Ayer, A., Terkelsen, C. J. Difficult ECGs in STEMI: Lessons learned from serial sampling of pre- and in-hospital ECGs. J Electrocardiol. 2014; 47:448–458.Google Scholar

Chan, T. C., Brady, W. J., Harrigan, R. A. et al. ECG in emergency medicine and acute care. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby, 2005.Google Scholar

Cope, Z. The early diagnosis of the acute abdomen. Fourteenth edition. London: Oxford University Press, 1972 (Quotation from the preface to the first edition, 1921).Google Scholar

Elko, P. P., Weaver, W. D., Kudenchuk, P., Rowlandson, I. The dilemma of sensitivity versus specificity in computer-interpreted acute myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 1992; 24(Suppl.):2–7.Google Scholar

Fisch, C. Evolution of the clinical electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14:1127–1128.Google Scholar

Fye, W. B. A history of the origin, evolution and impact of electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73:937–949.Google Scholar

Ginde, A. A., Char, D. M. Emergency medicine residency training in electrocardiogram interpretation. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:738–742.Google Scholar

Goldberger, A. L., Goldberger, Z. D., Shvilkin, A. Goldberger’s clinical electrocardiography: A simplified approach. Eighth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2013.Google Scholar

Horan, L. G. The quest for optimal electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1978; 41:126–129.Google Scholar

Kligfield, P., Gettes, L. S., Bailey, J. J. et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 491109–491127.Google Scholar

Kudenchuk, P. J., Ho, M. T., Weaver, W. D. et al. Accuracy of computer-interpreted electrocardiography in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy. MITI Project Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 17:1486–1491.Google Scholar

Marriott, H. J. L. Practical electrocardiography. Preface to the first edition. Eighth edition. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1988.Google Scholar

Marriott, H. J. L. Emergency electrocardiography. Naples, FL: Trinity Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Massel, D., Dawdy, J. A., Melendez, L. J. Strict reliance on a computer algorithm or measurable ST segment criteria may lead to errors in thrombolytic therapy eligibility. Am Heart J. 2000; 140:221–226.Google Scholar

Smith, S. C. Heart records: Their interpretation and preparation. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis, 1923. Cited in: Fye, WB. A history of the origin, evolution and impact of electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73: 937–949.Google Scholar

Smith, S. W., Zvosec, D. L., Sharkey, S. W., Henry, T. W. The ECG in acute MI. An evidence-based manual of reperfusion therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.Google Scholar

Southern, W. N., Arnsten, J. H. The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making. Med Decis Making. 2009; 29:372–376.Google Scholar

Surawicz, B., Knilans, T. K. Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice. Sixth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2008.Google Scholar

Wagner, G. S., Strauss, D. G. Marriott’s practical electrocardiography. Twelfth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2014.Google Scholar

Wellens, H. J. J. The electrocardiogram 80 years after Einthoven. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 7:484–491. Cited in: Fye, WB. A history of the origin, evolution and impact of electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73: 937–949.Google Scholar

Zoneraich, S., Spodick, D. H. Bedside science reduces laboratory art: Appropriate use of physical findings to reduce reliance on sophisticated and expensive methods. Circulation. 1995; 91:2089–2092.Google Scholar