Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T09:51:34.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Harmony, Illusory Relationship Costs, and Conflict Resolution in Chinese Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Angela K.-y. Leung
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
Chi-yue Chiu
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Ying-yi Hong
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Get access

Summary

Management of interpersonal conflicts has attracted researchers’ interest in the fields of psychology and management. Previous studies have documented drastic cultural differences in preferred conflict management styles, with Chinese people having a greater preference for conflict avoidance (e.g., Tjosvold & Sun, 2002) and Westerners having a greater preference for direct, confrontational strategies (Friedman, Chi, & Liu, 2006; Morris et al., 1998). The need to understand this cultural difference has become more pressing than ever given the rising economic power of China and the increasing prominence of Chinese companies as global business partners or competitors in international business.

In this chapter, we will provide a cultural explanation for Chinese people's tendency to avoid conflicts. This explanation pertains to the importance that Chinese culture accords to the values of maintaining harmonious interpersonal relationships. The concern with interpersonal harmony could lead Chinese people to erroneously overestimate the relationship costs of direct confrontation, believing that using a direct approach to conflict management would evoke strong negative reactions from and hurt the relationship with the other disputant. This belief would result in a preference for conflict avoidance, which ironically could increase tension in future interactions between the disputants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cultural Processes
A Social Psychological Perspective
, pp. 188 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agho, A. O.Price, J. L.Mueller, C. W. 1992 Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivityJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 65 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, D. A.Fink, E. L. 2002 Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivistsCommunication Monographs 69 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, C. C.Chuah, K. B. 2000 Intergroup conflict management framework for Hong Kong's manufacturing industryEngineering Management Journal 12 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-Y. 1991 Hierarchical social relations and justice judgment among Hong Kong Chinese college studentsJournal of Social Psychology 131 885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-Y. 1991 Righteousness: The notion of justice in Chinese societiesYang, C. F.Kao, H. S. R.Chinese people and Chinese mind: The cultural tradition261). Taipei, TaiwanYuan-Liu Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-Y.Chen, J. 2004 Symbols and interactions: Application of the CCC model to culture, language, and social identityNg, S. HCandlin, CChiu, C.Language mattersHong KongCity University of Hong Kong PressGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-Y.Hong, Y. 1997 Justice from a Chinese perspectiveKao, H. S. RSinha, D.Asian perspectives on psychology164New Delhi, IndiaSage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-Y.Hong, Y. 2006 Social Psychology of CultureNew YorkPsychology PressGoogle Scholar
Chua, E. G.Gudykunst, W. B. 1987 Conflict resolution styles in low- and high-context culturesCommunications Research Reports 4 32Google Scholar
Cohen, D. 2001 Cultural variation: Considerations and implicationsPsychological Bulletin 127 451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. 2000 Complementarity theory: Why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complementsPersonality and Social Psychology Review 4 76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, R.Chi, S. C.Liu, L. A. 2006 An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoidingJournal of International Business Studies 37 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, J. B. 1974
Ho, D. Y. F.Chan, Chiu, S. J.C-y, 1991 Relational orientation: An inquiry on the methodology of Chinese social psychologyYang, K. S.Hwang, K. K.Chinese psychology and behavior49Taipei, TaiwanKuei-Kuan Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F.Chen, S. F. F.Zhang, Z. X. 2001 Metarelational analysis: An answer to “What is Asian about Asian social psychology?Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies 2 7Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1980 Culture's consequencesBeverly Hills, CASageGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. B.Schroeder, H. E. 1979 Some interpersonal effects of assertion, nonassertion and aggressionBehavioral Therapy 10 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K. K. 1987 Face and favor: The Chinese power gameAmerican Journal of Sociology 92 944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B. J. 1979 A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliance: “Renqing” and “guanxi” in a rural Taiwanese TownshipChina Quarterly 78 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. 1974 Effects of covert modeling and model reinforcement on assertive behaviorJournal of Abnormal Psychology 83 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. A.St. Lawrence, J. S.Bradlyn, A. S.Himadi, W. G.Graves, K. A.Keane, T. M. 1982 Interpersonal reactions to assertive and unassertive styles when handling social conflict situationsJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 13 33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozan, M. K. 1997 Culture and conflict management: A theoretical frameworkInternational Journal of Conflict Management 8 338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 1987 Some determinants of reaction to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national studyJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 1997 Negotiation and reward allocations across culturesChristopher, P. E.Erez, M.New perspectives on international industrial organizational psychology640San FranciscoNew LexingtonGoogle Scholar
Leung, K.Bond, M. H. 1984 The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, W.Fang, X.Zhang, C.Burkholder, R. 2006 1
McFall, R. M.Lillesand, D. 1971 Behavior rehearsal with modeling and coaching in assertive trainingJournal of Abnormal Psychology 77 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W.Willians, K. Y.Leung, K.Larrick, R.Mendoza, M. T.Bhatnagar, D. 1998 Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differencesJournal of International Business Studies 29 729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohbuchi, K-I.Fukushima, O.Tedeschi, J. T. 1999 Cultural values in conflict management: Goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactics decisionJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahim, M. A. 1983 A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflictAcademy of Management Journal 26 368Google ScholarPubMed
Singelis, T. M. 1994 The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construalsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swap, W. C.Rubin, J. Z. 1983 Measurement of interpersonal orientationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. L.Kenneth, T. W. 1976 Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 142Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S.Gao, G.Trubisky, P.Yang, Z.Kim, H. S.Lin, S. L. 1991 Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study of five culturesInternational Journal of Conflict Management 2 275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. 1985 Implications of controversy research for managementJournal of Management 11 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D.Sun, H. 2002 Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivation, actions, and consequencesInternational Journal of Conflict Management 13 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1994 Culture and social behaviorNew YorkMcGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Woolfolk, R. L.Dever, S. 1979 Perceptions of assertion: An empirical analysisBehavioral Therapy 10 404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, K. S. 1995 Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysisLin, T. Y.Tseng, W. SYeh, E. K.Chinese societies and mental health19Hong KongOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. X. 2001 The effects of frequency of social interaction and relationship closeness on reward allocationJournal of Psychology 135 154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z. X. 2005
Zhang, Z. X. 2006 Chinese conceptions of justice and reward allocationKim, UYang, K. S.Hwang, K. K.Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context403New YorkSpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. X. 2007 24
Zhang, Z.Yang, C. F. 1998 Beyond distributive justice: The reasonableness norm in Chinese reward allocationAsian Journal of Social Psychology 1 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. X.Yang, C. F. 2001 An investigation of the concept of renqingYang, C. F.Interpersonal relationship, trust, and affect223TaipeiYuan LiuGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×