Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T18:07:24.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Elina Meliou
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Joana Vassilopoulou
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Mustafa F. Ozbilgin
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access

Summary

Existing research on the rise of precarious forms of employment has paid little attention to gender and diversity challenges. Yet precarious work has damaging effects for vulnerable demographics, with women, ethnic minorities, and people with disabilities more considerably affected. This volume unpacks this research and offers insights into the role of organisations in fostering inclusive change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441464.Google Scholar
Ayudhya, U. C. N., Prouska, R., & Beauregard, T. A. (2017). The impact of global economic crisis and austerity on quality of working life and work‐life balance: A capabilities perspective. European Management Review, 16(4) Winter 2019, 847–862. DOI: 10.1111/imre.12128Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385409.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (2009). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2001). Newliberalspeak: Notes on the planetary vulgate. RadicaL Philosophy, 105 (January/February): 25.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War. When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Identity politics, intersectionality, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 12411299.Google Scholar
Fleming, P. (2017). The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the ear of uberization. Organization Studies, 38(5), 691709.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Özbilgin, M. F., & Tomlinson, D. (2022). How Covid-19 spreads: Narratives, counter narratives, and social dramas. BMJ, 378, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO (International Labour Organization). (2015). World Employment and Social Outlook: The Changing Nature of Jobs. Geneva: ILO Publications.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s. American Sociological Association Rose Series in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kamaşak, R., Özbilgin, M. F., & Yavuz, M. (2020). Understanding intersectional analyses. In: King, E., Roberson, Q., & Hebl, M. (eds.), Research on Social Issues in Management on Pushing Understanding of Diversity in Organizations (pp. 93115). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Kamasak, R., Özbilgin, M. F., Yavuz, M., & Akalin, C. (2019). Race discrimination at work in the United Kingdom. In Vassilopoulou, J., Brabet, J. and Showunmi, V. (eds.) Race Discrimination and Management of Ethnic Diversity and Migration at Work (pp. 81–105). London, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Küskü, F., Araci, Ö., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2021). What happens to diversity at work in the context of a toxic triangle? Accounting for the gap between discourses and practices of diversity management. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(2), 553574.Google Scholar
Küskü, F., Araci, Ö., Tanriverdi, V., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2022). Beyond the three monkeys of workforce diversity: Who hears, sees, and speaks up? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 879862.Google Scholar
Meliou, E. (2020). Family as a eudaimonic bubble: Women entrepreneurs mobilizing resources of care during persistent financial crisis and austerity. Gender, Work and Organization, 27(2), 218235.Google Scholar
Meliou, E. and Özbilgin, M. (2023). How is the illusio of gender equality in entrepreneurship sustained? A Bourdieusian Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 0 (online first), 126.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M. F., & Slutskaya, N. (2017). Consequences of Neo-liberal Politics on Equality and Diversity at Work in Britain: Is Resistance Futile? In Management and Diversity: Thematic Approaches. In Chanlat, J.-F. and Özbligin, M. F. (eds), Management and Diversity (International Perspectives on Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 4). (pp. 319334). London: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatli, A., & Bell, M. P. (2011). Work–life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 177198.Google Scholar
Sang, K., Al‐Dajani, H., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2013). Frayed careers of migrant female professors in British academia: An intersectional perspective. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(2), 158171.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (1982). The Inefficiency of the Stock Market Equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 49(2), 241261.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2000). Democratic development as the fruits of labor. Perspectives on Work, 4(1), 3137.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). Nobel Prize-winning economist Stiglitz tells us why ‘neoliberalism is dead’. www.businessinsider.com/joseph-stiglitz-says-neoliberalism-is-dead-2016-8?r=US&IR=TGoogle Scholar
Tatli, A. & Özbilgin, M. F. (2012a). An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: A Bourdieuan framing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(2), 180200.Google Scholar
Tatli, A. & Özbilgin, M. F. (2012b). Surprising intersectionalities of inequality and privilege: The case of the arts and cultural sector. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, S. (2015). Accounting for precarity: Recent studies of labor market uncertainty. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 44(4), 463469.Google Scholar
Vassilopoulou, J., April, K., Da Rocha, J. P., Kyriakidou, O., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2016). Does the ongoing global economic crisis put diversity gains at risk?: Diversity management during hard times–international examples from the USA, South Africa, and Greece. In Handbook of Research on Race, Gender, and the Fight for Equality (pp. 424452). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Vassilopoulou, J., Kyriakidou, O., Da Rocha, J. P., Georgiadou, A., & Mor Barak, M. (2018). International perspectives on securing human and social rights and diversity gains at work in the aftermath of the global economic crisis and in times of austerity. European Management Review, 16(4) Winter 2019, 837–845.Google Scholar
Villeseche, F., Meliou, E., & Jha, H. (2022). Feminism in women business networks: A freedom centred perspective. Human Relations, 75(10), 19031927.Google Scholar
Villesèche, F., Muhr, S. L., & Sliwa, M. (2018). From radical black feminism to postfeminist hashtags: Reclaiming intersectionality. Ephemera, 18(1), 117.Google Scholar
Vincent, S. (2016). Bourdieu and the gendered social structure of working time: A study of self employed human resources professionals. Human Relations, 69(5), 11631184.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2022). The Invention of the ‘Underclass’: A Study in the Politics of Knowledge. Cambridge, UK/Hoboken, NJ: Polity Press/John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Walby, S. (2015). Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×