Alvarez, R. M., and Nagler, J.. 1998. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections,” American Journal of Political Science 42: 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. M., and Nagler, J.. 2000. “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections,” British Journal of Political Science 30: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, C. 1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Anker, H. 1992. Normal Vote Analysis. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Anker, H., and E. Oppenhuis. 1995. Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1994. Amsterdam: Steinmetz Archive/SKON (the ICPSR version of this dataset was published in 1997, Study Nr. 6740).

Ansolabehere, S., and Iyengar, S.. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ark, B., and Haan, J.. 2000. “The Delta-Model Revisited: Recent Trends in the Structural Performance of the Dutch Economy,” International Review of Applied Economics 14: 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, B. M. 1970. Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions,” Political Behavior 24: 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartle, J. 1997. “Political Awareness and Heterogeneity in Models of Voting: Some Evidence from the Recent British Election Studies,” in British Elections and Parties Review 7, PattieDenver, C. D., Fisher, J., and Ludlam, S. (eds.). London: Frank Cass, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Beck, N., and Katz, J.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics,” American Political Science Review 89: 634–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R.. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis. Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., and McPhee, W. N.. 1954. Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berger, H., and Woitek, U.. 1997. “Searching for Political Business Cycles in Germany,” Public Choice 91: 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, A., and Nadeau, R.. 1992. “The Electoral Budget Cycle,” Public Choice 74: 389–403.Google Scholar

Bloom, H., and Price, D.. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession,” American Political Science Review 69: 1240–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, S., and Lanoue, D. J.. 1992. “The Sources of Tactical Voting in British Parliamentary Elections, 1983–1987,” Political Behavior 14: 141–57.Google Scholar

Brug, W. van der, and C. van der Eijk. 2000. “De campagne deed er toe, mediagebruik niet,” in Tussen Beeld en Inhoud. Politiek en media in de verkiezingen van 1998, Praag, P. Jr., and Brants, K. (eds.). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, pp. 214–43.Google Scholar

Brug, W., and Eijk, C. (eds.). Forthcoming. European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Brug, W. van der, C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. 2002. “The Reasoning Public: Education, Interest and Political Choices.” Paper presented at Joint Sessions of Workshops, ECPR, Turin, March.

Brug, W. van der, C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. Forthcoming. “EU Support and Party Choice,” in European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future, Brug, W. and Eijk, C. (eds.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp.Google Scholar

Brug, W., Fennema, M., and Tillie, J. 2000. “Anti-immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 37: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, I., Robertson, D., and Hearl, D. (eds.). 1987. Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burden, B. C. 1997. “Deterministic and Probabilistic Voting Models,” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1150–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, D. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1974. Political Change in Britain – the Evolution of Electoral Choice, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. E., and Garand, J. C.. 2000. Before the Vote. Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., and Kahn, R. L.. 1952. The People Elect a President. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center I.S.R.Google Scholar

Chrystal, K. A., and Alt, J. E.. 1981. “Some Problems in Formulating and Testing a Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom,” The Economic Journal 91: 730–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claggett, W. 1986. “A Re-examination of the Asymmetry Hypothesis: Economic Expansions, Contractions and Congressional Elections,” Western Political Quarterly 39: 623–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., and Stewart, M.. 1995. “Economic Evaluations, Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support: Rival Models Considered,” British Journal of Political Science 25: 15–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P.. 1998. “New Models for New Labour: The Political Economy of Labour Party Support, January 1992–April 1997,” American Political Science Review 92: 559–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., and Whiteley, P.. 1990. “Presidential Approval, Partisanship and the Economy: Evidence from the 1984 Continuous Monitoring Survey,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conover, P. J., and Feldman, S. 1982. “Projection and Perceptions of Candidates' Issue Positions,” Western Political Quarterly 35: 228–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conover, P. J., and Feldman, S.. 1984. “How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model,” American Journal of Political Science 28: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, Apter, D. (eds.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 219–41.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. 1966. “The Concept of a Normal Vote,” in Elections and the Political Order, Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (eds.). New York: Wiley, pp. 9–39.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. 1970. “Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, Tufte, E. R. (ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 168–89.Google Scholar

Dalen, H. P., and Swank, O. H.. 1996. “Government Spending Cycles: Ideological or Opportunistic?” Public Choice 89: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, R. J., and M. Wattenberg. 1993. “The Not So Simple Act of Voting,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Finifter, A. W. (eds.). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 424–47.Google Scholar

Daudt, H. 1961. Floating Voters and the Floating Vote. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.Google Scholar

Diez-Roux, A. V. 2000. “Multilevel Analysis in Public Health Research,” Annual Review of Public Health 21: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorussen, H., and Taylor, M. (eds.). 2002. Economic Voting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Duch, R. M., and Palmer, H. D.. 2002. “Heteregeneous Perceptions of Economic Conditions in Cross-National Perspective,” in Economic Voting, H. Dorussen and M. Taylor (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 139–72.Google Scholar

Duch, R. M., and Stevenson, R.. 2003. “Re-evaluating Economic Voting.” Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops, ECPR, Edinburgh.

Eijk, C.. 2001. “Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales,” Quality and Quantity 35: 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C.. 2002. “Design Issues in Electoral Research: Taking Care of (Core) Business,” Electoral Studies 21: 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C., Brug, W., Kroh, M., and Franklin, M.. 2006. “Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior – on the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities,” Electoral Studies 25.Google Scholar

Eijk, C., and Franklin, M.. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C. van der, M. Franklin, and W. van der Brug. 1999. “Policy Preferences and Party Choice,” in Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, Schmitt, H. and Thomassen, J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C. van der, and M. Franklin, with F. Demant and W. van der Brug. 2004. “The Endogenous Economy: ‘Real’ Economic Conditions and Subjective Economic Evaluations.” Paper presented at the Workshop on “Perceptions, Preferences and Rationalization: Overcoming the Problem of Causal Inference in the Study of Voting,” Nuffield College, Oxford.

Eijk, C. van der, and M. Franklin, F. Demant, W. van der Brug. 2007. “The Endogenous Economy: ‘Real’ Economic Conditions, Subjective Economic Evaluations and Government Support,” Acta Politica 42(1).

Eijk, C., Franklin, M., and Marsh, M.. 1996. “What Voters Teach Us about Europe-wide Elections; What Europe-wide Elections Teach Us about Voters,” Electoral Studies 15: 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C. van der, M. Franklin, and E. Oppenhuis. 1996. “The Strategic Context: Party Choice,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, C., Franklin, M., et al. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 332–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C., and Niemöller, B.. 1983. Electoral Change in the Netherlands. Empirical Research and Methods of Measurement. Amsterdam: CT Press.Google Scholar

Eijk, C., and Niemöller, B.. 1984. “Het potentiële electoraat van de Nederlandse politieke partijen,” Beleid en Maatschappij 11: 192–204.Google Scholar

Eijk, C., and Oppenhuis, E.. 1991. “European Parties' Performance in Electoral Competition,” European Journal of Political Research 19: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enelow, J., and Hinich, M.. 1984. “Probabilistic Voting and the Importance of Centrist Ideologies in Democratic Elections,” Journal of Politics 46: 459–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, R. S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote,” American Political Science Review 83: 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, R. S. 2002. “National Election Studies and Macro Analysis,” Electoral Studies 21: 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M., and Stimson, J. A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fair, R. 1988. “The Effect of Economic Events on the Vote for President: A 1984 Update,” Political Behavior 10: 168–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, S., and Conover, P. J.. 1983. “Candidates, Issues, and Voters: The Role of Inference in Political Perception,” Journal of Politics 45: 812–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 22: 426–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, S. T., and Linville, P. W.. 1980. “What Does the Schema Concept Buy Us?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6: 543–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, M., C. van der Eijk, and E. Oppenhuis. 1996. “The Institutional Context: Turnout,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, Cees and Franklin, Mark (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 306–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, M., and C. Hughes. 1999. “Dynamic Representation in Britain,” in A Critical Election? British Voters and Parties in Long-Term Perspective, Norris, P., and Evans, G. (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 240–58.Google Scholar

Franklin, M., Mackie, T., Valen, H., et al. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, M., Niemi, R., and Whitten, G.. 1994. “The Two Faces of Tactical Voting,” British Journal of Political Science 24: 549–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, M., and Wlezien, C.. 1997. “The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galli, E., and Rossi, S. P. S.. 2002. “Political Budget Cycles: The Case of the Western German Länder,” Public Choice 110: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, D. G., and Poterba, J. M.. 1980. “The Price of Popularity: The Political Business Cycle Reexamined,” American Journal of Political Science 24: 696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haverland, M. 2001. “Another Dutch Miracle? Explaining Dutch and German Pension Trajectories,” Journal of European Social Policy 11: 308–23.CrossRef

Heath, A., and Evans, G.. 1994. “Tactical Voting: Concepts, Measurement and Findings,” British Journal of Political Science 24: 557–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemerijck, A. 2003. “A Paradoxical Miracle: The Politics of Coalition Government and Social Concertation in Dutch Welfare Reform,” in Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat, Jochem, S. and Siegel, N. A. (eds.). Opladen: Leske and Budrich, pp. 232–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, D. A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review 71: 1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, D. A. 1982. “On Demand for Economic Outcomes: Macroeconomic Performance and Mass Political Support in the United States, Great Britain and Germany,” Journal of Politics 44: 426–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., and Krosnick, J. A.. 1984. “The Evening News and Presidential Evaluations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 778–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under risk,” Econometrica 47: 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karp, J. A., Vowles, J., Banducci, S. A., and Donovan, T.. 2002. “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand's New Mixed System,” Electoral Studies 21: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. R. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. 1993. “Coming to Grips with the Holy Ghost,” in Experimental Foundations of Political Science, Kinder, D. R., and Palfrey, T. R. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R.. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting,” American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R.. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case,” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R., and Budge, I.. 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Sage.Google Scholar

Kramer, G. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting,” American Political Science Review 77: 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, G. A. 1997. “Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectations,” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1170–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroh, M. 2003. “Parties, Politicians and Policies. Orientations of Vote Choice across Voters and Contexts.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

Kroh, M., W. van der Brug, and C. van der Eijk. Forthcoming. “Prospects for Electoral Change,” in European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future, Brug, W. and Eijk, C. (eds.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Paldam, M.. 2000. “Economic Voting: An Introduction,” Electoral Studies 19: 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Stegmaier, M.. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes,” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, A., and McCubbins, M. D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luskin, R. C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication,” American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maas, K., Steenbergen, M., and Saris, W.. 1990. “Vote Probabilities,” Electoral Studies 9: 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, S. E., Listhaug, O., and Rabinowitz, G.. 1991. “Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems,” American Political Science Review 85: 1107–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackuen, M. B., , R.Erikson, S., and Stimson, J. A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy,” American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, P. 2002a. “De eigenaardigheden van de Nederlanders. De verkiezingen van 2002 in een vergelijkend perspectief,” B en M Tijdschrift voor Beleid, Politiek en Maatschappij 29: 160–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, P. 2002b. “In the Aggregate: Mass Electoral Behaviour in Western Europe, 1950–2000,” in Comparative Democratic Politics. A Guide to Contemporary Theory and Research, Keman, H. (ed.). London: Sage, pp. 122–40.Google Scholar

Markus, G. B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 32: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, G. B. 1992. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on Presidential Voting, 1956–1988 (an Update),” American Journal of Political Science 36: 829–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsh, M. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model After Four European Elections,” British Journal of Political Science 28: 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsh, M., and M. Franklin. 1996. “The Foundations: Unanswered Questions from the Study of European Elections, 1979–1994,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, C., Franklin, M., et al. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 332–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadeau, R., and Lewis-Beck, M. S.. 2001. “National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections,” Journal of Politics 63: 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, P., and Paldam, M.. 1994. “The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions After 25 Years,” Public Choice 79: 213–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, P., and Paldam, M.. 1997. “The Grievance Asymmetry Revisited: A Micro Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1986–1992,” European Journal of Political Economy 13: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, P., and M. Paldam. 2002. “The Cost of Ruling: a Foundation Stone for Two Theories,” in Economic Voting, Dorussen, H. and Taylor, M. (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar

Nickell, S., and Ours, J.. 1999. “The Netherlands and the United Kingdom: A European Unemployment Miracle?” Paper presented in Frankfurt at the Economic Policy Panel Meeting, April 9, 1999, and in Ottawa at the CSLS Conference on the Structural Aspects of Unemployment in Canada, April 23, 1999.Google Scholar

Niemi, R. G., Whitten, G., and Franklin, M. N.. 1992. “Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election,” British Journal of Political Science 22: 229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. 1975. “The Political Business Cycle,” The Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norpoth, H. 1996. “The Economy,” in Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., and Norris, P. (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 299–318.Google Scholar

Oppenhuis, E. 1995. Voting Behavior in Europe. A Comparative Analysis of Electoral Participation and Party Choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Oppenhuis, E., C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. 1996. “The Party Context: Outcomes,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, Cees and Franklin, Mark (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ordeshook, P. C., and Zeng, L.. 1997. “Rational Voters and Strategic Voting: Evidence from the 1968, 1980, and 1992 Elections,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paldam, M. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of 17 Countries Over Four Decades,” in Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Lafay, J.-D. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar

Paldam, M. 1997. “Political Business Cycles,” in Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, ed. D. Mueller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–70.Google Scholar

Pattie, C. J., and Johnston, R. J.. 2001. “Routes to Party Choice: Ideology, Economic Evaluations and Voting at the 1997 British General Election,” European Journal of Political Research 39: 373–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popkin, S. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. B. Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. B.., and Whitten, B. G.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context,” American Journal of Political Science 37: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, S., and Sanders, D.. 1993. “Modeling Government Popularity in Postwar Britain: A Methodological Example,” American Journal of Political Science 37: 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, S., and Sanders, D.. 1994. “Party Support and Economic Perceptions in the UK: A Two-Level Approach,” in British Elections and Parties Yearbook, eds. D. Broughton et al. London: Frank Cass, pp. 46–72.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., and Teune, H.. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, G., and MacDonald, S.. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting,” American Political Science Review 83: 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reif, K. (ed.). 1984. European Elections 1979/81 and 1984. Conclusion and Perspectives from Empirical Research. Berlin: Quorum.Google Scholar

Reif, K., and Schmitt, H.. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections. A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results,” European Journal for Political Research 8: 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals,” American Sociological Review 15: 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royed, T. J., Leyden, K. M., and Borrelli, S. A.. 2000. “Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's Hypothesis,” British Journal of Political Science 30: 669–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D. 1996. “Economic Performance, Management Competence and the Outcome of the Next General Election,” Political Studies 44: 203–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D. 1999. “Conservative Incompetence, Labour Responsibility, and the Feelgood Factor: Why the Economy Failed to Save the Conservatives in 1997,” Electoral Studies 18: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saris, W. E. (ed.). 1988. Variation in Response Function: A Source of Measurement Error. Amsterdam: SRF.Google Scholar

Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, H., and K. Reif. 2003. “Der Hauptwahlzyklus und die Ergebnisse von Nebenwahlen: Konzeptuelle und empirische Rekonstruktionen am Beispiel der Europawahlen in Wahlzyklus der Bundesrepublik,” in Politbarometer, Wuest, A. M. (ed.). Opladen: Leske und Budrich, pp. 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, H., and Thomassen, J. (eds.) 1999. Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sniderman, P. M. 1993. “The New Look in Public Opinion Research,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Finifter, A. W. (ed.). Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association, pp. 219–45.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., and Tetlock, P. E. (eds.). 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snijders, T. A. B., and Bosker, R. J.. 1999. Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Steenbergen, M. R., and Jones, B. S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures,” American Journal of Political Science 46: 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, R. T. (2002). “The Economy as Context: Indirect Links Between the Economy and Voters,” in Economic Voting, Dorussen, H. and Taylor, M. (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar

Stimson, J. A. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay,” American Journal of Political Science 29: 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoker, L., and J. Bowers. 2002. “Designing Multi-Level Studies: Sampling Voters and Electoral Contexts,” in The Future of Election Studies, Franklin, M. and Wlezien, C. (eds.). Amsterdam: Pergamon, pp. 77–110.Google Scholar

Thomassen, J. (ed.)., 2005. The European Voter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tillie, J. 1995. Party Utility and Voting Behavior. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Train, K. E. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treisman, D., and Gimpelson, V.. 2001. “Political Business Cycles and Russian Elections, or the Manipulations of ‘Chudar,’” British Journal of Political Science 31: 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufte, E. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Visser, J., and Hemerijck, A.. 1997. A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitten, G., and Palmer, H. D.. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting,” Electoral Studies 18: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkin, S., Haller, B., and Norpoth, H.. 1997. “From Argentina to Zambia – A World-Wide Test of Economic Voting,” Electoral Studies 16: 301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending,” American Journal of Political Science 39: 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy,” The Journal of Politics 66: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C., and Erikson, R. S.. 2002. “The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns,” The Journal of Politics 64: 969–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C., Franklin, M., and Twiggs, D.. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity,” Political Behavior 19: 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J. R. 2002. “The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns,” Electoral Studies 21: 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J. R. 2005. “Floating Voters in U.S. Presidential Elections 1948–2000,” in Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, Saris, W. E. and Sniderman, P. M. (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 166–214.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. M., and Nagler, J.. 1998. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections,” American Journal of Political Science 42: 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. M., and Nagler, J.. 2000. “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections,” British Journal of Political Science 30: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, C. 1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Anker, H. 1992. Normal Vote Analysis. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Anker, H., and E. Oppenhuis. 1995. Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1994. Amsterdam: Steinmetz Archive/SKON (the ICPSR version of this dataset was published in 1997, Study Nr. 6740).

Ansolabehere, S., and Iyengar, S.. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ark, B., and Haan, J.. 2000. “The Delta-Model Revisited: Recent Trends in the Structural Performance of the Dutch Economy,” International Review of Applied Economics 14: 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, B. M. 1970. Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions,” Political Behavior 24: 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartle, J. 1997. “Political Awareness and Heterogeneity in Models of Voting: Some Evidence from the Recent British Election Studies,” in British Elections and Parties Review 7, PattieDenver, C. D., Fisher, J., and Ludlam, S. (eds.). London: Frank Cass, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Beck, N., and Katz, J.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics,” American Political Science Review 89: 634–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R.. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis. Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., and McPhee, W. N.. 1954. Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berger, H., and Woitek, U.. 1997. “Searching for Political Business Cycles in Germany,” Public Choice 91: 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, A., and Nadeau, R.. 1992. “The Electoral Budget Cycle,” Public Choice 74: 389–403.Google Scholar

Bloom, H., and Price, D.. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession,” American Political Science Review 69: 1240–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, S., and Lanoue, D. J.. 1992. “The Sources of Tactical Voting in British Parliamentary Elections, 1983–1987,” Political Behavior 14: 141–57.Google Scholar

Brug, W. van der, and C. van der Eijk. 2000. “De campagne deed er toe, mediagebruik niet,” in Tussen Beeld en Inhoud. Politiek en media in de verkiezingen van 1998, Praag, P. Jr., and Brants, K. (eds.). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, pp. 214–43.Google Scholar

Brug, W., and Eijk, C. (eds.). Forthcoming. European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Brug, W. van der, C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. 2002. “The Reasoning Public: Education, Interest and Political Choices.” Paper presented at Joint Sessions of Workshops, ECPR, Turin, March.

Brug, W. van der, C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. Forthcoming. “EU Support and Party Choice,” in European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future, Brug, W. and Eijk, C. (eds.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp.Google Scholar

Brug, W., Fennema, M., and Tillie, J. 2000. “Anti-immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 37: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, I., Robertson, D., and Hearl, D. (eds.). 1987. Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burden, B. C. 1997. “Deterministic and Probabilistic Voting Models,” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1150–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, D. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1974. Political Change in Britain – the Evolution of Electoral Choice, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. E., and Garand, J. C.. 2000. Before the Vote. Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., and Kahn, R. L.. 1952. The People Elect a President. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center I.S.R.Google Scholar

Chrystal, K. A., and Alt, J. E.. 1981. “Some Problems in Formulating and Testing a Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom,” The Economic Journal 91: 730–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claggett, W. 1986. “A Re-examination of the Asymmetry Hypothesis: Economic Expansions, Contractions and Congressional Elections,” Western Political Quarterly 39: 623–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., and Stewart, M.. 1995. “Economic Evaluations, Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support: Rival Models Considered,” British Journal of Political Science 25: 15–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P.. 1998. “New Models for New Labour: The Political Economy of Labour Party Support, January 1992–April 1997,” American Political Science Review 92: 559–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., and Whiteley, P.. 1990. “Presidential Approval, Partisanship and the Economy: Evidence from the 1984 Continuous Monitoring Survey,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conover, P. J., and Feldman, S. 1982. “Projection and Perceptions of Candidates' Issue Positions,” Western Political Quarterly 35: 228–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conover, P. J., and Feldman, S.. 1984. “How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model,” American Journal of Political Science 28: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, Apter, D. (eds.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 219–41.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. 1966. “The Concept of a Normal Vote,” in Elections and the Political Order, Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (eds.). New York: Wiley, pp. 9–39.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. 1970. “Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, Tufte, E. R. (ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 168–89.Google Scholar

Dalen, H. P., and Swank, O. H.. 1996. “Government Spending Cycles: Ideological or Opportunistic?” Public Choice 89: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, R. J., and M. Wattenberg. 1993. “The Not So Simple Act of Voting,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Finifter, A. W. (eds.). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 424–47.Google Scholar

Daudt, H. 1961. Floating Voters and the Floating Vote. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.Google Scholar

Diez-Roux, A. V. 2000. “Multilevel Analysis in Public Health Research,” Annual Review of Public Health 21: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorussen, H., and Taylor, M. (eds.). 2002. Economic Voting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Duch, R. M., and Palmer, H. D.. 2002. “Heteregeneous Perceptions of Economic Conditions in Cross-National Perspective,” in Economic Voting, H. Dorussen and M. Taylor (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 139–72.Google Scholar

Duch, R. M., and Stevenson, R.. 2003. “Re-evaluating Economic Voting.” Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops, ECPR, Edinburgh.

Eijk, C.. 2001. “Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales,” Quality and Quantity 35: 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C.. 2002. “Design Issues in Electoral Research: Taking Care of (Core) Business,” Electoral Studies 21: 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C., Brug, W., Kroh, M., and Franklin, M.. 2006. “Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior – on the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities,” Electoral Studies 25.Google Scholar

Eijk, C., and Franklin, M.. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C. van der, M. Franklin, and W. van der Brug. 1999. “Policy Preferences and Party Choice,” in Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, Schmitt, H. and Thomassen, J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C. van der, and M. Franklin, with F. Demant and W. van der Brug. 2004. “The Endogenous Economy: ‘Real’ Economic Conditions and Subjective Economic Evaluations.” Paper presented at the Workshop on “Perceptions, Preferences and Rationalization: Overcoming the Problem of Causal Inference in the Study of Voting,” Nuffield College, Oxford.

Eijk, C. van der, and M. Franklin, F. Demant, W. van der Brug. 2007. “The Endogenous Economy: ‘Real’ Economic Conditions, Subjective Economic Evaluations and Government Support,” Acta Politica 42(1).

Eijk, C., Franklin, M., and Marsh, M.. 1996. “What Voters Teach Us about Europe-wide Elections; What Europe-wide Elections Teach Us about Voters,” Electoral Studies 15: 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C. van der, M. Franklin, and E. Oppenhuis. 1996. “The Strategic Context: Party Choice,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, C., Franklin, M., et al. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 332–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C., and Niemöller, B.. 1983. Electoral Change in the Netherlands. Empirical Research and Methods of Measurement. Amsterdam: CT Press.Google Scholar

Eijk, C., and Niemöller, B.. 1984. “Het potentiële electoraat van de Nederlandse politieke partijen,” Beleid en Maatschappij 11: 192–204.Google Scholar

Eijk, C., and Oppenhuis, E.. 1991. “European Parties' Performance in Electoral Competition,” European Journal of Political Research 19: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enelow, J., and Hinich, M.. 1984. “Probabilistic Voting and the Importance of Centrist Ideologies in Democratic Elections,” Journal of Politics 46: 459–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, R. S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote,” American Political Science Review 83: 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, R. S. 2002. “National Election Studies and Macro Analysis,” Electoral Studies 21: 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M., and Stimson, J. A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fair, R. 1988. “The Effect of Economic Events on the Vote for President: A 1984 Update,” Political Behavior 10: 168–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, S., and Conover, P. J.. 1983. “Candidates, Issues, and Voters: The Role of Inference in Political Perception,” Journal of Politics 45: 812–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 22: 426–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, S. T., and Linville, P. W.. 1980. “What Does the Schema Concept Buy Us?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6: 543–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, M., C. van der Eijk, and E. Oppenhuis. 1996. “The Institutional Context: Turnout,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, Cees and Franklin, Mark (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 306–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, M., and C. Hughes. 1999. “Dynamic Representation in Britain,” in A Critical Election? British Voters and Parties in Long-Term Perspective, Norris, P., and Evans, G. (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 240–58.Google Scholar

Franklin, M., Mackie, T., Valen, H., et al. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, M., Niemi, R., and Whitten, G.. 1994. “The Two Faces of Tactical Voting,” British Journal of Political Science 24: 549–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, M., and Wlezien, C.. 1997. “The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galli, E., and Rossi, S. P. S.. 2002. “Political Budget Cycles: The Case of the Western German Länder,” Public Choice 110: 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, D. G., and Poterba, J. M.. 1980. “The Price of Popularity: The Political Business Cycle Reexamined,” American Journal of Political Science 24: 696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haverland, M. 2001. “Another Dutch Miracle? Explaining Dutch and German Pension Trajectories,” Journal of European Social Policy 11: 308–23.CrossRef

Heath, A., and Evans, G.. 1994. “Tactical Voting: Concepts, Measurement and Findings,” British Journal of Political Science 24: 557–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemerijck, A. 2003. “A Paradoxical Miracle: The Politics of Coalition Government and Social Concertation in Dutch Welfare Reform,” in Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat, Jochem, S. and Siegel, N. A. (eds.). Opladen: Leske and Budrich, pp. 232–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, D. A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review 71: 1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, D. A. 1982. “On Demand for Economic Outcomes: Macroeconomic Performance and Mass Political Support in the United States, Great Britain and Germany,” Journal of Politics 44: 426–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., and Krosnick, J. A.. 1984. “The Evening News and Presidential Evaluations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 778–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under risk,” Econometrica 47: 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karp, J. A., Vowles, J., Banducci, S. A., and Donovan, T.. 2002. “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand's New Mixed System,” Electoral Studies 21: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. R. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. 1993. “Coming to Grips with the Holy Ghost,” in Experimental Foundations of Political Science, Kinder, D. R., and Palfrey, T. R. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R.. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting,” American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R.. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case,” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R., and Budge, I.. 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Sage.Google Scholar

Kramer, G. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting,” American Political Science Review 77: 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, G. A. 1997. “Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectations,” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1170–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroh, M. 2003. “Parties, Politicians and Policies. Orientations of Vote Choice across Voters and Contexts.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

Kroh, M., W. van der Brug, and C. van der Eijk. Forthcoming. “Prospects for Electoral Change,” in European Elections and Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future, Brug, W. and Eijk, C. (eds.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Paldam, M.. 2000. “Economic Voting: An Introduction,” Electoral Studies 19: 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Stegmaier, M.. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes,” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, A., and McCubbins, M. D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luskin, R. C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication,” American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maas, K., Steenbergen, M., and Saris, W.. 1990. “Vote Probabilities,” Electoral Studies 9: 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, S. E., Listhaug, O., and Rabinowitz, G.. 1991. “Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems,” American Political Science Review 85: 1107–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackuen, M. B., , R.Erikson, S., and Stimson, J. A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy,” American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, P. 2002a. “De eigenaardigheden van de Nederlanders. De verkiezingen van 2002 in een vergelijkend perspectief,” B en M Tijdschrift voor Beleid, Politiek en Maatschappij 29: 160–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, P. 2002b. “In the Aggregate: Mass Electoral Behaviour in Western Europe, 1950–2000,” in Comparative Democratic Politics. A Guide to Contemporary Theory and Research, Keman, H. (ed.). London: Sage, pp. 122–40.Google Scholar

Markus, G. B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 32: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, G. B. 1992. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on Presidential Voting, 1956–1988 (an Update),” American Journal of Political Science 36: 829–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsh, M. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model After Four European Elections,” British Journal of Political Science 28: 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsh, M., and M. Franklin. 1996. “The Foundations: Unanswered Questions from the Study of European Elections, 1979–1994,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, C., Franklin, M., et al. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 332–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadeau, R., and Lewis-Beck, M. S.. 2001. “National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections,” Journal of Politics 63: 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, P., and Paldam, M.. 1994. “The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions After 25 Years,” Public Choice 79: 213–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, P., and Paldam, M.. 1997. “The Grievance Asymmetry Revisited: A Micro Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1986–1992,” European Journal of Political Economy 13: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nannestad, P., and M. Paldam. 2002. “The Cost of Ruling: a Foundation Stone for Two Theories,” in Economic Voting, Dorussen, H. and Taylor, M. (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar

Nickell, S., and Ours, J.. 1999. “The Netherlands and the United Kingdom: A European Unemployment Miracle?” Paper presented in Frankfurt at the Economic Policy Panel Meeting, April 9, 1999, and in Ottawa at the CSLS Conference on the Structural Aspects of Unemployment in Canada, April 23, 1999.Google Scholar

Niemi, R. G., Whitten, G., and Franklin, M. N.. 1992. “Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election,” British Journal of Political Science 22: 229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. 1975. “The Political Business Cycle,” The Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norpoth, H. 1996. “The Economy,” in Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, LeDuc, L., Niemi, R. G., and Norris, P. (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 299–318.Google Scholar

Oppenhuis, E. 1995. Voting Behavior in Europe. A Comparative Analysis of Electoral Participation and Party Choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Oppenhuis, E., C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. 1996. “The Party Context: Outcomes,” in Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Eijk, Cees and Franklin, Mark (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ordeshook, P. C., and Zeng, L.. 1997. “Rational Voters and Strategic Voting: Evidence from the 1968, 1980, and 1992 Elections,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paldam, M. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of 17 Countries Over Four Decades,” in Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M. S., and Lafay, J.-D. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar

Paldam, M. 1997. “Political Business Cycles,” in Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, ed. D. Mueller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–70.Google Scholar

Pattie, C. J., and Johnston, R. J.. 2001. “Routes to Party Choice: Ideology, Economic Evaluations and Voting at the 1997 British General Election,” European Journal of Political Research 39: 373–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popkin, S. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. B. Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. B.., and Whitten, B. G.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context,” American Journal of Political Science 37: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, S., and Sanders, D.. 1993. “Modeling Government Popularity in Postwar Britain: A Methodological Example,” American Journal of Political Science 37: 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, S., and Sanders, D.. 1994. “Party Support and Economic Perceptions in the UK: A Two-Level Approach,” in British Elections and Parties Yearbook, eds. D. Broughton et al. London: Frank Cass, pp. 46–72.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., and Teune, H.. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, G., and MacDonald, S.. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting,” American Political Science Review 83: 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reif, K. (ed.). 1984. European Elections 1979/81 and 1984. Conclusion and Perspectives from Empirical Research. Berlin: Quorum.Google Scholar

Reif, K., and Schmitt, H.. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections. A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results,” European Journal for Political Research 8: 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals,” American Sociological Review 15: 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royed, T. J., Leyden, K. M., and Borrelli, S. A.. 2000. “Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's Hypothesis,” British Journal of Political Science 30: 669–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D. 1996. “Economic Performance, Management Competence and the Outcome of the Next General Election,” Political Studies 44: 203–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D. 1999. “Conservative Incompetence, Labour Responsibility, and the Feelgood Factor: Why the Economy Failed to Save the Conservatives in 1997,” Electoral Studies 18: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saris, W. E. (ed.). 1988. Variation in Response Function: A Source of Measurement Error. Amsterdam: SRF.Google Scholar

Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, H., and K. Reif. 2003. “Der Hauptwahlzyklus und die Ergebnisse von Nebenwahlen: Konzeptuelle und empirische Rekonstruktionen am Beispiel der Europawahlen in Wahlzyklus der Bundesrepublik,” in Politbarometer, Wuest, A. M. (ed.). Opladen: Leske und Budrich, pp. 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, H., and Thomassen, J. (eds.) 1999. Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sniderman, P. M. 1993. “The New Look in Public Opinion Research,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Finifter, A. W. (ed.). Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association, pp. 219–45.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., and Tetlock, P. E. (eds.). 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snijders, T. A. B., and Bosker, R. J.. 1999. Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Steenbergen, M. R., and Jones, B. S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures,” American Journal of Political Science 46: 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, R. T. (2002). “The Economy as Context: Indirect Links Between the Economy and Voters,” in Economic Voting, Dorussen, H. and Taylor, M. (eds.). London: Routledge, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar

Stimson, J. A. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay,” American Journal of Political Science 29: 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoker, L., and J. Bowers. 2002. “Designing Multi-Level Studies: Sampling Voters and Electoral Contexts,” in The Future of Election Studies, Franklin, M. and Wlezien, C. (eds.). Amsterdam: Pergamon, pp. 77–110.Google Scholar

Thomassen, J. (ed.)., 2005. The European Voter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tillie, J. 1995. Party Utility and Voting Behavior. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Train, K. E. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treisman, D., and Gimpelson, V.. 2001. “Political Business Cycles and Russian Elections, or the Manipulations of ‘Chudar,’” British Journal of Political Science 31: 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufte, E. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Visser, J., and Hemerijck, A.. 1997. A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitten, G., and Palmer, H. D.. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting,” Electoral Studies 18: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkin, S., Haller, B., and Norpoth, H.. 1997. “From Argentina to Zambia – A World-Wide Test of Economic Voting,” Electoral Studies 16: 301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending,” American Journal of Political Science 39: 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy,” The Journal of Politics 66: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C., and Erikson, R. S.. 2002. “The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns,” The Journal of Politics 64: 969–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wlezien, C., Franklin, M., and Twiggs, D.. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity,” Political Behavior 19: 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J. R. 2002. “The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns,” Electoral Studies 21: 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J. R. 2005. “Floating Voters in U.S. Presidential Elections 1948–2000,” in Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, Saris, W. E. and Sniderman, P. M. (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 166–214.Google Scholar