Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:40:29.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Investigation of Recurrent Miscarriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

By
Feroza Dawood ,
Roy G. Farquharson  and
Mary D. Stephenson
Edited by
Roy G. Farquharson  and
Mary D. Stephenson
Roy G. Farquharson
Affiliation:
Liverpool Women's Hospital
Mary D. Stephenson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Early Pregnancy , pp. 151 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stirrat, GM. Recurrent miscarriage: definition and epidemiology. Lancet 1990;336:673–75.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definition of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013;99:63.Google Scholar
Kolte, AM, van Oppenraaij, RH, Quenby, S, et al. Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2014;29:931–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolte, AM, Bernardi, LA, Christiansen, OB, Quenby, S, Farquharson, RG, Goddijn, M, Stephenson, M on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Early Pregnancy (SIGEP). Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability. Hum Reprod 2015;30:495–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, MD, Kutteh, W. Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;50:132–45.Google Scholar
Brigham, SA,Conlon, C, Farquharson, RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2868–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, M, Kamper-Jorgensen, M, Nielsen, HS, Lidegaard, O, Andersen, AM, Christiansen, OB. Prognosis for live birth in women with recurrent miscarriage: what is the best measure of success? Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, AMN, Wohlfahrt, J, Christens, P, Olsen, J, Melbye, M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population-based register linkage study. BMJ 2000;320:1708–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, V. Cigarette, alcohol and caffeine consumption: risk factors for spontaneous abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:182–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Infante-Rivard, C, Fernandez, A, Gauthier, R, et al. Fetal loss associated with caffeine intake before and during pregnancy. J Am Med Assoc 1993;270:2940–43.Google Scholar
Gardella, JR, Hill, JA. Environmental toxins associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 2000;18:407–24.Google Scholar
Mayumi, SO, Yasuhiko, O, Shin-ichi, S, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A is associated with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Report 2005;20:2325–29.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Guideline 17: The Management Of Recurrent Miscarriage. London: RCOG Press; 2011.Google Scholar
Li, TC, Makris, M, Tomsu, M, Tuckerman, E, Laird, S. Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:463–81.Google Scholar
McQueen, DB, Bernardi, LA; Stephenson, MD. Chronic endometritis in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss and/or fetal demise. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1026–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQueen, DB, Pefetto, CO, Hazard, FK, Lathi, RB. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic endometritis and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2015;104(4):927–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, OB, Andersen, AMN, Bosch, E, et al. Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2005;83:821–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardi, LA, Cohen, RN, Stephenson, MD. Impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on women with recurrent early pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2013;100:1326–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lata, K, Dutta, P, Sridar, S, et al.. Thyroid autoimmunity and obstetric outcomes in women with recurrent miscarriage: a case control study. Endocr Connect 2013;2:118–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rai, R, Backos, M, Rushworth, F, Regan, L. Polycystic ovaries and recurrent miscarriage: a reappraisal. Hum Reprod 2000;15:612–15.Google Scholar
Fedorcsak, P, Dale, PO, Storeng, R, Tanbo, T, Abyholm, T. The impact of obesity and insulin resistance on the outcome of IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1086–91.Google Scholar
Cocksedge, KA, Saravelos, SH, Wang, Q, Tuckerman, E, Laird, SM, Li, TC. Does free androgen index predict subsequent pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage? Hum Reprod 2008;23:797–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirahara, F, Andoh, N, Swai, K, et al. Hyperprolactinaemic recurrent miscarriage and results of bromocriptine treatment trials. Fertil Steril 1998;70:253–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweikert, A, Rau, T, Berkholz, A, Allera, A, Daufeldt, S, Wildt, L. Association of progesterone receptor polymorphism with recurrent abortions. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Repr Bio 2004;113:67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, JC, Cockwell, AE, Grant, E, Williams, S, Dunn, R, Ogilvie, CM. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost? BJOG 2010;117:885–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franssen, MT, Korevaar, JC, van der Veen, F, Leschot, NJ, Bossuyt, PM, Goddijn, M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ 2006;332:759–63. Erratum in: BMJ 2006;332:1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, MD, Sierra, S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1076–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogasawara, M, Aoki, K, Okada, S, Suzumori, K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2000;73:300–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, MD, Awartani, KA, Robinson, WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case–control study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:446–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardi, LA, Plunkett, BA, Stephenson, MD. Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation. Fertil Steril 2012;98:156–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathur, N, Triplett, L, Stephenson, MD. Miscarriage chromosome testing: utility of comparative genomic hybridization with reflex microsatellite analysis in preserved miscarriage tissue. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1349–52.Google Scholar
Amesse, LS, Pfaff-Amesse, T. Congenital anomalies of the reproductive tract. In Clinical Reproductive Medicine and Surgery (1st edition), ed. Falcone, T, Hurd, WW. New York: Mosby, 2007; pp. 171–90.Google Scholar
Dawood, F, Farquharson, RG. Cervical weakness in women who have uterine anomalies: impact on pregnancy outcome. In Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations, ed. Paschopoulos, M, Campo, R. London: Springer-Verlag, 2015; pp. 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, YY, Jayaprakasan, K, Tan, A, Thornton, JG, Coomarasamy, A, Raine-Fenning, NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:371–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Grimbizis, GF, Gordts, S, DiSpiezo Sardo, A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 2013;10:199–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimbizis, GF, Gordts, S, DiSpiezo Sardo, A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2032–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, MD. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertil Steril 1996;66:24–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Saravelos, S, Cocksedge, K, Li, T. The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:416–22.Google Scholar
Jurkovic, D, Geipel, A, Gruboeck, K, Jauniaux, E, Natucci, M, Campbell, S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:233–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raga, F, Bonilla-Musoles, F, Blanes, J, et al. Congenital Mullerian anomalies; diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996;65:523–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyakis, S, Lockshin, MD, Atsumi, T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, D, Mackie, I, Moore, GW, Greer, IA, Greaves, M, on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome. British J Haemat 2012;157:47–58.Google Scholar
Zoller, B, Dahlback, B. Linkage between inherited resistance to activated protein C and factor V gene mutation in venous thrombosis. Lancet 1995;343:1536–38.Google Scholar
Van Boven, HH, Reitsma, PPH, Rosendaal, FR, et al. Factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) in families with inherited antithrombin deficiency. Thromb Haemost 1996;75:417–21.Google Scholar
Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steiman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999;340:9–13.Google Scholar
Dizon-Townson, DS, Meline, L, Nelson, LM, Varner, M, Ward, K. Fetal carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation are prone to miscarriage and placental infarction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:402–05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawood, F, Farquharson, RG, Quenby, S, Toh, CH. Acquired activated protein C resistance may be a risk factor for recurrent fetal loss. Fertil Steril 2003;80:649–50.Google Scholar
Rey, E, Kahn, SR, David, M, Shrier, I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2003:361:901–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roque, H, Paidas, MJ, Funai, EF, Kuczynski, E, Lockwood, CJ. Maternal thrombophilias are not associated with early pregnancy loss. Thromb Haemost 2004;91:290–05.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, G, Gracia, CR, Berlin, JA, Sammel, MD, Barnhart, KT. Evaluation of the association between hereditary thrombophililas and recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:558–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krabbendam, I, Franx, A, Bots, ML, Fijnheer, R, Bruinse, HW. Thrombophilias and recurrent pregnancy loss: a critical appraisal of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep Bio 2005;118:143–53.Google Scholar
Saifi, B, Rezaee, SA, Tajik, N, Ahmadpour, ME, et al. Th17 cells and related cytokines in unexplained recurrent spontaneous miscarriage at the implantation window. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:481–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metwally, M, Preece, R, Thomas, J, Ledger, W, Li, TC. A proteomic analysis of the endometrium in obese and overweight women with recurrent miscarriage: preliminary evidence for an endometrial defect. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacks, G. Enough! Stop the arguments and get on with the science of natural killer cell testing. Hum Reprod 2015;30:1526–31.Google Scholar
Kwak-Kim, J, Gilman-Sachs, A. Clinical implication of natural killer cells and reproduction. Am J Reprod Immunol 2008;59:388–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffett, A, Regan, L, Braude, P. Natural killer cells, miscarriage and infertility. BMJ 2004;329:1283–85.Google Scholar
Ozcimen, EE, Kiyici, H, Uckuyu, A, Yanik, FF. Are CD57+ natural killer cells really important in early pregnancy failure? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:493–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Li, TC, Wu, YP, et al. Reappraisal of peripheral NK cells in women with recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:814–19.Google Scholar
Turner, MW. Mannose-binding lectin: the pluripotent molecule of the innate immune system. Immunol Today 1998;17:532–40.Google Scholar
Kruse, C, Rosgaard, A, Steffensen, R, Varming, K, Jensenius, JC, Christiansen, OB. Low serum level of mannan-binding lectin is a determinant for pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Ob Gynecol 2002;187:1313–20.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, DC, Starrs, L, Moore, S, Souter, V, Liston, WA. Mannan-binding lectin concentration and risk of miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2379–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, OB, Nielsen, HS, Lund, M, Steffensen, R, Varming, K. Mannose-binding lectin-2 genotypes and recurrent late pregnancy losses. Hum Reprod 2009;249:291–99.Google Scholar
Suarez, MB, Morales, P, Castro, MJ, et al. A new HLA-G allele (HLA-G01050N) and its distribution in the Spanish population. Immunogenetics 1997;45:464–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Aldrich, CL, Stephenson, MD, Karrison, T, et al. HLA-G genotypes and pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Mol Hum Reprod 2001;7:1167–72.Google Scholar
Stephenson, MD, Kutteh, WH, Purkiss, S, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin and idiopathic secondary recurrent miscarriage: A multicentered randomized placebo-controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2203–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×