Backscheider, Paula R., ‘Accounts of an eyewitness: Defoe’s dispatches from the vale of trade and the Edinburgh Parliament House’ in McKenzie, Alan T. (ed.), Sent as a Gift: Eight Correspondences from the Eighteenth Century (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1993), pp. 21–47.Google Scholar

Brant, Clare, Eighteenth-Century Letters and British Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Daybell, James, The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Novak, Max, ‘Defoe as a biographical subject’, Literature Compass, 3:6 (2006), 1218–36.Google Scholar

Redford, Bruce, The Converse of the Pen: Acts of Intimacy in the Eighteenth-Century Familiar Letter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Scarborough King, Rachael, Writing to the World: Letters and the Origins of Modern Print Genres (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Chalmers, George, The Life of Daniel De Foe (London: Printed for John Stockdale, 1790).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., The Canonisation of Daniel Defoe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., A Critical Bibliography of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1998).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., Defoe De-attributions: A Critique of J. R. Moore’s ‘Checklist’ (London: Hambledon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Hazlitt, William (ed.), The Works of Daniel de Foe: With a Memoir of His Life and Writings, 3 vols. (London: J. Clements, 1840–3).Google Scholar

Lee, William, Daniel Defoe: His Life, and Recently Discovered Writings: Extending from 1716 to 1729, 3 vols. (London: John Camden Hotten, 1869).Google Scholar

Marshall, Ashley, ‘Beyond Furbank and Owens: A new consideration of the evidence for the ‘“Defoe” canon’, Studies in Bibliography, 59 (2015), 131–90.Google Scholar

The Novels and Miscellaneous Works of Daniel de Foe: With a Biographical Memoir, Literary Prefaces to the Various Pieces, Illustrative Notes, etc., Including All Contained in the Edition Attributed to the Late Sir Walter Scott, with Considerable Additions, 20 vols. (Oxford: Printed by D. A. Talboys, for Thomas Tegg, 1840–1).Google Scholar

Rogers, Pat (ed.), Defoe: The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972).Google Scholar

Seager, Nicholas, ‘The celebrated Daniel De Foe: Publication history, 1731–1945’ in Seager, Nicholas and Downie, J. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Daniel Defoe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).Google Scholar

The Shakespeare Head Edition of the Novels and Selected Writings of Daniel Defoe, 14 vols. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1927–8).Google Scholar

Wilson, Walter, Memoirs of the Life and Times of Daniel De Foe: Containing a Review of His Writings, and His Opinions upon a Variety of Important Matters, Civil and Ecclesiastical, 3 vols. (London: Hurst, Chance, 1830).Google Scholar

Aravamudan, Srivinas, Tropicopolitans: Colonialism and Agency, 1688–1804 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Backscheider, Paula R., Daniel Defoe: Ambition and Innovation (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986).Google Scholar

Blewett, David, Defoe’s Art of Fiction (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Brown, Homer Obed, Institutions of the English Novel: From Defoe to Scott (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Macpherson, Sandra, Harm’s Way: Tragic Responsibility and the Novel Form (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., Realism, Myth, and History in Defoe’s Fiction (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Rader, Ralph W., ‘Fact, theory, and literary explanation’ in Phelan, James and Richter, David H. (eds.), Fact, Fiction, and Form: Selected Essays (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Van Ghent, Dorothy, The English Novel, Form and Function (New York: Rinehart, 1953).Google Scholar

Watt, Ian, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Everett, Defoe and the Novel (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Armstrong, Nancy, Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Ballaster, Ros, Seductive Forms: Women’s Amatory Fiction, 1684–1740 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Davis, Lennard J., Factual Fictions: The Origins of the English Novel (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Faller, Lincoln B., Crime and Defoe: A New Kind of Writing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Hammond, Brean, and Regan, Shaun, Making the Novel: Fiction and Society in Britain, 1660–1789 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Hunter, J. Paul, Before Novels: The Cultural Contexts of Eighteenth-Century English Fiction (New York: Norton, 1990).Google Scholar

Keymer, Thomas (ed.), The Oxford History of the Novel in English, vol. 1: Prose Fiction in English from the Origins of Print to 1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael, The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Neuberg, Victor E., Popular Literature: A History and Guide (London: Routledge, 1977).Google Scholar

Richetti, John J., Popular Fiction before Richardson: Narrative Patterns, 1700–1739 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Spufford, Margaret, Small Books and Pleasant Histories: Popular Fiction and Its Readership in Seventeenth-Century England (London: Methuen, 1981).Google Scholar

Hone, Joseph, ‘Daniel Defoe and the Whig tradition in satire’, ELH, 84:4 (2017), 865–90.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. Paul, ‘Defoe and poetic tradition’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 216–36.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. Paul, ‘Poetic footprints: Some formal elements in Defoe’s verse’ in Maniquis, Robert M. and Fisher, Carl (eds.), Defoe’s Footprints: Essays in Honor of Maximillian E. Novak (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), pp. 55–70.Google Scholar

Lord, George deForest, et al. (eds.), Poems on Affairs of State: Augustan Satirical Verse, 1660–1714, 7 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963–75).Google Scholar

Marshall, Ashley, The Practice of Satire in England, 1658–1770 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Mueller, Andreas K. E., A Critical Study of Daniel Defoe’s Verse: Recovering the Neglected Corpus of His Poetic Work. (Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Cole, Lucinda, Imperfect Creatures: Vermin, Literature, and the Sciences of Life, 1600–1740 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Cruise, James, ‘A Journal of the Plague Year: Defoe’s grammatology and the secrets of belonging’, The Eighteenth Century, 54:4 (2013), 479–95.Google Scholar

DeGabriele, Peter, ‘Intimacy, survival, and resistance in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year’, ELH, 77:1 (2010), 1–23.Google Scholar

Ellison, Katherine E., Fatal News: Reading and Information Overload in Early Eighteenth-Century Literature (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Ingram, Allan, and Dickson, Leigh Wetherall (eds.), Disease and Death in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Culture: Fashioning the Unfashionable (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar

Kickel, Katherine E., Novel Notions: Medical Discourse and the Mapping of the Imagination in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction (New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Loar, Christopher F., ‘Plague’s ecologies: Daniel Defoe and the epidemic constitution’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 32:1 (2019), 31–53.Google Scholar

Miller, Kathleen, The Literary Culture of Plague in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar

Thompson, Helen, ‘“It was impossible to know these People”: Secondary qualities and the form of character in A Journal of the Plague Year’, The Eighteenth Century, 54:2 (2013), 153–67.Google Scholar

Van Renen, Denys, The Other Exchange: Women, Servants and the Underclass in Early Modern Literature (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Wall, Cynthia, The Literary and Cultural Spaces of Restoration London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Cowan, Brian, ‘Daniel Defoe’s Review and the transformations of the English periodical’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 77:1 (2014), 79–110.Google Scholar

[Defoe, Daniel], The Master Mercury, intro. Frank H. Ellis and Henry L. Snyder (1704; repr., Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1977).Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., ‘Daniel Defoe’s Review and other political writings in the reign of Queen Anne’, unpublished MLitt thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (1973).Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., Robert Harley and the Press: Propaganda and Public Opinion in the Age of Swift and Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., ‘Stating facts right about Defoe’s Review’, Prose Studies, 16:1 (1993), 8–22.Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., ‘On the attribution of periodicals to Daniel Defoe’, Publishing History, 40 (1996), 83–98.Google Scholar

Hannis, Grant, ‘Daniel Defoe’s pioneering consumer journalism in the Review’, Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 30:1 (2007), 13–26.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. Paul, ‘Defoe, journalism, and the early English novel’ in Keymer, Thomas (ed.), The Oxford History of the Novel in English, vol. 1: Prose Fiction in English from the Origins of Print to 1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 515–29.Google Scholar

Marshall, Ashley, Political Journalism in London, 1695–1720: Defoe, Swift, Steele, and Their Contemporaries (London: Boydell Press, 2020).Google Scholar

McVeagh, John (ed.), Defoe’s Review, 9 vols. in 18 bks., The Works of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2003–11).Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian, ‘Daniel Defoe and Applebee’s Original Weekly Journal: An attempt at re-attribution’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 45:4 (2012), 585–608.Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., ‘Defoe’s political and religious journalism’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 25–44.Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., ‘Defoe’s role in the Weekly Journal: Gesture and rhetoric, archive and canon, and the uses of literary history in attribution’, Studies in Philology, 113:3 (2016), 694–711.Google Scholar

Payne, William L. (ed.), The Best of Defoe’s Review: An Anthology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951).Google Scholar

Payne, William Lytton, Mr. Review: Daniel Defoe as Author of The Review (New York: King’s Crown Press, 1947).Google Scholar

Seager, Nicholas, ‘“He reviews without Fear, and acts without Fainting”: Defoe’s Review’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 46:1 (2012), 131–42.Google Scholar

Secord, Arthur Wellesley (ed.), Defoe’s Review, 9 vols. in 22 bks. (New York: Columbia University Press for the Facsimile Text Society, 1938).Google Scholar

Wall, Cynthia, ‘Daniel Defoe (1660–1731): Journalism, myth, and verisimilitude’ in Bell, Michael (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to European Novelists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 36–53.Google Scholar

Foxon, David, Libertine Literature in England, 1660–1745 (New Hyde Park, NY: University Books, 1965).Google Scholar

Gladfelder, Hal, ‘Literature and pornography, 1660–1800’ in Oxford Handbook Topics in Literature, online ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935338.013.001.Google Scholar

Harvey, Karen, Reading Sex in the Eighteenth Century: Bodies and Gender in English Erotic Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Kendrick, Walter, The Secret Museum: Pornography in Modern Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Moulton, Ian Frederick, Before Pornography: Erotic Writing in Early Modern England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Mudge, Bradford K., The Whore’s Story: Women, Pornography, and the British Novel, 1684–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Mudge, Bradford K. (ed.), When Flesh Becomes Word: An Anthology of Early Eighteenth-Century Libertine Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Peakman, Julie, Mighty Lewd Books: The Development of Pornography in Eighteenth-Century England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Potter, Tiffany, ‘Genre and cultural disruption: Libertinism and the early English novel’, English Studies in Canada, 29:1–2 (2003), 165–91.Google Scholar

Toulalan, Sarah, Imagining Sex: Pornography and Bodies in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Turner, James Grantham, Schooling Sex: Libertine Literature and Erotic Education in Italy, France, and England, 1534–1685 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Achinstein, Sharon, Literature and Dissent in Milton’s England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Clark, Katherine, Daniel Defoe: The Whole Frame of Nature, Time and Providence (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar

Ferrell, Lori-Ann, and McCullough, Peter (eds.), The English Sermon Revised: Religion, Literature and History, 1600–1750 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Gordon, Alexander (ed.), Freedom after Ejection: A Review (1690–2) of Presbyterian and Congregational Nonconformity in England and Wales (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1917).Google Scholar

Keeble, N. H., The Literary Culture of Nonconformity in Later Seventeenth-Century England (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Mäkikalli, Aino, and Mueller, Andreas K. E. (eds.), Positioning Daniel Defoe’s Non-fiction: Form, Function, Genre (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2011).Google Scholar

Moore, John Robert, ‘Defoe’s persona as author: The Quaker’s Sermon’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 11:3 (1971), 507–16.Google Scholar

Pritchard, Penny, Before Crusoe: Defoe, Voice, and the Ministry (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Rivers, Isabel, Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Sell, Alan P., Dissenting Thought and the Life of the Churches: Studies in an English Tradition (San Francisco: Mellen, 1990).Google Scholar

Sommerville, C. John, Popular Religion in Restoration England (Gainesville: University Presses of Florida, 1977).Google Scholar

Ballaster, Rosalind, Fictions of Presence: Theatre and Novel in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Claydon, Tony, William III and the Godly Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Freeman, Lisa A., Antitheatricality and the Body Public (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Marshall, David, The Figure of Theater: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Moody, Jane, and O’Quinn, Daniel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to British Theatre, 1730–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Mueller, Andreas, Ewald, Karl, and Ridley, Glynis (eds.), Robinson Crusoe after 300 Years (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Felicity, Rival Queens: Actresses, Performance, and the Eighteenth-Century British Theater (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010).Google Scholar

O’Brien, John, Harlequin Britain: Pantomime and Entertainment, 1690–1760 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Roach, Joseph R., The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Bell, Ian A., ‘King Crusoe: Locke’s political theory in Robinson Crusoe’, English Studies, 69:1 (1988), 27–36.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Timothy C., ‘Friday’s religion: Its nature and importance in Robinson Crusoe’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 18:3 (1985), 360–82.Google Scholar

Landreth, Sara, ‘Defoe on spiritual communication, action at a distance, and the mind in motion’ in McMurran, Mary Helen and Conway, Alison (eds.), Mind, Body, Motion, Matter (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016), pp. 139–69.Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., ‘Crusoe the king and the political evolution of his island’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 2:3 (1962), 337–50.Google Scholar

Russell, Paul, ‘Causation, cosmology, and the limits of philosophy: The early eighteenth-century British debate’ in Harris, James A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 599–620.Google Scholar

Schliesser, Eric, ‘Newton and Newtonianism in eighteenth-century British thought’ in Harris, James A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 41–64.Google Scholar

Schonhorn, Manuel, Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Waldstein, Edmund, ‘The soul in the novel: From Daniel Defoe to David Foster Wallace’ in Lee, Eric Austin and Kimbriel, Samuel (eds.), The Resounding Soul: Reflections on the Metaphysics and Vivacity of the Human Person (Cambridge: Lutterworth, 2015), pp. 199–210.Google Scholar

Watson, Matthew, ‘Competing models of socially constructed economic man: Differentiating Defoe’s Crusoe from the Robinson of neoclassical economics’, New Political Economy 16:5 (2011), 609–26.Google Scholar

Backscheider, Paula R., ‘No defense: Defoe in 1703’, PMLA, 103:3 (1988), 274–84.Google Scholar

Beattie, John M., Crime and the Courts of England, 1660–1800 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Hamburger, Philip, ‘The development of the law of seditious libel and the control of the press’, Stanford Law Review, 37:661 (1985), 661–765.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, R. H., and Green, Thomas A., Juries, Libel and Justice: The Role of English Juries in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Trials for Libel and Slander (Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California, 1984).Google Scholar

Keymer, Thomas, Poetics of the Pillory: English Literature and Seditious Libel, 1660–1820 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., ‘Paying for poetry at the turn of the eighteenth century, with particular reference to Dryden, Pope, and Defoe’, Digital Defoe, 6:1 (2014), https://digitaldefoe.org/2014/10/28/paying-for-poetry-at-the-turn-of-the-eighteenth-century-with-particular-reference-to-dryden-pope-and-defoe/.Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., ‘Periodicals, the book trade and the “bourgeois public sphere”’, Media History, 14:3 (2008), 262–74.Google Scholar

Foxon, David, Pope and the Early Eighteenth-Century Book Trade, rev. and ed. McLaverty, James (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Griffin, Dustin, Authorship in the Long Eighteenth Century (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Hammond, Brean, Professional Imaginative Writing in England, 1670–1741: ‘Hackney for Bread’ (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D., ‘The value of money in eighteenth-century England: Incomes, prices, buying power – and some problems in cultural economics’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 77:4 (2014), 373–416.Google Scholar

Lockwood, Thomas, ‘Subscription-hunters and their prey’, Studies in the Literary Imagination, 34:1 (2001), 121–35.Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith, and Hume, Robert D., The Publication of Plays in London, 1660–1800: Playwrights, Publishers and the Market (London: British Library, 2015).Google Scholar

Raven, James, The Business of Books: Booksellers and the English Book Trade, 1450–1850 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

St Clair, William, The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Suarez, Michael F., and Turner, Michael L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, vol. 5: 1695–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Da, Nan Z., ‘The computational case against computational literary studies’, Critical Inquiry, 45:3 (2019), 601–39.Google Scholar

Ellison, Katherine, and Nelson, Holly Faith, ‘Defoe 2.0: An editorial introduction’, Digital Defoe, 1:1 (2009), 1–12, https://digitaldefoe.org/introduction/.Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., ‘On the attribution of novels to Daniel Defoe’, Philological Quarterly, 89:2–3 (2010), 243–53.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan, ‘The state of the digital humanities: A report and a critique’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11:1–2 (2012), 8–41.Google Scholar

McDowell, Paula, ‘Defoe and the contagion of the oral: Modeling media shift in A Journal of the Plague Year’, PMLA, 121:1 (2006), 87–106.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History (London: Verso, 2005).Google Scholar

Rudman, Joseph, ‘Unediting, de-editing, and editing in nontraditional authorship attribution studies: With an emphasis on the canon of Daniel Defoe’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 99:1 (2005), 5–36.Google Scholar

Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray, and Unsworth, John (eds.), A New Companion to Digital Humanities, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell, 2016).Google Scholar

Seager, Nicholas, ‘Lies, damned lies, and statistics: Epistemology and fiction in Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year’, Modern Language Review, 103:3 (2008), 639–53.Google Scholar

Svensson, Patrik, ‘Humanities computing as digital humanities’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 3:3 (2009), http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000065/000065.html.Google Scholar

Tonks, Patrick, ‘Robinson Crusoe’s Brazilian expedition and The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database’, Digital Defoe, 2:1 (2010), 85–8, https://english.illinoisstate.edu/digitaldefoe/archive/spring10/notes/tonks.html.Google Scholar

Brown, Homer , ‘The institution of the English novel: Defoe’s contribution’, NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, 29:3 (1996), 299–318.Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R, ‘The Defoe canon again’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 82:1 (1988), 95–8.Google Scholar

Griffin, Robert J., ‘Did Defoe write Roxana? Does it matter?’, Philological Quarterly, 89:2–3 (2010), 255–62.Google Scholar

Griffin, Robert J. (ed.), The Faces of Anonymity: Anonymous and Pseudonymous Publications from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., ‘A Vindication of the Press and the Defoe canon’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 27:3 (1987), 399–411.Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., ‘Whither the Defoe canon?’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 9:1 (1996), 89–91.Google Scholar

Owens, W. R., and Furbank, P. N., ‘A Vindication of the Press (1718): Not by Defoe?’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 78:3 (1984), 355–60.Google Scholar

Vareschi, Mark, ‘Attribution and repetition: The case of Defoe and the circulating library’, Eighteenth- Century Life, 36:2 (2012), 36–59.Google Scholar

Clark, K. R. P., ‘Defoe, Dissent, and early Whig ideology’, Historical Journal, 52:3 (2009), 595–614.Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., Robert Harley and the Press: Propaganda and Public Opinion in the Age of Swift and Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., A Political Biography of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2005).Google Scholar

Hayton, D. W., ‘Defoe and government: Propaganda and principle’ in Seager, Nicholas and Downie, J. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Daniel Defoe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).Google Scholar

Holmes, Geoffrey, British Politics in the Age of Anne, 2nd ed. (London: Hambledon Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Hone, Joseph, Literature and Party Politics at the Accession of Queen Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Kenyon, J. P., Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party, 1688–1720 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Marshall, Ashley, ‘Robert Harley and the politics of Daniel Defoe’s Review, 1710–1713’, 1650–1850, 24 (2019), 54–97.Google Scholar

Schonhorn, Manuel, Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Seager, Nicholas, ‘Literary evaluation and authorship attribution, or Defoe’s politics at the Hanoverian succession’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 80:1 (2017), 47–69.Google Scholar

Backscheider, Paula R., ‘The verse essay, John Locke, and Defoe’s Jure Divino’, ELH, 55:1 (1988), 99–124.Google Scholar

Clark, K. R. P., ‘Defoe, Dissent, and early Whig ideology’, Historical Journal, 52:3 (2009), 595–614.Google Scholar

Claydon, Tony, William III and the Godly Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., ‘Defoe’s early writings’, Review of English Studies, 46:182 (1995), 225–30.Google Scholar

McKendry, Andrew, ‘“No parallels from Hebrew times”: Troubled typologies and the Glorious Revolution in Daniel Defoe’s Williamite poetry’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 50:1 (2016), 81–99.Google Scholar

Peterson, Spiro, ‘Defoe and Westminster, 1696–1706’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12:3 (1979), 306–38.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steve, 1688: The First Modern Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Schwoerer, Lois G., ‘The literature of the standing army controversy, 1697–1699’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 28:3 (1965), 187–212.Google Scholar

Backscheider, Paula R., Daniel Defoe: Ambition and Innovation (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986).Google Scholar

Earle, Peter, The World of Defoe (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1976).Google Scholar

Guilhamet, Leon, Defoe and the Whig Novel: A Reading of the Major Fiction (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Hone, Joseph, Literature and Party Politics at the Accession of Queen Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Lamont, William, and Oldfield, Sybil (eds.), Politics, Religion, and Literature in the Seventeenth Century (London: Dent, 1975).Google Scholar

Loar, Christopher F., Political Magic: British Fictions of Savagery and Sovereignty, 1650–1750 (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Merrett, Robert J., Daniel Defoe: Contrarian (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., Daniel Defoe: Master of Fictions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Richetti, John, The Life of Daniel Defoe (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar

Roosen, William, Daniel Defoe and Diplomacy (Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Schonhorn, Manuel, Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Davis, Leith, Acts of Union: Scotland and the Literary Negotiation of the British Nation, 1707–1830 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Deschamps, Yannick, ‘The adventures of Daniel Defoe in Scotland (1706–1707): Secret agent, propagandist, and entrepreneur’ in Soupel, Serge, Cope, Kevin L., Pettit, Alexander, and Wood, Laura Thomason (eds.), Adventure: An Eighteenth-Century Idiom: Essays on the Daring and the Bold as a Pre-modern Medium (New York: AMS Press, 2009), pp. 189–209.Google Scholar

Dickey, Laurence, ‘Power, commerce, and natural law in Daniel Defoe’s political writings, 1698–1707’ in Robertson, John (ed.), A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 63–96.Google Scholar

Hall, Basil, ‘Daniel Defoe and Scotland’ in Buick Knox, R. (ed.), Reformation, Conformity and Dissent: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Nutall (London: Epworth, 1977), pp. 231–8.Google Scholar

Kerrigan, John, ‘Defoe, Scotland, and Union’ in Schwyzer, Philip and Mealor, Simon (eds.), Archipelagic Identities: Literature and Identity in the Atlantic Archipelago, 1550–1800 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 53–77.Google Scholar

Macaree, David, ‘Daniel Defoe, the Church of Scotland, and the Union of 1707’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7:1 (1973), 62–77.Google Scholar

Moore, John Robert, Daniel Defoe: Citizen of the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Riley, P. W. J., The Union of England and Scotland: A Study in Anglo-Scottish Politics of the Eighteenth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Robertson, John, ‘An elusive sovereignty: The course of the Union debate in Scotland, 1698–1707’ in Robertson, John (ed.), A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 198–227.Google Scholar

Shields, Juliet, Sentimental Literature and Anglo-Scottish Identity, 1745–1820 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Swenson, Rivka, Essential Scots and the Idea of Unionism in Anglo-Scottish Literature, 1603–1832 (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Arnold, Christof K., Wicked Lives. Funktion und Wandel der Verbrecherbiographie im England des 17. Und frühen 18. Jahrhunderts (Heidelberg: Winter, 1985).Google Scholar

Beattie, J. M., Crime and the Courts in England, 1660–1800 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Böker, Uwe, ‘The prison and the penitentiary as sites of public counter-discourse’ in Böker, Uwe and Hibbard, Julia A. (eds.), Sites of Discourse – Public and Private Spheres – Legal Culture. Papers from a Conference Held at the Technical University of Dresden, December 2001 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002), pp. 37–66.Google Scholar

deGategno, Paul J., ‘Daniel Defoe’s Newgate biographies: An economic crisis’, CLIO, 13:2 (1984), 157–70.Google Scholar

Ellison, Katherine, Kincade, Kit, and Nelson, Holly Faith (eds.), Topographies of the Imagination: New Approaches to Daniel Defoe (New York: AMS Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Gaskill, Malcolm, Crime and Mentalities in Early Modern English (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Harding, Christopher, Hines, Bill, Ireland, Richard, and Rawlings, Philip, Imprisonment in England and Wales: A Concise History (Beckenham: Croom Helm, 1985).Google Scholar

Olson, Greta, and Kayman, Martin A. (eds.), ‘Law, literature, and language’, special issue, European Journal of English Studies, 11:1 (2007).Google Scholar

Pache, Walter, Profit and Delight. Didaktik und Fiktion als Problem des Erzählens. Dargestellt am Beispiel des Romanwerks von Daniel Defoe (Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1980).Google Scholar

Pepper, Andrew, ‘Early crime writing and the state: Jonathan Wild, Daniel Defoe and Bernard Mandeville in 1720s London’, Textual Practice, 25:3 (2011), 473–91.Google Scholar

Rietz, John, ‘Criminal Ms-representation: Moll Flanders and female criminal biography’, Studies in the Novel, 23:2 (1991), 183–95.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, H., ‘Criminal biographies or picaresque novels? An investigation of the Dutch translations of The English Rogue and Moll Flanders’ in Wintle, M. J. and Vincent, Paul (eds.), Modern Dutch Studies: Essays in Honour of Peter King (London: Bloomsbury, 1988), pp. 116–25.Google Scholar

Brühlmeier, Daniel, ‘Daniel Defoe: Dissent, economics, toleration’ in Laursen, John Christian (eds.), Toleration: ‘The Variety of Rites’ from Cyrus to Defoe (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), pp. 211–27.Google Scholar

Champion, J. A. I., The Pillars of Priestcraft Shaken: The Church of England and Its Enemies, 1660–1730 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Conway, Alison, and Alvarez, David (eds.), Imagining Religious Toleration: A Literary History of an Idea (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Creppell, Ingrid, Toleration and Identity: Foundations in Early Modern Thought (New York: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar

Davie, Donald, A Gathered Church: The Literature of the English Dissenting Interest, 1700–1930 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Gregory, Jeremy, Restoration, Reformation, and Reform, 1660–1878 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), Enlightenment and Reform: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Haydon, Colin, Anti-Catholicism in Eighteenth-Century England, c. 1714–80: A Political and Social Study (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Mullett, Charles F., ‘The legal position of English Protestant Dissenters, 1689–1767’, Virginia Law Review, 23:4 (1937), 384–418.Google Scholar

Prince, Michael B., The Shortest Way with Defoe: Robinson Crusoe, Deism, and the Novel (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Schochet, Gordon, ‘From “persecution” to “toleration”’ in Jones, J. R. (ed.), Liberty Secured? Britain before and after 1688 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), pp. 122–57.Google Scholar

Seed, John, Dissenting Histories: Religious Division and the Politics of Memory in Eighteenth-Century England (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Sheehan, Jonathan, The Enlightenment Bible: Translation, Scholarship, Culture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Walsham, Alexandra, Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 1500–1700 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Webb, R. K., ‘From toleration to religious liberty’ in Jones, J. R. (ed.), Liberty Secured? Britain before and after 1688 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), pp. 158–98.Google Scholar

Weinbrot, Howard D., Literature, Religion, and the Evolution of Culture, 1660–1780 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Dickie, Simon, ‘Picaresque and rogue fiction’ in Keymer, Thomas (ed.), The Oxford History of the Novel in English, vol. 1: Prose Fiction in English from the Origins of Print to 1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 260–76.Google Scholar

Hammond, Brean, ‘Defoe and the picaresque’ in Ardila, J. A. Garrido (ed.), The Picaresque Novel in Western Literature: From the Sixteenth Century to the Neopicaresque (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 140–56.Google Scholar

Fairer, David, Chocolate House Treason: A Mystery of Queen Anne’s London (London: Matador, 2019).Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith, and Hume, Robert D., The Publication of Plays in London, 1660–1800: Playwrights, Publishers and the Market (London: British Library, 2015).Google Scholar

Todd, Dennis, Defoe’s America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Burden, Mark, ‘Academical learning in the Dissenters’ private academies, 1660–1720’, unpublished PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London (2012).Google Scholar

Cohen, Michèle, ‘Gender and “method” in eighteenth-century English education’, Journal of the History of Education, 33:5 (2004), 585–95.Google Scholar

Corfield, Penelope J., Power and the Professions, 1700–1850 (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Evans, G. R., The University of Cambridge: A New History (London: I. B. Tauris, 2004).Google Scholar

Hans, Nicholas, New Trends in Education in the Eighteenth Century (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951).Google Scholar

Hilton, Mary, and Shefrin, Jill (eds.), Educating the Child in Enlightenment Britain: Beliefs, Cultures, Practices (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar

O’Day, Rosemary, Education and Society, 1500–1800: The Social Foundations of Education in Early Modern Britain (London: Longman, 1982).Google Scholar

Otis, Jessica, ‘“Set Them to the Cyphering Schoole”: Reading, writing, and arithmetical education, circa 1540–1700’, Journal of British Studies, 56:3 (2017), 453–82.Google Scholar

Vincent, W. A. L., The Grammar Schools: Their Continuing Tradition, 1660–1714 (London: John Murray, 1969).Google Scholar

Jones, M. G., The Charity School Movement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938).Google Scholar

Barker-Benfield, G. J., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gregg, Stephen H., Defoe’s Writings and Manliness: Contrary Men (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar

Harvey, Karen, ‘The century of sex? Gender, bodies, and sexuality in the long eighteenth century’, Historical Journal, 45:4 (2002), 899–916.Google Scholar

Kahn, Madeleine, Narrative Transvestism: Rhetoric and Gender in the Eighteenth-Century English Novel (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael, ‘Historicizing patriarchy: The emergence of gender difference in England, 1660–1760’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 28:3 (1995), 295–322.Google Scholar

Perry, Ruth, The Celebrated Mary Astell: An Early English Feminist (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Pollak, Ellen, ‘Gender and fiction in Moll Flanders and Roxana’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 139–57.Google Scholar

Rogers, Katharine M., Feminism in Eighteenth-Century England (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Shevelow, Kathryn, Women and Print Culture: The Construction of Femininity in the Early Periodical (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar

Turley, Hans, Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash: Piracy, Sexuality, and Masculine Identity (New York: New York University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Wahrman, Dror, The Making of the Modern Self: Identity and Culture in Eighteenth-Century England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Degenhardt, Jane Hwang, ‘Cracking the mysteries of “China”: China(ware) in the early modern imagination’, Studies in Philology, 110:1 (2013), 132–67.Google Scholar

Festa, Lynn, ‘Crusoe’s Island of Misfit Things’, The Eighteenth Century, 52:3–4 (2011), 443–71.Google Scholar

Gerritsen, Anne, and McDowall, Stephen, ‘Material culture and the other: European encounters with Chinese porcelain, ca. 1650–1800’, Journal of World History, 23:1 (2012), 87–113.Google Scholar

Joseph, Betty, ‘Capitalism and its others: Intersecting and competing forms in eighteenth-century fiction’, Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 45 (2016), 157–73.Google Scholar

Kareem, Sarah Tindal, Eighteenth-Century Fiction and the Reinvention of Wonder (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Liu, Lydia H, ‘Robinson Crusoe’s earthenware pot’, Critical Inquiry, 25:4 (1999), 728–57.Google Scholar

Liu, Yu, Seeds of a Different Eden: Chinese Gardening Ideas and a New English Aesthetic Ideal (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Ma, Ning, The Age of Silver: The Rise of the Novel East and West (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Markley, Robert, The Far East and the English Imagination, 1600–1730 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Min, Eun Kyung, China and the Writing of English Literary Modernity, 1690–1770 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Ngai, Sianne, Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Porter, David, The Chinese Taste in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Starr, G. A., ‘Defoe and China’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 43:4 (2010), 435–54.Google Scholar

Stewart, Susan, On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Wilson, Francis, ‘The dark side of utopia: Misanthropy and the Chinese prelude in Defoe’s lunar journey’, Comparative Critical Studies, 4:2 (2007), 193–207.Google Scholar

Wood, James Robert, ‘Robinson Crusoe and the earthy ground’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 32:3 (2020), 381–406.Google Scholar

Yang, Chi-ming, Performing China: Virtue, Commerce, and Orientalism in Eighteenth-Century England, 1660–1760 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Zuroski, Eugenia, A Taste for China: English Subjectivity and the Prehistory of Orientalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Cowan, Brian, ‘The rise of the coffeehouse reconsidered’, Historical Journal, 47:1 (2004), 21–46.Google Scholar

Ellis, Markman, ‘Coffee-house libraries in mid-eighteenth-century London’, The Library, 10:1 (2009), 3–40.Google Scholar

Erickson, Amy Louise, ‘Eleanor Mosley and other milliners in the City of London companies 1700–1750’, History Workshop Journal, 71 (2001), 147–72.Google Scholar

Gowing, Laura, ‘Girls on forms: Apprenticing young women in seventeenth-century London’, Journal of British Studies, 55:3 (2016), 447–73.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark, ‘A city revolution: The remodelling of the London Livery companies in the 1680s’, English Historical Review, 112:449 (1997), 1141–78.Google Scholar

London Lives 1690 to 1800: Crime, Poverty and Social Policy in the Metropolis, https://www.londonlives.org/.Google Scholar

The Proceedings of the Old Bailey: London’s Central Criminal Court, 1674 to 1913, https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Robert B., Prosecution and Punishment: Petty Crime and the Law in London and Rural Middlesex, c. 1660–1725 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Wall, Cynthia, The Literary and Cultural Spaces of Restoration London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Ward, Joseph, Metropolitan Communities: Trade Guilds, Identity, and Change in Early Modern London (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Auricchio, Laura, Cook, Elizabeth Heckendorn, and Pacini, Giulia (eds.), Invaluable Trees: Cultures of Nature, 1660–1830 (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2012).Google Scholar

Barrell, John, English Literature in History, 1730–80: An Equal, Wide Survey (London: Hutchinson, 1983).Google Scholar

Buell, Lawrence, The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Clark, Timothy, The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Di Palma, Vittoria, Wasteland: A History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Drew, Erin, ‘Teaching and learning guide for: Ecocriticism and eighteenth-century English studies’, Literature Compass, 10:4 (2013), 301–10.Google Scholar

Festa, Lynn, ‘Crusoe’s Island of Misfit Things’, The Eighteenth Century, 53:3–4 (2011), 443–71.Google Scholar

Hiltner, Kent, ‘Early modern ecology’ in Hattaway, Michael (ed.), A New Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture, 2 vols. (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2010), vol. 2, pp. 555–68.Google Scholar

Hitt, Christopher, ‘Ecocriticism and the long eighteenth century’, College Literature, 31:3 (2004), 123–47.Google Scholar

Menely, Tobias, ‘“The Present Obfuscation”: Cowper’s task and the time of climate change’, PMLA, 127:3 (2012), 477–92.Google Scholar

Mentz, Steve, Shipwreck Modernity: Ecologies of Globalization, 1550–1719 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Remien, Peter, ‘Oeconomy and ecology in early modern England’, PMLA, 132:5 (2017), 1117–33.Google Scholar

Sitter, John, ‘Eighteenth-century ecological poetry and ecotheology’, Religion & Literature, 40:1 (2008), 11–37.Google Scholar

Worster, Donald, Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Ganz, Melissa J., Public Vows: Fictions of Marriage in the English Enlightenment (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Mason, Shirlene, Daniel Defoe and the Status of Women (St. Alban’s, VT: Eden Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Maurer, Shawn Lisa, ‘“I Wou’d Be a Man-Woman”: Roxana’s Amazonian threat to the ideology of marriage’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 46:3 (2004), 363–86.Google Scholar

Meyler, Bernadette, ‘Defoe’s formal laws’ in Nussbaum, Martha C. and LaCroix, Alison L. (eds.), Subversion and Sympathy: Gender, Law, and the British Novel (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 230–47.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, R. B., Clandestine Marriage in England, 1500–1850 (London: Hambledon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Peterson, Spiro, ‘The matrimonial theme of Defoe’s Roxana’, PMLA, 70:1 (1955), 166–91.Google Scholar

Phillips, Roderick, Putting Asunder: A History of Divorce in Western Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Pollak, Ellen, Incest and the English Novel, 1684–1814 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Probert, Rebecca, Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Staves, Susan, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Stone, Lawrence, Road to Divorce: England, 1530–1987 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Zomchick, John P., Family and the Law in Eighteenth-Century Fiction: The Public Conscience in the Private Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 5th ed., 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1773).Google Scholar

Bourguignon, Henry J., Sir William Scott, Lord Stowell, Judge of the High Court of Admiralty, 1798–1828 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Bull, Malcolm, On Mercy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De officiis (Of Duties), trans. Miller, Walter (New York: Macmillan, 1913).Google Scholar

Defoe, Daniel, Of Captain Misson, ed. Novak, Maximillian E., Augustan Reprint Society, no. 87 (Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California, 1961).Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis [and Guillaume Raynal], Political Writings, ed. Mason, John Hope and Wokler, Robert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gosse, Philip, The History of Piracy (London: Cassell, 1954).Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Free Sea, ed. Armitage, David (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Heller-Roazen, Daniel, The Enemy of All: Piracy and the Law of Nations (New York: Zone Books, 2009).Google Scholar

Hume, David, ‘Of justice’ in An Inquiry into the Principles of Morals, ed. Hendel, Charles W. (New York: Macmillan, 1957), pp. 14–34.Google Scholar

Lamb, Jonathan, Preserving the Self in the South Seas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, Of the Law of Nature and Nations, trans. Kennett, Basil (London: J. Walthoe and others, 1729).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. Cole, G. D. H. (London: Everyman, 1993).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Nomos of the Earth, trans. Ulmen, G. L. (New York: Telos, 2006).Google Scholar

Selden, John, Of the Dominion, or Ownership of the Sea (London, 1652).Google Scholar

Twiss, Travers (ed.), Monumenta Juridica. The Black Book of the Admiralty, 4 vols. (London: Longman and Trübner, 1871–6).Google Scholar

Bearden, Elizabeth, Monstrous Kinds: Body, Space, and Narrative in Renaissance Representations of Disability (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Davis, Lennard, Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Modern Body (London: Verso, 1995).Google Scholar

Deutsch, Helen, Loving Dr. Johnson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Deutsch, Helen, and Nussbaum, Felicity (eds.), Defects: Engendering the Modern Body (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Farr, Jason S., ‘Colonizing gestures: Crusoe, the signing sovereign’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 29:4 (2017), 537–62.Google Scholar

Gabbard, Chris, and Mintz, Susannah B. (eds.), The Cultural History of Disability in the Long Eighteenth Century (London: Bloomsbury, 2020).Google Scholar

Hobsgood, Allison P., and Wood, David Houston (eds.), Recovering Disability in the Early Modern Period (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Joshua, Essaka, ‘Disability and deformity: Function impairment and aesthetics in the long eighteenth century’ in Barker, Clare and Murray, Stuart (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 47–61.Google Scholar

Kelleher, Paul, ‘The man within the breast: Sympathy and deformity in Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments’, Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 44 (2015), 41–60.Google Scholar

Mounsey, Chris (ed.), The Idea of Disability in the Eighteenth Century (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Felicity A., The Limits of the Human: Fictions of Anomaly, Race, and Gender in the Long Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Turner, David, Disability in Eighteenth-Century England: Imagining Physical Impairment (New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Avaramudan, Srinivas, ‘Defoe, commerce, and empire’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 45–63.Google Scholar

Gildon, Charles, The life and strange surprizing adventures of Mr. D— de F (London: Printed for J. Roberts, 1719).Google Scholar

Hill, Christopher, ‘Robinson Crusoe’, History Workshop Journal, 10 (1980), 6–24.Google Scholar

Hulme, Peter, Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797 (London: Methuen, 1986).Google Scholar

Lifshey, Adam, ‘Castaway colonialism: Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca’s Account’ in Specters of Conquest: Indigenous Absence in Transatlantic Literatures (New York: Fordham University Press, 2010), pp. 62–89.Google Scholar

McInelly, Brett C., ‘Expanding empires, expanding selves: Colonialism, the novel, and Robinson Crusoe’, Studies in the Novel, 35:1 (2003), 1–21.Google Scholar

Said, Edward, Culture and Imperialism (New York: Vintage Books, 1994).Google Scholar

Todd, Dennis, ‘Robinson Crusoe and colonialism’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to ‘Robinson Crusoe’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 142–56.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Philip, What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity (New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar

Cole, Lucinda, ‘Animal studies and the eighteenth century: The nature of the beast’, Literature Compass, 16:1 (2019), e12536, https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12536.Google Scholar

Cole, Lucinda, Imperfect Creatures: Vermin, Literature, and the Sciences of Life, 1600–1740 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, The Beast and the Sovereign, vol. 2, trans. Bennington, Geoffrey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Festa, Lynn M., Fiction without Humanity: Person, Animal, Thing in Early Enlightenment Literature and Culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Keenleyside, Heather, Animals and Other People: Literary Forms and Living Beings in the Long Eighteenth Century (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kelleher, Paul, ‘A table in the wilderness: Desire, subjectivity, and animal husbandry in Robinson Crusoe’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 32:1 (2019), 9–29.Google Scholar

Lamb, Jonathan, ‘Sympathy with animals and salvation of the soul’, The Eighteenth Century, 52:1 (2011), 69–85.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, Alex, ‘Crusoe’s abattoir: Cannibalism and animal slaughter in Robinson Crusoe’, Critical Quarterly, 53:3 (2011), 24–43.Google Scholar

Marshall, David, ‘Autobiographical acts in Robinson Crusoe’, ELH, 71:4 (2004), 899–920.Google Scholar

Nash, Richard, Wild Enlightenment: The Borders of Human Identity in the Eighteenth Century (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Sudan, Rajani, Fair Exotics: Xenophobic Subjects in English Literature, 1720–1850 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Thomas, Keith, Man and the Natural World: A History of the Modern Sensibility (New York: Pantheon Books, 1983).Google Scholar

Wolloch, Nathaniel, The Enlightenment’s Animals: Changing Conceptions of Animals in the Long Eighteenth Century (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Anderson, Hans, ‘The paradox of trade and morality in Defoe’, Modern Philology, 39:1 (1941), 23–46.Google Scholar

Boulukos, George, The Grateful Slave: The Emergence of Race in Eighteenth-Century British and American Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Carey, Daniel, ‘Reading contrapuntally: Robinson Crusoe, slavery, and postcolonial theory’ in Carey, Daniel and Festa, Lynn (eds.), Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Colonialism and Postcolonial Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 105–36.Google Scholar

Coetzee, J. M., Foe (New York: Penguin Books, 1988).Google Scholar

Fleming, Catherine, ‘“My Fellow-Servants”: Othering and identification in Daniel Defoe’s Colonel Jack’, Digital Defoe, 11:1 (2019), 17–35, https://digitaldefoe.org/2019/12/04/my-fellow-servants-othering-and-identification-in-daniel-defoes-colonel-jack/.Google Scholar

Hulme, Peter, Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797 (London: Methuen, 1986).Google Scholar

Loar, Christopher F., Political Magic: British Fictions of Savagery and Sovereignty, 1650–1750 (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Mitstein, Rebekah, ‘Africa is always bringing forth something new: African worlds and worldviews in British Enlightenment literature, 1660–1780’, unpublished PhD thesis, Purdue University (2016).Google Scholar

Swaminathan, Srividhya, ‘Defoe’s Captain Singleton: A study in enslavement’ in Swaminathan, Srividhya and Beach, Adam (eds.), Invoking Slavery in the Eighteenth-Century British Imagination (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2013).Google Scholar

Todd, Dennis, Defoe’s America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Wheeler, Roxann, The Complexion of Race: Categories of Difference in Eighteenth-Century British Culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Wheeler, Roxann, ‘Powerful affections: Slaves, servants and labors of love in Defoe’s writings’ in Maniquis, Robert M. and Fisher, Carl (eds.), Defoe’s Footprints: Essays in Honour of Maximillian E. Novak (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), pp. 126–52.Google Scholar

Aravamudan, Srinivas, Tropicopolitans: Colonialism and Agency, 1688–1804 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Armstrong, Nancy, and Tennenhouse, Leonard, The Imaginary Puritan: Literature, Intellectual Labor, and the Origins of Personal Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Cole, Lucinda, Imperfect Creatures: Vermin, Literature, and the Sciences of Life, 1600–1740 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Fallon, Ann Marie, Global Crusoe: Comparative Literature, Postcolonial Theory and Transnational Aesthetics (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar

Grapard, Ulla, and Hewitson, Gillian (eds.), Robinson Crusoe’s Economic Man: A Construction and Deconstruction (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Markley, Robert, ‘Defoe and the problem of the East India Company’ in Clark, Steve and Yoshihara, Yukari (eds.), Robinson Crusoe in Asia (Singapore: Palgrave, 2021), pp. 23–46.Google Scholar

Markley, Robert, The Far East and the English Imagination, 1600–1730 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., Economics and the Fiction of Daniel Defoe (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Paul, Tawny, The Poverty of Disaster: Insecurity in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Sherman, Sandra, Finance and Fictionality in the Early Eighteenth Century: Accounting for Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Turley, Hans, Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash: Piracy, Sexuality, and Masculine Identity (New York: New York University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Baine, Rodney, Daniel Defoe and the Supernatural (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Defoe, Daniel, Christianity Not as Old as the Creation: The Last of Defoe’s Performances, ed. Starr, George A. (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2012).Google Scholar

Defoe, Daniel, An Essay on the History and Reality of Apparitions, ed. Kincade, Kit (New York: AMS Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Mullan, John (ed.), Satire, Fantasy and Writings on the Supernatural by Daniel Defoe, vol. 6: The Political History of the Devil (1726), The Works of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2005).Google Scholar

Orr, Leah, ‘Providence and religion in the Crusoe trilogy’, Eighteenth-Century Life, 38:2 (2014), 1–27.Google Scholar

Starr, G. A. (ed.), The Novels of Daniel Defoe, vol. 3: Serious Reflections during the Life and Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe, The Works of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2008).Google Scholar

Starr, G. A. (ed.), Satire, Fantasy and Writings on the Supernatural by Daniel Defoe, vol. 8: An Essay on the History and Reality of Apparitions (1727), The Works of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2005).Google Scholar

Starr, George, ‘Why Defoe probably did not write The Apparition of Mrs. Veal’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 15:3–4 (2003), 421–50.Google Scholar

Aravamudan, Srinivas, ‘Defoe, commerce, and empire’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 45–63.Google Scholar

Bartolomeo, Joseph F., ‘“New People in a New World”?: Defoe’s ambivalent narratives of emigration’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 23:3 (2011), 455–70.Google Scholar

Boulukos, George, The Grateful Slave: The Emergence of Race in Eighteenth-Century British and American Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Downie, J. A., ‘Defoe, imperialism, and the travel books reconsidered’ in Lund, Roger D. (ed.), Critical Essays on Daniel Defoe (New York: G. K. Hall, 1997), pp. 78–96.Google Scholar

Faller, Lincoln, Crime and Defoe: A New Kind of Writing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Flynn, Christopher, ‘Nationalism, commerce, and imperial anxiety in Defoe’s later works’, Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 54:2 (2000), 11–24.Google Scholar

McInelly, Brett C., ‘Expanding empires, expanding selves: Colonialism, the novel, and Robinson Crusoe’, Studies in the Novel, 35:1 (2003), 1–21.Google Scholar

Seidel, Michael, Robinson Crusoe: Island Myths and the Novel (Boston, MA: Twayne, 1991).Google Scholar

Todd, Dennis, Defoe’s America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Todd, Dennis, ‘Robinson Crusoe and colonialism’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 142–56.Google Scholar

Baine, Rodney M., ‘Chalmers’ first bibliography of Daniel Defoe’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 10:4 (1969), 547–68.Google Scholar

Brown, Homer Obed, Institutions of the English Novel: From Defoe to Scott (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., ‘BIBLIOGRAPHY: The Defoe that never was: A tale of de-attribution’, American Scholar, 66:2 (1997), 276–84.Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., The Canonisation of Daniel Defoe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., ‘The myth of Defoe as “Applebee’s man”’, Review of English Studies, 48:190 (1997), 198–204.Google Scholar

Moore, John Robert, ‘Defoe and Scott’, PMLA, 56:3 (1941), 710–35.Google Scholar

Moore, John Robert, ‘Defoe, Stevenson, and the pirates’, ELH, 10:1 (1943), 35–60.Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., ‘A Vindication of the Press and the Defoe canon’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 27:3 (1987), 399–411.Google Scholar

Peterson, Spiro, Daniel Defoe: A Reference Guide, 1731–1924 (Boston, MA: G. K. Hall, 1987).Google Scholar

Rogers, Pat (ed.), Daniel Defoe: The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972).Google Scholar

Snyder, Henry L., ‘Daniel Defoe, Arthur Maynwaring, Robert Walpole, and Abel Boyer: Some considerations of authorship’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 33:2 (1970), 133–53.Google Scholar

Vareschi, Mark, ‘Attribution, circulation, and “Defoe”’ in Everywhere and Nowhere: Anonymity and Mediation in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018), pp. 111–44.Google Scholar

Backscheider, Paula R., Daniel Defoe: His Life (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Baroud, Mahmoud, The Shipwrecked Sailor in Arabic and Western Literature: Ibn Tufayl and His Influence on European Writers (London: I. B. Taurus, 2012).Google Scholar

Ellison, Katherine, Kincade, Kit, and Nelson, Holly Faith (eds.), Topographies of the Imagination: New Approaches to Daniel Defoe (New York: AMS Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., The Canonisation of Daniel Defoe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Gregg, Stephen, Defoe’s Writing and Manliness: Contrary Men (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar

Marsh, Nicholas, Daniel Defoe: The Novels (New York: Palgrave, 2011).Google Scholar

Moore, John Robert, Defoe in the Pillory and Other Studies (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1939).Google Scholar

Napier, Elizabeth, Falling into Matter: Problems of Embodiment in English Fiction from Defoe to Shelley (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Novak, Maximillian E., Daniel Defoe: Master of Fictions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Richetti, John, The Life of Daniel Defoe (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar

Secord, Arthur Wellesley, Studies in the Narrative Method of Defoe (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1924).Google Scholar

Sutherland, James, Daniel Defoe: A Critical Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Blaim, Artur, Robinson Crusoe and His Doubles: The English Robinsonade of the Eighteenth Century (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2016).Google Scholar

Free, Melissa, ‘Un-erasing Crusoe: Farther Adventures in the nineteenth century’, Book History, 9 (2006), 89–130.Google Scholar

Furbank, P. N., and Owens, W. R., ‘The “lost” continuation of Defoe’s Roxana’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 9:3 (1997), 299–308.Google Scholar

Griffin, Robert J., ‘The text in motion: Eighteenth-century Roxanas’, ELH, 72:2 (2005), 387–406.Google Scholar

Hopes, Jeffrey, ‘Real and imaginary stories: Robinson Crusoe and the Serious Reflections’, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 8:3 (1996), 313–28.Google Scholar

Howell, Jordan, ‘Eighteenth-century abridgements of Robinson Crusoe’, The Library, 7th ser., 15:3 (2014), 292–342.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. Paul, ‘Serious reflections on farther adventures: Resistances to closure in eighteenth-century English novels’ in Rivero, Albert J. (ed.), Augustan Subjects: Essays in Honor of Martin C. Battestin (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1997), pp. 276–94.Google Scholar

Markley, Robert, ‘“I have now done with my island, and all manner of discourse about it”: Crusoe’s Farther Adventures and the unwritten history of the novel’ in Backscheider, Paula R. and Ingrassia, Catherine (eds.), A Companion to the Eighteenth-Century English Novel and Culture (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), pp. 25–47.Google Scholar

Mayer, Robert, ‘Robinson Crusoe in the screen age’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 220–33.Google Scholar

Parke, Catherine N., ‘Adaptations of Defoe’s Moll Flanders’ in Mayer, Robert (ed.), Eighteenth-Century Fiction on Screen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 52–69.Google Scholar

Seager, Nicholas, ‘Prudence and plagiarism in the 1740 continuation of Defoe’s Roxana’, The Library, 7th ser., 10:4 (2009), 357–71.Google Scholar

Starr, G. A., ‘Robinson Crusoe and its sequels: The Farther Adventures and Serious Reflections’ in Richetti, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 67–83.Google Scholar

Book contents

Further Reading

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Book contents

Further Reading

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive