Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T21:42:06.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Conceptual Transposition, Parallelism, and Interdisciplinary Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Jonathan Tudge
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Michael J. Shanahan
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

In Chapter 2, Michael Shanahan, Jaan Valsiner, and Gilbert Gottlieb address the usefulness of common concepts for describing human development and discuss their transposition across psychobiology, psychology, and sociology. The concepts are identified as theoretical principles of human development that arise out of “an epigenetic characterization of development as an emergent coactional hierarchical system” (Gottleib 1991a, p. 7). We interpret their statements as proposing that development should be viewed in terms of a systemic structure with bidirectional relationships between vertical and horizontal levels, occurring in social and personal time, and changing probabilistically, where changes are manifested in coactional coordinated patterns across levels of human functioning. Further, we see their final principle as a different kind of statement, not defining development as such, but rather identifying developmentalists' studies of change as activities located within a disciplinary domain and influenced by intellectual and social criteria.

Shanahan et al. are interested in establishing a foundation for interdisciplinary communication and multidisciplinary research in developmental science. Their analysis of the across–discipline parallelism and transposability of developmentally significant concepts is a timely piece of metatheoretical research. Wielding the analytic tool of examining the underlying structure of theories, the authors demonstrate that the developmental principles can be employed as heuristic definitions to identify commonalities of use in the three disciplines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparisons in Human Development
Understanding Time and Context
, pp. 293 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×