van Poelgeest, L., The Netherlands and the Tokyo Tribunal, Part 2: Aspects of the Allied Occupation of Japan (London: Suntory–Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, 1991).Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Crimes against Peace’ and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Tucker, R. W., The Just War: A Study in Contemporary American Doctrine (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Vyshinsky, A. Y., For Peace and Security of the Peoples against the Threat of a New War (London: Soviet News Booklet, 1950).Google Scholar

Schwebel, S. M., ‘Wars of Liberation – As Fought in U.N. Organs’, in Moore, J. N. (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Claude, I. L. Jr., ‘Just Wars: Doctrines and Institutions’, Political Science Quarterly, 95 (1980), 83–96.Google Scholar

Forsythe, D. P., Review Essay, ‘Law, Morality, and War after Vietnam’, World Politics, 28 (1976), 450–72.Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M., ‘The Cult of Custom in the late 20th Century’, California Western International Law Journal, 17 (1987), 133–45.Google Scholar

Schwebel, S. M., ‘Aggression, Intervention and Self-Defence in Modern International Law’, Recueil des Cours/Académie de droit international, 136 (1972-II), 411–98.Google Scholar

Stone, J., ‘Hopes and Loopholes in the 1974 Definition of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 71 (1977), 224–46.Google Scholar

Charter of the United Nations, Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization, vol. XV (New York: United Nations Information Organizations, 1945–55).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, 14 December 1960, UN Doc. A/RES/1514(XV).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1970, UN Doc. A/RES/2625(XXV).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Draft Definition of Aggression, 4 November 1950, UN Doc. A/C.1/608.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Duties of States in the Event of the Outbreak of Hostilities, 17 November 1950, UN Doc. A/C.1/SR.384.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Need to Expedite the Drafting of a Definition of Aggression in the Light of the Present International Situation, 18 December 1967, UN Doc. A/RES/2330(XXII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 31 January 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/599(VI).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 20 December 1952, UN Doc. A/RES/688(VII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 4 December 1954, UN Doc. A/RES/895(IX).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Question of Defining Aggression, 29 November 1957, UN Doc. A/RES/1181(XII).Google Scholar

General Assembly, Uniting for Peace, 3 November 1950, UN Doc. A/RES/377(V).Google Scholar

United Nations (ed.), ‘Political and Security Questions: Proposals for Strengthening Peace’, in Yearbook of the United Nations 1950 (1951), 181–220.Google Scholar

UN Security Council, Security Council Official Records, 18 December 1961, UN Doc. S/PV.987.Google Scholar

UN Security Council, Security Council Official Records, 18 December 1961, UN Doc. S/PV.988.Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, ‘The Blue Series’ (42 vols., Nuremberg: IMT, 1947–49).Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Pritchard, R. J. (ed.), The Tokyo Major War Crimes Trial (124 vols., Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Johnson, L. B., ‘Remarks at Townsville upon Departing from Australia’, 23 October 1966, www.presidency.ucsb.edu.Google Scholar

‘Vishinsky Depicts Dire West Future’, New York Times (22 November 1952).Google Scholar