayacian from Fontéchevade. PaleoAnthropology 2006: 1–21.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L., Chase, P. G., McPherron, S. P., and Tuffreau, A.. 1997. Testing the reality of a “living floor” with archaeological data. American Antiquity 62: 629–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, H. L. and Holdaway, S.. 1993. The Middle Paleolithic of Warwasi Rockshelter. In The Paleolithic Prehistory of the Zagros, edited by Olszewski, D. and Dibble, H. L., pp. 75–99. The University Museum. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L., Holdaway, S., Lenoir, M., McPherron, S. P., Roth, B. J., and Sanders-Gray, H.. 1995. Techniques of excavation and analysis. In The Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France), edited by Dibble, H. L. and Lenoir, M., pp. 27–40. The University Museum. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L. and McPherron, S. P.. 1989. On the computerization of archaeological projects. Journal of Field Archaeology 15: 431–440.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L. and McPherron, S. P.. 2006 The missing Mousterian. Current Anthropology 47: 777–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibble, H. L. and McPherron, S. P. 2007. Truncated-faceted pieces: Hafting modification, retouch, or cores? In Tools versus Cores Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis, S. McPherron, editor, pp. 75–90. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L., McPherron, S. P., Chase, P. G., Farrand, W. R., and Debénath, A., 2006. Taphonomy and the concept of Paleolithic cultures: The case of the Tayacian from Fontéchevade. Paleoanthropology 4: 1–21.Google Scholar

Dibble, H. L. and Rolland, N.. 1992. On assemblage variability in the Middle Paleolithic of Western Europe: History, perspectives, and a new synthesis. In The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior, and Variability, edited by Dibble, H. L. and Mellars, P., pp. 1–20. The University Museum. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Drennan, R. 1956. Note on the morphological status of the Swanscombe and Fontéchevade remains. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 14: 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duport, L. 1969. Le gisement préhistorique de Montgaudier (Charente). In Livret-Guide de l'Excursion A4, VIIIe Cong. d'INQUA.

Duport, L.. 1976. La grotte de Montgaudier, commune de Montbron, Cahrente. In Livret-Guide de l'Excursion A4,. IXe Congrès de l'UISPP, Nice, pp. 151–158.Google Scholar

Efremov, I. 1940. Taphonomy: A new branch of paleontology. Pan-American Geologist 74: 81–93.Google Scholar

Eisenmann, V. 1991. Les chevaux quaternaires européens (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Taille, typologie, biostratigraphie et taxonomie. Geobios 24: 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B. and Gose, W. A.. 2006. Heinrich H1 and 8,200 year B.P. climate events recorded in Hall's Cave, Texas. Geology 34: 753–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B. and Harrold, F. B. J.. 1993. Unusual electrical resistivity effects associated with fast-growing trees, Rio Maior, Portugal. Geoarchaeology 8: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Harrold, F. B., Benoist, S. L., Straus, L. G., Gonzalez-Morales, M., Petruso, K., Bicho, N. F., Zilhão, Z., and Soler, N. 2001. Paleoclimate and intersite correlations from Late Pleistocene/Holocene cave sites: Results from Southern Europe. Geoarchaeology 16: 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Harrold, F. B., Benoist, S. L., Thacker, P., Otte, M., Bonjean, D., Long, G. L., Shahin, A. M., Hermann, R. P., and Grandjean, F.. 2004. Magnetic susceptibility applied as an age-depth-climate relative dating technique using sediments from Scladina Cave, a Late Pleistocene cave site in Belgium. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Harrold, F. B., and Marks, A. E. 1994. Site identification and correlation using geoarchaeological methods at the Cabeço do Porto Marinho (CPM) locality, Rio Maior, Portugal. Journal of Archaeological Science 21: 779–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Harrold, F. B. J., Petruso, K. M., and Korkuti, M.. 1993. Electrical resistivity surveys as indicators of site potential: Examples from a rock shelter in southwestern France and a cave in southern Albania. Geoarchaeology 52: 137–150.Google Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Peter, D. E., Balsam, W., and Schieber, J. 1995. Magnetic and geochemical variations as indicators of paleoclimate and archaeological site evolution: Examples from 41TR68, Fort Worth, Texas. Journal of Archaeological Science 22: 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Petruso, K. M., and Harrold, F. B.. 1996. The utility of magnetic susceptibility for detecting paleoclimatic trends and as a stratigraphic correlation tool: An example from Konispol Cave sediments, SW Albania. Journal of Field Archaeology 23: 263–271.Google Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Petruso, K. M., Harrold, F. B., and Schuldenrein, J.. 1997. High-resolution paleoclimatic trends for the Holocene identified using magnetic susceptibility data from archaeological excavations in caves. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, B. B., Zilhão, J., Harrold, F. B., Balsam, W., Burkart, B., Long, G. J., Debénath, A., and Bouzouggar, A.. 1998. Identification of the Last Glacial Maximum in the Upper Paleolithic of Portugal using magnetic susceptibility measurements of Caldeirão Cave sediments. Geoarchaeology 13: 55–71.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fassbinder, J. W. E., Stanjek, H., and Vali, H.. 1990. Occurrence of magnetic bacteria in soil. Nature 343: 161–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fitte, P. 1948. Note sur le Tayacien. Bulletin de la Société Historique Naturelle du Vaucluse 1: 3–7.Google Scholar

Flenniken, J. and Haggerty, J.. 1979. Trampling as an agency in the formation of edge damage: An experiment in lithic technology. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 13: 208–214.Google Scholar

Fosse, P. 1995. Le role de l'hyène dans la formation des assemblages osseux: 150 ans de controverses. Paléo 7: 49–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fosse, P.. 1997. Variabilité des assemblages osseux créés par l'Hyène des cavernes. Paléo 9: 15–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrod, D. and Bate, D. M. A.. 1937. The Stone Age of Mount Carmel. Volume I. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Genty, D., Dauphin, Y., Deflandre, G., Quinif, Y., and Miskovsky, C.. 1997. Exemples de particules d'origine anthropique piegees dans les lamines de croissance de stalagmites; interet pour la reconstitution des environnements humains anciens. In Karst et archéologie, pp. 149–157, 341–342. Colloque de l'UMR 5590 du CNRS et de l'Association Française pour l'Etude du Quaternaire 8.Google Scholar

Giaccio, B., Hajdas, I., Peresani, M., Fedele, F. G.. and Isaia, R. 2006. The Campanian ignimbrite tephra and its relevance for the timing of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic shift. In When wNeanderthals and Modern Humans Met, edited by Conard, N. J., pp. 343–378. Tübingen Publications in Prehistory, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Giacobini, G. 1990–1991. Hyenas or cannibals: Fifty years of debate on the Guattari Cave Neandertal cranium. In The Fossil Man of Monte Circeo. Fifty Years of Studies on the Neandertals in Latium, edited by Bietti, A. and Manzi, G., pp. 593–604. Quaternaria Nova, Rome. I.Google Scholar

Gifford, D. P. and Crader, D. C.. 1977. A computer coding system for archaeological faunal remains. American Antiquity 42: 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Damrosch, D. B., Damrosch, D. R., Pryor, J. and Thunenl, R. L.. 1985. The third dimension in site structure: An experiment in trampling and vertical dispersal. American Antiquity 50: 803–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilot, E. 1984 Datations radiométriques. In Peuples chasseurs de la Belgique préhistorique dans leur cadre naturel, edited by Cahen, D. and Haesaerts, P., pp. 115–125. Institut royal des science naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles.Google Scholar

Goldberg, P., Weiner, S., Yosef, O. Bar, Xu, Q., and Liu, J.. 2001. Site formation processes at Zhoukoudian, China. Journal of Human Evolution 41: 483–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gradstein, F., , J. Ogg, and Smith, A. G.. 2004. A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimaud, D. 1982. Evolution du pariétal de l'Homme fossile. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Mémoire 15, Paris.Google Scholar

Guadelli, J.-L. 1987. Contribution à l'étude des zoocénoses préhistoriques en Aquitaine (Würm ancien et interstade würmien). Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux I.Google Scholar

Guérin, C. 1980. Les Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du Miocène supérieur au Pléistocène terminal en Europe occidentale. Comparaisons avec les espèces actuelles. Doctorat d'Etat ès Sciences, Université de Lyon I.Google Scholar

Hahn, J. 1988. Fiche sagaie à base fendue. Fiches typologiques de l'industrie osseuse préhistorique 1.Cahier I : Sagaies, Commission de nomenclature sur l'industrie osseuse de l'os préhistorique de l'UISPP, Publication de l'Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Harrold, F., Ellwood, B. P., Thacker, P., and Benoist, S.. 2004. Magnetic susceptibility analysis of sediments at the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition for two cave sites in northern Spain. In The Chronology of the Aurignacian and of the Transitional Technocomplexes. Dating, Stratigraphies, Cultural Implications, edited by Zilhão, J. and D'Errico, F., pp. 301–310. Trabahos de Arqueologia 33. Instituto Português de Arqueologia, Lisboa.Google Scholar

Heberer, G. 1951. Grundlinien in der pliestocänen Entfaltungsgeschichte der Euhomininen. Quartär 5: 58–78.Google Scholar

Heberer, G.. 1955. Die geographische Verbreitung der fossilen Hominiden (auszer Eusapiens) nach neuerer Gruppierung. Die Naturwissenschaften 42: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, F. and Evans, M. E.. 1995. Loess magnetism. Reviews of Geophysics 33: 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henri-Martin, G. 1951. Remarques sur la stratigraphie de la grotte de Fontéchevade (Charente) et les conditions dans lesquelles les échantillons des ossements fossiles de Fontéchevade ont été prélevés, afin d'être soumis au “test” de la fluorine. L'Anthropologie 55: 242–247.Google Scholar

Henri-Martin, G.. 1953. Un niveau de Châtelperron de la grotte de Fontéchevade (Charente). Bulletin de la Société d'Etudes et de Recherches Préhistoriques des Eyzies 2: 35–36.Google Scholar

Henri-Martin, G.. 1957. La Grotte de Fontéchevade. Première Partie: Historique, Fouilles, Stratigraphie, Archéologie. Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine 28. Masson et Compagnie, Paris.Google Scholar

Henri-Martin, G.. 1965. La Basse-Tardoire grottes et abris paléolithiques. A. Fontéchevade. Bulletin de l'Association Française pour l'Etude du Quaternaire 2: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herberer, G. 1951. Grundlinien in der pliestocänen Entfaltungsgeschichte der Euhomininen. Quartär 5: 58–78.Google Scholar

Hervet, S. 2000. Tortues quaternaires de France: Critères de détermination, repartitions chronologique et géographique. Mésogée 58: 9–47.Google Scholar

Hill, A. P. 1978. Taphonomical background to fossil man. In Geological Background to Fossil Man, edited by Bishop, W. W., pp. 87–101. Geological Society of London, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Hill, C. A. 1982. Origin of black deposits in caves. NSS Bulletin 44: 15–19.Google Scholar

Howell, F. C. 1951. Place of Neanderthal man in human evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 9: 379–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Howell, F. C.. 1957. The evolutionary significance of variation and varieties of Neanderthal man. Quarterly Review of Biology 32: 330–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Howell, F. C.. 1958. Upper Pleistocene men of the Southwest Asian Mousterian. In Hundert Jahre Neanderthaler, 1856–1956, edited by Koenigswald, G. H. R., pp. 185–198. Kemink en Zoon, Utrecht.Google Scholar

Howell, F. C.. 1959. Upper Pleistocene stratigraphy and early man in the Levant. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103: 1–65.Google Scholar

Imai, T., Kanemori, T., and Sakayama, T.. 1987. Use of ground probing radar and resistivity surveys for archaeological investigation. Geophysics 52: 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, S. 1989. Hominid use of fire in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene: A review of the evidence. Current Anthropology 30: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jéquier, J.-P. 1975. Le Moustérien alpin. Eburodunum II. Institut d'Archéologie Yverdonoise, Yverdon.Google Scholar

Joussaume, R., Joffroy, B., Henri-Martin, G., and Heim, J.-L.. 1975. Sépulture collective de l'Age du Bronze de la Grotte de Fontéchevade (Charente). Bulletin et Mémoires de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris 2, ser XIII(61–86):62–86.Google Scholar

Keller, G. and Frischknecht, F.. 1966. Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar

Klien, R. G. 1986. Carnivore size and Quaternary climatic change in southern Africa. Quaternary Research 26: 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klien, R. G. and Scott, K.. 1989. Glacial/interglacial size variation in fossil spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) from Britain. Quaternary Research 32: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, F. 1911. The correlation between the interorbital width and the other measures and indices of the human skull. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 41: 318–349.Google Scholar

Kolfschoten, T. V., Gifford, D. P. and Crader, D. C.. 1977. A computer coding system for archaeological faunal remains. American Antiquity 42: 225–238.Google Scholar

Kolfschoten, T. V. and Roebroeks, W.. 1985. Maastricht-Belvédère: Stratigraphy, palaeoenvironment and archaeology of the Middle and Late Pleistocene deposits. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 39: 1–121.Google Scholar

Kurtén, B. 1957. The bears and hyenas of the interglacials. Quaternaria 4: 69–81.Google Scholar

Lartet, E. 1861. Nouvelles recherches sur la coexistence de l'homme et des grands mammifères fossiles réputés caractéristiques de la dernière période géologique. Annales des Sciences naturelles. II. Zoologie, 4ème série XV: 177–253.Google Scholar

Lartet, E. and Christy, H.. 1865–1875. Reliquiae Aquitanicae, Being Contributions to the Archaeology and Palaeontology of Périgord and the Adjoining Provinces of Southern France. Williams & Norgate, London.Google Scholar

Laville, H. 1982. On the transition from ‘lower’ to ‘middle’ palaeolithic in south-west France. In The Transition from Lower to Middle Palaeolithic and the Origin of Modern Man, edited by Ronen, A., pp. 131–135. BAR International Series 151. BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar

Laville, H.. 1988. Recent developments on the chronostratigraphy of the Paleolithic in the Perigord. In Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, edited by Dibble, H. L. and Montet-White, A., pp. 147–160. University Museum Symposium Series, Vol. I. The University Museum. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Laville, H., Rigaud, J.-P., and Sackett, J. R.. 1980. Rock Shelters of the Perigord: Geological Stratigraphy and Archaeological Succession. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Laville, H., Turon, J. L., Texier, J.-P., Raynal, J.-P., Delpech, F., Paquereau, M., Prat, F., and Debénath, A.. 1983. Histoire paléoclimatique de l'Aquitaine et du Golfe de Gascogne au Pléistocène supérieur depuis le dernier interglaciaire. Bulletin de l'Institut Géologique du Bassin de l'Aquitaine, Bordeaux 34: 219–241.Google Scholar

Grand, Y. 1994. Approche méthodologique et technologique d'un site d'habitat du Pléistocène moyen: La grotte no. 1 du Mas des Caves (Lunel-Viel, Hérault). Préhistoire Anthropologie Méditerranéennes 3: 205–207.Google Scholar

Lenoble, A. and Bertran, P.. 2004. Fabric of Palaeolithic levels: Methods and implications for site formation processes. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964. Les Religions de la Prehistoire. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar

Lumley, H. d. 1960. Clactonien et Tayacien dans la région méditerranéenne française. Compte-Rendu Académie des Sciences de Paris 250: 1887–1888.Google Scholar

Lyman, R. L. 1987. Archaeofaunas and butchery studies: A taphonomic perspective. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 10: 249–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyman, R. L.. 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marseiller, E. 1937. Les dents humaines, morphologie. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar

McBrearty, S., Bishop, L. C., Plummer, T., Dewar, R., and Conard, N. J.. 1998. Tools underfoot: Human trampling as an agent of lithic artifact edge modification. American Antiquity 63: 108–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherron, S. J. P. 2005. Artifact orientations and site formation processes from total station proveniences. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1003–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherron, S. P. and Dibble, H. L.. 1987. Hardware and software complexity in computerizing archaeological projects. Advances in Computer Archaeology 4: 25–40.Google Scholar

McPherron, S. P. and Dibble, H. L.. 2000. The lithic assemblages of Pech de L'Aze IV (Dordogne, France). Préhistoire Européene 15: 9–43.Google Scholar

McPherron, S. P. and Dibble, H. L.. 2002. Using Computers in Archaeology: A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

McPherron, S. P., Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L.. 2001. Deux nouveaux projets de recherche á Pech de l'Azé (Dordogne, France). Préhistoire du Sud-Ouest 8: 11–30.Google Scholar

Mortillet, G. d. 1869. Essai d'une classification des cavernes et des stations sous abri, fondée sur les produits de l'industrie humaine. Matériaux pour servir à l'histoire primitive de l'homme V: 172–179.Google Scholar

Mortillet, G. d.. 1883. Le Préhistorique: Antiquité de l'Homme. C. Reinwald, Paris.Google Scholar

Mullins, C. E. 1977. Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science – a review. Journal of Soil Science 28: 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, D. and Petraglia, M.. 1987. Natural Formation Processes and the Archaeological Record. British Archaeological Reports, International Series, Oxford, 352, Oxford.Google Scholar

Neuville, R. 1951. Le site Clacto-Abbevillien, Tayacien, Acheuléen et Micoquien de Sidi-Abderrahman (Maroc); histoire d'un classement. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 48: 101–108.Google Scholar

Newcomer, M. 1971. Some quantitative experiments in handaxe manufacture. World Archaeology 3: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielson, A. 1991. Trampling the archaeological record: An experimental study. American Antiquity 56: 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nishiaki, Y. 1985. Truncated-faceted flakes from Levantine Mousterian assemblages. Bulletin, Department of Anthropology, University of Tokyo 4: 215–226.Google Scholar

O'Brien, S. R., Mayewski, P. A., Meeker, L. D., Meese, D. A., Twickler, M. S., and Whitlow, S. I.. 1995. Complexity of Holocene climate as reconstructed from a Greenland ice core. Science 270: 1962–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oakley, K. P. and Hoskins, C. R.. 1951. Application du test de la fluorine aux crânes de Fontéchevade (Charente) avec remarques sur la stratigraphie de Fontéchevade. L'Anthropologie 55: 239–247.Google Scholar

Olivier, G. 1960. Pratique anthropologique. Vigot Frères, Paris.Google Scholar

Palacky, G. 1988. Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. In Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics – Theory Volume 1, edited by Nabighian, M. and Corbett, J., pp. 53–129. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.Google Scholar

Paletta, C. 2005. L'Evolution des comportements de subsistance des hommes du moustérien au solutréen dans la région Poitou-Charentes (France). Ph.D. thesis, Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar

Perpère, M. and Schmider, B.. 2002. L'outillage lithique. In L'Aurignacien de la grotte du Renne, edited by Schmider, B., pp. 143–195. Supplément à Gallia-Préhistoire. Vol. 34. Editions du CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar

Perrot, J. 1968. La préhistoire palestinienne. Supplément au dictionnaire de la Bible VIII 43: 286–446.Google Scholar

Pettitt, P. B. 1997. High resolution Neanderthals? Interpreting Middle Paleolithic intrasite spatial data. World Archaeology 29: 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peyrony, D. 1938. La Micoque, les fouilles recentes, leurs significations. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 6: 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peyrony, D.. 1950. Qu'est-ce que le Tayacien?Bulletin Société Préhistoire Française 47: 102.Google Scholar

Pickering, T. R. 2002. Reconsideration of criteria for differentiating faunal assemblages accumulated by hyenas and hominids. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 12: 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potts, R. 1988. Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar

Prat, F. 1968. Recherches sur les équidés pléistocènes de France. Thèse de sciences naturelles, Université de Bordeaux I.Google Scholar

Quiles, G. 2003. Les Ursidae du Pléistocène moyen et supérieur en Midi médi-terranéen: Apports paléontologiques, biochronologiques et archéozoologiques. Thèse de doctorat, Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar

Rink, W. J. 1997. Electron spin resonance (ESR) dating and ESR applications in Quaternary science and archaeometry. Radiation Measurements 27: 975–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolland, N. 1981. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability. Man 16: 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolland, N.. 1986. Recent findings from La Micoque and other sites in southwestern and Mediterranean France: Their bearing on the “Tayacian” problem and Middle Paleolithic emergence. In Stone Age Prehistory, edited by Bailey, G. N. and Callow, P., pp. 121–151. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ruddiman, W. F. and Mix, A. C.. 1993. The North and Equatorial Atlantic at 9000 and 6000 yr B.P. In Global Climates since the Last Glacial Maximum, edited by Wright, J., Kutzbach, H.E., J. E., Webb, T. I., Ruddiman, W. F., Street-Perrott, F. A., and Bartlein, P. J., pp. 94–124. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Sackett, J. R. 1973. Style, function, and artifact variability in Palaeolithic assemblages. In The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, edited by Renfrew, C., pp. 317–325. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Sackett, J. R.. 1982. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sackett, J. R.. 1985. Style, ethnicity, and stone tools. In Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, edited by Thompson, M., Garcia, M. T., and Kense, F. J., pp. 277–282. University of Calgary, Calgary.Google Scholar

Schick, K. D. 1986. Stone Age Sites in the Making: Experiments in the Formation and Transformation of Archaeological Occurrences. British Archaeological Reports International Series 319, Oxford.Google Scholar

Schiffer, M. B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar

Schwarcz, H. P. and Blackwell, B.. 1983. 230Th/234U age of a Mousterian site in France. Nature 301: 236–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarcz, H. P., Blackwell, B., and Debénath, A.. 1983. Absolute dating of hominids and Paleolithic artifacts of the Cave of La Chaise de Vouthon (Charente), France. Journal of Archaeological Science 10: 493–513.Google Scholar

Sergi, G. 1967. Morphological position of the “Prophaneranthropi (Swanscombe and Fontéchevade).” In Ideas on Human Evolution 1949–1961, edited by Howells, W. W., pp. 507–520. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sergi, S. 1953a. I profaneratntropi di Swanscombe e di Fontéchevade. Rendiconti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Linei ser. 8, 15: 601–608.Google Scholar

Sergi, S.. 1953b. Morphological position of the “Prophaneranthropi” (Swanscombe and Fontéchevade). In Actes du Congrès International du Quaternaire INQUA, pp. 651–665.Google Scholar

Shahack-Gross, R., Bar-Yosef, O., and Weiner, S.. 1997. Black-coloured bone in Hayonim Cave, Israel: Differentiating between burning and oxide staining. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheriff, R. E. 1980. Seismic Stratigraphy. International Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipman, P. 1981. Life History of a Fossil. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Shott, M. J. 1994. Size and form in the analysis of flake debris: Review and recent approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 69–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonet, P. 1991. Contribution à la connaissance des grands mammifères du Pléistocène supérieur de Belgique et de Bretagne. Thèse, Université de Liège.Google Scholar

Singer, M. J. and Fine, P.. 1989. Pedogenic factors affecting magnetic susceptibility of northern California soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53: 1119–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solecki, R. S. 1968. The Shamsi industry, a Tayacian related industry at Yabroud, Syria. Preliminary report. In La Préhistoire: Problèmes et tendances, pp. 401–410. Eds du CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar

Solecki, R. S.. 1970. A new secondary flaking technique at the Nahr Ibrahim Cave site, Lebanon. Bulletin du Musée de Beyrought 23: 137–142.Google Scholar

Sonneville-Bordes, D. de. 1972. Environnement et culture de l'homme du Périgordien ancien dans le sud-ouest de la France: Données récentes. In The Origin of Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the Paris Symposium, 2–5 September, edited by Bordes, F., pp. 141–146. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar

Sonneville-Bordes, D. de. and Perrot, J.. 1954. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur, I. II. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 51: 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sonneville-Bordes, D. de. and Perrot, J.. 1955. Lexique typologique du Palolithique supérieur III. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 52: 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sonneville-Bordes, D. de. and Perrot, J.. 1956a. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 53: 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sonneville-Bordes, D. de. and Perrot, J.. 1956b. Lexique typologique du Paléolithique supérieur. IV. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 53: 408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stafford, T. W., Hare, P. E., Currie, L., Jull, A. J. T., and Donahue, D. J.. 1991. Accelerator radiocarbon dating at the molecular level. Journal of Archaeological Science 18: 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanjek, H., Fassbinder, J. W. E., Vali, H., Wägele, H., and Graf, W.. 1994. Evidence of biogenic greigite (ferrimagnetic Fe3S4) in soil. European Journal of Soil Science 45: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, J. K. and Teltser, P. A.. 1989. Size distributions of artifact classes: Combining macro- and micro-fractions. Geoarchaeology 41: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, N. 1991 The Scatters between the Patches: A Study of Early Hominid Land-Use Patterns in the Turkana Basin, Kenya. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Stern, N.. 1993. The structure of the Lower Pleistocene archaeological record: A case study from the Koobi Fora formation. Current Anthropology 34: 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiner, M. C. 1991. The faunal remains from Grotta Guattari: A taphonomic perspective. Current Anthropology 32: 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, A. and Rosen, K.. 1985. Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 50: 755–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutcliffe, A. J. 1970. Spotted hyena: Crusher, gnawer, digester and collector of bones. Nature 227: 1110–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tite, M. S. and Linington, R. E.. 1975. Effect of climate on the magnetic susceptibility of soils. Nature 256: 565–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tournepiche, J.-F. 1996. Les grands mammifères pléistocènes de Poitou-Charentes. Paléo 8: 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trinkaus, E. 1973. A reconsideration of the Fontéchevade fossils. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 39: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trinkaus, E., Moldavan, O., S. Milota, B. A., Sarcina, L., Athreya, S., Bailey, S., Rodrigo, R., Mircea, G., Higham, T., Ramsey, C. B., and Plicht, J.. 2003. An early modern human from the Peştera Oase, Romania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 11231–11236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tuffreau, A. 1982. The transition Lower/Middle Palaeolithic in Northern France. In The Transition from Lower to Middle Palaeolithic and the Origin of Modern Man, edited by Ronen, A., pp. 137–149. BAR International Series. BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar

Tuffreau, A. and Sommé, J.. 1988. Le Gisement paléolithique moyen de Biache-Saint-Vaast (Pas-de-Calais). Stratigraphie, environnement, Etudes archéolo-giques. Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique de France, t. 21, Paris.Google Scholar

Vail, P. R., Mitchum, R. M., and Thompson, S.. 1977. Chrono-stratigraphic significance of seismic reflections. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoirs 26: 99–116.Google Scholar

Valladas, H., Mercier, N., Joron, J. L., McPherron, S. P., Dibble, H. L., and Lenoir, M.. 2003. TL dates for the Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas, France. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 1443–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vallois, H. 1949. The Fontechevade fossil man. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 7: 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vallois, H.. 1958. La Grotte de Fontéchevade. II: Anthropologie. Archives de l'Instut de Paléontologie Humaine 29, Paris.Google Scholar

Valoch, K. 1968. Le remplissage et les industries du Paléolithique moyen de la Grotte Külna en Moravie. L'Anthropolgie 72: 453–466.Google Scholar

Verosub, K. L., Fine, P., Singer, M. J., and TenPas, J.. 1993. Pedogenesis and paleoclimate: Interpretation of the magnetic susceptibility record of Chinese loess-paleosol sequences. Geology 21: 1011–1014.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villa, P. 1982. Conjoinable pieces and site formation processes. American Antiquity 47: 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiner, J. and Campbell, B.. 1964. The taxonomic status of the Swanscombe skull. In The Swanscombe Skull, edited by C. D. Ovey, pp. 175–209. Occasional Papers 20. Royal Anthropological Institute, London.Google Scholar

Wendorf, F. and Schild, R.. 1974. A Middle Stone Age Sequence from the Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia. Zaklad Narodowy Im. Ossolinskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Wroclaw, Poland.Google Scholar

Weymouth, J. W. 1986. Geophysical method of archaeological site surveying. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 311–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, J. M. 1984. A new resistivity device. Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 110–114.Google Scholar

Wolliard, G. 1978. Grande Pile peat bog: A continuous pollen record for the last 140,000 years. Quaternary Research 9: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zohdy, A., Eaton, G., and Mabey, D.. 1974. Applications of Surface Geophysics to Groundwater Investigations: Techniques of Water Resources Investigations. Book 2, Chapter D1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar