Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:27:49.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Red Terror Trials versus Traditions of Restorative Justice in Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Kjetil Tronvoll
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Charles Schaefer
Affiliation:
Valparaiso University
Girmachew Alemu Aneme
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Get access

Summary

Introduction

After marching into Arat Kilo, the government headquarters in Addis Ababa, the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) declared victory over Mengistu's Marxist regime and committed itself to restoring human rights, ensuring the rule of law, initiating representative government and pursuing capitalist development. Expectations were exceedingly high in the early 1990s. Among the immediate problems facing the EPRDF in 1991 was what to do with the high-ranking Derg officials who carried out the Red Terror and were accused of committing genocide against students, intellectuals and other persons deemed threatening to the survival of the military junta. Resolving these gross human rights abuses was considered central in the Transitional Government of Ethiopia's (TGE) attempt to move beyond the immediate, bloody past and bring about reconciliation between parties and ethnic factions. Certainly there are numerous examples of reconciliation in Ethiopian history. At the state level, conflict resolution is as prominent a feature of the imperial chronicles as is warfare. Both modern and religious educational curricula dwell upon the country's peace treaties emphasizing levels of financial restitution and a wide range of charitable acts towards defeated foes with the aim of promulgating Ethiopia's efforts at peace building by emphasizing various methods of restorative justice. What is perplexing is the basic disregard for traditional restorative justice methods that the EPRDF was aware of, yet rejected in favour of a trial when contemplating what to do with Derg officials.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Ethiopian Red Terror Trials
Transitional Justice Challenged
, pp. 68 - 83
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×